83 FR 63802 - Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans; Valuation of Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 238 (December 12, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 238 (December 12, 2018)
| Page Range | 63802-63804 | |
| FR Document | 2018-26843 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 12, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 63802-63804] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-26843] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION 29 CFR Part 4044 Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans; Valuation of Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This rule amends the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's regulation on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans by substituting a new table for determining expected retirement ages for participants in pension plans undergoing distress or involuntary termination with valuation dates falling in 2019. This table is needed to compute the value of early retirement benefits and, thus, the total value of benefits under a plan. DATES: This rule is effective January 1, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hilary Duke ([email protected]), Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs, Office of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20005, 202-326-4400, ext. 3839. (TTY users may call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800- [[Page 63803]] 877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-4400, ext. 3839.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) administers the pension plan termination insurance program under title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). PBGC's regulation on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans (29 CFR part 4044) sets forth (in subpart B) the methods for valuing plan benefits of terminating single-employer plans covered under title IV. Guaranteed benefits and benefit liabilities under a plan that is undergoing a distress termination must be valued in accordance with subpart B of part 4044. In addition, when PBGC terminates an underfunded plan involuntarily pursuant to ERISA section 4042(a), it uses the subpart B valuation rules to determine the amount of the plan's underfunding. Under Sec. 4044.51(b) of the asset allocation regulation, early retirement benefits are valued based on the annuity starting date, if a retirement date has been selected, or the expected retirement age, if the annuity starting date is not known on the valuation date. Sections 4044.55 through 4044.57 set forth rules for determining the expected retirement ages for plan participants entitled to early retirement benefits. Appendix D of part 4044 contains tables to be used in determining the expected early retirement ages. Table I in appendix D (Selection of Retirement Rate Category) is used to determine whether a participant has a low, medium, or high probability of retiring early. The determination is based on the year a participant would reach ``unreduced retirement age'' (i.e., the earlier of the normal retirement age or the age at which an unreduced benefit is first payable) and the participant's monthly benefit at unreduced retirement age. The table applies only to plans with valuation dates in the current year and is updated annually by PBGC to reflect changes in the cost of living, etc. Tables II-A, II-B, and II-C (Expected Retirement Ages for Individuals in the Low, Medium, and High Categories respectively) are used to determine the expected retirement age after the probability of early retirement has been determined using Table I. These tables establish, by probability category, the expected retirement age based on both the earliest age a participant could retire under the plan and the unreduced retirement age. This expected retirement age is used to compute the value of the early retirement benefit and, thus, the total value of benefits under the plan. This document amends appendix D to replace Table I-18 with Table I- 19 to provide an updated correlation, appropriate for calendar year 2019, between the amount of a participant's benefit and the probability that the participant will elect early retirement. Table I-19 will be used to value benefits in plans with valuation dates during calendar year 2019. PBGC has determined that notice of, and public comment on, this rule are impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Plan administrators need to be able to estimate accurately the value of plan benefits as early as possible before initiating the termination process. For that purpose, if a plan has a valuation date in 2019, the plan administrator needs the updated table being promulgated in this rule. Accordingly, PBGC finds that the public interest is best served by issuing this table expeditiously, without an opportunity for notice and comment, and that good cause exists for making the table set forth in this amendment effective less than 30 days after publication to allow as much time as possible to estimate the value of plan benefits with the proper table for plans with valuation dates in early 2019. PBGC has determined that this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the criteria set forth in Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13771. Because no general notice of proposed rulemaking is required for this regulation, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply (5 U.S.C. 601(2)). List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 4044 Employee benefit plans, Pension insurance. In consideration of the foregoing, 29 CFR part 4044 is amended as follows: PART 4044--ALLOCATION OF ASSETS IN SINGLE-EMPLOYER PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 4044 continues to read as follows: Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3), 1341, 1344, 1362. 0 2. Appendix D to part 4044 is amended by removing Table I-18 and adding in its place Table I-19 to read as follows: Appendix D to Part 4044--Tables Used To Determine Expected Retirement Age Table I-19--Selection of Retirement Rate Category [For valuation dates in 2019 \1\] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Participant's retirement rate category is-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Low \2\ if Medium \3\ if monthly benefit at High \4\ if If participant reaches URA in year-- monthly benefit URA is-- monthly benefit at URA is less ------------------------------------ at URA is than-- From-- To-- greater than-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2020.................................... 655 655 2,767 2,767 2021.................................... 670 670 2,831 2,831 2022.................................... 686 686 2,896 2,896 2023.................................... 701 701 2,963 2,963 2024.................................... 718 718 3,031 3,031 2025.................................... 734 734 3,100 3,100 2026.................................... 751 751 3,172 3,172 2027.................................... 768 768 3,245 3,245 2028.................................... 786 786 3,319 3,319 2029 or later........................... 804 804 3,396 3,396 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Applicable tables for valuation dates before 2019 are available on PBGC's website (www.pbgc.gov). \2\ Table II-A. \3\ Table II-B. \4\ Table II-C. [[Page 63804]] * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC. Hilary Duke, Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. [FR Doc. 2018-26843 Filed 12-11-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7709-02-P
![63802 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
3308; or Airbus Service Bulletin A330–34– (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (ii) Airbus A330/A340 Airplane Flight
3345; embodied in service. (AMOCs): The Manager, International Manual Temporary Revision TR774, RNP AR
(3) Group 3 airplanes are those in any Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, Operations Forbidden with FMGEC Standard
configuration other than that identified in has the authority to approve AMOCs for this P5H3, Issue 1, dated October 16, 2017.
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. AD, if requested using the procedures found (3) For Airbus SAS service information
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS,
(h) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision 39.19, send your request to your principal Airworthiness Office—EAL, Rond-Point
For Group 2 airplanes: Within 30 days after inspector or local Flight Standards District Emile Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex,
the effective date of this AD, revise the Office, as appropriate. If sending information France, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
Limitations section of the Airbus A330/A340 directly to the International Section, send it fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
AFM to include the information in Airbus to the attention of the person identified in airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
A330/A340 AFM Temporary Revision paragraph (m)(2) of this AD. Information may internet http://www.airbus.com.
TR774, RNP AR Operations Forbidden with be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC- (4) You may view this service information
FMGEC Standard P5H3, Issue 1, dated REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
October 16, 2017 (‘‘TR774’’), and inform all approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
flight crews, and, thereafter, operate the principal inspector, or lacking a principal information on the availability of this
airplane accordingly, as specified in TR774. inspector, the manager of the local flight material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
TR774 prohibits the RNP–AR operation on standards district office/certificate holding (5) You may view this service information
district office. that is incorporated by reference at the
Airbus SAS Model A330 series airplanes
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any National Archives and Records
equipped with FMGEC standard P5H3.
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective Administration (NARA). For information on
Revising the AFM to include TR774 may be
actions from a manufacturer, the action must the availability of this material at NARA, call
done by inserting a copy of TR774 in the
be accomplished using a method approved 202–741–6030, or go to: http://
AFM. When TR774 has been included in by the Manager, International Section,
general revisions of the AFM, the general www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the locations.html.
revisions may be inserted in the AFM, European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
provided the relevant information in the Airbus SAS’s EASA Design Organization Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
general revision is identical to that in TR774, Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, November 2, 2018.
and TR774 may be removed. the approval must include the DOA Jeffrey E. Duven,
Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD: The authorized signature.
Airbus A330/A340 AFM for the aircraft Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any Certification Service.
affected by this AD is required to be service information contains procedures or
furnished with the aircraft, in accordance tests that are identified as RC, those [FR Doc. 2018–24685 Filed 12–11–18; 8:45 am]
with 14 CFR 25.1581. Further, operators of procedures and tests must be done to comply BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
the aircraft affected by this AD must operate with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
in accordance with the limitations specified not identified as RC are recommended. Those
in the AFM, in accordance with 14 CFR 91.9. procedures and tests that are not identified
(i) FMS Software Modification as RC may be deviated from using accepted PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
methods in accordance with the operator’s CORPORATION
(1) For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes: maintenance or inspection program without
Within 60 days after the effective date of this obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided 29 CFR Part 4044
AD, modify the airplane by installing FMS the procedures and tests identified as RC can
software P4A (P/N FMS operational SW be done and the airplane can be put back in Allocation of Assets in Single-
PS4087700–905) on FMGEC standard P5H3 an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
(P/N FMGEC C13226HA07 with P/N FMS
Employer Plans; Valuation of Benefits
changes to procedures or tests identified as and Assets; Expected Retirement Age
operational SW PS4087700–906), in RC require approval of an AMOC.
accordance with the instructions of Airbus AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty
Service Bulletin A330–22–3264, dated March (m) Related Information
14, 2018.
Corporation.
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
(2) For Group 2 airplanes: After Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD ACTION: Final rule.
modification of an airplane as required by 2017–0233, dated November 23, 2017, for
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, the AFM revision related information. This MCAI may be SUMMARY: This rule amends the Pension
required by paragraph (h) of this AD may be found in the AD docket on the internet at Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s
removed from the AFM of that airplane. http://www.regulations.gov by searching for regulation on Allocation of Assets in
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0584. Single-Employer Plans by substituting a
(j) Optional Modification (2) For more information about this AD, new table for determining expected
For Group 3 airplanes: From the effective contact Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace retirement ages for participants in
date of this AD, it is allowed to modify any Engineer, International Section, Transport
airplane into a Group 1 or Group 2 Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
pension plans undergoing distress or
configuration, provided that, concurrently, St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and involuntary termination with valuation
that airplane is modified in accordance with fax 206–231–3229. dates falling in 2019. This table is
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus (3) Service information identified in this needed to compute the value of early
Service Bulletin A330–22–3264, dated March AD that is not incorporated by reference is retirement benefits and, thus, the total
14, 2018. available at the addresses specified in value of benefits under a plan.
paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions DATES: This rule is effective January 1,
This paragraph provides credit for the (n) Material Incorporated by Reference 2019.
actions required by paragraph (i) of this AD (1) The Director of the Federal Register FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and optional actions specified in paragraph approved the incorporation by reference Hilary Duke (duke.hilary@pbgc.gov),
(j) of this AD, if those actions were performed (IBR) of the service information listed in this Assistant General Counsel for
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
before the effective date of this AD using paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Regulatory Affairs, Office of the General
Airbus Alert Operators Transmission–AOT part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
A22L002–17, dated October 20, 2017.
as applicable to do the actions required by Corporation, 1200 K Street NW,
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. Washington, DC 20005, 202–326–4400,
The following provisions also apply to this (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–22–3264, ext. 3839. (TTY users may call the
AD: dated March 14, 2018. Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Dec 11, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM 12DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_64040/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 63803
877–8339 and ask to be connected to reach ‘‘unreduced retirement age’’ (i.e., promulgated in this rule. Accordingly,
202–326–4400, ext. 3839.) the earlier of the normal retirement age PBGC finds that the public interest is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The or the age at which an unreduced best served by issuing this table
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation benefit is first payable) and the expeditiously, without an opportunity
(PBGC) administers the pension plan participant’s monthly benefit at for notice and comment, and that good
termination insurance program under unreduced retirement age. The table cause exists for making the table set
title IV of the Employee Retirement applies only to plans with valuation forth in this amendment effective less
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). dates in the current year and is updated than 30 days after publication to allow
PBGC’s regulation on Allocation of annually by PBGC to reflect changes in as much time as possible to estimate the
Assets in Single-Employer Plans (29 the cost of living, etc. value of plan benefits with the proper
CFR part 4044) sets forth (in subpart B) Tables II–A, II–B, and II–C (Expected table for plans with valuation dates in
the methods for valuing plan benefits of Retirement Ages for Individuals in the early 2019.
Low, Medium, and High Categories PBGC has determined that this action
terminating single-employer plans
respectively) are used to determine the is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
covered under title IV. Guaranteed
expected retirement age after the under the criteria set forth in Executive
benefits and benefit liabilities under a
probability of early retirement has been Order 12866 and Executive Order
plan that is undergoing a distress
determined using Table I. These tables 13771.
termination must be valued in
establish, by probability category, the Because no general notice of proposed
accordance with subpart B of part 4044.
expected retirement age based on both rulemaking is required for this
In addition, when PBGC terminates an
the earliest age a participant could retire
underfunded plan involuntarily regulation, the Regulatory Flexibility
under the plan and the unreduced
pursuant to ERISA section 4042(a), it Act of 1980 does not apply (5 U.S.C.
retirement age. This expected retirement
uses the subpart B valuation rules to 601(2)).
age is used to compute the value of the
determine the amount of the plan’s early retirement benefit and, thus, the List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 4044
underfunding. total value of benefits under the plan.
Under § 4044.51(b) of the asset This document amends appendix D to Employee benefit plans, Pension
allocation regulation, early retirement replace Table I–18 with Table I–19 to insurance.
benefits are valued based on the annuity provide an updated correlation, In consideration of the foregoing, 29
starting date, if a retirement date has appropriate for calendar year 2019, CFR part 4044 is amended as follows:
been selected, or the expected between the amount of a participant’s
retirement age, if the annuity starting benefit and the probability that the PART 4044—ALLOCATION OF
date is not known on the valuation date. participant will elect early retirement. ASSETS IN SINGLE-EMPLOYER
Sections 4044.55 through 4044.57 set Table I–19 will be used to value benefits PLANS
forth rules for determining the expected in plans with valuation dates during
retirement ages for plan participants calendar year 2019. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 4044
entitled to early retirement benefits. PBGC has determined that notice of, continues to read as follows:
Appendix D of part 4044 contains tables and public comment on, this rule are Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3),
to be used in determining the expected impracticable and contrary to the public 1341, 1344, 1362.
early retirement ages. interest. Plan administrators need to be
■ 2. Appendix D to part 4044 is
Table I in appendix D (Selection of able to estimate accurately the value of
amended by removing Table I–18 and
Retirement Rate Category) is used to plan benefits as early as possible before
adding in its place Table I–19 to read as
determine whether a participant has a initiating the termination process. For
follows:
low, medium, or high probability of that purpose, if a plan has a valuation
retiring early. The determination is date in 2019, the plan administrator Appendix D to Part 4044—Tables Used
based on the year a participant would needs the updated table being To Determine Expected Retirement Age
TABLE I–19—SELECTION OF RETIREMENT RATE CATEGORY
[For valuation dates in 2019 1]
Participant’s retirement rate category is—
Low 2 if High 4 if
If participant reaches URA in year— Medium 3 if monthly benefit at URA
monthly monthly
is—
benefit at benefit at
URA is less URA is
than— From— To— greater than—
2020 ................................................................................................. 655 655 2,767 2,767
2021 ................................................................................................. 670 670 2,831 2,831
2022 ................................................................................................. 686 686 2,896 2,896
2023 ................................................................................................. 701 701 2,963 2,963
2024 ................................................................................................. 718 718 3,031 3,031
2025 ................................................................................................. 734 734 3,100 3,100
2026 ................................................................................................. 751 751 3,172 3,172
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
2027 ................................................................................................. 768 768 3,245 3,245
2028 ................................................................................................. 786 786 3,319 3,319
2029 or later .................................................................................... 804 804 3,396 3,396
1 Applicable tables for valuation dates before 2019 are available on PBGC’s website (www.pbgc.gov).
2 Table II–A.
3 Table II–B.
4 Table II–C.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Dec 11, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM 12DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_64040/page/2.svg)
![63804 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 12, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
* * * * * I. Table of Abbreviations IV. Discussion of the Rule
Issued in Washington, DC. COTP Captain of the Port This rule establishes a safety zone that
Hilary Duke, CFR Code of Federal Regulations will encompass all navigable waters of
Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory DHS Department of Homeland Security the Atlantic Ocean within a 1000-yard
Affairs Pension Benefit Guaranty E.O Executive order radius of a Falcon 9 rocket located at
Corporation. FR Federal Register position 28°24.3 N 080°30.8 W, in the
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
[FR Doc. 2018–26843 Filed 12–11–18; 8:45 am]
Pub. L. Public Law
vicinity of Port Canaveral Harbor, Cape
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P § Section Canaveral, Florida. The safety zone will
U.S.C. United States Code be enforced during control, movement,
and removal operations associated with
II. Background Information and the Falcon 9 rocket from 7 p.m. on
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Regulatory History December 5, 2018 until 11:59 p.m. on
SECURITY The Coast Guard is issuing this December 28, 2018, unless sooner
temporary rule without prior notice and terminated by the COTP Jacksonville
Coast Guard
opportunity to comment pursuant to upon completion of the removal
authority under section 4(a) of the operations. The duration of the safety
33 CFR Part 165
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 zone is intended to ensure the safety of
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision persons, vessels, and the marine
[Docket Number USCG–2018–1081]
authorizes an agency to issue a rule environment from potential hazards
without prior notice and opportunity to associated with rocket and debris
RIN 1625–AA00
comment when the agency for good movement control and removal
Safety Zone; Rocket Debris Control cause finds that those procedures are operations. These operations include
and Removal Operations, Atlantic ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary the use of towing vessels, divers and
Ocean, Cape Canaveral, FL to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. support vessels. There will be occasions
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that during the operations when there will
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. good cause exists for not publishing a be divers in the water and the waterway
ACTION: Temporary final rule. notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) will be obstructed by the associated
with respect to this rule because it is vessels and equipment. No vessel or
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is impracticable. On December 5, 2018, the person will be permitted to enter, transit
establishing a 1000-yard temporary Coast Guard determined that immediate through, anchor in, or remain within the
moving safety zone around the Falcon 9 action was necessary to protect life and safety zone unless authorized by the
rocket in the Atlantic Ocean, in the property from the hazards associated COTP Jacksonville or designated
vicinity of Port Canaveral Harbor, Cape with control and removal of a Falcon 9 representative. If authorization to enter,
Canaveral, FL. This safety zone is rocket and any associated debris located transit through, anchor in, or remain
necessary to protect personnel, vessels, in the Atlantic Ocean. Due to the within the safety zone granted by the
and the public from potential hazards emergent nature and increased safety COTP Jacksonville or a designated
associated with the control and removal risks associated with control and representative, all persons and vessels
of the rocket and any debris from removal operations for the rocket, there receiving such authorization must
navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean. is insufficient time to publish an NPRM transit at a minimum safe speed and
All persons and vessels are prohibited and to receive public comments before must comply with the orders of the
from entering, transiting through, the rulemaking is required. The COTP Jacksonville or designated
anchoring in, or remaining within the regulation is necessary to provide for representative. The Coast Guard will
safety zone unless authorized by the the safety of persons and vessels within provide notice and status of the safety
Captain of the Port Jacksonville or a a 1000-yard radius of the Falcon 9 zone by Broadcast Notice to Mariners or
designated representative. rocket. For those reasons, it would be on-scene designated representatives.
DATES: This rule is effective without impracticable to publish an NPRM.
V. Regulatory Analyses
actual notice from December 12, 2018 For the reasons discussed above,
through December 28, 2018. For under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast We developed this rule after
purposes of enforcement, actual notice Guard finds that good cause exists for considering numerous statutes and
will be used from December 5, 2018 making this rule effective less than 30 Executive orders related to rulemaking.
through December 12, 2018. days after publication in the Federal Below we summarize our analyses
ADDRESSES: To view documents Register. based on a number of these statutes and
mentioned in this preamble as being Executive orders, and we discuss First
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule Amendment rights of protestors.
available in the docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018– The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The A. Regulatory Planning and Review
1081 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket Captain of the Port Jacksonville (COTP) Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Folder on the line associated with this has determined that potential hazards direct agencies to assess the costs and
rule. associated with control and removal benefits of available regulatory
operations for the Falcon 9 rocket will alternatives and, if regulation is
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
be a safety concern for persons and necessary, to select regulatory
you have questions on this rule, call or vessels within a 1000-yard radius of the approaches that maximize net benefits.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
email Petty Officer Rory Boyle, Sector rocket. The purpose of this rule is to Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
Jacksonville, Waterways Management protect personnel, vessels, and the to control regulatory costs through a
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone marine environment in the navigable budgeting process. This rule has not
(904) 714–7661, email Rory.C.Boyle@ waters within the safety zone during been designated a ‘‘significant
uscg.mil. control and removal operations regulatory action,’’ under Executive
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: associated with the Falcon 9 rocket. Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Dec 11, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM 12DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_64040/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-12-12 01:39:34
Document Modified: 2018-12-12 01:39:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective January 1, 2019. | |
| Contact | Hilary Duke ([email protected]), Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs, Office of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20005, 202-326-4400, ext. 3839. (TTY users may call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800- 877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-4400, ext. 3839.) | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 63802 | |
| CFR Associated | Employee Benefit Plans and Pension Insurance |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR