83 FR 53814 - Safety Zone; Allegheny River, Miles 0.25 to 0.7, Pittsburgh, PA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 207 (October 25, 2018)

Page Range		53814-53816
FR Document		2018-23301

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for all navigable waters of the Allegheny River from mile 0.25 to mile 0.7. This safety zone is necessary to protect persons, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards associated with low flying aircraft over the Allegheny River. Entry of persons or vessels into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 207 (Thursday, October 25, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 207 (Thursday, October 25, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53814-53816]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0986]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Allegheny River, Miles 0.25 to 0.7, Pittsburgh, PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
all navigable waters of the Allegheny River from mile 0.25 to mile 0.7. 
This safety zone is necessary to protect persons, vessels, and the 
marine environment from potential hazards associated with low flying 
aircraft over the Allegheny River. Entry of persons or vessels into 
this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from October 25, 
2018 through noon on November 5, 2018. For the purposes of enforcement, 
actual notice will be used from 6 a.m. on October 22, 2018 through 
October 25, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0986 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Petty Officer Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit 
Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 412-221-0807, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that it is 
``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' 
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists 
for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect 
to this rule because it is impracticable. This safety zone must be 
established as early as October 22, 2018, and we lack sufficient time 
to provide a reasonable comment period and then consider those comments 
before issuing this rule. The NPRM process would delay the 
establishment of the safety zone until after the aircraft operation.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying this rule would be 
contrary to the public interest because immediate action is necessary 
to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with low flying 
aircraft over the Allegheny River.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh (COTP) has 
determined that potential hazards associated with low flying aircraft 
will be a safety hazard for anyone within a one half-mile stretch of 
the Allegheny River. The rule is needed to protect persons, vessels, 
and the marine environment on the navigable waters within the safety 
zone before, during, and after the aircraft operation.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary safety zone from 6 a.m. on 
October 22, 2018 through noon on November 5, 2018. The safety zone will 
cover all navigable waters of the Allegheny River, from mile 0.25 to 
mile 0.7. The safety zone will be enforced only on one day during the 
effective period, from 6 a.m. through noon. The COTP or a designated 
representative would inform the public through Broadcast Notices to 
Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/or Marine Safety 
Information Bulletins (MSIBs), and/or other means of public notice, as 
appropriate, at least 24 hours in advance of the enforcement period. 
The duration of the zone is intended to protect persons, vessels, and 
the marine environment on these navigable waters before, during, and 
after a low-flying aircraft operation. No vessel or person will be 
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from 
the COTP or a designated representative. A designated representative is 
a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard 
assigned to units under the operational control of USCG Marine Safety 
Unit Pittsburgh. Persons and vessels seeking entry into this safety 
zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated 
representative. They may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16 or by 
telephone at (412) 221-0807. Persons and vessels permitted to enter 
this safety zone must transit at their slowest safe speed and comply 
with all lawful instructions of the COTP or a designated 
representative. The COTP or a designated representative will inform the 
public of the enforcement period for the safety zone as well as any 
changes in the schedule through Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), 
Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/or Marine Safety Information 
Bulletins (MSIBs), as appropriate.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, and duration of the temporary safety zone. This regulation 
will impact vessel traffic on a less than one-half mile stretch the 
Allegheny River for six hours on one morning. Moreover, the Coast Guard

[[Page 53815]]

will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 
about the zone, and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter 
the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
temporary safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in 
section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the 
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This regulation 
will impact vessel traffic on a less than one-half mile stretch the 
Allegheny River for six hours on one morning. It is categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, 
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of 
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available 
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0986 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T08-0986  Safety Zone; Allegheny River, miles 0.25 to 0.7, 
Pittsburgh, PA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable 
waters of the Allegheny River from mile 0.25 to mile 0.7.
    (b) Effective period. This section is effective from 6 a.m. on 
October 22, 2018 through noon on November 5, 2018.
    (c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced on one day 
during the effective period from 6 a.m. through noon. The Captain of 
the Port Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated 
representative will inform the public as provided in subsection (e) at 
least 24 hours in advance of the enforcement period.
    (d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by 
the COTP or a designated representative. A designated representative is 
a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard 
assigned to units under the operational control of USCG Marine Safety 
Unit Pittsburgh.
    (2) Persons and vessels seeking entry into this safety zone must 
request permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They 
may be

[[Page 53816]]

contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16 or by telephone at (412) 221-0807.
    (3) Persons and vessels permitted to enter this safety zone must 
transit at their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful 
instructions of the COTP or a designated representative.
    (e) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated 
representative will inform the public of the enforcement period for the 
safety zone as well as any changes in the schedule through Broadcast 
Notices to Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/or 
Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs) as appropriate.

    Dated: October 19, 2018.
A.W. Demo,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit 
Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2018-23301 Filed 10-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 53815

will issue a Broadcast Notice to D. Federalism and Indian Tribal supporting this determination is
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel Governments available in the docket where indicated
16 about the zone, and the rule allows A rule has implications for federalism under ADDRESSES.
vessels to seek permission to enter the under Executive Order 13132, G. Protest Activities
zone. Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
The Coast Guard respects the First
B. Impact on Small Entities effect on the States, on the relationship
Amendment rights of protesters.
between the national government and
Protesters are asked to contact the
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of the States, or on the distribution of
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, power and responsibilities among the
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
requires Federal agencies to consider various levels of government. We have
coordinate protest activities so that your
the potential impact of regulations on analyzed this rule under that Order and
message can be received without
small entities during rulemaking. The have determined that it is consistent
jeopardizing the safety or security of
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small with the fundamental federalism
people, places or vessels.
businesses, not-for-profit organizations principles and preemption requirements
that are independently owned and described in Executive Order 13132. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
operated and are not dominant in their Also, this rule does not have tribal Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
fields, and governmental jurisdictions implications under Executive Order (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
with populations of less than 50,000. 13175, Consultation and Coordination requirements, Security measures,
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. With Indian Tribal Governments, Waterways.
605(b) that this rule will not have a because it does not have a substantial For the reasons discussed in the
significant economic impact on a direct effect on one or more Indian preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
substantial number of small entities. tribes, on the relationship between the CFR part 165 as follows:
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
While some owners or operators of or on the distribution of power and PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
vessels intending to transit the responsibilities between the Federal AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
temporary safety zone may be small Government and Indian tribes. If you
entities, for the reasons stated in section believe this rule has implications for ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
V.A above, this rule will not have a federalism or Indian tribes, please continues to read as follows:
significant economic impact on any contact the person listed in the FOR Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
vessel owner or operator. FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Under section 213(a) of the Small above. Department of Homeland Security Delegation
Business Regulatory Enforcement No. 0170.1.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), ■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0986 to read as
we want to assist small entities in The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act follows:
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
understanding this rule. If the rule § 165.T08–0986 Safety Zone; Allegheny
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
would affect your small business, River, miles 0.25 to 0.7, Pittsburgh, PA.
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
organization, or governmental (a) Location. The following area is a
particular, the Act addresses actions
jurisdiction and you have questions that may result in the expenditure by a safety zone: All navigable waters of the
concerning its provisions or options for State, local, or tribal government, in the Allegheny River from mile 0.25 to mile
compliance, please contact the person aggregate, or by the private sector of 0.7.
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or (b) Effective period. This section is
CONTACT section. more in any one year. Though this rule effective from 6 a.m. on October 22,
Small businesses may send comments will not result in such an expenditure, 2018 through noon on November 5,
on the actions of Federal employees we do discuss the effects of this rule 2018.
who enforce, or otherwise determine elsewhere in this preamble. (c) Enforcement period. This section
compliance with, Federal regulations to will be enforced on one day during the
F. Environment effective period from 6 a.m. through
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman We have analyzed this rule under noon. The Captain of the Port Marine
and the Regional Small Business Department of Homeland Security Safety Unit Pittsburgh (COTP) or a
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Directive 023–01 and Commandant designated representative will inform
Ombudsman evaluates these actions Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the the public as provided in subsection (e)
annually and rates each agency’s Coast Guard in complying with the at least 24 hours in advance of the
responsiveness to small business. If you National Environmental Policy Act of enforcement period.
wish to comment on actions by 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have (d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
determined that this action is one of a with the general regulations in § 165.23,
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
category of actions that do not entry into this zone is prohibited unless
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
individually or cumulatively have a authorized by the COTP or a designated
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
significant effect on the human representative. A designated
small entities that question or complain environment. This regulation will representative is a commissioned,
about this rule or any policy or action impact vessel traffic on a less than one- warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
of the Coast Guard. half mile stretch the Allegheny River for Coast Guard assigned to units under the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

C. Collection of Information six hours on one morning. It is operational control of USCG Marine
categorically excluded from further Safety Unit Pittsburgh.
This rule will not call for a new review under paragraph L60(a) of (2) Persons and vessels seeking entry
collection of information under the Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction into this safety zone must request
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A permission from the COTP or a
U.S.C. 3501–3520). Record of Environmental Consideration designated representative. They may be

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:53 Oct 24, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM 25OCR1

53816 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

contacted on VHF–FM Channel 16 or by DATES: This final rule is effective on 420.02(39), NR 420.03(4)(b)3, NR
telephone at (412) 221–0807. November 26, 2018. 420.04(1)(b)4, and NR 420.04(3)(c)1.
(3) Persons and vessels permitted to ADDRESSES: EPA has established a EPA is also approving the withdrawal
enter this safety zone must transit at docket for this action under Docket ID of several remaining provisions from the
their slowest safe speed and comply No. EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0279. All Wisconsin SIP that are related to the
with all lawful instructions of the COTP documents in the docket are listed in Stage II vapor recovery program that
or a designated representative. the http://www.regulations.gov website. was terminated by Wisconsin in 2012.
(e) Informational broadcasts. The Although listed in the index, some Wisconsin originally submitted a SIP
COTP or a designated representative information is not publicly available, revision to EPA on November 18, 1992,
will inform the public of the e.g., Confidential Business Information to satisfy the requirement of section
enforcement period for the safety zone or other information whose disclosure is 182(b)(3) of the CAA. The revision
as well as any changes in the schedule restricted by statute. Certain other applied to Kenosha, Kewanee,
through Broadcast Notices to Mariners material, such as copyrighted material, Manitowoc, Milwaukee, Ozaukee,
(BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners is not placed on the internet and will be Racine, Sheboygan, Washington and
(LNMs), and/or Marine Safety publicly available only in hard copy Waukesha counties, and was
Information Bulletins (MSIBs) as form. Publicly available docket incorporated into the WDNR’s 1993–94
appropriate. materials are available either through ozone 15% Control Plan. EPA fully
Dated: October 19, 2018. http://www.regulations.gov, or please approved Wisconsin’s Stage II program
A.W. Demo, contact the person identified in the FOR on August 13, 1993 (53 FR 43080),
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
including the program’s legal authority
the Port Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh. for additional availability information. and administrative requirements found
in Section 285.31 of the Wisconsin
[FR Doc. 2018–23301 Filed 10–24–18; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Statutes and Chapter NR 420.045 of the
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Francisco J. Acevedo, Mobile Source
Wisconsin Administrative Code.
Program Manager, Control Strategies On November 12, 2012, WDNR
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR 18J), submitted a SIP revision requesting the
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Environmental Protection Agency, removal of Stage II requirements under
AGENCY Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, NR 420.045 of the Wisconsin
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6061, Administrative Code from the
40 CFR Part 52 acevedo.francisco@epa.gov. Wisconsin SIP. To support the removal
[EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0279; FRL–9985–30– SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of the Stage II requirements, the revision
Region 5] Throughout this document, wherever included a section 110(l) demonstration
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean addressing the emissions impacts
Approval and Promulgation of Air EPA. associated with the removal of the
Quality Implementation Plans;
I. What is being addressed by this program. On November 4, 2013 (78 FR
Wisconsin; VOC Definition Update and
document? 65875), EPA approved the removal of
Removal of Obsolete Gasoline Vapor
the Stage II requirements under NR
Recovery Regulations On May 25, 2018, at 83 FR 24267, 420.045 of the Wisconsin
AGENCY: Environmental Protection EPA proposed to approve a revision to Administrative Code from the
Agency (EPA). the Wisconsin SIP that updates the Wisconsin SIP. In this action EPA
definition of VOC at Wisconsin approves the removal of the residual
ACTION: Final rule.
Administrative Code Chapter NR Stage II provisions that remained in
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 400.02(162) to add the following place after the program was
Agency (EPA) is approving a request compounds to the list of exclusions at decommissioned. These provisions are
submitted by the Wisconsin Department NR 400.02(162): Trans-1,3,3,3- NR 420.02(8m), 420.02(26), 420.02(32),
of Natural Resources (WDNR) on May tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234ze), 420.02(38m), NR 425.035, NR
16, 2017, to revise the Wisconsin State HCF2OCF2H (HFE-134), 439.06(3)(i), NR 484.05(4), NR 484.05(5),
Implementation Plan (SIP). The HCF2OCF2OCF2H (HFE-236cal2), and NR 494.04.
submission includes amendments to the HCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (HFE-338pcc13),
Wisconsin Administrative Code HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (H-Galaden II. What comments did we receive on
updating the definition of ‘‘volatile 1040X or H-Galden ZT 130 (or 150 or the proposed SIP revision?
organic compound (VOC)’’ to add eight 180), Trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-triflouroprop- Our May 25, 2018 proposed rule
compounds to the list of exempt 1-ene (SolsticeTM 1233zd(E)), 2,3,3,3- provided a 30-day review and comment
compounds. In addition, WDNR is also tetraflouropropene (HFO-1234yf), and 2- period. The comment period closed on
requesting the withdrawal of several amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP; CAS June 25, 2018. EPA received one
previously approved provisions of the number 124–68–5). Wisconsin took this comment during the public comment
Wisconsin Administrative Code from action based on EPA’s 2012, 2013, and period, but the comment was
the SIP concerning the State’s Stage II 2014 rulemakings in which EPA completely outside of the scope of this
vapor recovery (Stage II) program that determined that these compounds have approval and, therefore, is not being
terminated in 2012. EPA approved the a negligible contribution to tropospheric addressed as part of this final action.
removal of the Stage II program as a ozone formation and thus should be
component of the Wisconsin SIP in excluded from the definition of VOC III. What action is EPA taking?
2013, including the approval of a codified at 40 CFR 51.100(s). See 77 FR EPA is approving the revision to the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

demonstration under section 110(l) of 37610 (June 22, 2012); 78 FR 9823 Wisconsin SIP submitted by WDNR on
the Clean Air Act (CAA) that addressed (February 12, 2013); 78 FR 62451 May 16, 2017, because the revision is
emissions impacts associated with the (October 22, 2013); 78 FR 53029 (August consistent with EPA’s prior actions
removal of the program. EPA proposed 28, 2013); and 79 FR 17037 (March 27, revising the definition of VOC. In
to approve the State’s submittal on May 2014). This action also approves minor addition, the removal of remaining
25, 2018. stylistic edits for clarity in NR Stage II program provisions from the SIP

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:53 Oct 24, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM 25OCR1

Document Created: 2018-10-25 01:45:49
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 01:45:49

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from October 25, 2018 through noon on November 5, 2018. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 6 a.m. on October 22, 2018 through October 25, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 412-221-0807, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 53814
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 53814 - Safety Zone; Allegheny River, Miles 0.25 to 0.7, Pittsburgh, PA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 207 (October 25, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard