83 FR 63389 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 236 (December 10, 2018)

Page Range63389-63392
FR Document2018-26464

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports that, for multimaterial (hybrid) joints of the passenger door frame fittings, the interfay sealant was not applied between all surfaces of the joint parts. This AD requires modification of the hybrid joints of the passenger doors by applying additional corrosion protection to the hybrid joints of the passenger door frame fittings. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 236 (Monday, December 10, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 236 (Monday, December 10, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63389-63392]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26464]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0761; Product Identifier 2018-NM-088-AD; Amendment 
39-19516; AD 2018-25-05]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 
Airbus SAS Model A350-941 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports 
that, for multimaterial (hybrid) joints of the passenger door frame 
fittings, the interfay sealant was not applied between all surfaces of 
the joint parts. This AD requires modification of the hybrid joints of 
the passenger doors by applying additional corrosion protection to the 
hybrid joints of the passenger door frame fittings. We are issuing this 
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective January 14, 2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 14, 
2019.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, 
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, Rond-Point Emile 
Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email continued-
[email protected]; internet http://www.airbus.com. You may 
view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the 
availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also 
available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching 
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0761.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0761; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains 
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and 
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace 
Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3218.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus SAS Model 
A350-941 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on 
September 4, 2018 (83 FR 44844). The NPRM was prompted by reports that, 
for multimaterial (hybrid) joints of the passenger door frame fittings, 
the interfay sealant was not applied between all surfaces of the joint 
parts. The NPRM proposed to require modification of the hybrid joints 
of the passenger doors by applying additional corrosion protection to 
the hybrid joints of the passenger door frame fittings.
    We are issuing this AD to address water ingress in the hybrid 
joints and subsequent galvanic corrosion of the aluminum holes. This 
condition, if not corrected, could lead to failure of the door, 
resulting in reduced evacuation capacity from the airplane during an 
emergency and consequent injury to occupants.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD 
2018-0108, dated May 15, 2018 (referred to after this as the Mandatory 
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an 
unsafe condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 airplanes. The 
MCAI states:

    Due to the misinterpretation of the prevailing requirements for 
multimaterial (hybrid) joints of the passenger door frame fittings, 
the interfay sealant, which prevents water ingress, was only applied 
on the surface in direct contact with the aluminum parts and not 
between all surfaces of the joint parts. For sealing of multi-
material-stacks involving aluminum, application of interfay sealant 
is necessary between all assembled parts, even between parts made of 
corrosion resistant material, in order to ensure a double barrier to 
prevent water ingress in the joint and subsequent potential galvanic 
corrosion on the aluminum holes.
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to failure of the 
door to perform its intended function, possibly resulting in reduced 
evacuation capacity from the aeroplane during an emergency and 
consequent injury to occupants.
    To address this unsafe condition, Airbus developed production 
mod 110790 and mod 109554 to improve protection against corrosion, 
and issued the SB [Airbus Service Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated 
September 7, 2017] to provide modification instructions for in-
service pre-mod aeroplanes.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a 
modification by adding sealant and protective treatment on the 
affected passenger doors.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0761.

[[Page 63390]]

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the 
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

    The Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA), Delta Air 
Lines (DAL), and JM, a private citizen, indicated their support for the 
NPRM.

Request To Allow Alternative Method of Compliance

    DAL requested the addition of a paragraph in the final rule that 
would allow operators to use certain Airbus Model A350 Airplane 
Maintenance Manual (AMM) tasks, identified in the comment, to 
accomplish the actions that would be required by the final rule. The 
commenter noted that the Airbus Model A350 AMM includes tasks related 
to maintenance of the passenger door frame fittings, including 
installation of the fittings with sealant applied between the fitting 
and the door, similar to what is described in the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated September 
7, 2017.
    The commenter also pointed out that the Airbus Model A350 AMM tasks 
do not include application of a top coat spray or corrosion prevention 
compound after installation of passenger door frame fittings, or 
include application of top coat sealant and application of primer over 
the fasteners, which are included in the Accomplishment Instructions of 
Airbus Service Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated September 7, 2017. The 
commenter observed that replacement of passenger door frame fittings 
in-service is customary, and that if an operator uses the Airbus Model 
A350 AMM tasks in-service to rework the passenger door frame fittings, 
the operator could be out of compliance with the requirements of the 
final rule because of the differences in the procedures between the 
Airbus Model A350 AMM tasks and the Accomplishment Instructions of 
Airbus Service Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated September 7, 2017.
    The commenter also indicated that some operators may perceive using 
the fay surface sealant as described in the Airbus Model A350 AMM tasks 
to be a more robust solution than the spray-on corrosion inhibitor 
compounds or top coating of fasteners described in the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated September 
7, 2017. The commenter observed that some operators may prefer to 
remove the passenger door frame fittings, apply the fay surface 
sealant, and re-install the passenger door frame fittings.
    The commenter clarified that the language in the suggested 
paragraph would not mandate the use of the Airbus Model A350 AMM tasks, 
but would state that operators would have to apply for an alternative 
method of compliance (AMOC) in order to use the Airbus Model A350 AMM 
tasks instead of the procedures in the Accomplishment Instructions of 
Airbus Service Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated September 7, 2017.
    We disagree with the commenter's request. The Airbus Model A350 AMM 
task numbers provided by the commenter do not match the Airbus Model 
A350 AMM task numbers specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A350-52-
P012, dated September 7, 2017. Also, the commenter did not provide 
sufficient documentation to show that, in regard to the unsafe 
condition identified in this AD, the Airbus Model A350 AMM tasks 
provide an equivalent level of safety as the procedures described in 
Airbus Service Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated September 7, 2017. Under 
the provisions of paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, operators may apply for 
an AMOC to use other Airbus Model A350 AMM tasks instead of the 
procedures in the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service 
Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated September 7, 2017. We have not changed 
this AD in regard to this issue.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this final rule as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We 
have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the 
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus SAS has issued Service Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated 
September 7, 2017. This service information describes procedures for 
modification of the hybrid joints of the left-hand and right-hand sides 
of the passenger door frame fittings at doors 1, 2, 3 and 4, by 
applying additional corrosion protection. This service information is 
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it 
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in 
the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1 airplane of U.S. registry. We 
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
60 work-hours x $85 per hour = $5,100........................              $0           $5,100           $5,100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this AD 
may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on 
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected 
individuals. As a result, we have included all known costs in our cost 
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority

[[Page 63391]]

because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or 
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the 
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by 
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is 
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but 
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the 
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and 
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

2018-25-05 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-19516; Docket No. FAA-2018-0761; 
Product Identifier 2018-NM-088-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective January 14, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model A350-941 airplanes, 
certificated in any category, as identified in Airbus Service 
Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated September 7, 2017.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports that, for multimaterial (hybrid) 
joints of the passenger door frame fittings, the interfay sealant 
was not applied between all surfaces of the joint parts. We are 
issuing this AD to address water ingress in the hybrid joints and 
subsequent galvanic corrosion of the aluminum holes. This condition, 
if not corrected, could lead to failure of the door, resulting in 
reduced evacuation capacity from the airplane during an emergency 
and consequent injury to occupants.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Modification of Passenger Door Hybrid Joints

    Within 48 months after the date of issuance of the original 
certificate of airworthiness or the original export certificate of 
airworthiness, whichever occurs earlier: Apply additional corrosion 
protection (e.g. primer/topcoat or corrosion prevention compound) to 
the hybrid joints of the left-hand and right-hand sides of the 
passenger door frame fittings at doors 1, 2, 3 and 4, in accordance 
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin 
A350-52-P012, dated September 7, 2017.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the 
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight 
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information 
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of 
the person identified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Information 
may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any 
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or 
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight 
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD 
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be 
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International 
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation 
Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus SAS's EASA Design Organization 
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include 
the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information 
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those 
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any 
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended. 
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be 
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the 
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining 
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as 
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy 
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests 
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(i) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information 
(MCAI) EASA AD 2018-0108, dated May 15, 2018, for related 
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket 
No. FAA-2018-0761.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Kathleen 
Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport 
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; 
telephone and fax 206-231-3218.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed 
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do 
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A350-52-P012, dated September 7, 
2017.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine 
No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax 
+33 5 61 93 45 80; email continued-[email protected]; 
internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport 
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated 
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.


[[Page 63392]]


    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on November 23, 2018.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-26464 Filed 12-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Current View
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis AD is effective January 14, 2019.
ContactKathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3218.
FR Citation83 FR 63389 
RIN Number2120-AA64
CFR AssociatedAir Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR