83 FR 6882 - Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 32 (February 15, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 32 (February 15, 2018)
| Page Range | 6882-6884 | |
| FR Document | 2018-03147 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 6882-6884] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-03147] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records AGENCY: Office of Inspector General, National Science Foundation. ACTION: Notice of a modified system of records. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, the National Science Foundation (NSF) is providing notice of revisions to an existing system, NSF-52 ``Office of Inspector General--Investigative Files.'' DATES: Sections 552a(e)(4) and (11) of Title 5 of the U.S. Code require that the public have thirty days to comment on the routine uses of systems of records. The new routine uses that are the subject of this notice will take effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, unless modified by a subsequent notice to incorporate comments received from the public. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by [docket number and/or RIN number __], by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Email: The Acting Senior Agency Official for Privacy, Dorothy Aronson, at daronson@nsf.gov. Include [docket number and/or RIN number __] in the subject line of the message. Mail: Dorothy Aronson, Acting Senior Agency Official for Privacy, Office of Information and Resource Management, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorothy Aronson, Acting Senior Agency Official for Privacy, Office of Information and Resource Management, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314, or daronson@nsf.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Routine use 1 is changed to allow OIG to disclose records that may not indicate wrongdoing on their face, but in conjunction with other records may constitute evidence that wrongdoing occurred. It is also changed to clarify that disclosure recipients can include tribal governments. Other nonsubstantive changes are made to remove excess or redundant wording. Routine use 2 is changed to advance oversight and accountability by permitting disclosure when deemed necessary to further OIG's investigative, audit, and inspection activities; and, following such activities, to facilitate institutional actions to address or prevent misconduct. Regarding the latter, we note that disclosure of information about administrative cases--including those cases that result in research misconduct findings--can be useful for NSF-funded entities affected by the investigation and/or outcome. For example, institutions employing involved individuals may need the information to effectively manage their personnel and to administer their research programs. Routine use 3 is changed to clarify that disclosure recipients can include tribal governments and to remove excess or redundant wording. Routine use 4 is changed to clarify that disclosure recipients can include tribal governments and to remove excess or redundant wording. Routine use 6 is changed to refer to ``research misconduct'' rather than ``misconduct in science'', to reflect the change in terminology in NSF's regulation at 45 CFR part 689 effective April 17, 2002. It is also changed to clarify that disclosure recipients can include tribal governments. Routine use 11 is removed as an unnecessary routine use, given that the described disclosure is already permissible under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(b). Routine use 13 is added to enable OIG to release information to the public when: (a) The matter under investigation has become public knowledge because information about it is publicly available (as is the case with suspensions, debarments, convictions, or civil judgments), (b) the Inspector General or designee determines that such disclosure is necessary to preserve confidence in the integrity of the OIG investigative process, or (c) to demonstrate the accountability of NSF employees or other individuals covered by this system. We note that routine use 13 is consistent with uses published by other federal OIGs and represents a balance between privacy interests and the public's interest in transparency. Disclosure of names pursuant to subpart (c) will help deter misconduct involving the Foundation and/or its funded activities. Public disclosure under this use would only be permissible after the Inspector General or designee initially determines that it would not result in an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Routine use 14 addresses limited disclosures--to complainants, victims, and witnesses--in situations not covered by routine use 13, and is consistent with uses promulgated by other federal OIGs. This use not only advances overall transparency, but, by keeping complainants and victims informed about cases in which they are involved, it will encourage individuals to come forward and to cooperate in future investigations. Providing witnesses with records they initially produced, or which contain their own statements or testimony, will, for example, assist the federal government in ongoing legal proceedings concerning the matter investigated. SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER Office of Inspector General--Investigative Files, NSF-52. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified SYSTEM LOCATION: Office of Inspector General, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. SYSTEM MANAGER: Inspector General, OIG, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: Inspector General Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. app. 4, 8G. PURPOSES OF THE SYSTEM: The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for the National Science Foundation (NSF) maintains this system of records in order to conduct its responsibilities pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, 5 U.S.C. app. 4, 8G. The OIG is statutorily directed and authorized to conduct and supervise investigations relating to programs and operations of NSF, to promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration of such programs and operations, and to prevent and detect fraud, waste and abuse in such programs and operations. Accordingly, the records are used in investigations of individuals and entities suspected of having committed illegal or unethical acts, and in any resulting criminal prosecutions, civil proceedings, or administrative actions. CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE SYSTEM: In connection with its investigative duties, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) maintains records on the following categories of individuals: (a) Individuals or entities who are or have been the subject of inquiries or investigations conducted by OIG, [[Page 6883]] including current and former employees of NSF; and current and former contractors (or applicants for contracts), subcontractors, consultants, or the recipients of (or applicants for) NSF grants or cooperative agreements, and their current or former employees, students, or collaborators; and (b) Individuals who are witnesses; complainants; confidential or nonconfidential informants; and parties who have been identified by OIG (on the basis of information received or developed by OIG) as potentially possessing information relevant to an investigation under the jurisdiction of the OIG. CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: Information relating to investigations including: (a) Letters, memoranda, and other documents citing complaints or alleged criminal, civil, or administrative misconduct; (b) Investigative files, which include: Reports of investigations to resolve allegations of misconduct or violations of law or administrative or ethical requirements; exhibits, statements, affidavits, or other records obtained or generated during investigations; prior criminal or noncriminal records of individuals as they relate to the investigations; reports from or to other law enforcement bodies; information obtained from informants and identifying data with respect to such informants; nature of allegations made against suspects and identifying data concerning such subjects; and public source materials. RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: The subjects of investigations; individuals with whom the subjects of investigations are associated; current and former NSF employees; federal, state, local, and foreign law enforcement and non-law enforcement agencies; private citizens; witnesses; confidential and nonconfidential informants; and public source materials. ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: These records may be disclosed as follows: 1. In the event that records indicate (on their face or in conjunction with other records), or may constitute potential evidence of, a violation or potential violation of a requirement, whether criminal, civil, regulatory, administrative, contractual, or ethical in nature, whether arising by statute, regulation, rule, order, contract, grant, cooperative agreement, or ethical practices or norms, the relevant records in the system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the appropriate entity, whether governmental (federal, state, local, tribal, or international) or non-governmental, charged with the responsibility of investigating or prosecuting such violation or potential violation, or charged with enforcing, implementing, or complying with such statute, regulation, rule, order, contract, or ethical practices or norms. 2. Disclosure may be made to appropriate entities, whether governmental (federal, state, local, tribal, or international) or non- governmental, or to an individual (a) when deemed necessary to further the conduct of OIG investigative, inspection, or audit activities, including instances in which disclosure is necessary to elicit information, or (b) following such activities, when deemed necessary to facilitate institutional actions to address or prevent misconduct. 3. Disclosure may be made to a federal, state, local, tribal, or international entity maintaining civil, criminal, or other relevant information if necessary to obtain information relevant to an OIG decision concerning the assignment, hiring, or retention of an individual and/or employee or disciplinary or other administrative action concerning an employee, the issuance or revocation of a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an individual and/or employee, or the award of a contract, grant or cooperative agreement. 4. Disclosure may be made to a federal, state, local, tribal, or international entity in connection with the assignment, hiring, or retention of an individual and/or employee, or disciplinary or other administrative action concerning an employee, the issuance or revocation of a security clearance, the reporting of an investigation of an individual and/or employee, or the award of a contract, grant or cooperative agreement or other benefit by the requesting agency to the extent that the information is relevant and necessary to the requesting agency's decision on the matter. 5. Disclosure may be made to the Office of Personnel Management or the Merit Systems Protection Board (including the Office of the Special Counsel) of information relevant and necessary to carrying out their functions. 6. In the event OIG is aware of information about possible research misconduct, disclosure of relevant records may be made by OIG to institutions or entities that have proposed or received contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements so that they can conduct inquiries and investigations into possible research misconduct pursuant to 45 CFR part 689. 7. Disclosure may also be made to independent auditors, contractors, experts, and other individuals who perform a service to or work on or under a contract, or other arrangement with or for the federal government, as necessary to carry out their duties. Such contractors will be required to maintain Privacy Act safeguards with respect to such records. 8. Disclosure may be made to another federal agency, a court, or a party in litigation before a court or in an administrative proceeding being conducted by a federal agency when the government is a party to the judicial or administrative proceeding. 9. In the event that OIG deems it desirable or necessary, in processing a Freedom of Information Act or Privacy Act request, disclosure may be made to the Department of Justice or the Office of Management and Budget for the purpose of obtaining its advice. 10. Disclosure may be made to the Department of Justice, to the extent it is compatible with the purpose for which the record was collected, and is relevant and necessary to litigation or anticipated litigation, in which one of the following is a party or has an interest: (a) NSF or any of its components; (b) an NSF employee in his or her official capacity; (c) an NSF employee in his or her official capacity when the Department of Justice is representing or considering representing the employee; or (d) the United States, when NSF determines that litigation is likely to affect NSF. 11. Disclosure may be made to a congressional office from the record of an individual in response to an inquiry from the congressional office made at the request of that individual. 12. Disclosure may be made to representatives of the General Services Administration and the National Archives and Records Administration who are conducting record management inspections under 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. 13. Unless the Inspector General or designee determines that disclosure of the specific information, in the context of a particular case, would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, disclosure may be made to the public (a) when the matter under investigation has become public knowledge because information about it is publicly available, (b) when the Inspector General or designee determines that such disclosure is necessary to preserve confidence in the [[Page 6884]] integrity of the OIG investigative process, or (c) to demonstrate the accountability of NSF employees or other individuals covered by this system. 14. Disclosure may be made to (a) complainants and/or victims to the extent necessary to provide such persons with information and explanations concerning the results of the investigation or case arising from the matters about which they complained and/or with respect to which they were a victim, and (b) to an individual who has been interviewed or contacted by OIG pursuant to an investigation, audit, or inspection, to the extent that OIG may provide copies of that individual's statements, testimony, or records produced. POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF RECORDS: These records are stored in a variety of media, primarily consisting of file folders, and computer storage equipment. POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF RECORDS: The records are retrieved by the names of individuals involved in the investigation or by a unique control number assigned to each investigation. POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF RECORDS: The Investigative Files are retained in accordance with OIG's records retention schedule. ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL SAFEGUARDS: The paper records are kept in OIG offices within limited access areas of the National Science Foundation during duty hours, and in locked offices at all other times. Passwords are required to access the computer storage equipment. RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: The major part of this system is exempted from this requirement pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or -(k)(2). To the extent that this system of records is not subject to exemption, it is subject to access. A determination as to exemption shall be made at the time a request for access is received. Access requests must be sent to the Privacy Act Officer in accordance with procedures found at 45 CFR part 613. CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: The major part of this system is exempted from this requirement pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or -(k)(2). To the extent that this system of records is not subject to exemption, it is subject to contest. A determination as to exemption shall be made at the time a request for contest is received. Requests must be sent to the Privacy Act Officer in accordance with procedures found at 45 CFR part 613. NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: The Privacy Act Officer should be contacted in accordance with procedures found at 45 CFR part 613. EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM: This system is exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a except subsections -(b); -(c)(1) and -(2); -(e)(4)(A) through -(F); -(e)(6), -(7), -(9), -(10), and -(11); and -(i) under 552a(j)(2) to the extent the system of records pertains to enforcement of criminal laws; and is exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), -(d), -(e)(1), -(e)(4)(G), -(H), and -(I), and - (f) under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) to the extent the system of records consists of investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the scope of the exemption at 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). These exemptions are contained in 45 CFR part 613. HISTORY: 69 FR 29703 (June 2, 1999). Dated: February 12, 2018. Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation. [FR Doc. 2018-03147 Filed 2-14-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
![6882 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Notices
Dated: February 12, 2018. Routine use 2 is changed to advance Routine use 14 addresses limited
Suzanne H. Plimpton, oversight and accountability by disclosures—to complainants, victims,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science permitting disclosure when deemed and witnesses—in situations not
Foundation. necessary to further OIG’s investigative, covered by routine use 13, and is
[FR Doc. 2018–03125 Filed 2–14–18; 8:45 am] audit, and inspection activities; and, consistent with uses promulgated by
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P following such activities, to facilitate other federal OIGs. This use not only
institutional actions to address or advances overall transparency, but, by
prevent misconduct. Regarding the keeping complainants and victims
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION latter, we note that disclosure of informed about cases in which they are
information about administrative involved, it will encourage individuals
Privacy Act of 1974; System of cases—including those cases that result to come forward and to cooperate in
Records in research misconduct findings—can future investigations. Providing
AGENCY: Office of Inspector General, be useful for NSF-funded entities witnesses with records they initially
National Science Foundation. affected by the investigation and/or produced, or which contain their own
ACTION: Notice of a modified system of outcome. For example, institutions statements or testimony, will, for
records. employing involved individuals may example, assist the federal government
need the information to effectively in ongoing legal proceedings concerning
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of manage their personnel and to the matter investigated.
1974, the National Science Foundation administer their research programs.
(NSF) is providing notice of revisions to SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER
Routine use 3 is changed to clarify
an existing system, NSF–52 ‘‘Office of that disclosure recipients can include Office of Inspector General—
Inspector General—Investigative Files.’’ tribal governments and to remove excess Investigative Files, NSF–52.
DATES: Sections 552a(e)(4) and (11) of or redundant wording.
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
Title 5 of the U.S. Code require that the Routine use 4 is changed to clarify
public have thirty days to comment on that disclosure recipients can include Unclassified
the routine uses of systems of records. tribal governments and to remove excess SYSTEM LOCATION:
The new routine uses that are the or redundant wording. Office of Inspector General, NSF, 4201
subject of this notice will take effect 30 Routine use 6 is changed to refer to Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
days after publication in the Federal ‘‘research misconduct’’ rather than
Register, unless modified by a ‘‘misconduct in science’’, to reflect the SYSTEM MANAGER:
subsequent notice to incorporate change in terminology in NSF’s Inspector General, OIG, NSF, 4201
comments received from the public. regulation at 45 CFR part 689 effective Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, April 17, 2002. It is also changed to
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
identified by [docket number and/or clarify that disclosure recipients can
RIN number __], by any of the following include tribal governments. Inspector General Act, as amended, 5
methods: Routine use 11 is removed as an U.S.C. app. 4, 8G.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// unnecessary routine use, given that the PURPOSES OF THE SYSTEM:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the described disclosure is already The Office of the Inspector General
instructions for submitting comments. permissible under the Privacy Act, 5 (OIG) for the National Science
• Email: The Acting Senior Agency U.S.C. 552a(b). Foundation (NSF) maintains this system
Official for Privacy, Dorothy Aronson, at Routine use 13 is added to enable OIG of records in order to conduct its
daronson@nsf.gov. Include [docket to release information to the public responsibilities pursuant to the
number and/or RIN number __] in the when: (a) The matter under Inspector General Act of 1978, as
subject line of the message. investigation has become public
• Mail: Dorothy Aronson, Acting amended, 5 U.S.C. app. 4, 8G. The OIG
knowledge because information about it is statutorily directed and authorized to
Senior Agency Official for Privacy, is publicly available (as is the case with
Office of Information and Resource conduct and supervise investigations
suspensions, debarments, convictions, relating to programs and operations of
Management, National Science or civil judgments), (b) the Inspector
Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., NSF, to promote economy, efficiency,
General or designee determines that and effectiveness in the administration
Alexandria, VA 22314. such disclosure is necessary to preserve of such programs and operations, and to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: confidence in the integrity of the OIG prevent and detect fraud, waste and
Dorothy Aronson, Acting Senior Agency investigative process, or (c) to abuse in such programs and operations.
Official for Privacy, Office of demonstrate the accountability of NSF Accordingly, the records are used in
Information and Resource Management, employees or other individuals covered investigations of individuals and
National Science Foundation, 2415 by this system. We note that routine use entities suspected of having committed
Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 13 is consistent with uses published by illegal or unethical acts, and in any
22314, or daronson@nsf.gov. other federal OIGs and represents a resulting criminal prosecutions, civil
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Routine balance between privacy interests and proceedings, or administrative actions.
use 1 is changed to allow OIG to the public’s interest in transparency.
disclose records that may not indicate Disclosure of names pursuant to subpart CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
wrongdoing on their face, but in (c) will help deter misconduct involving SYSTEM:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
conjunction with other records may the Foundation and/or its funded In connection with its investigative
constitute evidence that wrongdoing activities. Public disclosure under this duties, the Office of Inspector General
occurred. It is also changed to clarify use would only be permissible after the (OIG) maintains records on the
that disclosure recipients can include Inspector General or designee initially following categories of individuals: (a)
tribal governments. Other determines that it would not result in an Individuals or entities who are or have
nonsubstantive changes are made to unwarranted invasion of personal been the subject of inquiries or
remove excess or redundant wording. privacy. investigations conducted by OIG,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:01 Feb 14, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM 15FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_6914/page/1.svg)
![6884 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Notices
integrity of the OIG investigative exemption shall be made at the time a ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
process, or (c) to demonstrate the request for contest is received. Requests identified by [docket number and/or
accountability of NSF employees or must be sent to the Privacy Act Officer RIN number lll], by any of the
other individuals covered by this in accordance with procedures found at following methods:
system. 45 CFR part 613. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
14. Disclosure may be made to (a) www.regulations.gov. Follow the
complainants and/or victims to the NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: instructions for submitting comments.
extent necessary to provide such The Privacy Act Officer should be • Email: The Acting Senior Agency
persons with information and contacted in accordance with Official for Privacy, Dorothy Aronson, at
explanations concerning the results of procedures found at 45 CFR part 613. daronson@nsf.gov. Include [docket
the investigation or case arising from the number and/or RIN number lll] in
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM: the subject line of the message.
matters about which they complained
and/or with respect to which they were This system is exempted from 5 • Mail: Dorothy Aronson, Acting
a victim, and (b) to an individual who U.S.C. 552a except subsections –(b); Senior Agency Official for Privacy,
has been interviewed or contacted by –(c)(1) and –(2); –(e)(4)(A) through –(F); Office of Information and Resource
OIG pursuant to an investigation, audit, –(e)(6), –(7), –(9), –(10), and –(11); and Management, National Science
or inspection, to the extent that OIG –(i) under 552a(j)(2) to the extent the Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave.,
may provide copies of that individual’s system of records pertains to Alexandria, VA 22331.
statements, testimony, or records enforcement of criminal laws; and is Instructions: NSF will post all
produced. exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), –(d), comments on the NSF’s website (https://
–(e)(1), –(e)(4)(G), –(H), and –(I), and –(f) www.nsf.gov/policies/privacy_act.jsp).
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) to the extent All comments submitted in response to
RECORDS:
the system of records consists of this Notice will become a matter of
These records are stored in a variety investigatory material compiled for law public record. Therefore, you should
of media, primarily consisting of file enforcement purposes, other than submit only information that you wish
folders, and computer storage material within the scope of the to make publicly available.
equipment. exemption at 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). These FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF
exemptions are contained in 45 CFR you wish to submit general questions
RECORDS: part 613. about the proposed new system of
The records are retrieved by the records NSF–76, please contact Dorothy
HISTORY:
names of individuals involved in the Aronson, Acting Senior Agency Official
69 FR 29703 (June 2, 1999). for Privacy, at daronson@nsf.gov.
investigation or by a unique control
number assigned to each investigation. Dated: February 12, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The new
Suzanne H. Plimpton, system of records, NSF–76 Account
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND Registration and Management, will
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
DISPOSAL OF RECORDS: contain records from a new centralized
Foundation.
The Investigative Files are retained in [FR Doc. 2018–03147 Filed 2–14–18; 8:45 am] and streamlined account registration
accordance with OIG’s records retention BILLING CODE 7555–01–P process that NSF is transitioning
schedule. towards to provide each user a single
profile with a unique identifier to be
ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL
SAFEGUARDS: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION used across NSF systems. The new
account management functionality
The paper records are kept in OIG Privacy Act of 1974; System of allows users to maintain their own
offices within limited access areas of the Records account profiles, including personal
National Science Foundation during
information, and request roles to access
duty hours, and in locked offices at all AGENCY: National Science Foundation. NSF systems. It will also provide
other times. Passwords are required to ACTION:Notice of a New System of administrators the ability to manage
access the computer storage equipment. Records. roles for their organizations through a
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: dashboard with functions to approve,
SUMMARY: The National Science disapprove, and assign roles for their
The major part of this system is Foundation (NSF) is creating a new
exempted from this requirement organizations.
system of records: NSF–76 Account
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or –(k)(2). Registration and Management. This new SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER
To the extent that this system of records system of records will contain records
is not subject to exemption, it is subject Account Registration and
from a new centralized and streamlined Management Records, NSF–76.
to access. A determination as to account registration process that NSF is
exemption shall be made at the time a transitioning towards to provide each SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
request for access is received. Access user with a single profile and unique Unclassified.
requests must be sent to the Privacy Act identifier to be used across NSF
Officer in accordance with procedures SYSTEM LOCATION:
systems.
found at 45 CFR part 613. The National Science Foundation,
DATES: Persons wishing to comment on
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: the changes set out in this notice may 22314.
The major part of this system is do so on or before March 19, 2018.
exempted from this requirement Applicable Date: This action will be SYSTEM MANAGER(S):
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or –(k)(2). effective without further notice on Division Director, Division of
To the extent that this system of records March 19, 2018 unless modified by Information Systems, 2415 Eisenhower
is not subject to exemption, it is subject subsequent notice to incorporate Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314. Phone:
to contest. A determination as to comments received from the public. (703) 292–8150.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:01 Feb 14, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM 15FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_6914/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-15 00:21:16
Document Modified: 2018-02-15 00:21:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of a modified system of records. | |
| Dates | Sections 552a(e)(4) and (11) of Title 5 of the U.S. Code require that the public have thirty days to comment on the routine uses of systems of records. The new routine uses that are the subject of this notice will take effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, unless modified by a subsequent notice to incorporate comments received from the public. | |
| Contact | Dorothy Aronson, Acting Senior Agency Official for Privacy, Office of Information and Resource Management, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314, or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 6882 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR