83 FR 51980 - Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices and Products Containing Same Notice of the Commission's Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 199 (October 15, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 199 (October 15, 2018)
| Page Range | 51980-51982 | |
| FR Document | 2018-22325 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 199 (Monday, October 15, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 51980-51982] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-22325] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-1046] Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices and Products Containing Same Notice of the Commission's Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 in this investigation and has issued a limited exclusion order prohibiting importation of infringing non-volatile memory devices and products containing the same and issued cease and desist orders directed to the domestic respondents Toshiba America, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3042. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205- 1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA- 1046 on April 12, 2017, based on a complaint filed by Macronix International Co., Ltd. of Hsin-chu, Taiwan and Macronix America, Inc. of Milpitas, California (collectively, ``Macronix''). 82 FR 17687-88 (Apr. 12, 2017). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the [[Page 51981]] importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain non-volatile memory devices and products containing the same that infringe one or more of claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 6,552,360 (``the '360 patent''); claims 1-12 and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,788,602 (``the '602 patent''); and claims 1-7, 11-16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,035,417 (``the '417 patent''). The notice of investigation named the following respondents: Toshiba Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Toshiba America, Inc. of New York, New York; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. of Irvine, California; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. of Irvine, California; and Toshiba Information Equipment (Philippines), Inc. of Binan, Philippines (collectively, ``Toshiba''). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is a party to the investigation. On June 16, 2017, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ's order (Order No. 11) granting an unopposed motion to amend the Notice of investigation to add Toshiba Memory Corporation of Tokyo, Japan as a respondent. See Order No. 11, Comm'n Notice of Non-Review (June 16, 2017). On October 17, 2017, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ's order (Order No. 20) granting an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation as to claims 11, 12, and 16 of the '602 patent. See Order No. 20, Comm'n Notice of Non-Review (Oct. 17, 2017). On October 4, 2017, the ALJ held a Markman hearing to construe certain disputed claim terms. On December 5, 2017, the ALJ issued Order No. 23 (Markman Order), setting forth her construction of the disputed claim terms. On January 18, 2018, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ's order (Order No. 24) granting an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation as to claims 1-7 and 18 of the '417 patent. Order No. 24; Comm'n Notice of Non-Review (Jan. 18, 2018). The ALJ held an evidentiary hearing from February 8, 2018, through February 14, 2018, and thereafter received post-hearing briefs. On April 27, 2018, the ALJ issued her final ID, finding no violation of section 337 by Toshiba in connection with the remaining claims, i.e., claims 1-8 of the '360 patent; claims 1-10 of the '602 patent; and claims 11-16 of the '417 patent. Specifically, the ALJ found that the Commission has subject matter jurisdiction, in rem jurisdiction over the accused products, and in personam jurisdiction over Toshiba. ID at 15-17. The ALJ also found that Macronix satisfied the importation requirement of section 337 (19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(1)(B)). Id. The ALJ, however, found that the accused products do not infringe the asserted claims of the '360 patent and '417 patent. See ID at 19- 65, 118-130. The ALJ also found that Toshiba failed to establish that the asserted claims of the '417 patent are invalid for obviousness. ID at 132-141. Toshiba did not challenge the validity of the '360 patent. ID at 70. With respect to the '602 patent, the ALJ found that certain accused products infringe asserted claims 1-10, but that claims 1-5 and 7-10 are invalid for obviousness. ID at 71-88, 91-117. Finally, the ALJ found that Macronix failed to establish the existence of a domestic industry that practices the asserted patents under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(2) and also failed to show a domestic industry in the process of being established. See ID at 257-261, 288-294. On May 10, 2018, the ALJ issued her recommended determination on remedy and bonding. Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding (``RD''). The ALJ recommends that in the event the Commission finds a violation of section 337, the Commission should issue a limited exclusion order prohibiting the importation of Toshiba's accused products that infringe the asserted claims of the asserted patents. RD at 1-5. The ALJ also recommends issuance of cease and desist orders against the domestic Toshiba respondents based on the presence of commercially significant inventory in the United States. RD at 5. With respect to the amount of bond that should be posted during the period of Presidential review, the ALJ recommends that the Commission set a bond in the amount of 100 percent of entered value for Toshiba flash memory devices and solid state drives, and a bond in the amount of six percent of entered value for Toshiba PCs imported during the period of Presidential review. RD at 6-9. On May 14, 2018, Macronix filed a petition for review challenging the ID's finding of no violation of section 337. The IA also filed a petition for review that day, challenging the ID's finding that Macronix failed to establish a domestic industry in the process of being established and certain findings as to the '602 patent. Also on May 14, 2018, Toshiba filed a contingent petition for review of the ID ``in the event that the Commission decides to review the ID.'' On May 22, 2018, Macronix and Toshiba filed their respective responses to the petitions for review. On May 23, 2018, the IA filed a response to the private parties' petitions for review. The Chairman granted the IA's motion for leave to file the response one day late. On June 28, 2018, the Commission determined to review the final ID in part and requested the parties to brief certain issues. See 83 FR 31416-18 (July 5, 2018). Specifically, the Commission determined to review the following: (1) The finding that Macronix failed to satisfy the domestic industry requirement; and (2) the findings of infringement and invalidity as to the '602 patent. On July 12, 2018, the parties filed submissions to the Commission's questions and also briefed the issues of remedy, the public interest and bonding. On July 19, 2018, the parties filed responses to the initial submissions. Having examined the record of this investigation, including the final ID, and the parties' submissions, the Commission has determined to (1) reverse the ALJ's finding that the accused products do not directly infringe the asserted claims of the '602 patent; (2) affirm the ALJ's indirect infringement and invalidity findings as to the '602 patent; and (3) reverse the ALJ's finding that Macronix failed to establish a domestic industry in the process of being established. The Commission adopts the ID's findings to the extent they are not inconsistent with the Commission opinion issued herewith. The Commission action results in a violation of section 337 as to claim 6 of the '602 patent. Having found a violation of section 337 in this investigation, the Commission has determined that the appropriate form of relief is: (1) A limited exclusion order prohibiting the unlicensed entry of non- volatile memory devices and products containing the same that infringe claim 6 of the '602 patent that are manufactured by, or on behalf of, or are imported by or on behalf of Respondents or any of their affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries, agents, or other related business entities, or their successors or assigns, are excluded from entry for consumption into the United States, entry for consumption from a foreign-trade zone, or withdrawal from a warehouse for consumption, for the remaining term of the '602 patent except under license of the patent owner or as provided by law; and (2) cease and desist orders prohibiting domestic respondents Toshiba America, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. from conducting any of the following activities in the United States: Importing, selling, marketing, advertising, distributing, transferring [[Page 51982]] (except for exportation), and soliciting U.S. agents or distributors for, non-volatile memory device and products containing same covered by claim 6 of the '602 patent. The Commission has also determined that the public interest factors enumerated in section 337(d) and (f) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d) and (f)) do not preclude issuance of the limited exclusion order or cease and desist orders. Finally, the Commission has determined that a bond in the amount of 100 percent of entered value for Toshiba flash memory devices, solid-state drives, USB flash drives, and microcontroller units; and a bond in the amount of six percent of entered value for Toshiba personal computers, multi-function printers, and air conditioners is required to permit temporary importation during the period of Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) of products that are subject to the remedial orders. The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President and to the United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 9, 2018 Katherine Hiner, Supervisory Attorney. [FR Doc. 2018-22325 Filed 10-12-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
![51980 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2018 / Notices
needed to assist the regulatory authority information in your comment, you INTERNATIONAL TRADE
to determine the eligibility of an should be aware that your entire COMMISSION
applicant to conduct surface coal comment—including your personal
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1046]
mining operations on Federal lands. identifying information—may be made
DATES: Interested persons are invited to publicly available at any time. While Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices
submit comments on or before you can ask us in your comment to and Products Containing Same Notice
November 14, 2018. withhold your personal identifying of the Commission’s Final
ADDRESSES: Send written comments on information from public review, we Determination Finding a Violation of
this information collection request (ICR) cannot guarantee that we will be able to Section 337; Issuance of a Limited
to the Office of Management and do so. Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist
Budget’s Desk Officer for the Title of Collection: 30 CFR part 740— Orders; Termination of the
Department of the Interior by email at General Requirements for Surface Coal Investigation
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov; or via Mining and Reclamation Operations on
facsimile to (202) 395–5806. Please Federal Lands. AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
provide a copy of your comments to Commission.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0027.
John Trelease, Office of Surface Mining ACTION: Notice.
Abstract: Section 523 of the Surface
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1849 C
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Street NW, Mail Stop 4559, Washington,
1977 requires that a Federal lands the U.S. International Trade
DC 20240; or by email to jtrelease@
program be established to govern Commission has found a violation of
osmre.gov. Please reference OMB
surface coal mining and reclamation section 337 in this investigation and has
Control Number 1029–0027 in the
operations on Federal lands. The issued a limited exclusion order
subject line of your comments.
information is needed to assist the prohibiting importation of infringing
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To regulatory authority to determine the non-volatile memory devices and
request additional information about eligibility of an applicant to conduct products containing the same and
this ICR, contact John Trelease by email coal mining on Federal lands. issued cease and desist orders directed
at jtrelease@osmre.gov, or by telephone
Form Number: None. to the domestic respondents Toshiba
at (202) 208–2783. You may also view
Type of Review: Extension of a America, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
the ICR at http://www.reginfo.gov/
currently approved collection. Toshiba America Electronic
public/do/PRAMain.
Components, Inc. and Toshiba America
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In Respondents/Affected Public: Information Systems, Inc. The
accordance with the Paperwork Applicants for surface coal mine investigation is terminated.
Reduction Act of 1995, we provide the permits on Federal lands, and State
Regulatory Authorities. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
general public and other Federal
agencies with an opportunity to Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General
Total Estimated Number of Annual Counsel, U.S. International Trade
comment on new, proposed, revised, Respondents: 5 applicants and 5 States.
and continuing collections of Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Total Estimated Number of Annual Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
information. This helps us assess the Responses: 6 applicants and 6 States.
impact of our information collection 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential
requirements and minimize the public’s Estimated Completion Time per documents filed in connection with this
reporting burden. It also helps the Response: Varies from 1 to 244 hours for investigation are or will be available for
public understand our information applicants depending on the activity, inspection during official business
collection requirements and provides and 285 hours for each State regulatory hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
the requested data in the desired format. authority. Office of the Secretary, U.S.
A Federal Register notice with a 60- Total Estimated Number of Annual International Trade Commission, 500 E
day public comment period soliciting Burden Hours: 1,225 hours for Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
comments on this collection of applicants and 1,425 hours for States. telephone 202–205–2000. General
information was published on July 6, information concerning the Commission
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
2018 (83 FR 31567). No comments were may also be obtained by accessing its
obtain or retain a benefit.
received. internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
Frequency of Collection: Once. The public record for this investigation
We are again soliciting comments on
the proposed ICR that is described Total Estimated Annual Nonhour may be viewed on the Commission’s
below. We are especially interested in Burden Cost: $0. electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
public comment addressing the An agency may not conduct or edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
following issues: (1) Is the collection sponsor and a person is not required to persons are advised that information on
necessary to the proper functions of respond to a collection of information this matter can be obtained by
OSMRE; (2) is the estimate of burden unless it displays a currently valid OMB contacting the Commission’s TDD
accurate; (3) how might OSMRE control number. terminal on 202–205–1810.
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity Authority: The authorities for this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
of the information to be collected; and action are the Surface Mining Control Commission instituted Inv. No. 337–
(4) how might OSMRE minimize the and Reclamation Act of 1977, as TA–1046 on April 12, 2017, based on a
complaint filed by Macronix
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
burden of this collection on the amended (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.), and
respondents, including through the use the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 International Co., Ltd. of Hsin-chu,
of information technology. (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Taiwan and Macronix America, Inc. of
Comments that you submit in Milpitas, California (collectively,
response to this notice are a matter of John A. Trelease, ‘‘Macronix’’). 82 FR 17687–88 (Apr. 12,
public record. Before including your Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. 2017). The complaint alleges violations
address, phone number, email address, [FR Doc. 2018–22332 Filed 10–12–18; 8:45 am] of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
or other personal identifying BILLING CODE 4310–05–P as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:34 Oct 12, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_52179/page/1.svg)
![51982 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2018 / Notices
(except for exportation), and soliciting any applications for any other DEA The Government also submitted a
U.S. agents or distributors for, non- registrations.’’ Id. Certification of Registration History,
volatile memory device and products Regarding the Agency’s jurisdiction, which was sworn to on December 28,
containing same covered by claim 6 of the Show Cause Order alleged that 2017 by the Associate Chief of the
the ’602 patent. Registrant holds DEA Certificate of Registration and Program Support
The Commission has also determined Registration No. FR0024997, pursuant to Section. GX 1. In that Certification, she
that the public interest factors which he is authorized to dispense stated that DEA Registration No.
enumerated in section 337(d) and (f) (19 controlled substances as a practitioner FR0024997 ‘‘expires on April 30, 2018.’’
U.S.C. 1337(d) and (f)) do not preclude in schedules II through V at the Id. at 1. The Associate Chief further
issuance of the limited exclusion order registered address of Providence Family stated that ‘‘Phillip O. Rawlings, Jr.,
or cease and desist orders. Finally, the Physicians, 8833 Cottage Hill Road, M.D., has no other pending or valid
Commission has determined that a bond Mobile, Alabama. Id. The Order also DEA registration(s) in Alabama.’’ Id.
in the amount of 100 percent of entered alleged that this registration was set to According to the Agency’s current
value for Toshiba flash memory devices, expire by its terms on April 30, 2018. Id. registration records for Registrant, of
solid-state drives, USB flash drives, and The substantive ground for the which I take official notice,2 DEA
microcontroller units; and a bond in the proceeding set forth in the Show Cause Registration No. FR0024997 expired on
amount of six percent of entered value Order is that Registrant is ‘‘currently April 30, 2018, and he has not
for Toshiba personal computers, multi- without authority to practice medicine submitted an application to renew his
function printers, and air conditioners is or handle controlled substances in the registration or for any other registration
required to permit temporary State of Alabama, the state in which [he in the State of Alabama. Thus, I find
importation during the period of is] registered with the DEA’’ because that Registrant’s registration expired on
Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) Registrant’s Alabama Medical License April 30, 2018, and that there is no
of products that are subject to the and Alabama Controlled Substances application upon which to act.3
remedial orders. The Commission’s Certificate have been in ‘‘Inactive-By DEA has long held that ‘‘ ‘if a
orders and opinion were delivered to Request’’ status since December 31, registrant has not submitted a timely
the President and to the United States 2016 . Id. As a consequence, the Order renewal application prior to the
Trade Representative on the day of their alleged that ‘‘DEA must revoke your expiration date, then the registration
issuance. DEA registration.’’ Id. at 2. expires and there is nothing to revoke.’ ’’
The Show Cause Order notified Donald Brooks Reece II, M.D., 77 FR
The authority for the Commission’s
Registrant of his right to request a 35054, 35055 (2012) (quoting Ronald J.
determination is contained in section
hearing on the allegations or to submit Riegel, 63 FR 67312, 67133 (1998)); see
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
a written statement in lieu of a hearing, also Greg N. Rampey, D.O., 83 FR
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
the procedures for electing each option,
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
and the consequences for failing to elect 2 Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
either option. Id. (citing 21 CFR an agency ‘‘may take official notice of facts at any
210). stage in a proceeding—even in the final decision.’’
1301.43). The Order also notified
By order of the Commission. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Attorney General’s Manual on
Registrant of the opportunity to submit the Administrative Procedure Act 80 (1947) (Wm.
Issued: October 9, 2018 a corrective action plan. Id. at 2–3 W. Gaunt & Sons, Inc., Reprint 1979). In accordance
Katherine Hiner, (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C)). with the APA and DEA’s regulations, Registrant is
Supervisory Attorney. On April 26, 2018, my office received ‘‘entitled on timely request to an opportunity to
show to the contrary.’’ 5 U.S.C. 556(e); see also 21
[FR Doc. 2018–22325 Filed 10–12–18; 8:45 am] the Government’s Second Request for CFR 1316.59(e). To allow Registrant the opportunity
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Final Agency Action (SRFAA) 1 to refute the facts of which I take official notice,
describing Diversion Investigators’ Registrant may file a motion for reconsideration
attempts to serve the Show Cause Order within 15 calendar days of service of this order
which shall commence on the date this order is
and seeking a final order revoking
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Registrant’s registration. SRFAA, at 2, 6.
mailed.
3 As already noted, my Office received the
Drug Enforcement Administration Government’s Second Request for Final Agency
1 On January 10, 2018, the Government submitted Action on April 26, 2018. This filing arrived in my
a Request for Final Agency Action seeking to revoke office too late for me to issue a final decision and
Phillip O. Rawlings, Jr., M.D.; Decision Registrant’s same DEA registration based on an order before the registration would expire on April
and Order October 31, 2017 Order to Show Cause. GX 6. In 30, 2018. DEA regulation 21 CFR 1316.67 requires
that Request, the Government represented that that I issue a final order that takes effect not less
On March 8, 2018, the Acting Registrant did not request a hearing and ‘‘ha[d] not than 30 days from the date of publication in the
Assistant Administrator, Diversion otherwise corresponded or communicated with Federal Register unless the public interest
Control Division, Drug Enforcement DEA regarding the Order served on him . . . within necessitates an earlier effective date. The record
30 days of receipt of the Order.’’ Id. at 1–2. before me fails to include facts supporting a finding
Administration (DEA), issued an Order However, on February 6, 2018, the then-Acting that ‘‘the public interest in the matter necessitates
to Show Cause to Phillip O. Rawlings, Administrator issued an Order noting that, an earlier effective date.’’ 21 CFR 1316.67. Thus,
Jr., M.D. (Registrant), of Mobile, ‘‘although the Government is clearly in possession even if I had submitted a final order in this case
Alabama. The Show Cause Order of information suggesting that Registrant now lives to the Federal Register on the same day (April 26,
in California, it has offered no explanation for why 2018) that my office received the SRFAA to revoke
proposed the revocation of Registrant’s it did not attempt to obtain Registrant’s address Registrant’s registration, I could not have issued an
DEA Certificate of Registration No. from the Board of Medical Examiners and serve order that would have taken effect by April 30, 2018
FR0024997 on the ground that he has Registrant at that address.’’ GX 7, at 1. As a result, because the Federal Register would not have been
‘‘no state authority to handle controlled the then-Administrator denied the Government’s able to publish it 30 days before the registration’s
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Request for Final Agency Action without prejudice. April 30, 2018 expiration. And as the Agency has
substances.’’ Order to Show Cause, Id. at 2. See also SRFAA, at 1–2. By that time, the previously noted, there is no point in issuing a
Government Exhibit (GX) 8, at 1 (citing December 26, 2017 hearing date listed in the 2017 ruling on a Show Cause Order where, as here, that
21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3)). For the same Show Cause Order had passed. SRFAA, at 2 n.1. As ruling would constitute an advisory opinion subject
reason, the Order also proposed the a result, the Agency issued the pending Show Cause to vacation on judicial review. See, e.g., Josip Pasic,
Order on March 8, 2018, with a new hearing date M.D., 82 FR 24146, 24147 (2017) (‘‘As the requested
denial of any of Registrant’s of April 24, 2018. Id.; GX 8, at 1. It is this new Show factual findings and legal conclusions would be
‘‘applications for renewal or Cause Order for which the Government now seeks subject to vacation on judicial review, there is no
modification of such registration and final agency action. point in making them.’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:34 Oct 12, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_52179/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-13 10:05:45
Document Modified: 2018-10-13 10:05:45
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Contact | Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3042. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205- 1810. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 51980 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR