83_FR_52086 83 FR 51887 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

83 FR 51887 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 199 (October 15, 2018)

Page Range51887-51889
FR Document2018-21966

We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that the inner skin at the lower fastener row is subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This proposed AD would require a general visual inspection of certain lap splice inspection areas for any repair common to the fuselage skin lap splice inspection areas, repetitive dual frequency eddy current (DFEC) inspections of a certain lap splice inner skin for any crack, and applicable on-condition actions. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 199 (Monday, October 15, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 199 (Monday, October 15, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51887-51889]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21966]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2018 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 51887]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0899; Product Identifier 2018-NM-099-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
certain The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. This proposed AD was 
prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) 
indicating that the inner skin at the lower fastener row is subject to 
widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This proposed AD would require a 
general visual inspection of certain lap splice inspection areas for 
any repair common to the fuselage skin lap splice inspection areas, 
repetitive dual frequency eddy current (DFEC) inspections of a certain 
lap splice inner skin for any crack, and applicable on-condition 
actions. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on 
these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 29, 
2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600; 
telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may 
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport 
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information 
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It 
is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by 
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0899.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0899; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains 
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other 
information. The street address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD 
docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Truong, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount 
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712 4137; phone: 562-627-5224; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed 
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0899; 
Product Identifier 2018-NM-099-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. 
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, 
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all 
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because 
of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Fatigue damage can occur locally, in small areas or structural 
design details, or globally, in widespread areas. Multiple-site damage 
is widespread damage that occurs in a large structural element such as 
a single rivet line of a lap splice joining two large skin panels. 
Widespread damage can also occur in multiple elements such as adjacent 
frames or stringers. Multiple-site damage and multiple-element damage 
cracks are typically too small initially to be reliably detected with 
normal inspection methods. Without intervention, these cracks will 
grow, and eventually compromise the structural integrity of the 
airplane. This condition is known as WFD. It is associated with general 
degradation of large areas of structure with similar structural details 
and stress levels. As an airplane ages, WFD will likely occur, and will 
certainly occur if the airplane is operated long enough without any 
intervention.
    The FAA's WFD final rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) became 
effective on January 14, 2011. The WFD rule requires certain actions to 
prevent structural failure due to WFD throughout the operational life 
of certain existing transport category airplanes and all of these 
airplanes that will be certificated in the future. For existing and 
future airplanes subject to the WFD rule, the rule requires that DAHs 
establish a limit of validity (LOV) of the engineering data that 
support the structural maintenance program. Operators affected by the 
WFD rule may not fly an airplane beyond its LOV, unless an extended LOV 
is approved.
    The WFD rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) does not require 
identifying and developing maintenance actions if the DAHs can show 
that such actions are not necessary to prevent WFD before the airplane 
reaches the LOV. Many LOVs, however, do depend on accomplishment of 
future maintenance actions. As stated in the WFD rule, any maintenance 
actions necessary to reach the LOV will be mandated by airworthiness 
directives through separate rulemaking actions.

[[Page 51888]]

    In the context of WFD, this action is necessary to enable DAHs to 
propose LOVs that allow operators the longest operational lives for 
their airplanes, and still ensure that WFD will not occur. This 
approach allows for an implementation strategy that provides 
flexibility to DAHs in determining the timing of service information 
development (with FAA approval), while providing operators with 
certainty regarding the LOV applicable to their airplanes.
    We have received a report indicating the inner skin at the lower 
fastener row is subject to WFD. The inner skin at the lap splice could 
also have scratches that can grow into scratch cracks, which could 
interact with multi-site damage (MSD) fastener hole fatigue cracking. 
This condition, if not addressed, could result in accelerated crack 
growth rate, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the 
airplane.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-53A0111 RB, 
dated May 21, 2018. The service information describes procedures for a 
general visual inspection of certain lap splice inspection areas for 
any repair common to the fuselage skin lap splice inspection areas, 
repetitive DFEC inspections of the S-14 lap splice inner skin for any 
crack, and applicable on-condition actions. This service information is 
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it 
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in 
the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant 
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is 
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions 
identified in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-53A0111 RB, dated 
May 21, 2018, described previously, except for any differences 
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
    For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this 
service information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and 
locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0899.

Explanation of Requirements Bulletin

    The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the 
Airworthiness Directives Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee 
(AD ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement is a process for 
annotating which steps in the service information are ``required for 
compliance'' (RC) with an AD. Boeing has implemented this RC concept 
into Boeing service bulletins.
    In an effort to further improve the quality of ADs and AD-related 
Boeing service information, a joint process improvement initiative was 
worked between the FAA and Boeing. The initiative resulted in the 
development of a new process in which the service information more 
clearly identifies the actions needed to address the unsafe condition 
in the ``Accomplishment Instructions.'' The new process results in a 
Boeing Requirements Bulletin, which contains only the actions needed to 
address the unsafe condition (i.e., only the RC actions).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 451 airplanes of U.S. 
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed 
AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                 Cost on U.S.
             Action                     Labor cost          Parts cost     Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General visual inspection......  Up to 6 work-hours x                 $0  Up to $510........  Up to $230,010.
                                  $85 per hour = up to
                                  $510.
Repetitive DFEC inspections....  Up to 124 work-hours x                0  Up to $10,540 per   Up to $4,753,540
                                  $85 per hour = up to                     inspection cycle.   per inspection
                                  $10,540 per inspection                                       cycle.
                                  cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide 
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed 
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated 
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as 
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, 
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and 
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the 
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable 
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the 
Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

[[Page 51889]]

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2018-0899; Product Identifier 
2018-NM-099-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by November 29, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF, -
200CB, and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as 
identified in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-53A0111 RB, 
dated May 21, 2018.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval 
holder (DAH) indicating that the inner skin at the lower fastener 
row is subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). We are issuing 
this AD to address scratches that can grow into scratch cracks, 
which could interact with multi-site damage (MSD) fastener hole 
fatigue cracking. This condition, if not addressed, could result in 
accelerated crack growth rate, which could result in reduced 
structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the 
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing 
Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-53A0111 RB, dated May 21, 2018, do 
all applicable actions identified in, and in accordance with, the 
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 
757-53A0111 RB, dated May 21, 2018.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD:  Guidance for accomplishing 
the actions required by this AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 757-53A0111, dated May 21, 2018, which is referred to in 
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-53A0111 RB, dated May 21, 
2018.

(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements 
of this AD: Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-53A0111 RB, 
dated May 21, 2018, uses the phrase ``the original issue date of 
Requirements Bulletin 757-53A0111 RB,'' this AD requires using ``the 
effective date of this AD.''
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-53A0111 RB, 
dated May 21, 2018, specifies contacting Boeing for alternative 
inspections or repair instructions, this AD requires alternative 
inspection or repair before further flight using a method approved 
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this 
AD.
    (3) Inspections performed in accordance with Boeing Alert 
Requirements Bulletin 757-53A0111 RB, dated May 21, 2018, are not 
necessary in areas where existing FAA approved repairs cover the 
affected inspection areas; provided the outermost repair doubler 
extends a minimum of three rows of fasteners above and below the 
original group of lap splice fasteners subject to the inspection. 
Damage tolerance inspections specified for existing repairs must 
continue. Inspections outside of the repaired boundaries are still 
required as specified in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-
53A0111 RB, dated May 21, 2018.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority 
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures 
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards 
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to 
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of 
the person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information 
may be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD 
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the 
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be 
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration 
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the 
approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact David Truong, 
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712 4137; phone: 562-627-
5224; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected].
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services 
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service 
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th 
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this 
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.


    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on September 20, 2018.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-21966 Filed 10-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P



                                                                                                                                                                                                 51887

                                                Proposed Rules                                                                                                Federal Register
                                                                                                                                                              Vol. 83, No. 199

                                                                                                                                                              Monday, October 15, 2018



                                                This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER                    p.m., Monday through Friday, except                   www.regulations.gov, including any
                                                contains notices to the public of the proposed          Federal holidays.                                     personal information you provide. We
                                                issuance of rules and regulations. The                     For service information identified in              will also post a report summarizing each
                                                purpose of these notices is to give interested          this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial                  substantive verbal contact we receive
                                                persons an opportunity to participate in the            Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data              about this proposed AD.
                                                rule making prior to the adoption of the final
                                                rules.
                                                                                                        Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster
                                                                                                                                                              Discussion
                                                                                                        Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA
                                                                                                        90740–5600; telephone 562–797–1717;                      Fatigue damage can occur locally, in
                                                DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                            internet https://                                     small areas or structural design details,
                                                                                                        www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view                   or globally, in widespread areas.
                                                Federal Aviation Administration                         this referenced service information at                Multiple-site damage is widespread
                                                                                                        the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,                  damage that occurs in a large structural
                                                14 CFR Part 39                                          2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.                 element such as a single rivet line of a
                                                                                                        For information on the availability of                lap splice joining two large skin panels.
                                                [Docket No. FAA–2018–0899; Product
                                                Identifier 2018–NM–099–AD]                              this material at the FAA, call 206–231–               Widespread damage can also occur in
                                                                                                        3195. It is also available on the internet            multiple elements such as adjacent
                                                RIN 2120–AA64                                           at http://www.regulations.gov by                      frames or stringers. Multiple-site
                                                                                                        searching for and locating Docket No.                 damage and multiple-element damage
                                                Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing                    FAA–2018–0899.                                        cracks are typically too small initially to
                                                Company Airplanes                                                                                             be reliably detected with normal
                                                                                                        Examining the AD Docket
                                                AGENCY: Federal Aviation                                                                                      inspection methods. Without
                                                Administration (FAA), DOT.                                 You may examine the AD docket on                   intervention, these cracks will grow,
                                                ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
                                                                                                        the internet at http://                               and eventually compromise the
                                                (NPRM).                                                 www.regulations.gov by searching for                  structural integrity of the airplane. This
                                                                                                        and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–                     condition is known as WFD. It is
                                                SUMMARY:   We propose to adopt a new                    0899; or in person at Docket Operations               associated with general degradation of
                                                airworthiness directive (AD) for certain                between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday                     large areas of structure with similar
                                                The Boeing Company Model 757                            through Friday, except Federal holidays.              structural details and stress levels. As
                                                airplanes. This proposed AD was                         The AD docket contains this NPRM, the                 an airplane ages, WFD will likely occur,
                                                prompted by an evaluation by the                        regulatory evaluation, any comments                   and will certainly occur if the airplane
                                                design approval holder (DAH)                            received, and other information. The                  is operated long enough without any
                                                indicating that the inner skin at the                   street address for Docket Operations                  intervention.
                                                lower fastener row is subject to                        (phone: 800–647–5527) is in the                          The FAA’s WFD final rule (75 FR
                                                widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This                   ADDRESSES section. Comments will be                   69746, November 15, 2010) became
                                                proposed AD would require a general                     available in the AD docket shortly after              effective on January 14, 2011. The WFD
                                                visual inspection of certain lap splice                 receipt.                                              rule requires certain actions to prevent
                                                inspection areas for any repair common                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      structural failure due to WFD
                                                to the fuselage skin lap splice inspection              David Truong, Aerospace Engineer,                     throughout the operational life of
                                                areas, repetitive dual frequency eddy                   Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles                    certain existing transport category
                                                current (DFEC) inspections of a certain                 ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount                            airplanes and all of these airplanes that
                                                lap splice inner skin for any crack, and                Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712 4137;                   will be certificated in the future. For
                                                applicable on-condition actions. We are                 phone: 562–627–5224; fax: 562–627–                    existing and future airplanes subject to
                                                proposing this AD to address the unsafe                 5210; email: david.truong@faa.gov.                    the WFD rule, the rule requires that
                                                condition on these products.                            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            DAHs establish a limit of validity (LOV)
                                                DATES: We must receive comments on                                                                            of the engineering data that support the
                                                this proposed AD by November 29,                        Comments Invited                                      structural maintenance program.
                                                2018.                                                     We invite you to send any written                   Operators affected by the WFD rule may
                                                ADDRESSES: You may send comments,                       relevant data, views, or arguments about              not fly an airplane beyond its LOV,
                                                using the procedures found in 14 CFR                    this proposal. Send your comments to                  unless an extended LOV is approved.
                                                11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following                an address listed under the ADDRESSES                    The WFD rule (75 FR 69746,
                                                methods:                                                section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–                    November 15, 2010) does not require
                                                  • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to                   2018–0899; Product Identifier 2018–                   identifying and developing maintenance
                                                http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the                  NM–099–AD’’ at the beginning of your                  actions if the DAHs can show that such
                                                instructions for submitting comments.                   comments. We specifically invite                      actions are not necessary to prevent
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL




                                                  • Fax: 202–493–2251.                                  comments on the overall regulatory,                   WFD before the airplane reaches the
                                                  • Mail: U.S. Department of                            economic, environmental, and energy                   LOV. Many LOVs, however, do depend
                                                Transportation, Docket Operations, M–                   aspects of this NPRM. We will consider                on accomplishment of future
                                                30, West Building Ground Floor, Room                    all comments received by the closing                  maintenance actions. As stated in the
                                                W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,                     date and may amend this NPRM                          WFD rule, any maintenance actions
                                                Washington, DC 20590.                                   because of those comments.                            necessary to reach the LOV will be
                                                  • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail                         We will post all comments we                       mandated by airworthiness directives
                                                address above between 9 a.m. and 5                      receive, without change, to http://                   through separate rulemaking actions.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:23 Oct 12, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00001   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM   15OCP1


                                                51888                  Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules

                                                   In the context of WFD, this action is                common to the fuselage skin lap splice                   Explanation of Requirements Bulletin
                                                necessary to enable DAHs to propose                     inspection areas, repetitive DFEC
                                                LOVs that allow operators the longest                   inspections of the S–14 lap splice inner                   The FAA worked in conjunction with
                                                operational lives for their airplanes, and              skin for any crack, and applicable on-                   industry, under the Airworthiness
                                                still ensure that WFD will not occur.                   condition actions. This service                          Directives Implementation Aviation
                                                This approach allows for an                             information is reasonably available                      Rulemaking Committee (AD ARC), to
                                                implementation strategy that provides                   because the interested parties have                      enhance the AD system. One
                                                flexibility to DAHs in determining the                  access to it through their normal course                 enhancement is a process for annotating
                                                timing of service information                           of business or by the means identified                   which steps in the service information
                                                development (with FAA approval),                        in the ADDRESSES section.                                are ‘‘required for compliance’’ (RC) with
                                                while providing operators with certainty                                                                         an AD. Boeing has implemented this RC
                                                                                                        FAA’s Determination                                      concept into Boeing service bulletins.
                                                regarding the LOV applicable to their
                                                airplanes.                                                We are proposing this AD because we                      In an effort to further improve the
                                                                                                        evaluated all the relevant information                   quality of ADs and AD-related Boeing
                                                   We have received a report indicating
                                                                                                        and determined the unsafe condition                      service information, a joint process
                                                the inner skin at the lower fastener row
                                                                                                        described previously is likely to exist or               improvement initiative was worked
                                                is subject to WFD. The inner skin at the
                                                                                                        develop in other products of the same                    between the FAA and Boeing. The
                                                lap splice could also have scratches that               type design.
                                                can grow into scratch cracks, which                                                                              initiative resulted in the development of
                                                could interact with multi-site damage                   Proposed AD Requirements                                 a new process in which the service
                                                (MSD) fastener hole fatigue cracking.                     This proposed AD would require                         information more clearly identifies the
                                                This condition, if not addressed, could                 accomplishment of the actions                            actions needed to address the unsafe
                                                result in accelerated crack growth rate,                identified in Boeing Alert Requirements                  condition in the ‘‘Accomplishment
                                                which could result in reduced structural                Bulletin 757–53A0111 RB, dated May                       Instructions.’’ The new process results
                                                integrity of the airplane.                              21, 2018, described previously, except                   in a Boeing Requirements Bulletin,
                                                                                                        for any differences identified as                        which contains only the actions needed
                                                Related Service Information Under 1                                                                              to address the unsafe condition (i.e.,
                                                CFR Part 51                                             exceptions in the regulatory text of this
                                                                                                        proposed AD.                                             only the RC actions).
                                                  We reviewed Boeing Alert                                For information on the procedures                      Costs of Compliance
                                                Requirements Bulletin 757–53A0111                       and compliance times, see this service
                                                RB, dated May 21, 2018. The service                     information at http://                                      We estimate that this proposed AD
                                                information describes procedures for a                  www.regulations.gov by searching for                     affects 451 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
                                                general visual inspection of certain lap                and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–                        estimate the following costs to comply
                                                splice inspection areas for any repair                  0899.                                                    with this proposed AD:

                                                                                                      ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
                                                          Action                                     Labor cost                            Parts cost            Cost per product             Cost on U.S. operators

                                                General visual inspec-        Up to 6 work-hours × $85 per hour = up to                                 $0   Up to $510 ...................   Up to $230,010.
                                                  tion.                         $510.
                                                Repetitive DFEC inspec-       Up to 124 work-hours × $85 per hour = up to                                0   Up to $10,540 per in-            Up to $4,753,540 per
                                                  tions.                        $10,540 per inspection cycle.                                                  spection cycle.                  inspection cycle.



                                                  We have received no definitive data                   is within the scope of that authority                    proposed AD would not have a
                                                that would enable us to provide cost                    because it addresses an unsafe condition                 substantial direct effect on the States, on
                                                estimates for the on-condition actions                  that is likely to exist or develop on                    the relationship between the national
                                                specified in this proposed AD.                          products identified in this rulemaking                   Government and the States, or on the
                                                                                                        action.                                                  distribution of power and
                                                Authority for This Rulemaking
                                                                                                           This proposed AD is issued in                         responsibilities among the various
                                                   Title 49 of the United States Code                   accordance with authority delegated by                   levels of government.
                                                specifies the FAA’s authority to issue                  the Executive Director, Aircraft                           For the reasons discussed above, I
                                                rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,                   Certification Service, as authorized by                  certify this proposed regulation:
                                                section 106, describes the authority of                 FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
                                                the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:                    with that order, issuance of ADs is                        (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
                                                Aviation Programs, describes in more                    normally a function of the Compliance                    action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
                                                detail the scope of the Agency’s                        and Airworthiness Division, but during                     (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
                                                authority.                                              this transition period, the Executive                    the DOT Regulatory Policies and
                                                   We are issuing this rulemaking under                 Director has delegated the authority to                  Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
                                                the authority described in Subtitle VII,                issue ADs applicable to transport                        1979),
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL




                                                Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:                     category airplanes and associated                          (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
                                                ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that                    appliances to the Director of the System
                                                                                                                                                                 in Alaska, and
                                                section, Congress charges the FAA with                  Oversight Division.
                                                promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in                                                                         (4) Will not have a significant
                                                                                                        Regulatory Findings                                      economic impact, positive or negative,
                                                air commerce by prescribing regulations
                                                for practices, methods, and procedures                    We determined that this proposed AD                    on a substantial number of small entities
                                                the Administrator finds necessary for                   would not have federalism implications                   under the criteria of the Regulatory
                                                safety in air commerce. This regulation                 under Executive Order 13132. This                        Flexibility Act.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:23 Oct 12, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00002   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM      15OCP1


                                                                       Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules                                               51889

                                                List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39                        Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD:                 (j) Related Information
                                                                                                        Guidance for accomplishing the actions                   (1) For more information about this AD,
                                                  Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation                required by this AD can be found in Boeing
                                                safety, Incorporation by reference,                                                                           contact David Truong, Aerospace Engineer,
                                                                                                        Alert Service Bulletin 757–53A0111, dated             Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO
                                                Safety.                                                 May 21, 2018, which is referred to in Boeing          Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
                                                The Proposed Amendment                                  Alert Requirements Bulletin 757–53A0111               Lakewood, CA 90712 4137; phone: 562–627–
                                                                                                        RB, dated May 21, 2018.                               5224; fax: 562–627–5210; email:
                                                  Accordingly, under the authority                                                                            david.truong@faa.gov.
                                                delegated to me by the Administrator,                   (h) Exceptions to Service Information
                                                                                                                                                                 (2) For service information identified in
                                                the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part                   Specifications
                                                                                                                                                              this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
                                                39 as follows:                                             (1) For purposes of determining                    Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
                                                                                                        compliance with the requirements of this AD:          Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
                                                PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS                                   Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin              MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
                                                DIRECTIVES                                              757–53A0111 RB, dated May 21, 2018, uses              telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
                                                                                                        the phrase ‘‘the original issue date of               www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
                                                ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39                 Requirements Bulletin 757–53A0111 RB,’’               referenced service information at the FAA,
                                                continues to read as follows:                           this AD requires using ‘‘the effective date of        Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
                                                                                                        this AD.’’                                            216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
                                                    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.             (2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements                on the availability of this material at the
                                                § 39.13   [Amended]                                     Bulletin 757–53A0111 RB, dated May 21,                FAA, call 206–231–3195.
                                                                                                        2018, specifies contacting Boeing for
                                                ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding                   alternative inspections or repair instructions,         Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
                                                the following new airworthiness                         this AD requires alternative inspection or            September 20, 2018.
                                                directive (AD):                                         repair before further flight using a method           John P. Piccola,
                                                The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–                     approved in accordance with the procedures            Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
                                                    2018–0899; Product Identifier 2018–                 specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.                Aircraft Certification Service.
                                                    NM–099–AD.                                             (3) Inspections performed in accordance
                                                                                                                                                              [FR Doc. 2018–21966 Filed 10–12–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                        with Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin
                                                (a) Comments Due Date                                   757–53A0111 RB, dated May 21, 2018, are               BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
                                                  We must receive comments by November                  not necessary in areas where existing FAA
                                                29, 2018.                                               approved repairs cover the affected
                                                                                                        inspection areas; provided the outermost              DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                                                (b) Affected ADs                                        repair doubler extends a minimum of three
                                                  None.                                                 rows of fasteners above and below the                 Federal Aviation Administration
                                                (c) Applicability                                       original group of lap splice fasteners subject
                                                                                                        to the inspection. Damage tolerance                   14 CFR Part 39
                                                   This AD applies to The Boeing Company                inspections specified for existing repairs
                                                Model 757–200, –200PF, –200CB, and –300                 must continue. Inspections outside of the             [Docket No. FAA–2018–0807; Product
                                                series airplanes, certificated in any category,         repaired boundaries are still required as             Identifier 2018–NM–003–AD]
                                                as identified in Boeing Alert Requirements              specified in Boeing Alert Requirements
                                                Bulletin 757–53A0111 RB, dated May 21,                  Bulletin 757–53A0111 RB, dated May 21,
                                                2018.                                                                                                         RIN 2120–AA64
                                                                                                        2018.
                                                (d) Subject                                             (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance                 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
                                                  Air Transport Association (ATA) of                    (AMOCs)                                               Airplanes
                                                America Code 53, Fuselage.                                (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch,            AGENCY: Federal Aviation
                                                (e) Unsafe Condition                                    FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs               Administration (FAA), DOT.
                                                                                                        for this AD, if requested using the procedures
                                                   This AD was prompted by an evaluation by                                                                   ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
                                                                                                        found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
                                                the design approval holder (DAH) indicating                                                                   (NPRM).
                                                                                                        14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
                                                that the inner skin at the lower fastener row
                                                                                                        principal inspector or local Flight Standards
                                                is subject to widespread fatigue damage                                                                       SUMMARY:   We propose to adopt a new
                                                                                                        District Office, as appropriate. If sending
                                                (WFD). We are issuing this AD to address                                                                      airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
                                                                                                        information directly to the manager of the
                                                scratches that can grow into scratch cracks,                                                                  Airbus Model A330–200, A330–300,
                                                                                                        certification office, send it to the attention of
                                                which could interact with multi-site damage
                                                (MSD) fastener hole fatigue cracking. This
                                                                                                        the person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of          A340–200, and A340–300 series
                                                                                                        this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-            airplanes. This proposed AD was
                                                condition, if not addressed, could result in
                                                accelerated crack growth rate, which could              ANM-LAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.                      prompted by a report that revealed the
                                                result in reduced structural integrity of the             (2) Before using any approved AMOC,                 wheel axles of the main landing gear
                                                airplane.                                               notify your appropriate principal inspector,          (MLG) were machined with a radius as
                                                                                                        or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
                                                (f) Compliance                                          of the local flight standards district office/
                                                                                                                                                              small as 0.4 millimeters and a
                                                                                                        certificate holding district office.                  determination that the life limit for the
                                                   Comply with this AD within the                                                                             affected wheel axles of the MLG must be
                                                compliance times specified, unless already                (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
                                                done.                                                   level of safety may be used for any repair,           reduced. This proposed AD would
                                                                                                        modification, or alteration required by this          require an inspection to determine the
                                                (g) Required Actions                                    AD if it is approved by the Boeing                    part number and serial number of each
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL




                                                   Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this         Commercial Airplanes Organization                     MLG wheel axle and replacement of
                                                AD: At the applicable times specified in the            Designation Authorization (ODA) that has              affected parts prior to exceeding the
                                                ‘‘Compliance’’ paragraph of Boeing Alert                been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles           reduced life limits. We are proposing
                                                Requirements Bulletin 757–53A0111 RB,                   ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings.              this AD to address the unsafe condition
                                                dated May 21, 2018, do all applicable actions           To be approved, the repair method,
                                                                                                        modification deviation, or alteration
                                                                                                                                                              on these products.
                                                identified in, and in accordance with, the
                                                Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert             deviation must meet the certification basis of        DATES: We must receive comments on
                                                Requirements Bulletin 757–53A0111 RB,                   the airplane, and the approval must                   this proposed AD by November 29,
                                                dated May 21, 2018.                                     specifically refer to this AD.                        2018.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:23 Oct 12, 2018   Jkt 247001   PO 00000   Frm 00003   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\15OCP1.SGM   15OCP1



Document Created: 2018-10-13 10:03:15
Document Modified: 2018-10-13 10:03:15
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
DatesWe must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 29, 2018.
ContactDavid Truong, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712 4137; phone: 562-627-5224; fax: 562-627- 5210; email: [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 51887 
RIN Number2120-AA64
CFR AssociatedAir Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR