83 FR 63479 - Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 236 (December 10, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 236 (December 10, 2018)
| Page Range | 63479-63482 | |
| FR Document | 2018-26652 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 236 (Monday, December 10, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 63479-63482] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-26652] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-831] Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that exporters of fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China (China) sold merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), November 1, 2016, through October 31, 2017. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable December 10, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, [[Page 63480]] DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6251 or (202) 482-4956. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 11, 2018, Commerce initiated the twenty-third administrative review of fresh garlic from China with respect to 53 companies and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through January 22, 2018. As a result, all deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by three days.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 1329 (January 11, 2018). \2\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government,'' dated January 23, 2018 (Tolling Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order includes all grades of garlic, whole or separated into constituent cloves. Fresh garlic that are subject to the order are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0020, and 0703.20.0090. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive. For a full description of the scope of this order, please see ``Scope of the Order'' in the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 2016-2017 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China'' (November 30, 2018) (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission of Administrative Review On January 11, 2018, Commerce initiated a review of 53 companies in this administrative review.\4\ The mandatory respondents are Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Zhengyang) and Qingdao Sea-line International Trading Co. Ltd. (Sea-line). Between March 27, 2018, and April 12, 2018, review requests were timely withdrawn for twelve companies.\5\ Commerce is, therefore, partially rescinding this administrative review with respect to the companies listed in Appendix I, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 1329 (January 11, 2018). \5\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce is conducting these reviews in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.214. Export prices were calculated in accordance with section 772(a) of the Act. Because China is a non- market economy (NME) within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, NV has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments As discussed at ``Preliminary Determination of No Shipments'' in the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the QTF-Entity \6\ and Jining Shengtai Fruits and Vegetables Co., Ltd. (Shengtai) filed ``no shipment'' certifications stating that they had no entries into the United States of subject merchandise during the POR. Accordingly, we requested that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) conduct a query of potential shipments made by the QTF-Entity and Shengtai. Based on the company certifications and our analysis of CBP information, we preliminarily determine that the companies listed in Appendix III did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. In addition, we find that it is appropriate to complete the administrative review with respect to these companies and intend to issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the administrative review.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ The QTF-Entity includes Qingdao Lianghe International Trade Co., Ltd. (Lianghe); Qingdao Xintianfeng Foods Co., Ltd. (QXF); Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd. (QTF); Qingdao Tianhefeng Foods Co., Ltd. (QTHF); Qingdao Beixing Trading Co., Ltd. (QBT); Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd.; and Huamei Consulting. See Memorandum, ``23rd Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Status of the QTF-Entity,'' dated October 22, 2018 at Attachment. \7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011); see also ``Assessment Rates'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Verification As provided in section 19 CFR 351.307, we intend to verify information relied upon in the final results of the review. Preliminary Determination of Separate Rates for Non-Selected Companies In accordance with section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act, Commerce employed a limited examination methodology, as we determined that it would not be practicable to examine individually all companies for which a review request was made.\8\ There were six exporters of subject merchandise from China that have demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate but were not selected for individual examination in this review. These six exporters are listed in Appendix II. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Memorandum, ``Selection of Respondents for Individual Examination,'' dated February 28, 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neither the Act nor Commerce's regulations address the establishment of the rate applied to individual companies not selected for examination where Commerce limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Commerce's practice in cases involving limited selection based on exporters accounting for the largest volume of imports has been to look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs Commerce to use rates established for individually investigated producers and exporters, excluding any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available in investigations. In this review, we calculated weighted-average dumping margins for Zhengyang and Sea-line, and consistent with our practice, calculated an all-others rate for the companies to which it granted separate rate status, but which it did not individually examine.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Preliminary Dumping Margin for Separate Rate Recipients,'' dated November 30, 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- China-Wide Entity Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide entity applies to this administrative [[Page 63481]] review.\10\ Under this policy, the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce self- initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested, and Commerce did not self-initiate, a review of the China-wide entity for this POR, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate (i.e., $4.71/kg) is not subject to change.\11\ Aside from the no shipments companies discussed below, and the companies for which the review is being rescinded, Commerce considers all other companies for which a review was requested, and which did not preliminarily qualify for a separate rate, to be part of the China-wide entity. For additional information, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). \11\ See Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the 13th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Reviews, 74 FR 29174 (June 19, 2009). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Administrative Review Commerce preliminarily determines that the following weighted- average dumping margins exist for the administrative review covering the period November 1, 2016, through October 31, 2017: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average margin Exporter (dollars per kilogram) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co., Ltd.... 2.87 Qingdao Sea-Line International Trading Co., Ltd......... 4.60 Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd... 3.69 Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd.............................. 3.69 Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Ltd............. 3.69 Shandong Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd.......... 3.69 Shandong Happy Foods Co., Ltd........................... 3.69 Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd....... 3.69 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure, Public Comment and Opportunity To Request a Hearing Commerce intends to disclose the calculations used in our analyses to parties in this review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted by interested parties no later than seven days after the date on which the final verification report is issued in these proceedings and rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\12\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\13\ Any electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by the date and time it is due. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309. See also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310, any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice. Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. If a party requests a hearing, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. Commerce intends to issue the final results of these reviews, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions with respect to the companies for which this review is rescinded to CBP 15 days after the publication of this notice. For the remaining companies subject to review, Commerce will direct CBP to assess rates based on the per-unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on each entry of the subject merchandise during the POR. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of review. Pursuant to Commerce's assessment practice in NME cases, for merchandise that was not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, but that entered under the case number of that exporter (i.e., at the individually-examined exporter's cash deposit rate), Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the NME-wide rate. In addition, if Commerce determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the China-wide rate.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2) [[Page 63482]] of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the China- wide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars per kilogram; and (4) for all non- Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: November 30, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary of Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Companies for Which Administrative Reviews Have Been Rescinded 1. Foshan Fuyi Food Co., Ltd. 2. Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd. 3. Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export Co., Ltd. 4. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. 5. Jinxiang Kingkey Trade Co., Ltd. 6. Qingdao Joinseafoods 7. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd. 8. Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd. 9. Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. 10. Weifang Naike Food Co., Ltd. 11. Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. 12. Zhengzhou Yudishengjin Agricultural Trade Co., Ltd. Appendix II Non-Selected Separate Rate Companies 1. Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd 2. Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd. 3. Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Ltd. 4. Shandong Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd. 5. Shandong Happy Foods Co., Ltd. 6. Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd. Appendix III Companies That Have Certified No Shipments 1. QTF-Entity 2. Jining Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd. [FR Doc. 2018-26652 Filed 12-7-18; 8:45 a.m.] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2018 / Notices 63479
Public Comment weighted-average dumping margin is Dated: December 3, 2018.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), zero or de minimis in the final results Gary Taverman,
interested parties may submit case briefs of this review, we will instruct CBP not Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
no later than 30 days after the date of to assess duties on any of its entries in and Countervailing Duty Operations,
accordance with the Final Modification performing the non-exclusive functions and
publication of this notice. Rebuttal
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
briefs, limited to issues raised in the for Reviews.10
Enforcement and Compliance.
case briefs, may be filed no later than For entries of subject merchandise
five days after the date for filing case during the POR produced by Sidenor for Appendix
briefs.6 Parties who submit case briefs or which it did not know its merchandise List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are was destined for the United States, we Decision Memorandum
encouraged to submit with each will instruct CBP to liquidate I. Summary
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; II. Background
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate
(2) a brief summary of the argument; III. Period of Review
and (3) a table of authorities.7 if there is no rate for the intermediate
IV. Scope of the Order
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), company or companies involved in the V. Discussion of the Methodology
interested parties who wish to request a transaction. (1) Comparisons to Normal Value
hearing must submit a written request to We intend to issue instructions to A. Determination of Comparison Method
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement CBP 15 days after publication of the B. Results of the Differential Pricing
and Compliance. All documents must Analysis
final results of this review. (2) Product Comparisons
be filed electronically using ACCESS,
Cash Deposit Requirements (3) Date of Sale
which is available to registered users at (4) Level of Trade/CEP Offset
http://access.trade.gov. An (5) Export Price
In the Revocation Notice, Commerce
electronically filed request must be (6) Normal Value
stated that it would issue instructions to
received successfully in its entirety by A. Home Market Viability and Comparison
CBP to terminate the suspension of
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Market
within 30 days after the date of liquidation and to discontinue the B. Cost of Production
publication of this notice.8 Requests collection of cash deposits on entries of 1. Calculation of Cost of Production
should contain: (1) The party’s name, subject merchandise, entered or 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
withdrawn from warehouse, on or after 3. Results of the COP Test
address and telephone number; (2) the
August 9, 2017.11 On October 19, 2018, C. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
number of participants; and (3) a list of Comparison Market Prices
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in Commerce issued liquidation
D. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison
the hearing will be limited to those instructions to CBP.12 Furthermore, VI. Currency Conversion
raised in the respective case briefs. because the antidumping duty order on VII. Recommendation
Commerce intends to issue the final SSB from Spain has been revoked as a [FR Doc. 2018–26650 Filed 12–7–18; 8:45 am]
results of this administrative review, result of the Revocation Notice, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
including the results of its analysis of Commerce will not issue cash deposit
the issues raised in any written briefs, instructions at the conclusion of this
no later than 120 days after the date of administrative review. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
publication of this notice, unless
extended, pursuant to section Notification to Importers International Trade Administration
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR This notice serves as a preliminary [A–570–831]
351.213(h)(1) and (2).
reminder to importers of their
Assessment Rates responsibility under 19 CFR Fresh Garlic From the People’s
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Republic of China: Preliminary Results
Upon issuance of the final results,
regarding the reimbursement of of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Commerce shall determine and U.S.
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Review; 2016–2017
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess antidumping duties on all of the relevant entries during this POR. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
appropriate entries covered by this Failure to comply with this requirement International Trade Administration,
revised POR. If Sidenor’s weighted- could result in the Secretary’s Department of Commerce.
average dumping margin continues to be presumption that reimbursement of SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
above de minimis in the final results of antidumping duties occurred and the (Commerce) preliminarily determines
this review, we will calculate importer- subsequent assessment of double that exporters of fresh garlic from the
specific assessment rates based on the antidumping duties. People’s Republic of China (China) sold
ratio of the total amount of antidumping merchandise in the United States at
We are issuing and publishing these
duties calculated for each importer’s prices below normal value (NV) during
results in accordance with sections
examined sales and the total entered the period of review (POR), November 1,
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
value of the sales in accordance with 19 2016, through October 31, 2017. We
CFR 351.212(b)(1).9 If Sidenor’s CFR 351.213(h)(1) and 351.221(b)(4).
invite interested parties to comment on
these preliminary results.
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for DATES: Applicable December 10, 2018.
7 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing Reviews).
requirements). 10 See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
8102.
Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla,
9 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied
11 See Revocation Notice, 83 FR at 49911. AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Enforcement and Compliance,
12 See Commerce Letter re: Sunset Revocation of
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Antidumping Duty Orders—U.S. Customs and International Trade Administration,
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Border Protection (CBP) Liquidation Instructions, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 dated November 26, 2018. Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:10 Dec 07, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_63715/page/1.svg)
![63482 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 236 / Monday, December 10, 2018 / Notices
of the Act: (1) For the companies listed Appendix II noaa.gov)or visit the NOAA RDEC
above, the cash deposit rate will be the Non-Selected Separate Rate Companies website at https://nrc.noaa.gov/About/
rate established in these final results of Committees.aspx.
1. Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry &
review (except, if the rate is zero or de Commerce Co., Ltd SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Key vision
minimis, then zero cash deposit will be 2. Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd. statement areas of the plan include: (1)
required for that company); (2) for 3. Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Reduced societal impacts from severe
previously investigated or reviewed Ltd. weather and other environmental
Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 4. Shandong Chenhe International Trading phenomena; (2) Sustainable use of
listed above that have separate rates, the Co., Ltd.
5. Shandong Happy Foods Co., Ltd.
ocean and coastal resources; and (3) A
cash deposit rate will continue to be the robust and effective research,
exporter-specific rate published for the 6. Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics
Co., Ltd. development, and transition enterprise.
most recent period; (3) for all Chinese Comments may address the proposed
exporters of subject merchandise which Appendix III vision statements as well as key
have not been found to be entitled to a Companies That Have Certified No questions, objectives, document
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will Shipments structure, and other content and
be the China-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. formatting aspects to consider for a draft
1. QTF-Entity
dollars per kilogram; and (4) for all non- 2. Jining Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co., R&D Plan.
Chinese exporters of subject Ltd.
merchandise which have not received Dated: October 31, 2018.
[FR Doc. 2018–26652 Filed 12–7–18; 8:45 a.m.]
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will David Holst,
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
be the rate applicable to the Chinese Chief Financial Officer/Administrative
exporter that supplied that non-Chinese Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric
Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
exporter. These requirements, when DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Administration.
imposed, shall remain in effect until
National Oceanic and Atmospheric [FR Doc. 2018–26131 Filed 12–7–18; 8:45 am]
further notice.
Administration BILLING CODE 3510–KD–P
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary Public Comment for the NOAA
reminder to importers of their Research and Development Plan DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
responsibility under 19 CFR AGENCY: National Oceanic and National Oceanic and Atmospheric
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Administration
regarding the reimbursement of Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Research (OAR), Department of RIN 0648–XG319
of the relevant entries during this Commerce (DOC).
review period. Failure to comply with Marine Mammals; File No. 22294
ACTION: Notice of public comment.
this requirement could result in AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Commerce’s presumption that SUMMARY: This notice sets forth a public Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
reimbursement of antidumping duties comment for NOAA’s Research and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
occurred and the subsequent assessment Development (R&D) Plan set for release Commerce.
of double antidumping duties. in 2019. NOAA R&D is an investment in ACTION: Notice; withdrawal of
We are issuing and publishing these the scientific knowledge and technology application.
preliminary results in accordance with that will allow the United States to
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, protect lives and property, adapt to SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and challenges, sustain a strong economy, Plimsoll Productions, Whiteladies
351.221(b)(4). and manage natural resources. The R&D House, 51–55 Whiteladies Road, Clifton,
Dated: November 30, 2018. strategic plan will provide a common Bristol, BS8 2LY, United Kingdom
Gary Taverman, understanding among NOAA’s (Responsible Party: Bill Markham) has
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping leadership, workforce, partners, and withdrawn their application for a permit
and Countervailing Duty Operations, constituents on the value and direction to conduct commercial or educational
performing the non-exclusive functions and of NOAA R&D activities. photography on bottlenose dolphins
duties of the Assistant Secretary of DATES: Comments are due by February (Tursiops truncatus).
Enforcement and Compliance. 8, 2019. ADDRESSES: The application and related
Appendix I Please refer to the web page https:// documents are available for review
nrc.noaa.gov/CouncilProducts/Research upon written request or by appointment
Companies for Which Administrative Plans.aspx to find the previous NOAA in the Permits and Conservation
Reviews Have Been Rescinded
R&D plan. Division, Office of Protected Resources,
1. Foshan Fuyi Food Co., Ltd. ADDRESSES: Submit public comments NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
2. Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
Ltd. via email to noaa.rdplan@noaa.gov.
3. Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export Co., Ltd. Include ‘‘NOAA R&D Plan Public (301) 427–8401; fax (301) 713–0376.
4. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. Comment’’ in the subject line of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
5. Jinxiang Kingkey Trade Co., Ltd. message. All comments received are Carrie Hubard or Sara Young, (301) 427–
6. Qingdao Joinseafoods part of the public record. 8401.
7. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 2,
8. Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd.
9. Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.
Gary Matlock, Deputy Assistant 2018, notice was published in the
10. Weifang Naike Food Co., Ltd. Administrator for Science, NOAA, Rm. Federal Register (83 FR 30916) that a
11. Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. 11461, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver request for a permit to conduct
12. Zhengzhou Yudishengjin Agricultural Spring, Maryland 20910. (Phone: 301– commercial or educational photography
Trade Co., Ltd. 734–1185, Email: gary.c.matlock@ had been submitted by the above-named
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:10 Dec 07, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_63715/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-12-08 00:21:38
Document Modified: 2018-12-08 00:21:38
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable December 10, 2018. | |
| Contact | Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6251 or (202) 482-4956. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 63479 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR