83_FR_5728 83 FR 5700 - Airworthiness Directives; Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. Pitot Probes

83 FR 5700 - Airworthiness Directives; Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. Pitot Probes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 28 (February 9, 2018)

Page Range5700-5705
FR Document2018-02550

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Rosemount Aerospace Model 851AK pitot probes that were repaired by CSI Aerospace, Inc. between January 2013 and July 2014 that are installed on airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that certain pitot probes are indicating the wrong airspeed during flight. This AD requires inspecting the airplane to determine the number of affected pitot probes installed and replacing the affected pitot probes. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 28 (Friday, February 9, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5700-5705]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-6616; Product Identifier 2016-CE-004-AD; Amendment 
39-19177; AD 2018-03-04]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. Pitot Probes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
Rosemount Aerospace Model 851AK pitot probes that were repaired by CSI 
Aerospace, Inc. between January 2013 and July 2014 that are installed 
on airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report that certain pitot 
probes are indicating the wrong airspeed during flight. This AD 
requires inspecting the airplane to determine the number of affected 
pitot probes installed and replacing the affected pitot probes. We are 
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective March 16, 2018.

[[Page 5701]]

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
6616; or in person at the Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    The AD docket contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, 
any comments received, and other information. The street address for 
Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-5527) is U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Kim, Aerospace Engineer, Fort 
Worth ACO Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177-
1524; telephone: (817) 222-5131; fax: (817) 222-5245; email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to Rosemount Aerospace Model 
851AK pitot probes that were repaired by CSI Aerospace, Inc. between 
January 2013 and July 2014 that are installed on airplanes. The NPRM 
was published in the Federal Register on May 11, 2016 (81 FR 29193). 
The NPRM was prompted by a report that certain pitot probes are 
indicating the wrong airspeed during flight. The NPRM proposed to 
require inspecting the airplane to determine the number of affected 
pitot probes installed and replacing the affected pitot probes. We are 
issuing this AD to prevent incorrect airspeed indications during 
flight, which could lead to loss of control. Due to design redundancy, 
this is only applicable if more than one deficient probe is installed.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and 
the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the AD

    Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) supported the 
proposed AD as written.
    We have not changed this AD action based on this comment.

Request To Revise the Description of the Unsafe Condition

    Andy Feely of CSI Aerospace, Inc. (CSI) stated that they do not 
have any data which confirms that the inaccurate airspeed occurred 
during flight ``in icing conditions.''
    The commenter also stated that in the proposed AD, in the Summary, 
Discussion, and paragraph (e) Unsafe Condition sections, several 
references are made to the reported problem occurring ``in icing 
conditions.'' CSI does not have any data to support this statement. 
This statement is inconsistent with the field data that CSI has been 
able to collect. CSI has communicated with affected operators and has 
been unable to confirm experiences of inaccurate airspeed reporting 
during flight ``in icing conditions.'' CSI has a service difficulty 
report (SDR) where the airplane had varying airspeed indications from 
the airspeed indication systems (pitot probes), however, it does not 
contain a report of icing conditions.
    The commenter requested removing all references to ``icing 
conditions'' throughout the final rule AD action.
    We partially agree with the commenter. We agree to remove the 
language ``icing conditions'' from the Summary, Discussion, and 
paragraph (e) of the AD because the SDR report that prompted the AD 
action does not provide meteorological conditions. However, we disagree 
that icing conditions do not contribute to the unsafe condition. There 
is evidence that the migrated braze material may present a non-
conforming, forward facing surface inside the pitot throat on which ice 
crystals may accumulate when they make contact and could lead to the 
incorrect airspeed indications.
    We have changed the AD as indicated above.

Request To Clarify Summary

    Andy Feely of CSI stated that there is a specific time period that 
the affected pitot probes were repaired by CSI.
    The commenter requested that the specific time period of between 
January 2013 and July 2014 be added in the Summary section of the final 
rule AD action to clarify the applicability of the affected pitot 
probes and to be consistent with the dates in the Discussion section of 
the proposed AD.
    We agree with the commenter. We have changed this AD action based 
on this comment.

Request To Revise the FAA's Determination Section

    Andy Feely of CSI stated that the FAA's Determination section in 
the proposed AD does not accurately reflect the scope of the unsafe 
condition. It implies a more widespread problem. Through CSI's 
immediate actions taken, once notified of the initial report (March 
2014), all suspect serial numbers of the affected pitot probes were 
identified and located. All affected customers were notified and were 
provided instructions to inspect, scrap, return and/or replace the 
suspect probes. The commenter also stated that it is his opinion that 
this condition is not ``likely to exist or develop in other products of 
the same type design'' because the probes were located, contained, and 
monitored.
    The commenter requested a revision to this section to more 
accurately indicate the scope of the unsafe condition.
    We do not agree with the commenter. In 14 CFR, section 39.5, the 
FAA is required to issue an AD when we find that an unsafe condition 
exists in a product and the condition is likely to exist or develop in 
other products of the same type design. We have determined that this AD 
meets these requirements.
    We have not changed this AD action based on this comment.

Request To Revise the Applicability Section

    Andy Feely of CSI stated that the Applicability section should 
include a statement to clarify the time period to narrow the actual 
scope of the problem and to be consistent with the dates stated in the 
Discussion section of the proposed AD. The commenter also stated that 
pitot probes re-repaired after August 1, 2014, are no longer part of 
the affected probes.
    The commenter requested that paragraph (c) of the final rule AD be 
revised to add the specific time period the affected probes were 
repaired by CSI and to specify the serial numbers of pitot probes 
repaired after August 1, 2014, which are no longer part of the affected 
probes.
    We partially agree with the commenter. We agree with including a 
statement in the Applicability section that suspect probes that were 
re-repaired by CSI Aerospace, Inc. after August 1, 2014, are not at 
risk because corrective actions have been taken to address the unsafe 
condition. We have changed the final rule AD action to add the serial 
numbers of the re-repaired probes to the Applicability section. Because 
we are relaxing the requirement to allow probes to be re-repaired after 
August 2014 and CSI is confident that these probes were re-repaired 
after August 2014, this does not add any additional burden to 
operators.

[[Page 5702]]

    We disagree with removing the serial numbers of re-repaired pitot 
probes from the Applicability section because we do not want to omit 
serial numbers from the final rule AD action based on claims that 
affected parts are already in compliance with the actions of the 
proposed AD. The original list of serial numbers provided in the 
proposed AD did not include serial numbers of re-repaired probes, but 
we have added them to the final rule AD action. Again, adding these 
serial numbers does not impose a burden on the public and this AD only 
documents those serial numbers that originally had the unsafe 
condition. All airplanes that had probes previously repaired would not 
be subject to any actions of this AD other than the requirement to 
assure that no suspect probe is installed in the future.
    We have not changed this AD action based on this part of the 
comment.

Request To Correct Serial Number of Affect Pitot Probe

    Andy Feely of CSI stated that the serial number of pitot probe 
88912 in the proposed AD is incorrect.
    The commenter requested the serial number be corrected to 88192 in 
the final rule AD action.
    We agree with the commenter and have changed this AD action based 
on this comment.

Request To Allow Maintenance Records Review

    Andy Feely of CSI and Ryan Hall of Delta Air Lines stated that 
operators who have serial number traceability of the affected pitot 
probes fully documented in their maintenance records should be 
permitted to do a records review in order to determine location and 
number of affected probes installed on their airplane(s).
    The commenters requested that paragraph (g) of the final rule AD 
action be changed to include a review of the maintenance records in 
lieu of a physical inspection of the airplane if the serial number and 
repair date of the pitot probe can be positively identified.
    We agree with the commenter. Many operators keep thorough 
maintenance records that make it possible to positively identify the 
serial number of the affected probe and the repair date from a review 
their maintenance records.
    We have changed this AD action based on this comment.

Request To Clarify Compliance

    Andy Feely of CSI stated it is not initially clear to owners/
operators who have determined, either through inspection of the 
airplane, through maintenance records review, or that action was 
already taken before the effective date of this AD to assure that no 
more than one affected probe remains on the airplane and that two out 
of the three pitot probes installed on their airplane are not affected 
are in compliance with certain portions of the proposed AD.
    The commenter requested an additional statement be added to 
paragraph (g) of the final rule AD action to clarify that no further 
action is required except for the ongoing requirement in paragraph 
(h)(2) of this final rule AD action if airplane inspection or 
maintenance records review reveals that no more than one affected probe 
remains on the airplane.
    We agree with the commenter and have changed this AD action based 
on this comment.

Request To Clarify Replacement Requirement

    Andy Feely of CSI stated that in the proposed AD it is unclear when 
the replacement of the affected pitot probes is required.
    The commenter requested to have the words ``after the effective 
date of this AD'' removed from paragraph (h)(1) of the final rule AD 
action.
    We do not agree with the commenter. If it is determined that the 
pitot probes are required to be replaced, as specified in paragraph 
(h)(1) of the proposed AD, the operator will have two months after the 
effective date of the final rule AD action to do so.
    We have not changed this AD action based on this comment.

Request To Remove Certain Pitot Probes From the Applicability

    Andy Feely of CSI stated that as a result of the aggressive 
voluntary corrective action plan by CSI and the airlines, the serial 
number listing of the affected pitot probes has been greatly reduced.
    The commenter stated that robust traceability by serial number, 
delivery date, and customer, have allowed CSI and its customers the 
ability to proactively remove the affected probes for re-repair or 
scrap. CSI maintains very tight coordination with the affected 
customers and is aware of the status of all affected pitot probes.
    The commenter has requested that many of the pitot probes listed in 
the Applicability section be removed from the final rule AD action.
    We do not agree with the commenter. We disagree with removing the 
serial numbers of re-repaired or scrapped pitot probes from the 
Applicability section of the final rule AD action because we do not 
want to omit serial numbers based on claims that affected parts are 
already in compliance. We acknowledge that CSI has made significant 
efforts to remove all affected pitot probes from the fleet and to 
communicate their efforts to the FAA; however, after their effort was 
complete, approximately 100 pitot probes could not be accounted for.
    We have not changed this AD action based on this comment.

Request To Extend Compliance Time for Replacement

    Robert Holcomb of American Airlines stated that the final rule AD 
should take into account the burden of costs associated with acquiring 
additional spares to meet the two-month replacement compliance time.
    The commenter stated that American Airlines owns 197 of the 
affected pitot probes. Of the 197 affected pitot probes, 83 are on 
active airplanes and 21 of those have been re-repaired. The commenter 
also stated that American Airlines has not had any failures of the 
affected pitot probes and currently has 87 active airplanes with 
potential to have an affected pitot probe installed.
    The commenter requested increasing the replacement compliance time 
to 6 months based on lack of failures on the MD80 fleet, current spare 
constraints, and turnaround time of re-repaired pitot probes.
    We do not agree with the commenter. We received a report about 
erroneous airspeed data being transmitted from multiple Rosemount 
Aerospace Model 851AK pitot probes repaired by CSI when installed on a 
Boeing Aircraft Company Model B717 airplane. Because we cannot say with 
certainty when or where this unsafe condition will manifest in the 
pitot probe, we are unable to increase the replacement compliance time 
to six months without additional justification. If operators have 
substantiating data to demonstrate that an acceptable level of safety 
has been met with a change in compliance time or other changes to this 
AD, we will consider an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to the 
final rule AD action on a case by case basis. We do not provide costs 
beyond initial work hours and parts costs. Therefore, accounting for 
costs associated with acquiring spares is beyond the scope of our 
policy.
    We have not changed this AD action based on this comment.

Request To Clarify Exclusion of Certain Pitot Probes From the 
Applicability

    Ryan Hall of Delta Air Lines stated that it is not clear in the 
Applicability section of the proposed AD that pitot

[[Page 5703]]

probes repaired by CSI on or after August 1, 2014, are not part of the 
applicability.
    The commenter stated that paragraph (c) of proposed rule AD applies 
to pitot probes that were repaired by CSI and have a serial number 
listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD that are known to be installed on 
aircraft. However, paragraph (h)(3) of the proposed AD contains the 
phrase, `unless it has been repaired by CSI and has a date of August 1, 
2014, or later.
    The commenter requested that the Applicability section of the final 
rule AD action be revised to include the statement excluding pitot 
probes repaired by CSI Aerospace, Inc. after August 1, 2014, from the 
applicability.
    We agree with the commenter and have changed this AD action based 
on this comment.

Request To Add Removal Requirement

    Ralph Isaacson stated that the laser etching, which identifies the 
manufacturer and serial number, is eventually worn off by environmental 
conditions, usage, and age.
    The commenter stated that in some instances the pitot probes will 
require removal from the fuselage to clearly identify the mechanically 
stamped serial number at the inner base of the probe.
    The commenter requested that a requirement for removing the pitot 
probes in order to identify the overhauled pitot probes serial numbers 
should be added to the final rule AD action.
    We partially agree with the commenter. We agree with the 
possibility that the serial number may not be legible on the outside of 
the pitot probe because of environmental conditions, usage, age, etc. 
However, we disagree with adding a requirement to remove the pitot 
probe during every inspection. If the serial number is legible from the 
outside of the pitot probe, this may add an unnecessary burden to the 
operators. Also, some operators are capable of positively identifying 
the serial number of the affected pitot probe and the repair date from 
a review of maintenance records. We have not changed this AD action 
based on this comment.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial 
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the 
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the 
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 679 products installed on 
airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Cost per      Cost on U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts  cost       product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect to determine the number of   1 work-hour x $85 per hour              N/A             N/A         $57,715
 defective pitot probes installed     = $85.
 on the airplane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements 
that will be required based on the results of the inspection. We have 
no way of determining the number of airplanes that might need these 
replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Cost per
                   Action                                 Labor cost                Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace defective pitot probe..............  1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85...          $6,750          $6,835
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the 
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by 
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is 
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but 
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the 
authority to issue ADs applicable to small airplanes, gliders, 
balloons, airships, domestic business jet transport airplanes, and 
associated appliances to the Director of the Policy and Innovation 
Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

[[Page 5704]]

    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

2018-03-04 Rosemount Aerospace, Inc.: Amendment 39-19177; Docket No. 
FAA-2016-6616; Product Identifier 2016-CE-004-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective March 16, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. Model 851AK pitot 
probes that were repaired by CSI Aerospace Inc. and have a serial 
number listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD that are known to be 
installed on but not limited to the airplanes listed in paragraph 
(c)(2) of this AD. Pitot probes that were repaired by CSI Aerospace 
Inc. that have a repair date of August 1, 2014, or later, are 
excluded from the applicability.
    (1) 24352, 53257, 61568, 68168, 69913, 69953, 71007, 71802, 
71820, 73010, 73406, 75549, 75555, 80489, 80491, 83809, 84200, 
84495, 84911, 84922, 85317, 85731, 87225, 87234, 87235, 87241, 
87272, 87512, 87551, 87909, 88192, 88622, 90538, 91606, 93291, 
93292, 93293, 93305, 93941, 93948, 93960, 94258, 94304, 94559, 
94814, 94819, 95150, 95849, 97405, 98194, 99498, 99509, 100105, 
100111, 100127, 100313, 100741, 101374, 101500, 102037, 102054, 
102309, 102502, 104604, 106134, 106139, 106381, 106905, 107251, 
107405, 107406, 107450, 107887, 108174, 108302, 108858, 108859, 
108967, 108970, 109119, 109122, 109124, 109128, 109383, 109393, 
109394, 109467, 109474, 109488, 109521, 109524, 109537, 109577, 
109795, 109798, 109799, 109808, 109810, 109946, 109954, 109958, 
109962, 109996, 110323, 110324, 110327, 110338, 110611, 110626, 
110880, 110895, 110956, 111061, 111066, 111315, 111320, 111432, 
111561, 111571, 111578, 111802, 111807, 112229, 112280, 112343, 
112497, 112646, 112657, 112677, 112779, 112781, 112783, 112979, 
112993, 113025, 113026, 113129, 113151, 113382, 113721, 113758, 
113837, 113838, 113843, 113845, 113920, 113934, 114130, 114147, 
114152, 114157, 114223, 114239, 114376, 114572, 114813, 114869, 
114872, 114959, 114962A, 114966, 115428, 115713, 116046, 116249, 
116253, 116255, 116271, 116424, 116557, 116734, 116792, 116994, 
117022, 117144, 117164, 117310, 117412, 117414, 117426, 117427, 
117428, 117587, 117961, 118111, 118119, 118234, 118331, 118637, 
118639, 118770, 118938, 119115, 119281, 119290, 119414, 119441, 
119496, 119587, 119593, 119694, 119695, 119737, 119852, 120456, 
120461, 120728, 120823, 120825, 120826, 120829, 121040, 121041, 
121110, 121116, 121145, 121172, 121320, 121322, 121524, 121661, 
121834, 121852, 122286, 122662, 122843,122934, 122935, 123286, 
123289, 123330, 123745, 123746, 123753, 123767, 124144, 124385, 
124390, 124396, 124890, 125016, 125021, 125077, 125163, 125174, 
126785, 127449, 127894, 127899, 128302, 128307, 129503, 130371, 
130377, 130688, 131422, 131423, 131752, 132065, 132067, 132297, 
132825, 133103, 133161, 133220, 133291, 133310, 133313, 133394, 
133396, 133512, 133521, 134100, 134102, 134403, 134535, 134537, 
134639, 134675, 134681, 135136, 135234, 135246, 135250, 135554, 
135561, 135568, 135735, 135743, 136075, 136208, 137049, 137398, 
137543, 137544, 137642, 139076, 139081, 139433, 139444, 139691, 
139694, 139759, 139763, 139971, 139976, 140188, 140563, 140565, 
140643, 140649, 140650, 141161, 141356, 141362, 141497, 141501, 
141605, 141607, 142426, 142765, 142774, 142775, 143070, 143405, 
143409, 143411, 143418, 143816, 143818, 143988, 143992, 143999, 
144591, 144814, 144816, 144976, 144977, 146116, 146835, 147421, 
148524, 148765, 148777, 149460, 149464, 149510, 149941, 150196, 
150206, 150211, 150212, 150214, 150542, 150725, 151077, 151086, 
151095, 151493, 152097, 152819, 152922, 152969, 152974, 152981, 
153232, 153233, 153453, 153454, 153625, 153628, 153635, 153641, 
153956, 153962, 153966, 153984, 154007, 154156, 154704, 154721, 
154738, 154741, 155003, 155042, 155045, 155238, 155278, 155517, 
156022, 156025, 156222, 156526, 156529, 156672, 157023, 157137, 
157143, 158393, 158790, 158797, 159033, 159036, 159413, 159440, 
159891, 160000, 160002, 160006, 160456, 160459, 160463, 160466, 
160468, 161137, 161139, 161159, 161177, 161184, 161185, 161363, 
161364, 161366, 162376, 162384, 162674, 162682, 162685, 162688, 
163176, 163178, 163181, 163557, 163559, 163602, 164217, 164279, 
164746, 164750, 164907, 164908, 165135, 165259, 165459, 165805, 
166235, 166324, 166325, 166326, 166331, 166477, 166481, 166608, 
166671, 166673, 166892, 167029, 167030, 167035, 167037, 167182, 
167341, 167556, 167559, 167705, 167707, 167709, 167763, 167764, 
167765, 167766, 167811, 195627, 195628, 195706, 195707, 195710, 
195796, 195833, 195876, 196041, 196042, 196045, 196137, 196234, 
196397, 196400, 196401, 196403, 196498, 196500, 196761, 197097, 
197137, 197140, 197143, 197238, 197657, 197874, 198528, 198687, 
198775, 198780, 198788, 198872, 198878, 199034, 199042, 199187, 
199441, 199613, 199616, 199669, 200293, 200324, 200534, 200535, 
200538, 200556, 200737, 200738, 200739, 200793, 200830, 200834, 
200872, 201576, 201685, 201733, 201892, 201893, 201964, 202053, 
202305, 202306, 202469, 202471, 202472, 202596, 202625, 202633, 
202760, 202381, 202879, 202901, 203010, 203016, 203147, 204629, 
204665, 204714, 204820, 204821, 204822, 205249, 205253, 205329, 
205335, 205526, 205527, 205529, 205700, 205882, 205967, 206273, 
206406, 206436, 206441, 206646, 207019, 207020, 207021, 207364, 
207369, 207683, 207684, 207837, 207849, 207850, 208206, 208381, 
208394, 208396, 208543, 209148, 209698, 209704, 209707, 212176, 
212525, 212697, 212700, 213952, 213953, 214085, 214089, 214144, 
214795, 214803, 215392, 215476, 216214, 216509, 216515, 216951, 
216955, 216957, 217368, 217369, 217382, 217441, 217708, 217805, 
218112, 218610, 218613, 218757, 218761, 218958, 218965, 218967, 
218970, 218976, 219226, 219228, 219233, 219236, 219411, 219418, 
219832, 219840, 219842, 219915, 220990, 220991, 221197, 221286, 
221635, 224540, 224700, 224701, 224704, 224707, 224876, 225257, 
225262, 225586, 225907, 225910, 225974, 226133, 226136, 226465, 
226466, 226467, 227159, 227174, 227836, 227837, 229277, 230190, 
230191, 230192, 230193, 231082, 232015, 232681, 232684, 234534, 
235621, 235628, 238097, 238179, 239755, 239760, 239956, 239964, 
242109, 242998, 243347, 243350, 243351, 245230, 246442, 246792, 
246851, 247007, 247302, 250747, 253132, 256326, 256327, 258614, 
258861, 258865, 260508, 262743, 262744, 263643, 263644, 263645, 
263651, 263700, 264117, 264119, 264122, 264123, 264125, 264193, 
264738, 265208, 265210, 265655, 265656, 265657, 265658, 268055, 
268562, 268564, 268565, 268566, 272372, 272592, 273833, 273835, 
275276, 275658, 275663, 277554, 280433, 280435, 296902, 298059, and 
298843.
    (2) DC-9-11, DC-9-12, DC-9-13, DC-9-14, DC-9-15, DC-9-15F, DC-9-
21, DC-9-31, DC-9-32, DC-9-32 (VC-9C), DC-9-32F, DC-9-32F (C-9A, C-
9B), DC-9-33F, DC-9-34, DC-9-34F, DC-9-41, DC-9-51, DC-9-81 (MD-81), 
DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), MD-88, MD-90-30, 
and 717-200.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association 
(ATA) of America Code 3414, Airspeed/Mach Indicator.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that the pitot probes are 
indicating the wrong airspeed during flight. We are issuing this AD 
to prevent incorrect airspeed indications during flight, which could 
lead to loss of control. Due to design redundancy, this is only 
applicable if more than one deficient probe is installed.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified. If 
the actions required in paragraphs (g) and (h)(1) of this AD have 
already been done before March 16,

[[Page 5705]]

2018 (the effective date of this AD), then only paragraph (h)(2) of 
this AD applies.

(g) Determine Number of Affected Pitot Probes Installed

    Within 30 days after March 16, 2018 (the effective date of this 
AD), inspect the airplane to determine the number of pitot probes 
identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD that are installed on the 
airplane. This inspection can be performed through a review of 
maintenance records in lieu of a physical inspection of the product 
if the serial number and repair date can be positively identified 
from the review. If the serial number cannot be positively 
identified from a review of the aircraft's maintenance records or 
from the outside of the airplane, this may require the pitot probe 
to be removed from the fuselage to view the serial number at the 
inner base of the probe. If it is determined that no more than one 
pitot probe identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD is installed 
on the airplane, no further action is required except for the 
ongoing requirement in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD.

(h) Replace Affected Pitot Probes

    (1) If it is determined that more than one pitot probe 
identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD is installed on the 
airplane during the inspection required in paragraph (g) of this AD, 
within the next 2 months after March 16, 2018 (the effective date of 
this AD), do one of the following so that no more than one pitot 
probe identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD is installed on any 
aircraft simultaneously.
    (i) Replace the pitot probes that are listed with pitot probes 
that do not have a serial number listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this 
AD; or
    (ii) Replace the pitot probes that are listed with one that has 
been properly repaired, and if repaired by CSI, has a repair date of 
August 1, 2014, or later. This can be done by having the existing 
pitot probe repaired by CSI Aerospace, Inc.
    (2) As of March 16, 2018 (the effective date of this AD), do not 
install on any airplane a pitot probe having a serial number listed 
in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD, unless it has been properly 
repaired, and if repaired by CSI Aerospace, Inc., has a repair date 
of August 1, 2014, or later.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Fort Worth ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority 
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures 
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards 
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to 
the manager of the ACO Branch, send it to the attention of the 
person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.

(i) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Jonathan Kim, 
Aerospace Engineer, Fort Worth ACO Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood 
Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177-1524; telephone: (817) 222-5131; 
fax: (817) 222-5245; email: [email protected].

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 2, 2018.
Melvin J. Johnson,
Deputy Director, Policy & Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-02550 Filed 2-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P



                                              5700               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

                                              Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–3095,                   2016–0188, dated September 21, 2016;                     (xxiv) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–
                                              Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014; Airbus                corrected September 22, 2016, for related             4121, dated April 20, 2016.
                                              Service Bulletin A340–52–4101, Revision 01,             information. This MCAI may be found in the               (xxv) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–
                                              dated July 28, 2014; or Airbus Service                  AD docket on the internet at http://                  5020, Revision 02, including Appendices 01
                                              Bulletin A340–52–5023, Revision 01, dated               www.regulations.gov by searching for and              and 02, dated November 27, 2015.
                                              July 28, 2014; as applicable; provided that             locating Docket No. FAA–2017–0713.                       (xxvi) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–
                                              the next inspection of all frame fork areas,              (2) For more information about this AD,             5023, Revision 02, including Appendices 01
                                              frame head areas, and outer skin area of each           contact Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace                   and 02, dated November 27, 2015.
                                              affected aft cargo door is accomplished                 Engineer, International Section, Transport               (3) For service information identified in
                                              within 550 flight cycles after that inspection          Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue               this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
                                              in accordance with the Accomplishment                   SW, Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone                  Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
                                              Instructions of SB A330–52–3095, R02; SB                425–227–1138; fax 425–227–1149.                       31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33
                                              A340–52–4101, R02; or SB A340–52–5023,                    (3) Service information identified in this          5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93 45 80; email:
                                              R02, as applicable.                                     AD that is not incorporated by reference is           airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
                                                 (5) Where Airbus Service Bulletins A330–             available at the addresses specified in               internet: http://www.airbus.com.
                                              52–3095, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014;              paragraphs (v)(4) and (v)(5) of this AD.                 (4) You may view this service information
                                              A340–52–4101, Revision 01, dated July 28,                                                                     at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
                                                                                                      (v) Material Incorporated by Reference
                                              2014; A340–52–5020, Revision 01, dated July                                                                   1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For
                                              9, 2014; and A340–52–5023, Revision 01,                    (1) The Director of the Federal Register           information on the availability of this
                                              dated July 28, 2014; refers to using fasteners          approved the incorporation by reference               material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
                                              having P/N ASNA2657, this AD also allows                (IBR) of the service information listed in this          (5) You may view this service information
                                              the use of alternative HST11 series fasteners.          paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR             that is incorporated by reference at the
                                                                                                      part 51.                                              National Archives and Records
                                              (t) Other FAA AD Provisions                                (2) You must use this service information          Administration (NARA). For information on
                                                 The following provisions also apply to this          as applicable to do the actions required by           the availability of this material at NARA, call
                                              AD:                                                     this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.          202–741–6030, or go to: http://
                                                 (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance                   (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–3087,          www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
                                              (AMOCs): The Manager, International                     Revision 02, including Appendix 01, dated             locations.html.
                                              Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,               February 18, 2016.
                                                                                                         (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–3095,           Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
                                              has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
                                                                                                      Revision 02, including Appendices 01 and              11, 2018.
                                              AD, if requested using the procedures found
                                              in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR              02, dated February 19, 2016.                          John P. Piccola, Jr.,
                                              39.19, send your request to your principal                 (iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–             Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
                                              inspector or local Flight Standards District            3105, dated February 15, 2016.                        Aircraft Certification Service.
                                              Office, as appropriate. If sending information             (iv) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–              [FR Doc. 2018–01803 Filed 2–8–18; 8:45 am]
                                              directly to the manager of the certification            3106, dated February 24, 2016.
                                                                                                                                                            BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
                                              office, send it to the attention of the person             (v) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–3110,
                                              identified in paragraph (u)(2) of this AD.              dated February 15, 2016.
                                              Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-                  (vi) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–
                                              AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using                     3111, dated February 15, 2016.                        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                                              any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate                 (vii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–
                                              principal inspector, or lacking a principal             3112, dated February 24, 2016.                        Federal Aviation Administration
                                              inspector, the manager of the local flight                 (viii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–
                                              standards district office/certificate holding           3113, dated February 15, 2016.                        14 CFR Part 39
                                              district office.                                           (ix) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–
                                                                                                                                                            [Docket No. FAA–2016–6616; Product
                                                 (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the           3114, dated February 15, 2016.
                                                                                                                                                            Identifier 2016–CE–004–AD; Amendment
                                              effective date of this AD, for any requirement             (x) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–3115,
                                                                                                                                                            39–19177; AD 2018–03–04]
                                              in this AD to obtain corrective actions from            dated April 20, 2016.
                                              a manufacturer, the action must be                         (xi) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–              RIN 2120–AA64
                                              accomplished using a method approved by                 3116, dated April 20, 2016.
                                              the Manager, International Section, Transport              (xii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–             Airworthiness Directives; Rosemount
                                              Standards Branch, FAA; or the EASA; or                  3117, dated April 20, 2016.                           Aerospace, Inc. Pitot Probes
                                              Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved by the                      (xiii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–52–
                                              DOA, the approval must include the DOA-                 3118, dated April 20, 2016.                           AGENCY:  Federal Aviation
                                              authorized signature.                                      (xiv) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–             Administration (FAA), DOT.
                                                 (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except             4095, Revision 02, including Appendix 01,             ACTION: Final rule.
                                              as required by paragraph (p) of this AD: If             dated November 27, 2015.
                                              any service information contains procedures                (xv) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–              SUMMARY:   We are adopting a new
                                              or tests that are identified as RC, those               4101, Revision 02, including Appendices 01            airworthiness directive (AD) for
                                              procedures and tests must be done to comply             and 02, dated November 27, 2015.                      Rosemount Aerospace Model 851AK
                                              with this AD; any procedures or tests that are             (xvi) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–             pitot probes that were repaired by CSI
                                              not identified as RC are recommended. Those             4108, dated February 15, 2016.
                                                                                                         (xvii) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–
                                                                                                                                                            Aerospace, Inc. between January 2013
                                              procedures and tests that are not identified
                                              as RC may be deviated from using accepted               4109, dated February 25, 2016.                        and July 2014 that are installed on
                                              methods in accordance with the operator’s                  (xviii) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–           airplanes. This AD was prompted by a
                                              maintenance or inspection program without               4113, dated February 15, 2016.                        report that certain pitot probes are
                                              obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided                    (xix) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–             indicating the wrong airspeed during
                                              the procedures and tests identified as RC can           4114, dated February 15, 2016.                        flight. This AD requires inspecting the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              be done and the airplane can be put back in                (xx) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–              airplane to determine the number of
                                              an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or            4115, dated February 19, 2016.                        affected pitot probes installed and
                                              changes to procedures or tests identified as               (xxi) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–             replacing the affected pitot probes. We
                                              RC require approval of an AMOC.                         4118, dated April 20, 2016.
                                                                                                         (xxii) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–
                                                                                                                                                            are issuing this AD to address the unsafe
                                              (u) Related Information                                 4119, dated April 20, 2016.                           condition on these products.
                                                (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing                        (xxiii) Airbus Service Bulletin A340–52–           DATES: This AD is effective March 16,
                                              Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD                4120, dated April 20, 2016.                           2018.


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:59 Feb 08, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00020   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM   09FER1


                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                          5701

                                              Examining the AD Docket                                 Request To Revise the Description of                  proposed AD does not accurately reflect
                                                                                                      the Unsafe Condition                                  the scope of the unsafe condition. It
                                                You may examine the AD docket on                                                                            implies a more widespread problem.
                                              the internet at http://                                    Andy Feely of CSI Aerospace, Inc.
                                                                                                      (CSI) stated that they do not have any                Through CSI’s immediate actions taken,
                                              www.regulations.gov by searching for                                                                          once notified of the initial report (March
                                              and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–                       data which confirms that the inaccurate
                                                                                                      airspeed occurred during flight ‘‘in icing            2014), all suspect serial numbers of the
                                              6616; or in person at the Docket                                                                              affected pitot probes were identified and
                                              Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,                   conditions.’’
                                                                                                         The commenter also stated that in the              located. All affected customers were
                                              Monday through Friday, except Federal                                                                         notified and were provided instructions
                                              holidays.                                               proposed AD, in the Summary,
                                                                                                      Discussion, and paragraph (e) Unsafe                  to inspect, scrap, return and/or replace
                                                The AD docket contains this final                     Condition sections, several references                the suspect probes. The commenter also
                                              rule, the regulatory evaluation, any                    are made to the reported problem                      stated that it is his opinion that this
                                              comments received, and other                            occurring ‘‘in icing conditions.’’ CSI                condition is not ‘‘likely to exist or
                                              information. The street address for                     does not have any data to support this                develop in other products of the same
                                              Docket Operations (phone: 800–647–                      statement. This statement is                          type design’’ because the probes were
                                              5527) is U.S. Department of                             inconsistent with the field data that CSI             located, contained, and monitored.
                                              Transportation, Docket Operations, M–                   has been able to collect. CSI has                        The commenter requested a revision
                                              30, West Building Ground Floor, Room                    communicated with affected operators                  to this section to more accurately
                                              W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,                     and has been unable to confirm                        indicate the scope of the unsafe
                                              Washington, DC 20590.                                   experiences of inaccurate airspeed                    condition.
                                              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        reporting during flight ‘‘in icing                       We do not agree with the commenter.
                                              Jonathan Kim, Aerospace Engineer, Fort                  conditions.’’ CSI has a service difficulty            In 14 CFR, section 39.5, the FAA is
                                              Worth ACO Branch, FAA, 10101                            report (SDR) where the airplane had                   required to issue an AD when we find
                                              Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas                     varying airspeed indications from the                 that an unsafe condition exists in a
                                              76177–1524; telephone: (817) 222–5131;                  airspeed indication systems (pitot                    product and the condition is likely to
                                              fax: (817) 222–5245; email:                             probes), however, it does not contain a               exist or develop in other products of the
                                              jonathan.kim@faa.gov.                                   report of icing conditions.                           same type design. We have determined
                                                                                                         The commenter requested removing                   that this AD meets these requirements.
                                              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              all references to ‘‘icing conditions’’                   We have not changed this AD action
                                              Discussion                                              throughout the final rule AD action.                  based on this comment.
                                                                                                         We partially agree with the
                                                 We issued a notice of proposed                       commenter. We agree to remove the                     Request To Revise the Applicability
                                              rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR                       language ‘‘icing conditions’’ from the                Section
                                              part 39 by adding an AD that would                      Summary, Discussion, and paragraph (e)                   Andy Feely of CSI stated that the
                                              apply to Rosemount Aerospace Model                      of the AD because the SDR report that                 Applicability section should include a
                                              851AK pitot probes that were repaired                   prompted the AD action does not                       statement to clarify the time period to
                                              by CSI Aerospace, Inc. between January                  provide meteorological conditions.                    narrow the actual scope of the problem
                                              2013 and July 2014 that are installed on                However, we disagree that icing                       and to be consistent with the dates
                                              airplanes. The NPRM was published in                    conditions do not contribute to the                   stated in the Discussion section of the
                                              the Federal Register on May 11, 2016                    unsafe condition. There is evidence that              proposed AD. The commenter also
                                              (81 FR 29193). The NPRM was                             the migrated braze material may present               stated that pitot probes re-repaired after
                                              prompted by a report that certain pitot                 a non-conforming, forward facing                      August 1, 2014, are no longer part of the
                                              probes are indicating the wrong                         surface inside the pitot throat on which              affected probes.
                                              airspeed during flight. The NPRM                        ice crystals may accumulate when they                    The commenter requested that
                                              proposed to require inspecting the                      make contact and could lead to the                    paragraph (c) of the final rule AD be
                                              airplane to determine the number of                     incorrect airspeed indications.                       revised to add the specific time period
                                              affected pitot probes installed and                        We have changed the AD as indicated                the affected probes were repaired by CSI
                                              replacing the affected pitot probes. We                 above.                                                and to specify the serial numbers of
                                              are issuing this AD to prevent incorrect                                                                      pitot probes repaired after August 1,
                                                                                                      Request To Clarify Summary
                                              airspeed indications during flight,                                                                           2014, which are no longer part of the
                                              which could lead to loss of control. Due                   Andy Feely of CSI stated that there is
                                                                                                      a specific time period that the affected              affected probes.
                                              to design redundancy, this is only                                                                               We partially agree with the
                                              applicable if more than one deficient                   pitot probes were repaired by CSI.
                                                                                                         The commenter requested that the                   commenter. We agree with including a
                                              probe is installed.                                                                                           statement in the Applicability section
                                                                                                      specific time period of between January
                                              Comments                                                2013 and July 2014 be added in the                    that suspect probes that were re-
                                                                                                      Summary section of the final rule AD                  repaired by CSI Aerospace, Inc. after
                                                We gave the public the opportunity to                                                                       August 1, 2014, are not at risk because
                                              participate in developing this AD. The                  action to clarify the applicability of the
                                                                                                      affected pitot probes and to be                       corrective actions have been taken to
                                              following presents the comments                                                                               address the unsafe condition. We have
                                              received on the NPRM and the FAA’s                      consistent with the dates in the
                                                                                                      Discussion section of the proposed AD.                changed the final rule AD action to add
                                              response to each comment.                                                                                     the serial numbers of the re-repaired
                                                                                                         We agree with the commenter. We
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              Support for the AD                                      have changed this AD action based on                  probes to the Applicability section.
                                                                                                      this comment.                                         Because we are relaxing the requirement
                                                Air Line Pilots Association,                                                                                to allow probes to be re-repaired after
                                              International (ALPA) supported the                      Request To Revise the FAA’s                           August 2014 and CSI is confident that
                                              proposed AD as written.                                 Determination Section                                 these probes were re-repaired after
                                                We have not changed this AD action                      Andy Feely of CSI stated that the                   August 2014, this does not add any
                                              based on this comment.                                  FAA’s Determination section in the                    additional burden to operators.


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:59 Feb 08, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00021   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM   09FER1


                                              5702               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

                                                 We disagree with removing the serial                 maintenance records review, or that                   not want to omit serial numbers based
                                              numbers of re-repaired pitot probes                     action was already taken before the                   on claims that affected parts are already
                                              from the Applicability section because                  effective date of this AD to assure that              in compliance. We acknowledge that
                                              we do not want to omit serial numbers                   no more than one affected probe                       CSI has made significant efforts to
                                              from the final rule AD action based on                  remains on the airplane and that two                  remove all affected pitot probes from the
                                              claims that affected parts are already in               out of the three pitot probes installed on            fleet and to communicate their efforts to
                                              compliance with the actions of the                      their airplane are not affected are in                the FAA; however, after their effort was
                                              proposed AD. The original list of serial                compliance with certain portions of the               complete, approximately 100 pitot
                                              numbers provided in the proposed AD                     proposed AD.                                          probes could not be accounted for.
                                              did not include serial numbers of re-                      The commenter requested an                            We have not changed this AD action
                                              repaired probes, but we have added                      additional statement be added to                      based on this comment.
                                              them to the final rule AD action. Again,                paragraph (g) of the final rule AD action
                                                                                                                                                            Request To Extend Compliance Time
                                              adding these serial numbers does not                    to clarify that no further action is
                                                                                                                                                            for Replacement
                                              impose a burden on the public and this                  required except for the ongoing
                                              AD only documents those serial                          requirement in paragraph (h)(2) of this                  Robert Holcomb of American Airlines
                                              numbers that originally had the unsafe                  final rule AD action if airplane                      stated that the final rule AD should take
                                              condition. All airplanes that had probes                inspection or maintenance records                     into account the burden of costs
                                              previously repaired would not be                        review reveals that no more than one                  associated with acquiring additional
                                              subject to any actions of this AD other                 affected probe remains on the airplane.               spares to meet the two-month
                                              than the requirement to assure that no                     We agree with the commenter and                    replacement compliance time.
                                              suspect probe is installed in the future.               have changed this AD action based on                     The commenter stated that American
                                                 We have not changed this AD action                   this comment.                                         Airlines owns 197 of the affected pitot
                                              based on this part of the comment.                                                                            probes. Of the 197 affected pitot probes,
                                                                                                      Request To Clarify Replacement                        83 are on active airplanes and 21 of
                                              Request To Correct Serial Number of                     Requirement                                           those have been re-repaired. The
                                              Affect Pitot Probe                                         Andy Feely of CSI stated that in the               commenter also stated that American
                                                 Andy Feely of CSI stated that the                    proposed AD it is unclear when the                    Airlines has not had any failures of the
                                              serial number of pitot probe 88912 in                   replacement of the affected pitot probes              affected pitot probes and currently has
                                              the proposed AD is incorrect.                           is required.                                          87 active airplanes with potential to
                                                 The commenter requested the serial                      The commenter requested to have the                have an affected pitot probe installed.
                                              number be corrected to 88192 in the                     words ‘‘after the effective date of this                 The commenter requested increasing
                                              final rule AD action.                                   AD’’ removed from paragraph (h)(1) of                 the replacement compliance time to 6
                                                 We agree with the commenter and                      the final rule AD action.                             months based on lack of failures on the
                                              have changed this AD action based on                       We do not agree with the commenter.                MD80 fleet, current spare constraints,
                                              this comment.                                           If it is determined that the pitot probes             and turnaround time of re-repaired pitot
                                                                                                      are required to be replaced, as specified             probes.
                                              Request To Allow Maintenance Records                    in paragraph (h)(1) of the proposed AD,                  We do not agree with the commenter.
                                              Review                                                  the operator will have two months after               We received a report about erroneous
                                                 Andy Feely of CSI and Ryan Hall of                   the effective date of the final rule AD               airspeed data being transmitted from
                                              Delta Air Lines stated that operators                   action to do so.                                      multiple Rosemount Aerospace Model
                                              who have serial number traceability of                     We have not changed this AD action                 851AK pitot probes repaired by CSI
                                              the affected pitot probes fully                         based on this comment.                                when installed on a Boeing Aircraft
                                              documented in their maintenance                                                                               Company Model B717 airplane. Because
                                                                                                      Request To Remove Certain Pitot                       we cannot say with certainty when or
                                              records should be permitted to do a
                                                                                                      Probes From the Applicability                         where this unsafe condition will
                                              records review in order to determine
                                              location and number of affected probes                     Andy Feely of CSI stated that as a                 manifest in the pitot probe, we are
                                              installed on their airplane(s).                         result of the aggressive voluntary                    unable to increase the replacement
                                                 The commenters requested that                        corrective action plan by CSI and the                 compliance time to six months without
                                              paragraph (g) of the final rule AD action               airlines, the serial number listing of the            additional justification. If operators
                                              be changed to include a review of the                   affected pitot probes has been greatly                have substantiating data to demonstrate
                                              maintenance records in lieu of a                        reduced.                                              that an acceptable level of safety has
                                              physical inspection of the airplane if the                 The commenter stated that robust                   been met with a change in compliance
                                              serial number and repair date of the                    traceability by serial number, delivery               time or other changes to this AD, we
                                              pitot probe can be positively identified.               date, and customer, have allowed CSI                  will consider an alternative method of
                                                 We agree with the commenter. Many                    and its customers the ability to                      compliance (AMOC) to the final rule AD
                                              operators keep thorough maintenance                     proactively remove the affected probes                action on a case by case basis. We do
                                              records that make it possible to                        for re-repair or scrap. CSI maintains                 not provide costs beyond initial work
                                              positively identify the serial number of                very tight coordination with the affected             hours and parts costs. Therefore,
                                              the affected probe and the repair date                  customers and is aware of the status of               accounting for costs associated with
                                              from a review their maintenance                         all affected pitot probes.                            acquiring spares is beyond the scope of
                                              records.                                                   The commenter has requested that                   our policy.
                                                 We have changed this AD action                       many of the pitot probes listed in the                   We have not changed this AD action
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              based on this comment.                                  Applicability section be removed from                 based on this comment.
                                                                                                      the final rule AD action.
                                              Request To Clarify Compliance                              We do not agree with the commenter.                Request To Clarify Exclusion of Certain
                                                Andy Feely of CSI stated it is not                    We disagree with removing the serial                  Pitot Probes From the Applicability
                                              initially clear to owners/operators who                 numbers of re-repaired or scrapped pitot                Ryan Hall of Delta Air Lines stated
                                              have determined, either through                         probes from the Applicability section of              that it is not clear in the Applicability
                                              inspection of the airplane, through                     the final rule AD action because we do                section of the proposed AD that pitot


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:59 Feb 08, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00022   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM   09FER1


                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                                      5703

                                              probes repaired by CSI on or after                               The commenter stated that in some                       We have not changed this AD action
                                              August 1, 2014, are not part of the                           instances the pitot probes will require                    based on this comment.
                                              applicability.                                                removal from the fuselage to clearly
                                                 The commenter stated that paragraph                                                                                   Conclusion
                                                                                                            identify the mechanically stamped
                                              (c) of proposed rule AD applies to pitot                      serial number at the inner base of the                       We reviewed the relevant data,
                                              probes that were repaired by CSI and                          probe.                                                     considered the comments received, and
                                              have a serial number listed in paragraph                         The commenter requested that a                          determined that air safety and the
                                              (c)(1) of this AD that are known to be                        requirement for removing the pitot                         public interest require adopting this AD
                                              installed on aircraft. However,                               probes in order to identify the                            with the changes described previously
                                              paragraph (h)(3) of the proposed AD                           overhauled pitot probes serial numbers                     and minor editorial changes. We have
                                              contains the phrase, ‘unless it has been                      should be added to the final rule AD                       determined that these minor changes:
                                              repaired by CSI and has a date of August                      action.                                                      • Are consistent with the intent that
                                              1, 2014, or later.                                                                                                       was proposed in the NPRM for
                                                 The commenter requested that the                              We partially agree with the
                                                                                                            commenter. We agree with the                               addressing the unsafe condition; and
                                              Applicability section of the final rule
                                                                                                            possibility that the serial number may                       • Do not add any additional burden
                                              AD action be revised to include the
                                                                                                            not be legible on the outside of the pitot                 upon the public than was already
                                              statement excluding pitot probes
                                                                                                            probe because of environmental                             proposed in the NPRM.
                                              repaired by CSI Aerospace, Inc. after
                                              August 1, 2014, from the applicability.                       conditions, usage, age, etc. However, we                     We also determined that these
                                                 We agree with the commenter and                            disagree with adding a requirement to                      changes will not increase the economic
                                              have changed this AD action based on                          remove the pitot probe during every                        burden on any operator or increase the
                                              this comment.                                                 inspection. If the serial number is                        scope of this AD.
                                                                                                            legible from the outside of the pitot                      Costs of Compliance
                                              Request To Add Removal Requirement                            probe, this may add an unnecessary
                                                Ralph Isaacson stated that the laser                        burden to the operators. Also, some                          We estimate that this AD affects 679
                                              etching, which identifies the                                 operators are capable of positively                        products installed on airplanes of U.S.
                                              manufacturer and serial number, is                            identifying the serial number of the                       registry.
                                              eventually worn off by environmental                          affected pitot probe and the repair date                     We estimate the following costs to
                                              conditions, usage, and age.                                   from a review of maintenance records.                      comply with this AD:

                                                                                                                           ESTIMATED COSTS
                                                                                                                                                                          Parts            Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                                                                       Action                                                   Labor cost                                cost             product        operators

                                              Inspect to determine the number of defective                 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................                      N/A             N/A        $57,715
                                                pitot probes installed on the airplane.



                                                We estimate the following costs to do                       required based on the results of the                       determining the number of airplanes
                                              any necessary replacements that will be                       inspection. We have no way of                              that might need these replacements:

                                                                                                                         ON-CONDITION COSTS
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Cost per
                                                                            Action                                                             Labor cost                                  Parts cost      product

                                              Replace defective pitot probe .......................................   1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ...............................          $6,750         $6,835



                                              Authority for This Rulemaking                                 is within the scope of that authority                      Regulatory Findings
                                                                                                            because it addresses an unsafe condition
                                                 Title 49 of the United States Code                                                                                      This AD will not have federalism
                                                                                                            that is likely to exist or develop on
                                              specifies the FAA’s authority to issue                                                                                   implications under Executive Order
                                                                                                            products identified in this rulemaking
                                              rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,                                                                                    13132. This AD will not have a
                                                                                                            action.
                                              section 106, describes the authority of                          This AD is issued in accordance with                    substantial direct effect on the States, on
                                              the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:                          authority delegated by the Executive                       the relationship between the national
                                              Aviation Programs, describes in more                          Director, Aircraft Certification Service,                  government and the States, or on the
                                              detail the scope of the Agency’s                              as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.                       distribution of power and
                                              authority.                                                    In accordance with that order, issuance                    responsibilities among the various
                                                 We are issuing this rulemaking under                       of ADs is normally a function of the                       levels of government.
                                              the authority described in Subtitle VII,                      Compliance and Airworthiness                                 For the reasons discussed above, I
                                              Part A, Subpart III, section 44701:                           Division, but during this transition                       certify that this AD:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that                          period, the Executive Director has                           (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
                                              section, Congress charges the FAA with                        delegated the authority to issue ADs                       action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
                                              promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in                    applicable to small airplanes, gliders,                      (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
                                              air commerce by prescribing regulations                       balloons, airships, domestic business jet                  DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
                                              for practices, methods, and procedures                        transport airplanes, and associated                        (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
                                              the Administrator finds necessary for                         appliances to the Director of the Policy                     (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
                                              safety in air commerce. This regulation                       and Innovation Division.                                   in Alaska, and


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014     15:59 Feb 08, 2018    Jkt 244001    PO 00000     Frm 00023    Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM         09FER1


                                              5704               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

                                                (4) Will not have a significant                       112280, 112343, 112497, 112646, 112657,               198788, 198872, 198878, 199034, 199042,
                                              economic impact, positive or negative,                  112677, 112779, 112781, 112783, 112979,               199187, 199441, 199613, 199616, 199669,
                                              on a substantial number of small entities               112993, 113025, 113026, 113129, 113151,               200293, 200324, 200534, 200535, 200538,
                                                                                                      113382, 113721, 113758, 113837, 113838,               200556, 200737, 200738, 200739, 200793,
                                              under the criteria of the Regulatory
                                                                                                      113843, 113845, 113920, 113934, 114130,               200830, 200834, 200872, 201576, 201685,
                                              Flexibility Act.                                        114147, 114152, 114157, 114223, 114239,               201733, 201892, 201893, 201964, 202053,
                                              List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39                      114376, 114572, 114813, 114869, 114872,               202305, 202306, 202469, 202471, 202472,
                                                                                                      114959, 114962A, 114966, 115428, 115713,              202596, 202625, 202633, 202760, 202381,
                                                Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation                116046, 116249, 116253, 116255, 116271,               202879, 202901, 203010, 203016, 203147,
                                              safety, Incorporation by reference,                     116424, 116557, 116734, 116792, 116994,               204629, 204665, 204714, 204820, 204821,
                                              Safety.                                                 117022, 117144, 117164, 117310, 117412,               204822, 205249, 205253, 205329, 205335,
                                                                                                      117414, 117426, 117427, 117428, 117587,               205526, 205527, 205529, 205700, 205882,
                                              Adoption of the Amendment                               117961, 118111, 118119, 118234, 118331,               205967, 206273, 206406, 206436, 206441,
                                                Accordingly, under the authority                      118637, 118639, 118770, 118938, 119115,               206646, 207019, 207020, 207021, 207364,
                                              delegated to me by the Administrator,                   119281, 119290, 119414, 119441, 119496,               207369, 207683, 207684, 207837, 207849,
                                                                                                      119587, 119593, 119694, 119695, 119737,               207850, 208206, 208381, 208394, 208396,
                                              the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as                        119852, 120456, 120461, 120728, 120823,
                                              follows:                                                                                                      208543, 209148, 209698, 209704, 209707,
                                                                                                      120825, 120826, 120829, 121040, 121041,               212176, 212525, 212697, 212700, 213952,
                                                                                                      121110, 121116, 121145, 121172, 121320,               213953, 214085, 214089, 214144, 214795,
                                              PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS                                   121322, 121524, 121661, 121834, 121852,               214803, 215392, 215476, 216214, 216509,
                                              DIRECTIVES                                              122286, 122662, 122843,122934, 122935,                216515, 216951, 216955, 216957, 217368,
                                                                                                      123286, 123289, 123330, 123745, 123746,               217369, 217382, 217441, 217708, 217805,
                                              ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39                 123753, 123767, 124144, 124385, 124390,               218112, 218610, 218613, 218757, 218761,
                                              continues to read as follows:                           124396, 124890, 125016, 125021, 125077,               218958, 218965, 218967, 218970, 218976,
                                                  Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.          125163, 125174, 126785, 127449, 127894,               219226, 219228, 219233, 219236, 219411,
                                                                                                      127899, 128302, 128307, 129503, 130371,               219418, 219832, 219840, 219842, 219915,
                                              § 39.13   [Amended]                                     130377, 130688, 131422, 131423, 131752,               220990, 220991, 221197, 221286, 221635,
                                                                                                      132065, 132067, 132297, 132825, 133103,               224540, 224700, 224701, 224704, 224707,
                                              ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding                   133161, 133220, 133291, 133310, 133313,               224876, 225257, 225262, 225586, 225907,
                                              the following new airworthiness                         133394, 133396, 133512, 133521, 134100,               225910, 225974, 226133, 226136, 226465,
                                              directive (AD):                                         134102, 134403, 134535, 134537, 134639,               226466, 226467, 227159, 227174, 227836,
                                              2018–03–04 Rosemount Aerospace, Inc.:                   134675, 134681, 135136, 135234, 135246,               227837, 229277, 230190, 230191, 230192,
                                                  Amendment 39–19177; Docket No.                      135250, 135554, 135561, 135568, 135735,               230193, 231082, 232015, 232681, 232684,
                                                  FAA–2016–6616; Product Identifier                   135743, 136075, 136208, 137049, 137398,               234534, 235621, 235628, 238097, 238179,
                                                  2016–CE–004–AD.                                     137543, 137544, 137642, 139076, 139081,               239755, 239760, 239956, 239964, 242109,
                                                                                                      139433, 139444, 139691, 139694, 139759,               242998, 243347, 243350, 243351, 245230,
                                              (a) Effective Date                                      139763, 139971, 139976, 140188, 140563,               246442, 246792, 246851, 247007, 247302,
                                                This AD is effective March 16, 2018.                  140565, 140643, 140649, 140650, 141161,               250747, 253132, 256326, 256327, 258614,
                                                                                                      141356, 141362, 141497, 141501, 141605,               258861, 258865, 260508, 262743, 262744,
                                              (b) Affected ADs                                        141607, 142426, 142765, 142774, 142775,               263643, 263644, 263645, 263651, 263700,
                                                None.                                                 143070, 143405, 143409, 143411, 143418,               264117, 264119, 264122, 264123, 264125,
                                                                                                      143816, 143818, 143988, 143992, 143999,               264193, 264738, 265208, 265210, 265655,
                                              (c) Applicability                                       144591, 144814, 144816, 144976, 144977,               265656, 265657, 265658, 268055, 268562,
                                                 This AD applies to Rosemount Aerospace,              146116, 146835, 147421, 148524, 148765,               268564, 268565, 268566, 272372, 272592,
                                              Inc. Model 851AK pitot probes that were                 148777, 149460, 149464, 149510, 149941,               273833, 273835, 275276, 275658, 275663,
                                              repaired by CSI Aerospace Inc. and have a               150196, 150206, 150211, 150212, 150214,               277554, 280433, 280435, 296902, 298059,
                                              serial number listed in paragraph (c)(1) of             150542, 150725, 151077, 151086, 151095,               and 298843.
                                              this AD that are known to be installed on but           151493, 152097, 152819, 152922, 152969,                 (2) DC–9–11, DC–9–12, DC–9–13, DC–9–
                                              not limited to the airplanes listed in                  152974, 152981, 153232, 153233, 153453,               14, DC–9–15, DC–9–15F, DC–9–21, DC–9–31,
                                              paragraph (c)(2) of this AD. Pitot probes that          153454, 153625, 153628, 153635, 153641,               DC–9–32, DC–9–32 (VC–9C), DC–9–32F, DC–
                                              were repaired by CSI Aerospace Inc. that                153956, 153962, 153966, 153984, 154007,               9–32F (C–9A, C–9B), DC–9–33F, DC–9–34,
                                              have a repair date of August 1, 2014, or later,         154156, 154704, 154721, 154738, 154741,               DC–9–34F, DC–9–41, DC–9–51, DC–9–81
                                              are excluded from the applicability.                    155003, 155042, 155045, 155238, 155278,               (MD–81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–
                                                 (1) 24352, 53257, 61568, 68168, 69913,               155517, 156022, 156025, 156222, 156526,               83), DC–9–87 (MD–87), MD–88, MD–90–30,
                                              69953, 71007, 71802, 71820, 73010, 73406,               156529, 156672, 157023, 157137, 157143,               and 717–200.
                                              75549, 75555, 80489, 80491, 83809, 84200,               158393, 158790, 158797, 159033, 159036,
                                              84495, 84911, 84922, 85317, 85731, 87225,               159413, 159440, 159891, 160000, 160002,               (d) Subject
                                              87234, 87235, 87241, 87272, 87512, 87551,               160006, 160456, 160459, 160463, 160466,                 Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
                                              87909, 88192, 88622, 90538, 91606, 93291,               160468, 161137, 161139, 161159, 161177,               Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
                                              93292, 93293, 93305, 93941, 93948, 93960,               161184, 161185, 161363, 161364, 161366,               Code 3414, Airspeed/Mach Indicator.
                                              94258, 94304, 94559, 94814, 94819, 95150,               162376, 162384, 162674, 162682, 162685,
                                              95849, 97405, 98194, 99498, 99509, 100105,              162688, 163176, 163178, 163181, 163557,               (e) Unsafe Condition
                                              100111, 100127, 100313, 100741, 101374,                 163559, 163602, 164217, 164279, 164746,                  This AD was prompted by a report that the
                                              101500, 102037, 102054, 102309, 102502,                 164750, 164907, 164908, 165135, 165259,               pitot probes are indicating the wrong
                                              104604, 106134, 106139, 106381, 106905,                 165459, 165805, 166235, 166324, 166325,               airspeed during flight. We are issuing this AD
                                              107251, 107405, 107406, 107450, 107887,                 166326, 166331, 166477, 166481, 166608,               to prevent incorrect airspeed indications
                                              108174, 108302, 108858, 108859, 108967,                 166671, 166673, 166892, 167029, 167030,               during flight, which could lead to loss of
                                              108970, 109119, 109122, 109124, 109128,                 167035, 167037, 167182, 167341, 167556,               control. Due to design redundancy, this is
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              109383, 109393, 109394, 109467, 109474,                 167559, 167705, 167707, 167709, 167763,               only applicable if more than one deficient
                                              109488, 109521, 109524, 109537, 109577,                 167764, 167765, 167766, 167811, 195627,               probe is installed.
                                              109795, 109798, 109799, 109808, 109810,                 195628, 195706, 195707, 195710, 195796,
                                              109946, 109954, 109958, 109962, 109996,                 195833, 195876, 196041, 196042, 196045,               (f) Compliance
                                              110323, 110324, 110327, 110338, 110611,                 196137, 196234, 196397, 196400, 196401,                  Comply with this AD within the
                                              110626, 110880, 110895, 110956, 111061,                 196403, 196498, 196500, 196761, 197097,               compliance times specified. If the actions
                                              111066, 111315, 111320, 111432, 111561,                 197137, 197140, 197143, 197238, 197657,               required in paragraphs (g) and (h)(1) of this
                                              111571, 111578, 111802, 111807, 112229,                 197874, 198528, 198687, 198775, 198780,               AD have already been done before March 16,



                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:59 Feb 08, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00024   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM   09FER1


                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                          5705

                                              2018 (the effective date of this AD), then only         Fort Worth ACO Branch, FAA, 10101                     published yearly and effective on
                                              paragraph (h)(2) of this AD applies.                    Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177–            September 15.
                                                                                                      1524; telephone: (817) 222–5131; fax: (817)
                                              (g) Determine Number of Affected Pitot                                                                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:    John
                                                                                                      222–5245; email: jonathan.kim@faa.gov.
                                              Probes Installed                                                                                              Fornito, Operations Support Group,
                                                 Within 30 days after March 16, 2018 (the               Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on                 Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
                                              effective date of this AD), inspect the                 February 2, 2018.                                     Administration, P.O. Box 20636,
                                              airplane to determine the number of pitot               Melvin J. Johnson,                                    Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
                                              probes identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this           Deputy Director, Policy & Innovation Division,        305–6364.
                                              AD that are installed on the airplane. This             Aircraft Certification Service.                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                              inspection can be performed through a                   [FR Doc. 2018–02550 Filed 2–8–18; 8:45 am]
                                              review of maintenance records in lieu of a
                                                                                                      BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
                                                                                                                                                            Authority for This Rulemaking
                                              physical inspection of the product if the
                                              serial number and repair date can be
                                                                                                                                                              The FAA’s authority to issue rules
                                              positively identified from the review. If the                                                                 regarding aviation safety is found in
                                              serial number cannot be positively identified           DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                          Title 49 of the United States Code.
                                              from a review of the aircraft’s maintenance                                                                   Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
                                              records or from the outside of the airplane,            Federal Aviation Administration                       authority of the FAA Administrator.
                                              this may require the pitot probe to be                                                                        Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
                                              removed from the fuselage to view the serial            14 CFR Part 71                                        describes in more detail the scope of the
                                              number at the inner base of the probe. If it                                                                  agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
                                              is determined that no more than one pitot               [Docket No. FAA–2017–0279; Airspace
                                                                                                      Docket No. 17–ASO–10]                                 promulgated under the authority
                                              probe identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this
                                              AD is installed on the airplane, no further                                                                   described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
                                              action is required except for the ongoing               Establishment of Class E Airspace;                    Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
                                              requirement in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD.             Johnson City, TN                                      section, the FAA is charged with
                                                                                                                                                            prescribing regulations to assign the use
                                              (h) Replace Affected Pitot Probes                       AGENCY:  Federal Aviation                             of airspace necessary to ensure the
                                                 (1) If it is determined that more than one           Administration (FAA), DOT.                            safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
                                              pitot probe identified in paragraph (c)(1) of           ACTION: Final rule.                                   airspace. This regulation is within the
                                              this AD is installed on the airplane during
                                                                                                                                                            scope of that authority as it establishes
                                              the inspection required in paragraph (g) of             SUMMARY:   This action establishes Class
                                              this AD, within the next 2 months after                                                                       Class E airspace at Johnson City Medical
                                                                                                      E airspace extending upward from 700                  Center Heliport, Johnson City, TN, to
                                              March 16, 2018 (the effective date of this
                                              AD), do one of the following so that no more            feet above the surface at Johnson City,               support IFR operations under standard
                                              than one pitot probe identified in paragraph            TN, to accommodate new area                           instrument approach procedures at the
                                              (c)(1) of this AD is installed on any aircraft          navigation (RNAV) global positioning                  heliport.
                                              simultaneously.                                         system (GPS) standard instrument
                                                 (i) Replace the pitot probes that are listed         approach procedures (SIAPs) serving                   History
                                              with pitot probes that do not have a serial             Johnson City Medical Center Heliport.                    The FAA published a notice of
                                              number listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD;           Controlled airspace is necessary for the              proposed rulemaking in the Federal
                                              or                                                      safety and management of instrument                   Register (82 FR 24268, May 26, 2017)
                                                 (ii) Replace the pitot probes that are listed
                                              with one that has been properly repaired, and           flight rules (IFR) operations at the                  for Docket No. FAA–2017–0279 to
                                              if repaired by CSI, has a repair date of August         heliport.                                             establish Class E airspace extending
                                              1, 2014, or later. This can be done by having                                                                 upward from 700 feet above the surface
                                                                                                      DATES:  Effective 0901 UTC, March 29,
                                              the existing pitot probe repaired by CSI                                                                      at Johnson City Medical Center Heliport,
                                                                                                      2018. The Director of the Federal
                                              Aerospace, Inc.                                                                                               Johnson City, TN, due to the new RNAV
                                                                                                      Register approves this incorporation by
                                                 (2) As of March 16, 2018 (the effective date                                                               (GPS) standard instrument approach
                                              of this AD), do not install on any airplane a           reference action under title 1, Code of
                                                                                                                                                            procedures for IFR operations at the
                                              pitot probe having a serial number listed in            Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to
                                                                                                                                                            heliport. Interested parties were invited
                                              paragraph (c)(1) of this AD, unless it has been         the annual revision of FAA Order
                                                                                                                                                            to participate in this rulemaking effort
                                              properly repaired, and if repaired by CSI               7400.11 and publication of conforming
                                              Aerospace, Inc., has a repair date of August
                                                                                                                                                            by submitting written comments on the
                                                                                                      amendments.
                                              1, 2014, or later.                                                                                            proposal to the FAA. No comments
                                                                                                      ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11B,                        were received.
                                              (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance                   Airspace Designations and Reporting                      Class E airspace designations are
                                              (AMOCs)                                                 Points, and subsequent amendments can                 published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
                                                 (1) The Manager, Fort Worth ACO Branch,              be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/               Order 7400.11B dated August 3, 2017,
                                              FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs                 air_traffic/publications/. For further                and effective September 15, 2017, which
                                              for this AD, if requested using the procedures          information, you can contact the                      is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
                                              found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with               Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation
                                              14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
                                                                                                                                                            71.1. The Class E airspace designations
                                                                                                      Administration, 800 Independence                      listed in this document will be
                                              principal inspector or local Flight Standards
                                              District Office, as appropriate. If sending             Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;                      published subsequently in the Order.
                                              information directly to the manager of the              telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is
                                                                                                      also available for inspection at the                  Availability and Summary of
                                              ACO Branch, send it to the attention of the
                                              person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.          National Archives and Records                         Documents for Incorporation by
                                                 (2) Before using any approved AMOC,                  Administration (NARA). For                            Reference
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES




                                              notify your appropriate principal inspector,            information on the availability of FAA                  This document proposes to amend
                                              or lacking a principal inspector, the manager           Order 7400.11B at NARA, call (202)                    FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace
                                              of the local flight standards district office/          741–6030, or go to https://                           Designations and Reporting Points,
                                              certificate holding district office.
                                                                                                      www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/                dated August 3, 2017, and effective
                                              (i) Related Information                                 ibr-locations.html.                                   September 15, 2017. FAA Order
                                                 For more information about this AD,                     FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace                        7400.11B is publicly available as listed
                                              contact Jonathan Kim, Aerospace Engineer,               Designations and Reporting Points, is                 in the ADDRESSES section of this


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:59 Feb 08, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00025   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM   09FER1



Document Created: 2018-02-09 00:12:08
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 00:12:08
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis AD is effective March 16, 2018. Examining the AD Docket
ContactJonathan Kim, Aerospace Engineer, Fort Worth ACO Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177- 1524; telephone: (817) 222-5131; fax: (817) 222-5245; email: [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 5700 
RIN Number2120-AA64
CFR AssociatedAir Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR