83 FR 49776 - Irish Potatoes Grown in Certain Designated Counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon; Modification of Handling Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 192 (October 3, 2018)
Agricultural Marketing Service
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 192 (October 3, 2018)
| Page Range | 49776-49780 | |
| FR Document | 2018-21480 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 3, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 49776-49780] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-21480] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 945 [Doc. No. AMS-SC-17-0077; SC18-945-1 FR] Irish Potatoes Grown in Certain Designated Counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon; Modification of Handling Regulations AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This final rule implements a recommendation from the Idaho- Eastern Oregon Potato Committee (Committee) to revise the varietal classifications that determine the size requirements for Irish potatoes grown in certain designated counties of Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon. As provided under section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, this modification also applies to all imported long type Irish potatoes. This final rule also makes administrative revisions to the subpart headings to bring the language into conformance with the Office of Federal Register requirements. DATES: Effective November 2, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Broadbent, Marketing Specialist, or Gary D. Olson, Regional Manager, Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or Email: [[Page 49777]] [email protected] or [email protected]. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This final rule is issued under Marketing Agreement No. 98 and Order No. 945, as amended (7 CFR part 945), regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in certain designated counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon. Part 945 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised of potato producers and handlers operating within the production area. Section 8e of the Act provides that whenever certain specified commodities, including potatoes, are regulated under a Federal marketing order, imports of these commodities into the United States are prohibited unless they meet the same or comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity requirements as those in effect for the domestically produced commodities. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this final rule in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. Additionally, because this final rule does not meet the definition of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs'[thinsp]'' (February 2, 2017). This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This final rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of import regulations issued under section 8e of the Act. Under the terms of the Order, fresh market shipments of Idaho- Eastern Oregon potatoes are required to be inspected and are subject to minimum grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, and container requirements. This final rule revises the varietal classifications that determine the size requirements for potatoes handled under the Order. As required under section 8e of the Act, the revisions to the Order's varietal classifications will also be applied to imported long type potatoes. At its meeting on November 8, 2017, the Committee unanimously recommended revising the varietal classifications that determine the size requirements for U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes. Sections 945.51 and 945.52 provide authority for the establishment and modification of grade, size, quality, and maturity regulations applicable to the handling of potatoes. Section 945.341 establishes minimum grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, and container requirements for potatoes handled subject to the Order. The Order's handling regulations currently have two different size requirements for U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes. The requirements are applied based upon the varietal classification of the subject potato. Prior to this action, the varietal classifications that determine which of the different size requirements are applicable are designated as ``round varieties'' in Sec. 945.341(a)(2)(i) and as ``all other varieties'' in Sec. 945.341(a)(2)(ii). This final rule removes the designation ``round varieties'' in Sec. 945.341(a)(2)(i) to make the size requirements in that paragraph applicable to all U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes, unless otherwise specified. In addition, this final rule changes the designation for ``all other varieties'' in Sec. 945.341(a)(2)(ii) to ``Russet types,'' maintaining the larger size requirements for ``Russet types'' only. Committee members reported that the Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato industry has been producing and shipping an increasing number of non- traditional potato varieties, such as oblong, fingerling, and banana potatoes. Prior to this final rule, the size requirements contained in the handling regulations did not adequately differentiate between the various types of potatoes to effectively regulate the unique varieties that are now being marketed from the production area. Without a clear distinction, there existed the potential to inhibit orderly marketing of such potatoes by requiring them to adhere to size requirements that were never intended to be applied to that type or variety. Designating potatoes as ``round varieties'' and ``all other varieties'' was appropriate when the regulations were initially established, but potatoes from the production area are now segmented into two different market sectors: Russet type potatoes and all other non-Russet varieties. The characteristics of each of these market sectors continues to need different minimum size requirements. However, with the previous size requirement classifications in the handling regulations, some varieties of potatoes were being required to meet size requirements that did not match their natural characteristics or their intended market outlet. For example, Russet varieties are primarily utilized as baked potatoes or are peeled and further prepared by the consumer as products such as french fries, potato salad, or mashed potatoes. The Committee intends for the size requirements for these potatoes to be greater than for other varieties of potatoes and those size requirements match the likely utilization of such potatoes. Non-Russet type potatoes are typically marketed fresh and are prepared and consumed whole. These types, while predominantly round varieties, include unique varieties that could not be described as ``round'' but are also not comparable to Russet types. Requiring non-Russet type potatoes to meet size requirements intended for potatoes used for baking or french fries puts those potatoes at a marketing disadvantage. The Committee believes that potato size is a significant consideration of potato buyers. Providing potato buyers with the sizes desired by their customers for the type of potato that is being marketed is important to promoting potato sales. The size requirements intended to facilitate [[Page 49778]] orderly marketing should not unintentionally inhibit a market segment, even if that segment is a minor one. Modifying the size requirement classifications to meet the intent of the Committee will help facilitate the growth of the emerging market for unique potato varieties. This change is expected to improve the marketing of Idaho- Eastern Oregon potatoes and enhance overall returns to handlers and producers. This final rule relaxes the current handling regulations for non- round potatoes that are also not Russet type. Such potatoes will be subject to the smaller size requirements that have been, and will continue to be, applied to round varieties of potatoes. The Committee believes that, while these potatoes represent a small market segment relative to the total output from the production area, the market is expected to grow, and the Order's handling regulations should be responsive to it. Section 8e mandates the regulation of certain imported commodities whenever those same commodities are regulated by a domestic marketing order. Irish potatoes are one of the commodities specifically covered by section 8e in the Act. In addition, section 8e stipulates that whenever two or more such marketing orders regulating the same agricultural commodity produced in different areas are concurrently in effect, imports must comply with the provisions of the order which regulates the commodity produced in the area with which the imported commodity is in the ``most direct competition.'' 7 CFR 980.1(a)(2)(iii) contains the determination that imports of long type potatoes during each month of the year are in most direct competition with potatoes of the same type produced in the area covered by the Order. Minimum grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements for potatoes imported into the United States are currently in effect under Sec. 980.1. Section 980.1(b)(2) stipulates that, through the entire year, the grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements of the Order applicable to potatoes of all long types shall be the respective grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements for imported potatoes of all long types. Therefore, this action relaxes the minimum size requirements for imports of non-round U.S. No. 2 grade long type potatoes, other than Russet types, accordingly. This final rule also allows potato importers to respond to the changing demands of domestic consumers. The domestic market's increasing preference for unique potato varieties applies to imported potatoes as well as to domestically produced potatoes. In addition, the higher prices that the unique potatoes are expected to command will also apply to imported product. Thus, importers are expected to benefit along with domestic producers and handlers by increased sales of U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes and increased total revenue. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. Import regulations issued under the Act are based on those established under Federal marketing orders. There are approximately 32 handlers of Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes who are subject to regulation under the Order and about 450 potato producers in the regulated area. In addition, there are approximately 255 importers of all types of potatoes, many of which import long types, who are subject to regulation under the Act. Small agricultural service firms, which include potato handlers and importers, are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less than $7,500,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201). During the 2016-2017 fiscal period, the most recent full year of statistics available, 37,449,300 hundredweight of Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes were inspected under the Order and sold into the fresh market. Based on information provided by the National Agricultural Statistics Service, the average producer price for the 2016 Idaho potato crop was $6.75 per hundredweight. Multiplying $6.75 by the shipment quantity of 37,449,300 hundredweight yields an annual crop revenue estimate of $252,782,775. The average annual fresh potato revenue for each of the 450 producers is therefore calculated to be $561,740 ($252,782,775 divided by 450), which is less than the SBA threshold of $750,000. Consequently, on average, most of the Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato producers may be classified as small entities. In addition, based on information reported by USDA's Market News Service, the average f.o.b. shipping point price for the 2016-2017 Idaho potato crop was $11.79 per hundredweight. Multiplying $11.79 by the shipment quantity of 37,449,300 hundredweight yields an annual crop revenue estimate of $441,527,247. The average annual fresh potato revenue for each of the 32 handlers is therefore calculated to be $13,797,726 ($441,527,247 divided by 32), which is above the SBA threshold of $7,500,000 for agricultural service firms. Therefore, most of the Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato handlers would be classified as large entities. Further, based on information from USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), potato importers imported 11,157,190 hundredweight of potatoes into the U.S. in 2016 (the most recent full year for which statistics are available). FAS also reported the total value of potato imports for 2016 to be $212,331,000. The average annual revenue of the estimated 255 potato importers is therefore calculated to be $832,670 ($212,331,000 divided by 255), which is significantly less than the SBA threshold of $7,500,000. Consequently, on average, most of the entities importing potatoes into the U.S. may be classified as small entities. This final rule revises the varietal classifications that determine the size requirements for U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes handled under the Order. Specifically, this action removes the designation ``round varieties'' in Sec. 945.341(a)(2)(i) to make the size requirements in that paragraph applicable to all U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes, unless otherwise specified. In addition, this final rule changes the designation for ``all other varieties'' in Sec. 945.341(a)(2)(ii) to ``Russet types,'' maintaining the larger size requirements that have been applied to all non-round varieties, but will now only apply them to ``Russet types.'' Pursuant to section 8(e) of the Act, this revision to the Order's varietal classifications that determine the size requirements for U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes will also be applied to imported long type Irish potatoes. This action was recommended by the Committee to ensure that the size profile of non-round, non-Russet type U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes will consistently be a size preferred by consumers. This change is expected to improve the marketability of Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes and increase returns to [[Page 49779]] handlers and producers. Authority for this final rule is provided in Sec. Sec. 945.51 and 945.52 of the Order. At the November 8, 2017, meeting, the Committee discussed the impact of this change on handlers and producers. The change to the varietal classifications that determine the size requirements is a relaxation in regulation. The regulatory change is expected to have a positive, or neutral, impact on industry participants. The Committee relied on the opinions of producers and handlers familiar with the industry to draw its conclusions regarding the recommended handling regulation change. The Committee received anecdotal evidence from industry members at the November 8, 2017, meeting that there is some confusion in the industry with regards to which size requirements apply to which varieties of potatoes and that some varieties are being inspected and sized to requirements that were not intended by the Committee. The change to the size requirements clarifies which size requirements are applicable to which potatoes. This change is expected to lead to increased revenue for handlers and producers. Prior to this action, non-round potato varieties that are not Russet type are required to conform to the larger size requirements, even though the Committee does not believe that this meets its intent with regards to the handling regulation. Better defining the distinct classifications of potatoes will allow more of the non-round, non-Russet type potatoes to enter the market, thereby allowing the sale of potatoes that would have otherwise been restricted. The benefits derived from this action are not expected to be disproportionately greater or less for small handlers or producers than for larger entities. The Committee discussed alternatives to this change. One consideration was making no change at all to the current regulation. Another alternative was to further differentiate between various varieties and types of potatoes in the handling regulations. There was some discussion of adding another classification. After consideration of all the alternatives, the Committee decided that the changes effectuated by this action will provide the greatest amount of benefit to the industry with the least amount of burden to producers and handlers. Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the potato industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all Committee meetings, the November 8, 2017, meeting was a public meeting, and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on this issue. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No changes in those requirements are necessary as a result of this action. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. This final rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large potato handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this final rule. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal Register on May 9, 2018 (83 FR 21188). A copy of the proposed rule was provided to the handlers by the Committee. Finally, the proposal was made available through the internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period ending July 9, 2018, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. One comment was received. The commenter questioned why the proposed change would only apply to the Order's production area and not to all potato growing regions. Marketing orders only regulate the production area as defined in each respective order. Therefore, this change can only apply to the handling of potatoes in the Order's production area as defined in Sec. 945.4. The commenter did not otherwise address the merits of the proposal. Accordingly, no changes will be made to the rule as proposed, based on the comment received. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. In accordance with section 8e of the Act, the United States Trade Representative has concurred with the issuance of this final rule. After consideration of all relevant material presented, including the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 945 Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR part 945 is amended as follows: PART 945--IRISH POTATOES GROWN IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN IDAHO, AND MALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON 0 1. The authority citation for part 945 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674. [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A]. 0 2. Redesignate ``Subpart--Order Regulating Handling'' as ``Subpart A-- Order Regulating Handling''. [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B and Amended] 0 3. Redesignate ``Subpart--Rules and Regulations'' as subpart B and revise the heading to read as follows: Subpart B--Administrative Requirements [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C] 0 4. Redesignate ``Subpart--Assessment Rates'' as ``Subpart C--Assessment Rates''. [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart D and Amended] 0 5. Redesignate ``Subpart--Handling Regulations'' as subpart D and revise the heading to read as follows: Subpart D--Handling Requirements 0 6. In Sec. 945.341, revise paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (ii) to read as follows: Sec. 945.341 Handling regulation. * * * * * (a) * * * (2) Size--(i) All varieties, except Russet types. 1\7/8\ inches minimum diameter, unless otherwise specified on the container in connection with the grade. [[Page 49780]] (ii) Russet types. 2 inches minimum diameter, or 4 ounces minimum weight: Provided, That at least 40 percent of the potatoes in each lot shall be 5 ounces or heavier. * * * * * Dated: September 27, 2018. Bruce Summers, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2018-21480 Filed 10-2-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
![49776 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(j) Other statutes specifically information to the public must be available, for identifying additional
providing for fees. The fee schedule of considered. CIGIE will presume that a records of interest to the public that are
this section does not apply to fees representative of the news media will appropriate for public disclosure, and
charged under any statute that satisfy this consideration. for posting and indexing such records.
specifically requires an agency to set (iii) The disclosure must not be CIGIE must ensure that its website of
and collect fees for particular types of primarily in the commercial interest of posted records and indices is reviewed
records. In instances where records the requester. To determine whether and updated on an ongoing basis.
responsive to a request are subject to a disclosure of the requested information CIGIE’s FOIA Public Liaison can assist
statutorily-based fee schedule program, is primarily in the commercial interest individuals in locating records at CIGIE.
CIGIE shall inform the requester of the of the requester, CIGIE will consider the
contact information for that program. following criteria: § 9801.111 Other rights and services.
(k) Requirements for waiver or (A) CIGIE must identify whether the Nothing in this part shall be
reduction of fees. (1) Requesters may requester has any commercial interest construed to entitle any person, as of
seek a waiver of fees by submitting a that would be furthered by the right, to any service or to the disclosure
written application demonstrating how requested disclosure. A commercial of any record to which such person is
disclosure of the requested information interest includes any commercial, trade, not entitled under FOIA.
is in the public interest because it is or profit interest. Requesters must be Dated: September 26, 2018.
likely to contribute significantly to given an opportunity to provide
Michael E. Horowitz,
public understanding of the operations explanatory information regarding this
Chairperson of the Council of the Inspectors
or activities of the government and is consideration.
General on Integrity and Efficiency.
not primarily in the commercial interest (B) If there is an identified
[FR Doc. 2018–21548 Filed 10–2–18; 8:45 am]
of the requester. commercial interest, CIGIE must
(2) CIGIE will furnish records determine whether that is the primary BILLING CODE 6820–C9–P
responsive to a request without charge interest furthered by the request. A
or at a reduced rate when it determines, waiver or reduction of fees is justified
based on all available information, that when the requirements of paragraphs DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
disclosure of the requested information (k)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section are
is in the public interest because it is satisfied and any commercial interest is Agricultural Marketing Service
likely to contribute significantly to not the primary interest furthered by the
public understanding of the operations request. CIGIE ordinarily will presume 7 CFR Part 945
or activities of the government and is that when a news media requester has
not primarily in the commercial interest satisfied the requirements of paragraphs [Doc. No. AMS–SC–17–0077; SC18–945–1
of the requester. In deciding whether (k)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section, the FR]
this standard is satisfied CIGIE will request is not primarily in the
consider the factors described in Irish Potatoes Grown in Certain
commercial interest of the requester. Designated Counties in Idaho, and
paragraphs (k)(2)(i) through (iii) of this Disclosure to data brokers or others who
section. Malheur County, Oregon; Modification
merely compile and market government of Handling Regulations
(i) Disclosure of the requested information for direct economic return
information would shed light on the will not be presumed to primarily serve AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
operations or activities of the the public interest. USDA.
government. The subject of the request (3) Where only some of the records to ACTION: Final rule.
must concern identifiable operations or be released satisfy the requirements for
activities of the Federal Government a waiver of fees, a waiver will be SUMMARY: This final rule implements a
with a connection that is direct and granted for those records. recommendation from the Idaho-Eastern
clear, not remote or attenuated. (4) Requests for a waiver or reduction Oregon Potato Committee (Committee)
(ii) Disclosure of the requested of fees should be made when the request to revise the varietal classifications that
information would be likely to is first submitted to CIGIE and should determine the size requirements for
contribute significantly to public address the criteria referenced above. A Irish potatoes grown in certain
understanding of those operations or requester may submit a fee waiver designated counties of Idaho, and
activities. This factor is satisfied when request at a later time so long as the Malheur County, Oregon. As provided
the following criteria are met: underlying record request is pending or under section 8e of the Agricultural
(A) Disclosure of the requested on administrative appeal. When a Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, this
records must be meaningfully requester who has committed to pay modification also applies to all
informative about government fees subsequently asks for a waiver of imported long type Irish potatoes. This
operations or activities. The disclosure those fees and that waiver is denied, the final rule also makes administrative
of information that already is in the requester shall be required to pay any revisions to the subpart headings to
public domain, in either the same or a costs incurred up to the date the fee bring the language into conformance
substantially identical form, would not waiver request was received. with the Office of Federal Register
be meaningfully informative if nothing requirements.
new would be added to the public’s § 9800.110 Public reading room.
understanding. CIGIE maintains an electronic public DATES: Effective November 2, 2018.
(B) The disclosure must contribute to reading room on its website, http:// FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
the understanding of a reasonably broad www.ignet.gov, which contains the Barry Broadbent, Marketing Specialist,
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
audience of persons interested in the records that FOIA requires be regularly or Gary D. Olson, Regional Manager,
subject, as opposed to the individual made available for public inspection Northwest Marketing Field Office,
understanding of the requester. A and copying, as well as additional Marketing Order and Agreement
requester’s expertise in the subject area records of interest to the public. CIGIE Division, Specialty Crops Program,
as well as the requester’s ability and is responsible for determining which of AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326–
intention to effectively convey its records must be made publicly 2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or Email:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Oct 02, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM 03OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_49968/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 49779
handlers and producers. Authority for meeting, and all entities, both large and guide should be sent to Richard Lower
this final rule is provided in §§ 945.51 small, were able to express their views at the previously mentioned address in
and 945.52 of the Order. on this issue. the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
At the November 8, 2017, meeting, the In accordance with the Paperwork section.
Committee discussed the impact of this Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. In accordance with section 8e of the
change on handlers and producers. The Chapter 35), the Order’s information Act, the United States Trade
change to the varietal classifications that collection requirements have been Representative has concurred with the
determine the size requirements is a previously approved by OMB and issuance of this final rule.
relaxation in regulation. The regulatory assigned OMB No. 0581–0178, After consideration of all relevant
change is expected to have a positive, or Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No material presented, including the
neutral, impact on industry participants. changes in those requirements are information and recommendation
The Committee relied on the opinions necessary as a result of this action. submitted by the Committee and other
of producers and handlers familiar with Should any changes become necessary, available information, it is hereby found
the industry to draw its conclusions they would be submitted to OMB for that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
regarding the recommended handling approval. will tend to effectuate the declared
regulation change. The Committee This final rule imposes no additional policy of the Act.
received anecdotal evidence from reporting or recordkeeping requirements
industry members at the November 8, on either small or large potato handlers. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 945
2017, meeting that there is some As with all Federal marketing order Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
confusion in the industry with regards programs, reports and forms are Reporting and recordkeeping
to which size requirements apply to periodically reviewed to reduce requirements.
which varieties of potatoes and that information requirements and For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR
some varieties are being inspected and duplication by industry and public part 945 is amended as follows:
sized to requirements that were not sector agencies.
intended by the Committee. The change As noted in the initial regulatory PART 945—IRISH POTATOES GROWN
to the size requirements clarifies which flexibility analysis, USDA has not IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES
size requirements are applicable to identified any relevant Federal rules IN IDAHO, AND MALHEUR COUNTY,
which potatoes. that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with OREGON
This change is expected to lead to this final rule.
increased revenue for handlers and AMS is committed to complying with ■ 1. The authority citation for part 945
producers. Prior to this action, non- the E-Government Act, to promote the continues to read as follows:
round potato varieties that are not use of the internet and other
Russet type are required to conform to information technologies to provide Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
the larger size requirements, even increased opportunities for citizen [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A].
though the Committee does not believe access to Government information and
■ 2. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Order
that this meets its intent with regards to services, and for other purposes.
Regulating Handling’’ as ‘‘Subpart A—
the handling regulation. Better defining A proposed rule concerning this
Order Regulating Handling’’.
the distinct classifications of potatoes action was published in the Federal
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B
will allow more of the non-round, non- Register on May 9, 2018 (83 FR 21188).
and Amended]
Russet type potatoes to enter the market, A copy of the proposed rule was
thereby allowing the sale of potatoes provided to the handlers by the ■ 3. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Rules and
that would have otherwise been Committee. Finally, the proposal was Regulations’’ as subpart B and revise the
restricted. The benefits derived from made available through the internet by heading to read as follows:
this action are not expected to be USDA and the Office of the Federal
Subpart B—Administrative
disproportionately greater or less for Register. A 60-day comment period
Requirements
small handlers or producers than for ending July 9, 2018, was provided to
larger entities. allow interested persons to respond to [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C]
The Committee discussed alternatives the proposal. ■ 4. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Assessment
to this change. One consideration was One comment was received. The Rates’’ as ‘‘Subpart C—Assessment
making no change at all to the current commenter questioned why the Rates’’.
regulation. Another alternative was to proposed change would only apply to [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart D
further differentiate between various the Order’s production area and not to and Amended]
varieties and types of potatoes in the all potato growing regions. Marketing
■ 5. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Handling
handling regulations. There was some orders only regulate the production area
discussion of adding another as defined in each respective order. Regulations’’ as subpart D and revise the
classification. After consideration of all Therefore, this change can only apply to heading to read as follows:
the alternatives, the Committee decided the handling of potatoes in the Order’s Subpart D—Handling Requirements
that the changes effectuated by this production area as defined in § 945.4.
action will provide the greatest amount The commenter did not otherwise ■ 6. In § 945.341, revise paragraphs
of benefit to the industry with the least address the merits of the proposal. (a)(2)(i) and (ii) to read as follows:
amount of burden to producers and Accordingly, no changes will be made
handlers. to the rule as proposed, based on the § 945.341 Handling regulation.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was * * * * *
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
comment received.
widely publicized throughout the potato A small business guide on complying (a) * * *
industry, and all interested persons with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop (2) Size—(i) All varieties, except
were invited to attend the meeting and marketing agreements and orders may Russet types. 17⁄8 inches minimum
participate in Committee deliberations. be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ diameter, unless otherwise specified on
Like all Committee meetings, the rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. the container in connection with the
November 8, 2017, meeting was a public Any questions about the compliance grade.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Oct 02, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM 03OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_49968/page/4.svg)
![49780 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Russet types. 2 inches minimum https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You door, which, if not corrected, could lead
diameter, or 4 ounces minimum weight: may view this service information at the to injuries to persons and damage to the
Provided, That at least 40 percent of the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 airplane.
potatoes in each lot shall be 5 ounces or South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
heavier. information on the availability of this Comments
* * * * * material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. We gave the public the opportunity to
It is also available on the internet at participate in developing this AD. The
Dated: September 27, 2018.
http://www.regulations.gov by searching following presents the comments
Bruce Summers, for and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
0905. response to each comment.
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–21480 Filed 10–2–18; 8:45 am] Examining the AD Docket
Support for the NPRM
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at http:// FedEx Express and United Airlines
www.regulations.gov by searching for (UAL) stated they had no technical
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and locating Docket No. FAA–2017– objection to the NPRM.
0905; or in person at Docket Operations
Federal Aviation Administration Request To Withdraw the NPRM
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. Three commenters requested that the
14 CFR Part 39 The AD docket contains this final rule, NPRM be withdrawn. Virgin Atlantic
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0905; Product the regulatory evaluation, any Airlines (VAA) and Deutsche Lufthansa
Identifier 2017–NM–090–AD; Amendment comments received, and other AG (DLH) pointed out there have been
39–19424; AD 2018–19–23] information. The address for Docket no reported failures of the cargo door
Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is control switches or incidents of
RIN 2120–AA64 Docket Operations, U.S. Department of uncommanded door operation at VAA
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Transportation, Docket Operations, or DLH since AD 2013–01–02 was
Company Airplanes M–30, West Building Ground Floor, issued. United Parcel Service (UPS)
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey stated that the NPRM appears to be
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. based on a single event of an otherwise
Administration (FAA), DOT. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: reliable cargo door switch configuration,
ACTION: Final rule. Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer, based on industry data that show no
Cabin Safety and Environmental significant number of unscheduled
SUMMARY: We are superseding Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO removals reported since AD 2013–01–02
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013–01– Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
02, which applied to certain The Boeing was issued. DLH commented that the
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206– operational area of the cargo door is a
Company Model 747–100, 747–100B, 231–3570; email: susan.l.monroe@
747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, safety critical area that requires the
faa.gov. operator to verify that the area is safe
747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and clear, whether an additional arm
400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP
series airplanes; and Model 757–200, Discussion switch is present or not. All commenters
757–200PF, and 757–300 series stated that the repetitive inspections
We issued a notice of proposed required by AD 2013–01–02 should
airplanes. AD 2013–01–02 required rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
replacing the control switches of certain remain in place and that accomplishing
part 39 to supersede AD 2013–01–02, the actions in Boeing Special Attention
cargo doors. This AD requires Amendment 39–17316 (78 FR 4051,
replacement of certain cargo door Service Bulletin 747–52–2307, dated
January 18, 2013) (‘‘AD 2013–01–02’’). May 23, 2017; and Boeing Special
control switches with a new, improved AD 2013–01–02 applied to certain The
switch; installation of an arm switch in Attention Service Bulletin 747–52–
Boeing Company Model 747–100, 747– 2308, dated June 5, 2017; should be an
certain cargo doors; operational and 100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–
functional tests; and applicable on- optional terminating action for the
200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, inspections.
condition actions. This AD also adds 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP
airplanes to the applicability. This AD series airplanes; and Model 757–200, We disagree with the commenters’
was prompted by reports of 757–200PF, and 757–300 series request because our risk analysis
uncommanded cargo door operation. airplanes. The NPRM published in the indicates that the actions mandated by
We are issuing this AD to address the Federal Register on October 6, 2017 (82 AD 2013–01–02 were inadequate to
unsafe condition on these products. FR 46722). The NPRM was prompted by mitigate the unsafe condition. Although
DATES: This AD is effective November 7, reports of uncommanded cargo door VAA and DLH have had no new
2018. operation. The NPRM proposed to incidents, there have been multiple
The Director of the Federal Register require replacement of certain cargo reports of uncommanded cargo door
approved the incorporation by reference door control switches with a new, operation within the affected fleets.
of certain publications listed in this AD improved switch; installation of an arm Therefore, existing procedures for door
as of November 7, 2018. switch in certain cargo doors; operation have not been adequate to
ADDRESSES: For service information operational and functional tests; and prevent the unsafe condition. We are
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
identified in this final rule, contact applicable on-condition actions. The mandating the actions in this AD
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, NPRM also proposed to add airplanes to because an unsafe condition exists,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services the applicability. We are issuing this AD which is likely to exist or develop on
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC to prevent failures of the cargo door other products of the same type design.
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600; control switch from allowing We have not changed this AD in this
telephone 562–797–1717; internet uncommanded movement of the cargo regard.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Oct 02, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM 03OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_49968/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-03 02:29:41
Document Modified: 2018-10-03 02:29:41
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | Effective November 2, 2018. | |
| Contact | Barry Broadbent, Marketing Specialist, or Gary D. Olson, Regional Manager, Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 49776 | |
| CFR Associated | Marketing Agreements; Potatoes and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR