83 FR 49941 - Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Na Pua Makani Wind Energy Project, Oahu, HI
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 192 (October 3, 2018)
Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 192 (October 3, 2018)
| Page Range | 49941-49943 | |
| FR Document | 2018-21457 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 3, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 49941-49943] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-21457] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS-R1-ES-2018-N108; FXES11140100000-189-FF01E00000] Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Na Pua Makani Wind Energy Project, Oahu, HI AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability; record of decision. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of a record of decision (ROD) for proposed issuance of an Endangered Species Act (ESA) permit for the Na Pua Makani Wind Energy Project (project) and habitat conservation plan (HCP). The ROD documents the Service's decision to issue an incidental take permit (ITP) to Na Pua Makani Power Partners, LLC (applicant). As summarized in the ROD, the Service has selected Alternative 2a--the Modified Proposed Action, which includes implementation of the HCP and issuance of the ITP authorizing incidental take of one threatened and six endangered species listed under the ESA that may occur as a result of construction and operation of the project over a 21-year period. ADDRESSES: You may obtain copies of the ROD and other documents associated with the decision by the following methods.Internet: Documents may be viewed and downloaded on the internet at http://www.fws.gov/pacificislands/. U.S. Mail: You may obtain a CD-ROM with electronic copies of these documents if you make a request within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice by writing to Mary Abrams, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122, Honolulu, HI 96850. Telephone: Call 808-792-9400 during regular business hours. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Aaron Nadig (Deputy Field Supervisor), by telephone at 808-792-9400, by Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339, or by mail to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see ADDRESSES). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of a record of decision (ROD) for proposed issuance of an Endangered Species Act (ESA) section 10(a)(1)(B) permit for the Na Pua Makani Wind Energy Project (project) and habitat conservation plan (HCP). The ROD documents the Service's decision to issue an incidental take permit (ITP) to Na Pua Makani Power Partners, LLC (applicant). As summarized in the ROD, the Service has selected Alternative 2a--the Modified Proposed Action (described below), which includes implementation of the HCP and issuance of the ITP authorizing incidental take of one threatened and six endangered species listed under the ESA that may occur as a result of construction and operation of the project over a 21-year period. We are advising the public of the availability of the ROD, developed in compliance with the agency decision-making requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), as well as the final HCP as submitted by the applicant. All alternatives have been described in detail, evaluated, and analyzed in our final EIS (FEIS) and supplemental EIS (SEIS). Our notice of availability of the FEIS and HCP was published in the Federal Register on July 12, 2016 (81 FR 45174). The Council of Environmental Quality regulations require agencies to prepare supplements to either draft or final EISs if there are substantial changes in the proposed action that are relevant to environmental concerns or there are significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns that bear on the proposed action or its impacts; SEISs may also be prepared if the lead agency determines that the purpose of NEPA will be furthered by doing so. After reviewing comments received after issuance of the Draft EIS (DEIS), the Service worked with the applicant to develop a modified action to address some of the comments received. Accordingly, the Service determined that publishing an SEIS and providing an additional opportunity for public review on Alternative 2a would further the purposes of NEPA and the ESA. The SEIS and HCP were noticed in the Federal Register on November 17, 2016 (81 FR 81151). Background Na Pua Makani Power Partners proposes to construct and operate the project near the town of Kahuku in the Koolauloa District of the City and County of Honolulu on the Island of Oahu, Hawaii. The project would consist of up to 9 wind turbine generators (WTGs) with a net generating capacity of up to approximately 25 megawatts (MW), located within a project site of approximately 707 acres. The site includes portions of two parcels leased from the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR), State-owned access areas, and privately owned lands. The site is located almost entirely within the State agricultural land use district. Na Pua Makani Power Partners applied to the Service for an ITP under ESA section 10(a)(1)(B). The ITP is for a 21-year permit term and authorizes take of the threatened Newell's shearwater (Puffinus newelli), and the endangered Hawaiian stilt (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni), Hawaiian coot (Fulica americana alai), Hawaiian moorhen (Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis), Hawaiian duck (Anas wyvilliana), Hawaiian goose (Branta [[Page 49942]] sandvicensis), and the Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) (collectively these species are hereafter referred to as the ``covered species'') that may occur as a result of the construction and operation of the project. The applicant developed a final HCP that addresses the incidental take of the seven covered species that may occur as a result of the construction and operation of the project over a period of 21 years. The HCP details measures the applicant will implement to minimize, mitigate, and monitor incidental take of the covered species. The Service prepared an FEIS and SEIS pursuant to the requirements of NEPA in response to the permit application because issuance of an ITP by the Service is a Federal action that may affect the quality of the human environment. Purpose and Need The purpose and need of the Service's proposed action is to evaluate the authorization of incidental take of the covered species associated with construction and operation of the project and make a decision on the application pursuant to the requirements of ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) and its implementing regulations and policies. Any permit issued by the Service must meet all applicable issuance criteria, and implementation should be technically and economically feasible. Issuance criteria include requirements that the applicant will minimize and mitigate the impacts of the taking on the covered species to the maximum extent practicable and the taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the species in the wild. Alternatives Our FEIS and SEIS analyzed the environmental impacts of three alternatives related to the issuance of the ITP and implementation of the HCP. Alternative 1--No Action: Under Alternative 1, the Service would not issue an ITP, and the project would not be constructed. Alternative 2--Proposed Action: The project, as originally described as Alternative 2 of the DEIS, would consist of between 8 and 10 WTG and includes implementation of the HCP and issuance of an ITP for construction and operation of a wind energy project with a generation capacity of up to 25 MW. Alternative 2a--Modified Proposed Action: Our selected alternative consists of implementation of the HCP and issuance of an ITP for construction and operation of a wind energy project with a maximum number of 9 WTG with a generation capacity of up to 25 MW. In response to public comments on the DEIS related to visual impacts and consideration of fewer turbines with larger generating capacities, a project design with a reduced maximum number of turbines of only 9 WTG with larger generating capacities and taller dimensions was added to the FEIS and SEIS. The applicant is considering a variety of WTG models, each ranging from 427 feet to 656 feet in height, and each having up to 3.3 MW of generating capacity. The applicant will select the most appropriate WTGs prior to construction. The selection of the WTG models would not change the impacts to the covered species analyzed in the EIS. This alternative includes the avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures identified for the covered species (described below) to minimize and offset the impacts of the anticipated take of the covered species. Alternative 3--Consists of a 42-MW generation wind project with up to 12 WTG, each with a generating capacity of up to 3.3 MW. Alternative 3 includes the issuance of an ITP to authorize incidental take of the covered species in association with construction and operation of the up to approximately 25-MW project and implementation of the project HCP with avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures identified for covered species that would occur at levels described above for the Proposed Action. Due to transmission line upgrades required for additional turbines and associated generating capacity beyond those identified in Alternative 2, there would be a lag of at least 3 years before the construction of an additional two to four turbines. Due to the uncertainty related to the timing of construction of the additional turbines under this alternative, Na Pua Makani Power Partners would reinitiate coordination with the Service prior to their construction to address potential impacts of the larger generation facility to the covered species. The mitigation and monitoring associated with the additional turbines would be covered in an amendment to the HCP. Decision and Rationale for Decision Based on our review of the alternatives and their environmental consequences as described in our FEIS and SEIS, we have selected the Modified Proposed Action option (Alternative 2a). The Modified Proposed Action is the implementation of the final HCP and issuance of an ITP authorizing incidental take of the covered species that may occur as a result of the construction and operation of the project. In order to issue an ITP, we must determine that the HCP meets the issuance criteria set forth in 16 U.S.C. 1539(a)(2)(A) and (B). We have made that determination based on the findings summarized below: 1. The taking will be incidental. We find that take of listed species will be incidental to otherwise lawful activities, including the construction, operation, and maintenance of the wind energy facility. 2. The applicant will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize and mitigate the impacts of such takings. The applicant has developed and is committed to implementing a program that includes a variety of habitat and species protection measures that minimize and mitigate the impacts of the taking on the covered species. To reduce take of the Hawaiian hoary bat, Na Pua Makani Partners will implement low wind-speed curtailment by raising the cut-in speed of the WTGs to 16 feet per second (ft/s) and feathering WTG blades below 16 ft/s from sunset to sunrise during the months of March to November. To offset the impacts of anticipated take on the covered species, the applicant is proposing mitigation measures on Oahu that include: (1) Funding research to support management of the Newell's shearwater; (2) fencing and predator control to conserve the Hawaiian goose; (3) a combination of bat research and native forest restoration and management to increase Hawaiian hoary bat habitat; (4) acoustic surveys to document the presence of the Hawaiian hoary bat; and (5) fencing and public outreach to benefit the conservation of the Hawaiian stilt, Hawaiian coot, Hawaiian moorhen and the Hawaiian duck. 3. The applicant will ensure that adequate funding for the HCP will be provided. The applicant has developed an HCP, which includes a detailed estimate of the costs of implementing the HCP. Na Pua Makani Power Partners is committed to providing the funds necessary to implement the HCP, and its associated mitigation, monitoring, reporting, and adaptive management measures. Na Pua Makani Power Partners shall provide assurance of funding in the form of a letter of credit to The State of Hawaii Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) in the amount of $3,736,050, which covers the cost for Tier 1 mitigation and post-construction monitoring. Upon triggering Tier 2 mitigation, a letter of credit for an additional $894,000 will be provided to DOFAW. [[Page 49943]] 4. The taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of any listed species in the wild. As the Federal action agency considering whether to issue an ITP, we have reviewed the proposed action under section 7 of the ESA. Our biological opinion, dated April 29, 2016, concluded that issuance of the ITP will not jeopardize the continued existence of potentially affected listed species in the wild. 5. The applicant agrees to implement other measures that the Service requires as being necessary or appropriate for the purposes of the HCP. We provided technical assistance to the applicant in the development of the HCP. We commented on draft documents, participated in numerous meetings, and worked closely with the applicant throughout the development of the HCP to further the conservation of covered species. The HCP incorporates our technical advice for minimization and mitigation of take impacts likely to be caused by covered activities, as well as steps to monitor the effects of the HCP. Annual monitoring, as well as coordination and reporting mechanisms, have been designed to ensure that changes in the conservation measures via adaptive management can be implemented if proposed measures prove ineffective. Considerations relied upon for the ITP decision include whether (1) the proposed mitigation will benefit the covered species, (2) adaptive management of the conservation measures will insure that the goals and objectives of the HCP are realized, (3) conservation measures will protect and enhance habitat, (4) mitigation measures will fully offset anticipated impacts to the covered species and facilitate recovery, and (5) the HCP is consistent with the covered species' recovery plans. Authority We provide this notice in accordance with the requirements of section 10(c) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531, 1539(c)) and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32) and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (40 CFR 1506.6; 43 CFR part 46). The Service has made its decision to issue an ITP to Na Pua Makani Power Partners, LLC for the take of seven species in accordance with their HCP. Theresa E. Rabot, Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. 2018-21457 Filed 10-2-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2018 / Notices 49941
Overview of This Information (ROD) for proposed issuance of an making requirements of the National
Collection Endangered Species Act (ESA) permit Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
(1) Type of Information Collection: for the Na Pua Makani Wind Energy amended (NEPA), as well as the final
Extension, Without Change, of a Project (project) and habitat HCP as submitted by the applicant. All
Currently Approved Collection. conservation plan (HCP). The ROD alternatives have been described in
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: H–2 documents the Service’s decision to detail, evaluated, and analyzed in our
Petitioner’s Employment Related or Fee issue an incidental take permit (ITP) to final EIS (FEIS) and supplemental EIS
Related Notification. Na Pua Makani Power Partners, LLC (SEIS). Our notice of availability of the
(3) Agency form number, if any, and (applicant). As summarized in the ROD, FEIS and HCP was published in the
the applicable component of the DHS the Service has selected Alternative Federal Register on July 12, 2016 (81 FR
sponsoring the collection: No form; 2a—the Modified Proposed Action, 45174).
which includes implementation of the The Council of Environmental Quality
USCIS.
HCP and issuance of the ITP authorizing regulations require agencies to prepare
(4) Affected public who will be asked
incidental take of one threatened and supplements to either draft or final EISs
or required to respond, as well as a brief
six endangered species listed under the if there are substantial changes in the
abstract: Primary: Business or other for-
ESA that may occur as a result of proposed action that are relevant to
profit. The notification requirement is environmental concerns or there are
necessary to ensure that alien workers construction and operation of the
project over a 21-year period. significant new circumstances or
maintain their nonimmigrant status and information relevant to environmental
will help prevent H–2 workers from ADDRESSES: You may obtain copies of
the ROD and other documents concerns that bear on the proposed
engaging in unauthorized employment. action or its impacts; SEISs may also be
(5) An estimate of the total number of associated with the decision by the
following methods. prepared if the lead agency determines
respondents and the amount of time that the purpose of NEPA will be
estimated for an average respondent to • Internet: Documents may be viewed
and downloaded on the internet at furthered by doing so. After reviewing
respond: The estimated total number of comments received after issuance of the
respondents for the information http://www.fws.gov/pacificislands/.
• U.S. Mail: You may obtain a CD– Draft EIS (DEIS), the Service worked
collection H–2 Petitioner’s Employment with the applicant to develop a
Related or Fee Related Notification is ROM with electronic copies of these
documents if you make a request within modified action to address some of the
1,700 and the estimated hour burden comments received. Accordingly, the
per response is .5 hours. 30 days after the date of publication of
this notice by writing to Mary Abrams, Service determined that publishing an
(6) An estimate of the total public SEIS and providing an additional
burden (in hours) associated with the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Pacific Islands Fish and opportunity for public review on
collection: The total estimated annual Alternative 2a would further the
hour burden associated with this Wildlife Office, 300 Ala Moana
Boulevard, Room 3–122, Honolulu, HI purposes of NEPA and the ESA. The
collection is 850 hours. SEIS and HCP were noticed in the
(7) An estimate of the total public 96850.
• Telephone: Call 808–792–9400 Federal Register on November 17, 2016
burden (in cost) associated with the (81 FR 81151).
collection: The estimated total annual during regular business hours.
cost burden associated with this FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Background
collection of information is $8,500. Aaron Nadig (Deputy Field Supervisor), Na Pua Makani Power Partners
by telephone at 808–792–9400, by proposes to construct and operate the
Dated: September 27, 2018.
Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339, project near the town of Kahuku in the
Samantha L. Deshommes,
or by mail to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Koolauloa District of the City and
Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division, Service (see ADDRESSES).
Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship County of Honolulu on the Island of
and Immigration Services, Department of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the Oahu, Hawaii. The project would
Homeland Security. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), consist of up to 9 wind turbine
[FR Doc. 2018–21489 Filed 10–2–18; 8:45 am] announce the availability of a record of generators (WTGs) with a net generating
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
decision (ROD) for proposed issuance of capacity of up to approximately 25
an Endangered Species Act (ESA) megawatts (MW), located within a
section 10(a)(1)(B) permit for the Na Pua project site of approximately 707 acres.
Makani Wind Energy Project (project) The site includes portions of two
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
and habitat conservation plan (HCP). parcels leased from the Hawaii
Fish and Wildlife Service The ROD documents the Service’s Department of Land and Natural
decision to issue an incidental take Resources (DLNR), State-owned access
[FWS–R1–ES–2018–N108; permit (ITP) to Na Pua Makani Power areas, and privately owned lands. The
FXES11140100000–189–FF01E00000] Partners, LLC (applicant). As site is located almost entirely within the
summarized in the ROD, the Service has State agricultural land use district.
Record of Decision for the Final
selected Alternative 2a—the Modified Na Pua Makani Power Partners
Environmental Impact Statement for
Proposed Action (described below), applied to the Service for an ITP under
the Na Pua Makani Wind Energy
which includes implementation of the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B). The ITP is for
Project, Oahu, HI
HCP and issuance of the ITP authorizing a 21-year permit term and authorizes
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, incidental take of one threatened and take of the threatened Newell’s
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Interior. six endangered species listed under the shearwater (Puffinus newelli), and the
ACTION: Notice of availability; record of ESA that may occur as a result of endangered Hawaiian stilt (Himantopus
decision. construction and operation of the mexicanus knudseni), Hawaiian coot
project over a 21-year period. (Fulica americana alai), Hawaiian
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and We are advising the public of the moorhen (Gallinula chloropus
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of the ROD, developed in sandvicensis), Hawaiian duck (Anas
availability of a record of decision compliance with the agency decision- wyvilliana), Hawaiian goose (Branta
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Oct 02, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM 03OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_50133/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2018 / Notices 49943
4. The taking will not appreciably DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR related to revenue collection from such
reduce the likelihood of survival and development, including whether a need
recovery of any listed species in the Office of the Secretary exists for regulatory reform.
wild. As the Federal action agency [Docket No. ONRR–2018–0001; We are seeking nominations for
considering whether to issue an ITP, we [DS63600000 DR2000000.PMN000 individuals that represent Indian Tribes,
have reviewed the proposed action 178D0102R2] mineral and/or energy stakeholders,
under section 7 of the ESA. Our States, and academia/public interest, to
biological opinion, dated April 29, 2016, Royalty Policy Committee be considered as Committee alternate
concluded that issuance of the ITP will Establishment; Request for members. The Committee will not
not jeopardize the continued existence Nominations exceed 28 members and is composed of
of potentially affected listed species in Federal and non-Federal members in
AGENCY: Office of Natural Resources
the wild. order to ensure fair and balanced
Revenue, Interior.
5. The applicant agrees to implement representation. The Secretary will
ACTION: Notice.
other measures that the Service requires appoint non-Federal alternates to the
as being necessary or appropriate for SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Committee to serve up to a three-year
the purposes of the HCP. We provided Interior (DOI) is seeking nominations for term. The Director for the Bureau of
technical assistance to the applicant in primary and alternate members for Safety and Environmental Enforcement
the development of the HCP. We several sectors of the Royalty Policy is currently designated as Acting
commented on draft documents, Committee (Committee). This notice Chairman of the Committee.
participated in numerous meetings, and solicits nominees from: (1) Indian Federal Members: The Secretary has
worked closely with the applicant Tribes, (2) mineral and/or energy appointed the following officials as non-
throughout the development of the HCP stakeholders, (3) States and (4) voting, ex-officio members of the
to further the conservation of covered academia/public interest. Committee:
species. The HCP incorporates our The Committee provides advice to the • A representative of the Secretary’s
technical advice for minimization and Secretary on the fair market value of, Immediate Office
mitigation of take impacts likely to be and the collection of revenues derived • Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs
caused by covered activities, as well as from, the development of energy and • Assistant Secretary—Land and
steps to monitor the effects of the HCP. mineral resources on Federal and Indian Minerals Management
Annual monitoring, as well as lands. • Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs
coordination and reporting mechanisms, DATES: Nominations for the Committee • Director, Bureau of Land Management
have been designed to ensure that must be submitted by November 2, • Director, Office of Natural Resources
changes in the conservation measures 2018. Revenue
via adaptive management can be • Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy
ADDRESSES: You may submit
implemented if proposed measures Management
nominations by any of the following • Director, Bureau of Safety and
prove ineffective.
methods: Environmental Enforcement
Considerations relied upon for the ITP • Mail or hand-carry nominations to
decision include whether (1) the Mr. Chris Mentasti, Department of the These officials may designate a senior
proposed mitigation will benefit the Interior, Office of Natural Resources official to act on their behalf.
covered species, (2) adaptive Revenue, 1849 C Street NW, MS 5134, Non-Federal Members: The Secretary
management of the conservation Washington, DC 20240; or may appoint members in the following
measures will insure that the goals and • Email nominations to: RPC@ categories:
objectives of the HCP are realized, (3) ios.doi.gov. • Members representing the
conservation measures will protect and Governors of States that receive more
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
enhance habitat, (4) mitigation measures than $10,000,000 annually in royalty
Jennifer Malcolm, Office of Natural revenues from onshore and offshore
will fully offset anticipated impacts to
Resources Revenue, telephone at (202) Federal leases.
the covered species and facilitate
208–3938; email to Jennifer.Malcolm@ • Members representing the Indian
recovery, and (5) the HCP is consistent
onrr.gov. Tribes that are engaged in activities
with the covered species’ recovery
plans. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject to: The Act of May 11, 1938
Committee is established under the (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian
Authority authority of the Secretary of the Interior Mineral Leasing Act of 1938’’) (25
We provide this notice in accordance (Secretary) and regulated by the Federal U.S.C. 396a et seq.); Title XXVI of the
with the requirements of section 10(c) of Advisory Committee Act (FACA), as Energy Policy Act of 1992 (25 U.S.C.
the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531, 1539(c)) and amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2). The 3501 et seq.); The Indian Mineral
its implementing regulations (50 CFR Secretary seeks to ensure that the public Development Act of 1982 (25 U.S.C.
17.22 and 17.32) and NEPA (42 U.S.C. receives the full value of the natural 2101 et seq.); and any other law relating
4321 et seq.) and its implementing resources produced from Federal lands. to mineral development that is specific
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6; 43 CFR part The duties of the Committee are solely to one or more Indian Tribes.
46). The Service has made its decision advisory in nature. The Committee will, • Members representing various
to issue an ITP to Na Pua Makani Power at the request of the Designated Federal mineral and/or energy stakeholders in
Partners, LLC for the take of seven Officer (DFO), advise on current and Federal and Indian royalty policy.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
species in accordance with their HCP. emerging issues related to the • Members representing academia
determination of fair market value, and and public interest groups.
Theresa E. Rabot, the collection of revenue from energy Nominations should include a resume
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S. and mineral resources on Federal and providing an adequate description of the
Fish and Wildlife Service. Indian lands. The Committee also will nominee’s qualifications, including
[FR Doc. 2018–21457 Filed 10–2–18; 8:45 am] advise on the potential impacts of information that would enable DOI to
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P proposed policies and regulations make an informed decision regarding
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Oct 02, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM 03OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_50133/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-03 02:29:35
Document Modified: 2018-10-03 02:29:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of availability; record of decision. | |
| Contact | Mr. Aaron Nadig (Deputy Field Supervisor), by telephone at 808-792-9400, by Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339, or by mail to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 49941 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR