83 FR 658 - Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 4 (January 5, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 4 (January 5, 2018)
| Page Range | 658-660 | |
| FR Document | 2018-00016 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 658-660] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-00016] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-983] Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2016-2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on drawn stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of review (POR) is April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017. The review covers two mandatory respondents, Feidong Import and Export Co., Ltd. (Feidong) and Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd (Zhaoshun). We preliminarily determine that neither mandatory respondent qualifies for a separate rate and, therefore, both are considered part of the China- wide entity. Additionally, we are preliminarily including two companies that failed to demonstrate their entitlement to a separate rate (i.e., Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd. (Hongmao) and Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Yuyao)) as part of the China-wide entity. We also preliminarily grant separate rates to the following companies which demonstrated eligibility for separate rate status but were not selected for individual examination: Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd. (New Star); KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, Inc. (KaiPing); Guangdong New Shichu Import and Export Company Limited (New Sichu); and Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Afa). Finally, we preliminarily find that B&R Industries Limited (B&R); Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd. (Xinhe); Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Superte); and Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen & Bathroom Products Co., Ltd. (Zhuhai KOHLER) made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable January 5, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Janz or Ajay Menon, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2972 or (202) 482-1993, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The products covered by the order include drawn stainless steel sinks. Imports of subject merchandise are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China,'' issued concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Based on our analysis of CBP information and information provided by the companies, we preliminarily determine that B&R, Superte, Xinhe, and Zhuhai KOHLER did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. In addition, Commerce finds that, consistent with its assessment practice in non-market economy (NME) cases, it is appropriate not to rescind the review in part in these circumstances, but to complete the review with respect to these four companies and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results.\2\ For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) (NME AD Assessment) and the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Because Feidong is majority government-owned and Foshan did not respond to the NME questionnaire, we preliminarily determine that they are not eligible for a separate rate and are part of the China-wide entity, subject to the China-wide entity rate of 76.45 percent. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and [[Page 659]] Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is provided in the Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Results of Review Commerce finds that the two mandatory respondents have not established eligibility for a separate rate and are considered to be part of the China-wide entity for these preliminary results. Additionally, because Hongmao and Yuyao did not submit a separate rate application or certification by the deadline established in the Initiation Notice or make a claim that they had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR, we preliminarily find that these companies failed to establish their entitlement to a separate rate and, therefore, remain part of the China-wide entity. Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide entity applies to this administrative review.\3\ Under this policy, the China- wide rate will not be under review unless a party requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity, the entity is not under review, and the entity's rate is not subject to change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address what rate to apply to respondents not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for non-selected respondents that are not examined individually in an administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that the all-others rate should be calculated by averaging the weighted- average dumping margins for individually-examined respondents, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that where all rates are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, Commerce may use ``any reasonable method'' for assigning a rate to non- examined respondents. For these preliminary results, we have not calculated any individual rates or assigned a rate based on facts available. Therefore, consistent with our recent practice,\4\ we preliminary determine to assign to the non-individually examined separate rate respondents the most recently assigned separate rate in this proceeding, which is from the previous administrative review.\5\ Using this method, we are preliminarily assigning a separate rate margin of 1.78 percent to the four non-individually examined companies that demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 81 FR 62717 (September 12, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 10-11, unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 11431 (February 23, 2017). \5\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 28639, 28640 (June 23, 2017) (Sinks AR3 Final). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce preliminarily determines that the following weighted- average dumping margins exist for the period April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Guangdong New Shichu Import and Export Company Limited...... 1.78 Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd.................... 1.78 KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, Inc......................... 1.78 Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd........................ 1.78 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment Normally, Commerce will disclose the calculations used in our analysis to parties in this review within five days of the date of publication of the notice of preliminary results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, here, Commerce preliminary applied a separate rate \6\ and the China-wide rate \7\ that were established in prior segments of the proceeding. Thus, there are no calculations on this record to disclose. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Sinks AR3 Final. \7\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Investigation, Final Determination, 78 FR 13019 (February 26, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\8\ Rebuttals to case briefs may be filed no later than five days after the written comments are filed, and all rebuttal comments must be limited to comments raised in the case briefs.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice.\10\ Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\12\ Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication of the final results of this review. For the companies receiving a separate rate, we intend to assign an assessment rate of 1.78 percent, consistent with the methodology described above. For the final results, if we continue to treat the mandatory respondents as part of the China-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 76.45 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR that were produced and/or exported by those companies. In addition, if we continue to find that B&R, Superte, Xinhe, and Zhuhai KOHLER, had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended [[Page 660]] entries of subject merchandise from these companies will be liquidated at the China-wide rate.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \13\ For a full discussion of this practice, see NME AD Assessment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will be established for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed China and non-China exporters that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all China exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China- wide entity, which is 76.45 percent; and (4) for all non-China exporters of subject merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to China exporter(s) that supplied that non-China exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: December 29, 2017. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of Methodology A. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments B. Non-Market Economy Country Status C. Separate Rates Determination 1. Absence of De Jure Control 2. Absence of De Facto Control 3. Companies Not Eligible for a Separate Rate 4. Separate Rate for Eligible, Non-Selected Companies V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-00016 Filed 1-4-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![658 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Notices
and accountable processors and helps DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
ensure that processing is consistent with (202) 482–2972 or (202) 482–1993,
the controller’s CBPR System processing International Trade Administration respectively.
requirements. [A–570–983] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The PRP system requires processors to Scope of the Order
implement privacy policies and Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
practices consistent with the PRP People’s Republic of China: The products covered by the order
Preliminary Results of the include drawn stainless steel sinks.
system requirements for all personal
Antidumping Duty Administrative Imports of subject merchandise are
information that they process on behalf
Review and Preliminary Determination currently classified under the
of controllers, and these policies and Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
of No Shipments; 2016–2017
practices must be assessed as compliant United States (HTSUS) subheadings
by an APEC-recognized Accountability AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010.
Agent (‘‘PRP certification’’). Under the International Trade Administration, Although the HTSUS subheadings are
PRP system, an ‘‘Accountability Agent’’ Department of Commerce. provided for convenience and customs
is a third-party organization that SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce purposes, the written description of the
provides verification services related to (Commerce) is conducting an scope of the order is dispositive.1
the data privacy policies and practices administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on drawn Preliminary Determination of No
for those processors seeking PRP
stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from Shipments
certification. Only APEC-recognized
Accountability Agents may perform PRP the People’s Republic of China (China). Based on our analysis of CBP
certifications. The period of review (POR) is April 1, information and information provided
2016, through March 31, 2017. The by the companies, we preliminarily
An Accountability Agent may only determine that B&R, Superte, Xinhe,
review covers two mandatory
provide PRP certification for a U.S. respondents, Feidong Import and Export and Zhuhai KOHLER did not have any
processor that is subject to the Co., Ltd. (Feidong) and Foshan shipments of subject merchandise
enforcement authority of the Federal Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd (Zhaoshun). during the POR. In addition, Commerce
Trade Commission, the U.S. privacy We preliminarily determine that neither finds that, consistent with its
enforcement authority. mandatory respondent qualifies for a assessment practice in non-market
An applicant may be designated as an separate rate and, therefore, both are economy (NME) cases, it is appropriate
Accountability Agent if APEC member considered part of the China-wide not to rescind the review in part in these
economies recognize that it meets the entity. Additionally, we are circumstances, but to complete the
recognition criteria agreed to by APEC. preliminarily including two companies review with respect to these four
Those criteria are set forth in the that failed to demonstrate their companies and issue appropriate
entitlement to a separate rate (i.e., instructions to CBP based on the final
Accountability Agent APEC Application
Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd. results.2 For additional information
for the PRP System (‘‘APEC PRP System
(Hongmao) and Yuyao Afa Kitchenware regarding this determination, see the
Guide’’), which is available at: https:// Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
cbprs.blob.core.windows.net/files/ Co., Ltd. (Yuyao)) as part of the China-
Accountability%20Agent wide entity. We also preliminarily grant Methodology
separate rates to the following
%20Application%20for%20PRP Commerce is conducting this review
companies which demonstrated
%20Revised%20For%20Posting%203- in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
eligibility for separate rate status but
16.pdf. of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
were not selected for individual
Organizations interested in being examination: Jiangmen New Star Hi- (the Act). Because Feidong is majority
designated as an Accountability Agent Tech Enterprise Ltd. (New Star); government-owned and Foshan did not
should notify the Department of KaiPing Dawn Plumbing Products, Inc. respond to the NME questionnaire, we
Commerce of their interest in obtaining (KaiPing); Guangdong New Shichu preliminarily determine that they are
Import and Export Company Limited not eligible for a separate rate and are
APEC recognition and submit the
(New Sichu); and Ningbo Afa Kitchen part of the China-wide entity, subject to
information described in the APEC PRP
and Bath Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Afa). Finally, the China-wide entity rate of 76.45
System Guide to the Office of Digital
we preliminarily find that B&R percent.
Services Industries by email at For a full description of the
michael.rose@trade.gov. Industries Limited (B&R); Xinhe
methodology underlying our
Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd.
Dated: December 29, 2017. conclusions, see the Preliminary
(Xinhe); Zhongshan Superte
James Sullivan, Decision Memorandum. The
Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Superte); and
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services, U.S.
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
Zhuhai KOHLER Kitchen & Bathroom
Department of Commerce. public document and is on file
Products Co., Ltd. (Zhuhai KOHLER)
electronically via Enforcement and
[FR Doc. 2018–00046 Filed 1–4–18; 8:45 am] made no shipments of subject
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P merchandise during the POR. We invite 1 For a complete description of the Scope of the
interested parties to comment on these Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum
preliminary results. for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
DATES: Applicable January 5, 2018. Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks
from the People’s Republic of China,’’ issued
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
Rebecca Janz or Ajay Menon, AD/CVD notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
2 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
Compliance, International Trade FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) (NME AD
Administration, U.S. Department of Assessment) and the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section,
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue below.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:30 Jan 04, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM 05JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_662/page/1.svg)
![660 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Notices
entries of subject merchandise from Dated: December 29, 2017. on June 27, 2017.1 On October 24, 2017,
these companies will be liquidated at Christian Marsh, the Department postponed the
the China-wide rate.13 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement preliminary determination of this
and Compliance. investigation and the revised deadline is
Cash Deposit Requirements now December 18, 2017.2 For a
Appendix
The following cash deposit complete description of the events that
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary followed the initiation of this
requirements will be effective upon Decision Memorandum investigation, see the Preliminary
publication of the final results of this
I. Summary Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics
administrative review for all shipments II. Background included in the Preliminary Decision
of the subject merchandise from China III. Scope of the Order Memorandum is included as Appendix
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, IV. Discussion of Methodology II to this notice. The Preliminary
for consumption on or after the A. Preliminary Determination of No Decision Memorandum is a public
publication date, as provided for by Shipments
B. Non-Market Economy Country Status
document and is on file electronically
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For via Enforcement and Compliance’s
C. Separate Rates Determination
the companies listed above that have a Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
1. Absence of De Jure Control
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 2. Absence of De Facto Control Centralized Electronic Service System
be that rate established in the final 3. Companies Not Eligible for a Separate (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
results of this review (except, if the rate Rate registered users at https://
is zero or de minimis, then a cash 4. Separate Rate for Eligible, Non-Selected access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
deposit rate of zero will be established Companies Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
for that company); (2) for previously V. Recommendation the main Department of Commerce
investigated or reviewed China and non- [FR Doc. 2018–00016 Filed 1–4–18; 8:45 am] building. In addition, a complete
China exporters that received a separate BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P version of the Preliminary Decision
rate in a prior segment of this Memorandum can be found at http://
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and electronic versions of the
continue to be the existing exporter-
specific rate; (3) for all China exporters Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
International Trade Administration
of subject merchandise that have not identical in content.
been found to be entitled to a separate [A–580–893]
Scope of the Investigation
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber The product covered by this
rate for the China-wide entity, which is From the Republic of Korea: investigation is fine denier polyester
76.45 percent; and (4) for all non-China Preliminary Affirmative Determination staple fiber from Korea. For a complete
exporters of subject merchandise that of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, description of the scope of this
have not received their own rate, the Postponement of Final Determination, investigation, see Appendix I.
cash deposit rate will be the rate and Extension of Provisional Measures
applicable to China exporter(s) that Scope Comments
supplied that non-China exporter. These AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, In accordance with the preamble to
deposit requirements, when imposed, International Trade Administration, the Department’s regulations,4 the
shall remain in effect until further Department of Commerce. Initiation Notice set aside a period of
notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce time for parties to raise issues regarding
(the Department) preliminarily product coverage (i.e., scope).5 Certain
Notification to Importers determines that fine denier polyester interested parties commented on the
staple fiber (fine denier PSF) from the scope of the investigation as it appeared
This notice also serves as a
Republic of Korea (Korea) are being, or in the Initiation Notice. For a summary
preliminary reminder to importers of is likely to be sold in the United States of the product coverage comments and
their responsibility under 19 CFR at less than fair value (LTFV). The rebuttal responses submitted to the
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding period of investigation (POI) is April 1, record for this preliminary
the reimbursement of antidumping and/ 2016, through March 31, 2017. determination, and accompanying
or countervailing duties prior to discussion and analysis of all comments
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
liquidation of the relevant entries Karine Gziryan or Celeste Chen, AD/
during this review period. Failure to CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement 1 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the
comply with this requirement could and Compliance, International Trade People’s Republic of China, India, the Republic of
result in the Secretary’s presumption Korea, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of
Administration, U.S. Department of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
that reimbursement of antidumping Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Investigations, 82 FR 29023 (June 27, 2017)
and/or countervailing duties occurred NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (Initiation Notice).
and the subsequent assessment of (202) 482–4081 or (202) 482–0890, 2 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the
double antidumping duties. People’s Republic of China, India, the Republic of
respectively. Korea, and Taiwan: Postponement of Preliminary
We are issuing and publishing these DATES: Applicable January 5, 2018. Determinations in Less-Than-Fair-Value
preliminary results of review in Investigations, 82 FR 49178 (October 24, 2017).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and the Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than-
777(i)(l) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Background Fair Value Investigation of Fine Denier Polyester
This preliminary determination is Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
made in accordance with section 733(b) notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties:
13 For a full discussion of this practice, see NME (the Act). The Department published the Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
AD Assessment. notice of initiation of this investigation 5 See Initiation Notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:30 Jan 04, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM 05JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_662/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-26 09:32:14
Document Modified: 2018-10-26 09:32:14
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable January 5, 2018. | |
| Contact | Rebecca Janz or Ajay Menon, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2972 or (202) 482-1993, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 658 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR