83 FR 48461 - Cameco Resources; Smith Ranch-Highland Uranium Project

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 186 (September 25, 2018)

Page Range		48461-48463
FR Document		2018-20793
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the renewal of NRC source materials license SUA-1548, to authorize continued uranium in-situ recovery (ISR) operations at the sites under the Smith Ranch-Highland Uranium Project (Smith Ranch Project) (Docket No. 40-8964). The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for this licensing action.
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 186 (Tuesday, September 25, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48461-48463]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20793]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 40-8964; NRC-2012-0214]


Cameco Resources; Smith Ranch-Highland Uranium Project

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; 
issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering 
the renewal of NRC source materials license SUA-1548, to authorize 
continued uranium in-situ recovery (ISR) operations at the sites under 
the Smith Ranch-Highland Uranium Project (Smith Ranch Project) (Docket 
No. 40-8964). The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) and 
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for this licensing action.

[[Page 48462]]


DATES: The EA referenced in this document is available on September 25, 
2018.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2012-0214 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2012-0214. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301-287-
9127; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS 
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public 
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or 
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each 
document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first 
time that it is mentioned in this document.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Park, Office of Nuclear Material 
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington 
DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6954; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

    The NRC is considering the renewal of NRC source materials license 
No. SUA-1548 issued to Power Resources Inc. (doing business as Cameco 
Resources [Cameco]). License SUA-1548 authorizes Cameco to conduct ISR 
operations at the following four sites under the Smith Ranch Project 
located in Wyoming: The Smith Ranch site in Converse County (which 
encompasses the contiguous Smith Ranch, Highland, and Reynolds Ranch 
properties); the North Butte remote satellite site in Campbell County; 
the Ruth remote satellite site in Johnson County; and the Gas Hills 
remote satellite site in Fremont and Natrona Counties. Therefore, as 
required by part 51 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 
CFR part 51), ``Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic 
Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions,'' the NRC performed an EA. 
Based on the results of the EA, the NRC has determined not to prepare 
an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the amendment, and is 
issuing a FONSI.

II. Environmental Assessment

Description of the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would allow Cameco to continue ISR operations 
at the four sites under the Smith Ranch Project. As proposed, Cameco 
would continue to recover uranium from subsurface uranium deposits 
using the ISR process, open new wellfield areas for additional uranium 
recovery, perform aquifer restoration in wellfields where uranium 
recovery has ended, and conduct decommissioning activities as site-wide 
activities wind down. Additionally, Cameco requested NRC approval of 
increased ground water flowrates at certain project sites and the 
commencement of previously approved uranium recovery at the Reynolds 
Ranch satellite and at the Gas Hills remote satellite site. The 
proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's application dated 
February 1, 2012 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML12234A537 and ML12234A539).

Need for the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would allow Cameco to continue recovering 
uranium at the Smith Ranch Project sites. The licensee would process 
the recovered uranium into yellowcake at the existing central 
processing plant currently located on the Smith Ranch property and at 
the central processing facility located on the Highland property. 
Yellowcake is the uranium oxide product of the ISR milling process that 
is used to produce various products, including fuel for commercially-
operated nuclear power reactors.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC staff has assessed the potential environmental impacts from 
Cameco's continued ISR-related construction, operation, aquifer 
restoration, and decommissioning activities at the Smith Ranch Project 
sites. The NRC staff assessed the impacts of the proposed action on 
land use; historical and cultural resources; visual and scenic 
resources; climatology, meteorology and air quality; geology, minerals, 
and soils; water resources; ecological resources; socioeconomics; 
noise; traffic and transportation; public and occupational health and 
safety; and waste management. Impacts to all resources except ground 
water and noise were determined to be SMALL (i.e., not detectable or 
minor); ground water impacts were determined to be SMALL to MODERATE 
and noise impacts MODERATE (i.e., sufficient to alter noticeably, but 
not to destabilize, important attributes of the resource) to onsite 
workers and wildlife. The NRC staff concluded that renewal of source 
materials license SUA-1548 for the Smith Ranch Project would not 
significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Approval of 
the proposed action would not result in an increased radiological risk 
to public health or the environment.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered 
denial of the proposed license renewal (i.e., the ``No-Action'' 
alternative). Under the No-Action Alternative, Cameco would transition 
ongoing ISR operations at the Smith Ranch and Highland properties and 
at the North Butte remote satellite site from active uranium recovery 
to aquifer restoration and decommissioning. A much smaller amount of 
yellowcake would be produced, resulting from aquifer restoration 
activities.
    Decommissioning activities also would occur at the Reynolds Ranch 
satellite and the Ruth and Gas Hills remote satellite sites to remove 
existing infrastructure. Cameco would be required by 10 CFR part 
40.42(d) to submit a detailed decommissioning plan to the NRC staff for 
review and approval at least 12 months before the planned commencement 
of final decommissioning. The NRC concluded that environmental impacts 
from the No-Action Alternative would be not significant.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    In accordance with its stated policy, on August 8, 2018, the staff 
provided the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ) and the 
Wyoming State Historic Preservation Office (WY SHPO), with the draft EA 
for review and comment (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML18211A382 and 
ML18215A054). On August 29, 2018, the WDEQ stated that it had no 
comment on the draft EA, but noted one typographical error in the NRC's 
transmittal letter (ADAMS Accession No. ML18247A356). The WY SHPO also

[[Page 48463]]

responded on August 29, 2018, stating that the WY SHPO would not be 
commenting, considering its understanding that Section 106 consultation 
was completed during the original licensing for the project (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML18242A349).
    On August 9, 2018, the NRC staff made sections of the draft EA 
concerning historic and cultural resources available on the NRC public 
web page for the Smith Ranch Project for public comment at https://www.nrc.gov/materials/uranium-recovery/license-apps/smith-ranch/section106-smith-ranch.html. On the same date, the NRC staff also made 
these same sections of the draft EA available to the Tribal Historic 
Preservation Officers (THPOs) from 27 Native American Tribes for their 
review and comment.
    No comments were received from members of the public. In response 
to comments received from the THPO for the Northern Arapaho Tribe 
(ADAMS Accession No. ML18247A228), the NRC staff hosted two conference 
calls, on August 28 and 30, 2018, to discuss the staff's approach 
concerning protection of historic and cultural resources (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML18243A262); no THPOs attended these calls. The NRC 
staff also held a conference call with the Northern Cheyenne THPO on 
August 31, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18260A046). No written comments 
were received from the Northern Cheyenne THPO. However, the NRC staff 
addressed the Northern Arapaho THPO's comments provided on August 31, 
2018, conference call in the final EA.

Additional Information

    The NRC staff conducted its environmental review in accordance with 
10 CFR part 51, which implements the requirements of the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) and following the 
NRC staff guidance in NUREG-1748, ``Environmental Review Guidance for 
Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS Programs'' (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML032450279).
    In May 2009, the NRC staff issued NUREG-1910, ``Generic 
Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach Uranium Milling 
Facilities'' (herein referred to as the GEIS) (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML15093A368 and ML15093A486). In the GEIS, the NRC staff assessed the 
potential environmental impacts from construction, operation, aquifer 
restoration, and decommissioning of an in-situ leach uranium milling 
facility (also known as an ISR facility) located in four specific 
geographic regions of the western United States. Smith Ranch Project 
properties are located in two of these four regions.
    Where applicable, this EA incorporates by reference relevant 
portions from the GEIS, and uses site-specific information from 
Cameco's license renewal application and responses to NRC staff 
requests for additional information, and from independent sources to 
fulfill the requirements in 10 CFR 51.20(b)(8).
    License SUA-1548 authorizes Cameco to conduct ISR operations at 
four properties under the Smith Ranch Project located in Wyoming: The 
contiguous Smith Ranch, Highland, and Reynolds Ranch properties in 
Converse County; the North Butte remote satellite site in Campbell 
County; the Ruth remote satellite site in Johnson County; and the Gas 
Hills remote satellite site in Fremont and Natrona Counties.
    In the EA, the NRC staff assessed the potential environmental 
impacts from the continued construction, operation, aquifer 
restoration, and decommissioning of the sites under the Smith Ranch 
Project. The NRC staff assessed the impacts of the proposed action on 
land use; historical and cultural resources; visual and scenic 
resources; climatology, meteorology and air quality; geology, minerals, 
and soils; water resources; ecological resources; socioeconomics; 
noise; traffic and transportation; public and occupational health and 
safety; and waste management.
    In addition to the action proposed by the licensee, the NRC staff 
addressed the No-Action Alternative that serves as a baseline for 
comparison of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed 
action. Under the No-Action Alternative, the NRC staff would deny 
renewal of License SUA-1548.
    After weighing the impacts of the proposed license renewal and 
comparing to the No-Action Alternative, the NRC staff, in accordance 
with 10 CFR 51.91(d), sets forth its NEPA recommendation regarding the 
proposed action (granting the NRC license renewal request for the Smith 
Ranch Project). Unless safety issues mandate otherwise, the NRC staff 
recommendation related to the environmental aspects of the proposed 
action is that a renewed NRC license be issued. The EA for the proposed 
renewal of License SUA-1548 may be accessed at ADAMS Accession No. 
ML18257A071.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

    Based on its review of the proposed action, and in accordance with 
the requirements in 10 CFR part 51, the NRC staff has determined that 
renewal of source materials license SUA-1548 for the Smith Ranch 
Project would not significantly affect the quality of the human 
environment. In its license renewal request, Cameco proposed increased 
ground water flowrates at certain of the project properties with 
previously approved uranium recovery to commence at the Reynolds Ranch 
satellite and at the Gas Hills remote satellite site. No other 
significant changes in Cameco's authorized operations for the Smith 
Ranch Project were requested. Approval of the proposed action would not 
result in an increased radiological risk to public health or the 
environment. The NRC staff has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR 
51.31, preparation of an EIS is not required for the proposed action 
and that, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, a FONSI is appropriate.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of September 2018.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Craig G. Erlanger,
Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental 
Review, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2018-20793 Filed 9-24-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2018 / Notices 48461

responding to a suspected or confirmed circumstances of an accident or individual to the source from which the
breach or (2) preventing, minimizing, or incident; (2) determining the probable agency obtained the information. The
remedying the risk of harm to cause of an accident or incident; (3) NTSB is not authorized to amend
individuals, the recipient agency or evaluating human performance or records from non-agency sources.
entity (including its information survival factors issues arising during an Additionally, the NTSB is not
systems, programs, and operations), the accident or incident investigation; (4) authorized to direct a non-agency source
Federal Government, or national providing victim and family assistance to change or alter records. Because
security, resulting from a suspected or following an accident or incident; (5) medical practitioners may provide
confirmed breach. carrying out special studies and differing but equally valid medical
investigations about transportation judgments and opinions when making
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF
RECORDS:
safety (including avoiding personal medical evaluations of an individual’s
injury); and/or (6) examining techniques health status, review of requests from
MEDICS records are primarily
and methods of accident or incident individuals seeking amendment of their
maintained electronically in a database.
investigation, and periodically medical records, beyond administrative
Some paper records may also be kept,
publishing recommended procedures correction such as association of a
and their location will be identified in
for accident or incident investigations. medical record with an incorrect
the database. Paper records whose
Electronic records are protected from individual, may be limited to
location is identified in MEDICS will be
unauthorized access through password consideration of including the differing
secured in a locked file cabinet, a secure
identification procedures, limited opinion in the record rather than
office, or both, and will be searchable
access, firewalls and other system-based attempting to determine whether the
only by NTSB accident investigation
protection methods. This system original opinion is accurate.
number, not by PII. Paper records that
conforms to all applicable Federal laws
are uploaded to MEDICS are destroyed. NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
and regulations, as well as NTSB
The database may be accessed from Individuals wishing to inquire about
policies and standards, as they relate to
NTSB approved computers. In the whether this system of records contains
information security and data privacy.
future, the database may become information about them may contact the
Access is limited by user roles.
accessible from any computer that agency office listed in the Record
Participants to an investigation may
provides for an authorized user’s Access Procedure section, and provide
access only the records relevant to that
authentication. the identifying information described in
accident, while NTSB Medical Officers
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF will have access to all records. MEDICS that section.
RECORDS: will identify the location of paper EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
Once an authorized user accesses records, which will be stored in a
locked cabinet, a secured office, or both. None.
MEDICS with his or her user ID and
password, the MEDICS system is RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURE: HISTORY:
searchable by NTSB accident or 82 FR 23075.
incident number, accident city, accident Individuals wishing to access
state, accident country, and an information about themselves in this Dated: September 20, 2018.
individual’s name, age, and date of system of records may contact the Chief, Robert L. Sumwalt, III,
birth. Records Management Division, National Chairman.
Transportation Safety Board, 490 [FR Doc. 2018–20821 Filed 9–24–18; 8:45 am]
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND L’Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC
BILLING CODE 7533–01–P
DISPOSAL OF RECORDS: 20594. Individuals must comply with
MEDICS records that are disclosed in NTSB regulations regarding the Privacy
the NTSB’s public docket pursuant to Act, 49 CFR part 802, and must furnish
routine use number 5 will be retained the following information for their NUCLEAR REGULATORY
permanently. All other MEDICS records records to be located and identified: COMMISSION
will be destroyed one year after the 1. Full name(s). [Docket No. 40–8964; NRC–2012–0214]
conclusion of the investigation or safety 2. Date of birth.
study to which the record relates, unless 3. If known, the date and location of Cameco Resources; Smith Ranch-
required to be retained under another the accident, incident, or occurrence, or Highland Uranium Project
record retention statute, regulation or the NTSB investigation identifier(s) for
court order. the investigation(s) in which the NTSB AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
created or obtained the record. Commission.
ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL ACTION: Environmental assessment and
4. Signature.
SAFEGUARDS:
finding of no significant impact;
NTSB headquarters is guarded and CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURE:
issuance.
monitored by security personnel, Individuals wishing to amend their
cameras, a Physical Access Control records should contact the agency office SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
System (PACS), and other physical identified in the Record Access Commission (NRC) is considering the
security measures. The computerized Procedure section and furnish such renewal of NRC source materials license
records contained within MEDICS are identifying information described in SUA–1548, to authorize continued
maintained in a secure, password- that section to identify the records to be uranium in-situ recovery (ISR)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

protected, encrypted computer system. amended. Individuals seeking operations at the sites under the Smith
Access to and use of these records are amendment of their records must also Ranch-Highland Uranium Project
limited to NTSB employees and follow the agency’s Privacy Act (Smith Ranch Project) (Docket No. 40–
contractors whose official duties require regulations, 49 CFR part 802. Where the 8964). The NRC has prepared an
such access. NTSB personnel may requested amendment implicates Environmental Assessment (EA) and
access the records only when access is information provided by a third-party Finding of No Significant Impact
relevant to (1) determining the facts or source, the agency will refer the (FONSI) for this licensing action.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:40 Sep 24, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM 25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2018 / Notices 48463

responded on August 29, 2018, stating in four specific geographic regions of requirements in 10 CFR part 51, the
that the WY SHPO would not be the western United States. Smith Ranch NRC staff has determined that renewal
commenting, considering its Project properties are located in two of of source materials license SUA–1548
understanding that Section 106 these four regions. for the Smith Ranch Project would not
consultation was completed during the Where applicable, this EA significantly affect the quality of the
original licensing for the project incorporates by reference relevant human environment. In its license
(ADAMS Accession No. ML18242A349). portions from the GEIS, and uses site- renewal request, Cameco proposed
On August 9, 2018, the NRC staff specific information from Cameco’s increased ground water flowrates at
made sections of the draft EA license renewal application and certain of the project properties with
concerning historic and cultural responses to NRC staff requests for previously approved uranium recovery
resources available on the NRC public additional information, and from to commence at the Reynolds Ranch
web page for the Smith Ranch Project independent sources to fulfill the satellite and at the Gas Hills remote
for public comment at https:// requirements in 10 CFR 51.20(b)(8). satellite site. No other significant
www.nrc.gov/materials/uranium- License SUA–1548 authorizes Cameco changes in Cameco’s authorized
recovery/license-apps/smith-ranch/ to conduct ISR operations at four operations for the Smith Ranch Project
section106-smith-ranch.html. On the properties under the Smith Ranch were requested. Approval of the
same date, the NRC staff also made Project located in Wyoming: The proposed action would not result in an
these same sections of the draft EA contiguous Smith Ranch, Highland, and increased radiological risk to public
available to the Tribal Historic Reynolds Ranch properties in Converse health or the environment. The NRC
Preservation Officers (THPOs) from 27 County; the North Butte remote satellite staff has determined that pursuant to 10
Native American Tribes for their review site in Campbell County; the Ruth CFR 51.31, preparation of an EIS is not
and comment. remote satellite site in Johnson County; required for the proposed action and
No comments were received from and the Gas Hills remote satellite site in that, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, a FONSI
members of the public. In response to Fremont and Natrona Counties. is appropriate.
comments received from the THPO for In the EA, the NRC staff assessed the
the Northern Arapaho Tribe (ADAMS potential environmental impacts from Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day
Accession No. ML18247A228), the NRC the continued construction, operation, of September 2018.
staff hosted two conference calls, on aquifer restoration, and For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
August 28 and 30, 2018, to discuss the decommissioning of the sites under the Craig G. Erlanger,
staff’s approach concerning protection Smith Ranch Project. The NRC staff Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety,
of historic and cultural resources assessed the impacts of the proposed Safeguards, and Environmental Review,
(ADAMS Accession No. ML18243A262); action on land use; historical and Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
no THPOs attended these calls. The cultural resources; visual and scenic Safeguards.
NRC staff also held a conference call resources; climatology, meteorology and [FR Doc. 2018–20793 Filed 9–24–18; 8:45 am]
with the Northern Cheyenne THPO on air quality; geology, minerals, and soils; BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
August 31, 2018 (ADAMS Accession water resources; ecological resources;
No. ML18260A046). No written socioeconomics; noise; traffic and
comments were received from the transportation; public and occupational NUCLEAR REGULATORY
Northern Cheyenne THPO. However, health and safety; and waste COMMISSION
the NRC staff addressed the Northern management. [NRC–2018–0208]
Arapaho THPO’s comments provided on In addition to the action proposed by
August 31, 2018, conference call in the the licensee, the NRC staff addressed the Biweekly Notice; Applications and
final EA. No-Action Alternative that serves as a Amendments to Facility Operating
baseline for comparison of the potential Licenses and Combined Licenses
Additional Information
environmental impacts of the proposed Involving No Significant Hazards
The NRC staff conducted its action. Under the No-Action Considerations
environmental review in accordance Alternative, the NRC staff would deny
with 10 CFR part 51, which implements renewal of License SUA–1548. AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
the requirements of the National After weighing the impacts of the Commission.
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as proposed license renewal and ACTION: Biweekly notice.
amended (NEPA) and following the comparing to the No-Action Alternative,
NRC staff guidance in NUREG–1748, the NRC staff, in accordance with 10 SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 189a.(2)
‘‘Environmental Review Guidance for CFR 51.91(d), sets forth its NEPA of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
Licensing Actions Associated with recommendation regarding the proposed amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear
NMSS Programs’’ (ADAMS Accession action (granting the NRC license Regulatory Commission (NRC) is
No. ML032450279). renewal request for the Smith Ranch publishing this regular biweekly notice.
In May 2009, the NRC staff issued Project). Unless safety issues mandate The Act requires the Commission to
NUREG–1910, ‘‘Generic Environmental otherwise, the NRC staff publish notice of any amendments
Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach recommendation related to the issued, or proposed to be issued, and
Uranium Milling Facilities’’ (herein environmental aspects of the proposed grants the Commission the authority to
referred to as the GEIS) (ADAMS action is that a renewed NRC license be issue and make immediately effective
Accession No. ML15093A368 and issued. The EA for the proposed any amendment to an operating license
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

ML15093A486). In the GEIS, the NRC renewal of License SUA–1548 may be or combined license, as applicable,
staff assessed the potential accessed at ADAMS Accession No. upon a determination by the
environmental impacts from ML18257A071. Commission that such amendment
construction, operation, aquifer involves no significant hazards
restoration, and decommissioning of an III. Finding of No Significant Impact consideration, notwithstanding the
in-situ leach uranium milling facility Based on its review of the proposed pendency before the Commission of a
(also known as an ISR facility) located action, and in accordance with the request for a hearing from any person.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:40 Sep 24, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM 25SEN1
Document Created: 2018-09-25 00:21:36
Document Modified: 2018-09-25 00:21:36
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance.
Dates		The EA referenced in this document is available on September 25, 2018.
Contact		James Park, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6954; email: [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 48461