83 FR 63829 - Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 238 (December 12, 2018)

Page Range		63829-63830
FR Document		2018-26870

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that eight companies, including the mandatory respondent, Decca Furniture Ltd. (Decca), have not established their entitlement to a separate rate and are part of the China-wide entity, and that five companies had no reviewable transactions during the January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017, period of review (POR). We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 238 (Wednesday, December 12, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63829-63830]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26870]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-890]


Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines 
that eight companies, including the mandatory respondent, Decca 
Furniture Ltd. (Decca), have not established their entitlement to a 
separate rate and are part of the China-wide entity, and that five 
companies had no reviewable transactions during the January 1, 2017, 
through December 31, 2017, period of review (POR). We invite interested 
parties to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable December 12, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    After initiating this review with respect to 73 companies or 
company groupings,\1\ interested parties withdrew all review requests 
for 60 of the 73 companies. Thus, Commerce rescinded this review with 
respect to those companies.\2\ On June 20, 2018, Commerce issued an 
antidumping duty questionnaire to Decca, the only company under review 
that filed a separate rate application. Decca did not respond to the 
questionnaire. For a complete description of the events that followed 
the initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum which is hereby adopted by this notice.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 11685 (March 16, 2018) (Initiation 
Notice).
    \2\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 83 FR 45607 (September 10, 2018).
    \3\ See ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture 
from the People's Republic of China,'' from James Maeder, Senior 
Director, performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Gary 
Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive 
functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently 
with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and 
in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of 
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the Order is wooden bedroom furniture, 
subject to certain exceptions.\4\ Imports of subject merchandise are 
classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings: 9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7080, 9403.50.9041, 
9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. 
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written product description in the Order remains 
dispositive.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture 
from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) 
(Order).
    \5\ For a complete description of the scope of the Order, please 
see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 
351.213. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
preliminary results of review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 
A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 
provided in the Appendix to this notice.

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    Because U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) did not provide 
any information contradicting the claims of five of the companies under 
review which claimed to have made no shipments, Commerce preliminarily 
determines that these five companies did not have any reviewable 
transactions during the POR.\6\ For additional information regarding 
this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Consistent 
with Commerce's practice in non-market economy (NME) cases, Commerce is 
not rescinding this AR, in part, with respect to these five companies, 
but intends to complete the review with respect to the companies for 
which it has preliminarily found no shipments and issue appropriate 
instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The five companies/company groupings are: (1) Dongguan 
Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry Co., 
Ltd., Taicang Fairmount Designs Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise 
Furniture Co., Ltd.; (2) Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Taicang 
Sunrise Wood Industry Co., Ltd., Shanghai Sunrise Furniture Co. 
Ltd., Fairmont Designs; (3) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa 
Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (4) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture 
Co., Ltd. (Shenyang Shining); and (5) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
    \7\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) and 
the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rates

    Decca was the only company under review that submitted a separate 
rate application, and Commerce issued the antidumping duty 
questionnaire to Decca as the sole mandatory respondent. However, as 
noted above, Decca did not respond to Commerce's antidumping duty 
questionnaire. Therefore, Commerce preliminarily determines that Decca 
did not establish its eligibility for separate rate status. In 
addition, seven other companies for which a review was requested failed 
to provide separate rate applications or certifications.\8\ Therefore, 
Commerce preliminarily determines that these eight companies are part 
of the China-wide entity. Because no party requested a review of the 
China-wide entity, the entity is not under review, and the entity's 
dumping margin of 216.01 percent is not subject to change.\9\ For

[[Page 63830]]

additional information regarding this determination, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The seven companies are: (1) Dongguan Kingstone Furniture 
Co., Ltd.; Kingstone Furniture Co., Ltd.; (2) Kunshan Summit 
Furniture Co., Ltd.; (3) Qingdao Liangmu Co., Ltd.; (4) Restonic 
(Dongguan) Furniture Ltd.; Restonic Far East (Samoa) Ltd.; (5) 
Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (6) Techniwood Industries Ltd.; 
Ningbo Furniture Industries Ltd.; Ningbo Hengrun Furniture Co., 
Ltd.; and (7) Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan Decoration Co., Ltd.
    \9\ See Second Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's 
Republic of China, 72 FR 62834 (November 7, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Comment

    Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary 
results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed 
electronically using ACCESS, within 30 days of the date of publication 
of this notice, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, 
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, will be due five days 
after the due date for case briefs, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d). 
Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this review are requested 
to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a summary of the 
argument not to exceed five pages, and a table of statutes, 
regulations, and cases cited, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
    Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of 
publication of this notice.\10\ Hearing requests should contain the 
following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone 
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to 
be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to 
issues raised in the case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, 
parties will be notified of the time and date of the hearing to be held 
at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unless extended, Commerce intends to issue the final results of 
this AR, which will include the results of its analysis of issues 
raised in any briefs received, within 120 days of publication of these 
preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuing the final results of this review, Commerce will 
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries covered by this review.\12\ Commerce intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of 
the final results of this review. We intend to instruct CBP to 
liquidate entries of subject merchandise exported by the China-wide 
entity, including Decca and the other seven companies noted above which 
did not qualify for separate rate status, at the China-wide rate. 
Additionally, pursuant to Commerce's practice in NME cases, if we 
continue to determine that the five companies noted above had no 
shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR under their case numbers will be liquidated 
at the China-wide rate.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
    \13\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of 
subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by 
sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or 
reviewed China and non-China exporters that received a separate rate in 
a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue 
to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all Chinese 
exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for 
the China-wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; and (3) for all non-
China exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their 
own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the 
China exporter that supplied that non-China exporter.
    These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.

Notification To Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification To Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221.(b)(4).

    Dated: December 3, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

(1) Summary
(2) Background
(3) Scope of the Order
(4) Discussion of the Methodology
    a. NME Country Status
    b. Separate Rates
    c. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
(5) Conclusion

[FR Doc. 2018-26870 Filed 12-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 12, 2018 / Notices 63829

X. Currency Conversion The Preliminary Decision information contradicting the claims of
XI. Recommendation Memorandum is a public document and five of the companies under review
[FR Doc. 2018–26815 Filed 12–11–18; 8:45 am] is on file electronically via Enforcement which claimed to have made no
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P and Compliance’s Antidumping and shipments, Commerce preliminarily
Countervailing Duty Centralized determines that these five companies
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). did not have any reviewable
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ACCESS is available to registered users transactions during the POR.6 For
at http://access.trade.gov and in the additional information regarding this
International Trade Administration Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the determination, see the Preliminary
[A–570–890] main Department of Commerce Decision Memorandum. Consistent with
building. In addition, a complete Commerce’s practice in non-market
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the version of the Preliminary Decision economy (NME) cases, Commerce is not
People’s Republic of China: Memorandum can be accessed directly rescinding this AR, in part, with respect
Preliminary Results of Antidumping at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. to these five companies, but intends to
Duty Administrative Review; 2017 The signed Preliminary Decision complete the review with respect to the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Memorandum and the electronic companies for which it has
International Trade Administration, version of the Preliminary Decision preliminarily found no shipments and
Department of Commerce. Memorandum are identical in content. issue appropriate instructions to CBP
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Scope of the Order based on the final results of the review.7
(Commerce) preliminarily determines Separate Rates
The product covered by the Order is
that eight companies, including the
wooden bedroom furniture, subject to
mandatory respondent, Decca Furniture Decca was the only company under
certain exceptions.4 Imports of subject
Ltd. (Decca), have not established their review that submitted a separate rate
merchandise are classified under the
entitlement to a separate rate and are application, and Commerce issued the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
part of the China-wide entity, and that antidumping duty questionnaire to
United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
five companies had no reviewable Decca as the sole mandatory
9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7080,
transactions during the January 1, 2017, respondent. However, as noted above,
9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081,
through December 31, 2017, period of Decca did not respond to Commerce’s
9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041,
review (POR). We invite interested antidumping duty questionnaire.
7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although
parties to comment on these preliminary Therefore, Commerce preliminarily
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
results. determines that Decca did not establish
for convenience and customs purposes,
DATES: Applicable December 12, 2018. its eligibility for separate rate status. In
the written product description in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: addition, seven other companies for
Order remains dispositive.5
Patrick O’Connor, AD/CVD Operations, which a review was requested failed to
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, Methodology provide separate rate applications or
International Trade Administration, Commerce is conducting this review certifications.8 Therefore, Commerce
Department of Commerce, 1401 in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) preliminarily determines that these
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended eight companies are part of the China-
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0989. (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213. For a full wide entity. Because no party requested
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: description of the methodology a review of the China-wide entity, the
underlying our preliminary results of entity is not under review, and the
Background entity’s dumping margin of 216.01
review, see the Preliminary Decision
After initiating this review with Memorandum. A list of topics discussed percent is not subject to change.9 For
respect to 73 companies or company in the Preliminary Decision
6 The five companies/company groupings are: (1)
groupings,1 interested parties withdrew Memorandum is provided in the
Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Taicang
all review requests for 60 of the 73 Appendix to this notice. Sunrise Wood Industry Co., Ltd., Taicang
companies. Thus, Commerce rescinded Fairmount Designs Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou
this review with respect to those Preliminary Determination of No Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd.; (2) Dongguan Sunrise
companies.2 On June 20, 2018, Shipments Furniture Co., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry Co.,
Ltd., Shanghai Sunrise Furniture Co. Ltd., Fairmont
Commerce issued an antidumping duty Because U.S. Customs and Border Designs; (3) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa
questionnaire to Decca, the only Protection (CBP) did not provide any Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (4) Shenyang Shining
company under review that filed a Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd. (Shenyang Shining);
separate rate application. Decca did not Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the and (5) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.
respond to the questionnaire. For a People’s Republic of China,’’ from James Maeder, 7 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping

Senior Director, performing the duties of Deputy Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
complete description of the events that Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Duty and FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) and the
followed the initiation of this Countervailing Duty Operations, to Gary Taverman, ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below.
administrative review, see the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 8 The seven companies are: (1) Dongguan

Preliminary Decision Memorandum Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the Kingstone Furniture Co., Ltd.; Kingstone Furniture
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Co., Ltd.; (2) Kunshan Summit Furniture Co., Ltd.;
which is hereby adopted by this notice.3 Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (3) Qingdao Liangmu Co., Ltd.; (4) Restonic
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated (Dongguan) Furniture Ltd.; Restonic Far East
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1

1 See Initiation of Antidumping and concurrently with this notice. (Samoa) Ltd.; (5) Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co.,
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 4 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Ltd.; (6) Techniwood Industries Ltd.; Ningbo
11685 (March 16, 2018) (Initiation Notice). Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Furniture Industries Ltd.; Ningbo Hengrun
2 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the Furniture Co., Ltd.; and (7) Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan
People’s Republic of China: Notice of Partial People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, Decoration Co., Ltd.
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 2005) (Order). 9 See Second Amended Final Results of
Review, 83 FR 45607 (September 10, 2018). 5 For a complete description of the scope of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden
3 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Order, please see the Preliminary Decision Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Memorandum. China, 72 FR 62834 (November 7, 2007).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:39 Dec 11, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM 12DEN1

63830 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 12, 2018 / Notices

additional information regarding this above had no shipments of subject Dated: December 3, 2018.
determination, see the Preliminary merchandise, any suspended entries of Gary Taverman,
Decision Memorandum. subject merchandise during the POR Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
under their case numbers will be and Countervailing Duty Operations,
Public Comment performing the non-exclusive functions and
liquidated at the China-wide rate.13
Interested parties are invited to duties of the Assistant Secretary for
comment on the preliminary results and Cash Deposit Requirements Enforcement and Compliance.
may submit case briefs and/or written Appendix
comments, filed electronically using The following cash deposit
ACCESS, within 30 days of the date of requirements will be effective upon List of Topics Discussed in the
publication of this notice, pursuant to publication of the final results of this Preliminary Decision Memorandum
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, review for shipments of subject (1) Summary
limited to issues raised in the case merchandise from China entered, or (2) Background
briefs, will be due five days after the withdrawn from warehouse, for (3) Scope of the Order
due date for case briefs, pursuant to 19 consumption on or after the publication (4) Discussion of the Methodology
CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit date, as provided by sections a. NME Country Status
case or rebuttal briefs in this review are 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For b. Separate Rates
requested to submit with each argument c. Preliminary Determination of No
previously investigated or reviewed
Shipments
a statement of the issue, a summary of China and non-China exporters that (5) Conclusion
the argument not to exceed five pages, received a separate rate in a prior
[FR Doc. 2018–26870 Filed 12–11–18; 8:45 am]
and a table of statutes, regulations, and segment of this proceeding, the cash
cases cited, in accordance with 19 CFR BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
deposit rate will continue to be the
351.309(c)(2). existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all
Any interested party may request a Chinese exporters of subject
hearing within 30 days of publication of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
merchandise that have not been found
this notice.10 Hearing requests should to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash International Trade Administration
contain the following information: (1)
deposit rate will be the rate for the [A–570–828; A–823–805]
The party’s name, address, and
China-wide entity, which is 216.01
telephone number; (2) the number of
percent; and (3) for all non-China Silicomanganese From the People’s
participants; and (3) a list of the issues
to be discussed. Oral presentations at exporters of subject merchandise which Republic of China and Ukraine:
the hearing will be limited to issues have not received their own rate, the Continuation of the Antidumping Duty
raised in the case briefs. If a request for cash deposit rate will be the rate Orders
a hearing is made, parties will be applicable to the China exporter that
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
notified of the time and date of the supplied that non-China exporter.
International Trade Administration,
hearing to be held at the U.S. These deposit requirements, when Department of Commerce.
Department of Commerce, 1401 imposed, shall remain in effect until SUMMARY: As a result of determinations
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, further notice. by the Department of Commerce
DC 20230.11 (Commerce) and the International Trade
Unless extended, Commerce intends Notification To Importers
Commission (ITC) that revocation of the
to issue the final results of this AR, antidumping duty (AD) orders on
This notice also serves as a
which will include the results of its silicomanganese from the People’s
analysis of issues raised in any briefs preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR Republic of China (China) and Ukraine
received, within 120 days of publication would likely lead to a continuation or
of these preliminary results, pursuant to 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of recurrence of dumping and material
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. injury to an industry in the United
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
Assessment Rates of the relevant entries during this States, Commerce is publishing a notice
Upon issuing the final results of this review period. Failure to comply with of continuation of the AD orders on
review, Commerce will determine, and this requirement could result in silicomanganese from China and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on Ukraine.
Commerce’s presumption that
all appropriate entries covered by this reimbursement of antidumping duties DATES: Applicable December 12, 2018.
review.12 Commerce intends to issue occurred and the subsequent assessment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days of double antidumping duties. Jonathan Cornfield, AD/CVD
after the publication date of the final Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
results of this review. We intend to Notification To Interested Parties Compliance, International Trade
instruct CBP to liquidate entries of Administration, U.S. Department of
We are issuing and publishing these
subject merchandise exported by the Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
results in accordance with sections
China-wide entity, including Decca and NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
the other seven companies noted above 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
(202) 482–3855.
which did not qualify for separate rate CFR 351.221.(b)(4).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
status, at the China-wide rate.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1

Additionally, pursuant to Commerce’s Background
practice in NME cases, if we continue to On October 4, 2017, Commerce
determine that the five companies noted published the notice of initiation of the
13 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- fourth sunset reviews of the AD Orders,1
10 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
11 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order:
12 See 19 CFR 351.212(b). (October 24, 2011). Silicomanganese from the People’s Republic of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:39 Dec 11, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM 12DEN1

Document Created: 2018-12-12 01:39:58
Document Modified: 2018-12-12 01:39:58

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Dates		Applicable December 12, 2018.
Contact		Patrick O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0989.
FR Citation		83 FR 63829

83 FR 63829 - Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEInternational Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 238 (December 12, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration