83 FR 63827 - Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 238 (December 12, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 238 (December 12, 2018)
| Page Range | 63827-63829 | |
| FR Document | 2018-26815 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 12, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 63827-63829] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-26815] [[Page 63827]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-533-867] Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the May 10, 2016, through October 31, 2017, period of review (POR). We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable December 12, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita or Stephanie Berger, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4243 and (202) 482-2483, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on welded stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from India.\1\ We selected two companies, Bhandari Foils & Tubes, Ltd. (Bhandari) and Hindustan Inox, Ltd. (Hindustan Inox), for individual examination.\2\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an Appendix to this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 1329 (January 11, 2018) (Initiation Notice). \2\ See memorandum, ``First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Respondent Selection,'' dated February 2, 2018. \3\ See memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India, 2016-2017,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order \4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ For the full text of the scope of the order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. For purposes of this scope, references to size are in nominal inches and include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A-312 or ASTM A-778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A-358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A- 312 or ASTM A-778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and (2) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price were calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value was calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of the Review We preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis or based entirely on facts available. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. See also See Memorandum, ``Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Calculation of the All-Others Rate in the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016- 2017,'' dated concurrently with this notice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Estimated weighted- Exporter/producer average dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bhandari Foils & Tubes, Ltd............................. 7.19 Hindustan Inox, Ltd..................................... 2.03 Apex Tubes Private Ltd.................................. \5\ 3.89 Apurvi Industries....................................... 3.89 Arihant Tubes........................................... 3.89 Divine Tubes Pvt. Ltd................................... 3.89 Heavy Metal & Tubes..................................... 3.89 J.S.S. Steelitalia Ltd.................................. 3.89 Linkwell Seamless Tubes Private Limited................. 3.89 Maxim Tubes Company Pvt. Ltd............................ 3.89 MBM Tubes Pvt. Ltd...................................... 3.89 Mukat Tanks & Vessel Ltd................................ 3.89 Neotiss Ltd............................................. 3.89 Prakash Steelage Ltd.................................... 3.89 Quality Stainless Pvt. Ltd.............................. 3.89 Raajratna Metal Industries Ltd.......................... 3.89 Ratnadeep Metal & Tubes Ltd............................. 3.89 Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd............................ 3.89 Remi Edelstahl Tubulars................................. 3.89 Shubhlaxmi Metals & Tubes Private Limited............... 3.89 SLS Tubes Pvt. Ltd...................................... 3.89 Steamline Industries Ltd................................ 3.89 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. If the weighted-average dumping margin for the mandatory respondents (i.e., Bhandari and Hindustan Inox) is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer- specific ad valorem AD assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importers examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\6\ We will [[Page 63828]] instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent). Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review where applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: See Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the weighted-average of the cash deposit rates calculated for the companies selected for mandatory review (i.e., Bhandari and Hindustan), excluding any which are zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on adverse facts available. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which they did not know that their merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries not reviewed at the all-others rate of 8.35 percent if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\8\ We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of WSPP from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each company listed above will be equal to the dumping margins established in the final results of this review except if the ultimate rates are de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rates will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the producer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of the proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 8.35 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\9\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\10\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\11\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with the argument: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.\12\ All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this notice.\13\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined.\14\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \14\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their case briefs, within 120 days after issuance of these preliminary results. Notification To Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. These preliminary results of review is are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: December 3, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination V. Discussion of the Methodology A. Comparisons to Normal Value B. Determination of the Comparison Method C. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis VI. Date of Sale VII. Product Comparisons VIII. Export Price IX. Normal Value A. Home Market Viability B. Affiliated-Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test C. Level of Trade D. Cost of Production Analysis E. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison Market Prices [[Page 63829]] X. Currency Conversion XI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-26815 Filed 12-11-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 12, 2018 / Notices 63827
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 14 inches in outside diameter. For Preliminary Results of the Review
purposes of this scope, references to size We preliminarily determine the
International Trade Administration are in nominal inches and include all following weighted-average dumping
[A–533–867] products within tolerances allowed by margins exist for the POR:
pipe specifications. This merchandise
Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From includes, but is not limited to, the Estimated
India: Preliminary Results of American Society for Testing and weighted-
Antidumping Duty Administrative average
Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A– Exporter/producer dumping
Review; 2016–2017 778 specifications, or comparable margin
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, domestic or foreign specifications. (percent)
International Trade Administration, ASTM A–358 products are only
Bhandari Foils & Tubes, Ltd 7.19
Department of Commerce. included when they are produced to
Hindustan Inox, Ltd .............. 2.03
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 Apex Tubes Private Ltd ........ 5 3.89
(Commerce) preliminarily determines specifications, or comparable domestic Apurvi Industries ................... 3.89
that producers/exporters subject to this or foreign specifications. Arihant Tubes ....................... 3.89
review made sales of subject The subject imports are normally Divine Tubes Pvt. Ltd ........... 3.89
merchandise at less than normal value Heavy Metal & Tubes ........... 3.89
classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005, J.S.S. Steelitalia Ltd ............. 3.89
during the May 10, 2016, through 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, Linkwell Seamless Tubes
October 31, 2017, period of review 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Private Limited .................. 3.89
(POR). We invite interested parties to Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Maxim Tubes Company Pvt.
comment on these preliminary results. United States (HTSUS). They may also Ltd ..................................... 3.89
DATES: Applicable December 12, 2018. enter under HTSUS subheadings MBM Tubes Pvt. Ltd ............. 3.89
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mukat Tanks & Vessel Ltd ... 3.89
7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, Neotiss Ltd ............................ 3.89
Laurel LaCivita or Stephanie Berger, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, Prakash Steelage Ltd ........... 3.89
AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The Quality Stainless Pvt. Ltd ..... 3.89
Enforcement and Compliance, HTSUS subheadings are provided for Raajratna Metal Industries
International Trade Administration, convenience and customs purposes Ltd ..................................... 3.89
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 only; the written description of the Ratnadeep Metal & Tubes
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, scope of this order is dispositive. Ltd ..................................... 3.89
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4243 Ratnamani Metals & Tubes
and (202) 482–2483, respectively. Methodology Ltd ..................................... 3.89
Remi Edelstahl Tubulars ...... 3.89
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Commerce is conducting this review Shubhlaxmi Metals & Tubes
Background in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and Private Limited .................. 3.89
(2) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended SLS Tubes Pvt. Ltd .............. 3.89
Commerce is conducting an Steamline Industries Ltd ....... 3.89
administrative review of the (the Act). Export price and constructed
antidumping duty (AD) order on welded export price were calculated in
Assessment Rates
stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from accordance with section 772 of the Act.
India.1 We selected two companies, Normal value was calculated in Upon issuance of the final results,
Bhandari Foils & Tubes, Ltd. (Bhandari) accordance with section 773 of the Act. Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
and Hindustan Inox, Ltd. (Hindustan Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
For a full description of the shall assess, antidumping duties on all
Inox), for individual examination.2 For methodology underlying our
a complete description of the events that appropriate entries covered by this
conclusions, see the Preliminary review.
followed the initiation of this review,
Decision Memorandum. The If the weighted-average dumping
see the Preliminary Decision
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a margin for the mandatory respondents
Memorandum.3 A list of topics included
in the Preliminary Decision public document and is on file (i.e., Bhandari and Hindustan Inox) is
Memorandum is included as an electronically via Enforcement and not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
Appendix to this notice. Compliance’s Antidumping and percent), we will calculate importer-
Countervailing Duty Centralized specific ad valorem AD assessment rates
Scope of the Order 4 Electronic Service System (ACCESS). based on the ratio of the total amount of
The merchandise covered by this ACCESS is available to registered users dumping calculated for the importers
order is circular welded austenitic at https://access.trade.gov and is examined sales to the total entered
stainless pressure pipe not greater than available to all parties in the Central value of those same sales in accordance
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).6 We will
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Department of Commerce building. In
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 5 This rate is based on the rates for the
1329 (January 11, 2018) (Initiation Notice).
addition, a complete version of the
respondents that were selected for individual
2 See memorandum, ‘‘First Antidumping Duty Preliminary Decision Memorandum can review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis or
Administrative Review of Welded Stainless be accessed directly on the internet at based entirely on facts available. See section
Pressure Pipe from India: Respondent Selection,’’ http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. See also See Memorandum,
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
dated February 2, 2018. ‘‘Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India:
3 See memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for index.html. The signed Preliminary Calculation of the All-Others Rate in the
the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Decision Memorandum and the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Welded Stainless Pressure electronic version of the Preliminary Administrative Review; 2016–2017,’’ dated
Pipe from India, 2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently Decision Memorandum are identical in concurrently with this notice.
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 6 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). content. the assessment rate calculation method adopted in
4 For the full text of the scope of the order, see Antidumping Proceedings: See Calculation of the
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:39 Dec 11, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM 12DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_64065/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 12, 2018 / Notices 63829
X. Currency Conversion The Preliminary Decision information contradicting the claims of
XI. Recommendation Memorandum is a public document and five of the companies under review
[FR Doc. 2018–26815 Filed 12–11–18; 8:45 am] is on file electronically via Enforcement which claimed to have made no
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P and Compliance’s Antidumping and shipments, Commerce preliminarily
Countervailing Duty Centralized determines that these five companies
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). did not have any reviewable
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ACCESS is available to registered users transactions during the POR.6 For
at http://access.trade.gov and in the additional information regarding this
International Trade Administration Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the determination, see the Preliminary
[A–570–890] main Department of Commerce Decision Memorandum. Consistent with
building. In addition, a complete Commerce’s practice in non-market
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the version of the Preliminary Decision economy (NME) cases, Commerce is not
People’s Republic of China: Memorandum can be accessed directly rescinding this AR, in part, with respect
Preliminary Results of Antidumping at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. to these five companies, but intends to
Duty Administrative Review; 2017 The signed Preliminary Decision complete the review with respect to the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Memorandum and the electronic companies for which it has
International Trade Administration, version of the Preliminary Decision preliminarily found no shipments and
Department of Commerce. Memorandum are identical in content. issue appropriate instructions to CBP
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Scope of the Order based on the final results of the review.7
(Commerce) preliminarily determines Separate Rates
The product covered by the Order is
that eight companies, including the
wooden bedroom furniture, subject to
mandatory respondent, Decca Furniture Decca was the only company under
certain exceptions.4 Imports of subject
Ltd. (Decca), have not established their review that submitted a separate rate
merchandise are classified under the
entitlement to a separate rate and are application, and Commerce issued the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
part of the China-wide entity, and that antidumping duty questionnaire to
United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
five companies had no reviewable Decca as the sole mandatory
9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7080,
transactions during the January 1, 2017, respondent. However, as noted above,
9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081,
through December 31, 2017, period of Decca did not respond to Commerce’s
9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041,
review (POR). We invite interested antidumping duty questionnaire.
7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although
parties to comment on these preliminary Therefore, Commerce preliminarily
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
results. determines that Decca did not establish
for convenience and customs purposes,
DATES: Applicable December 12, 2018. its eligibility for separate rate status. In
the written product description in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: addition, seven other companies for
Order remains dispositive.5
Patrick O’Connor, AD/CVD Operations, which a review was requested failed to
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, Methodology provide separate rate applications or
International Trade Administration, Commerce is conducting this review certifications.8 Therefore, Commerce
Department of Commerce, 1401 in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) preliminarily determines that these
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended eight companies are part of the China-
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0989. (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213. For a full wide entity. Because no party requested
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: description of the methodology a review of the China-wide entity, the
underlying our preliminary results of entity is not under review, and the
Background entity’s dumping margin of 216.01
review, see the Preliminary Decision
After initiating this review with Memorandum. A list of topics discussed percent is not subject to change.9 For
respect to 73 companies or company in the Preliminary Decision
6 The five companies/company groupings are: (1)
groupings,1 interested parties withdrew Memorandum is provided in the
Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Taicang
all review requests for 60 of the 73 Appendix to this notice. Sunrise Wood Industry Co., Ltd., Taicang
companies. Thus, Commerce rescinded Fairmount Designs Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou
this review with respect to those Preliminary Determination of No Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd.; (2) Dongguan Sunrise
companies.2 On June 20, 2018, Shipments Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry Co.,
Ltd., Shanghai Sunrise Furniture Co. Ltd., Fairmont
Commerce issued an antidumping duty Because U.S. Customs and Border Designs; (3) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa
questionnaire to Decca, the only Protection (CBP) did not provide any Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (4) Shenyang Shining
company under review that filed a Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd. (Shenyang Shining);
separate rate application. Decca did not Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the and (5) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
respond to the questionnaire. For a People’s Republic of China,’’ from James Maeder, 7 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Senior Director, performing the duties of Deputy Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
complete description of the events that Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Duty and FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) and the
followed the initiation of this Countervailing Duty Operations, to Gary Taverman, ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below.
administrative review, see the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 8 The seven companies are: (1) Dongguan
Preliminary Decision Memorandum Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the Kingstone Furniture Co., Ltd.; Kingstone Furniture
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Co., Ltd.; (2) Kunshan Summit Furniture Co., Ltd.;
which is hereby adopted by this notice.3 Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (3) Qingdao Liangmu Co., Ltd.; (4) Restonic
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated (Dongguan) Furniture Ltd.; Restonic Far East
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and concurrently with this notice. (Samoa) Ltd.; (5) Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co.,
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 4 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Ltd.; (6) Techniwood Industries Ltd.; Ningbo
11685 (March 16, 2018) (Initiation Notice). Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Furniture Industries Ltd.; Ningbo Hengrun
2 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the Furniture Co., Ltd.; and (7) Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan
People’s Republic of China: Notice of Partial People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, Decoration Co., Ltd.
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 2005) (Order). 9 See Second Amended Final Results of
Review, 83 FR 45607 (September 10, 2018). 5 For a complete description of the scope of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden
3 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Order, please see the Preliminary Decision Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Memorandum. China, 72 FR 62834 (November 7, 2007).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:39 Dec 11, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM 12DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_64065/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-12-12 01:39:59
Document Modified: 2018-12-12 01:39:59
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable December 12, 2018. | |
| Contact | Laurel LaCivita or Stephanie Berger, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4243 and (202) 482-2483, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 63827 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR