83 FR 8108 - Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Evaluation of Strategies Used in TechHire and Strengthening Working Families Initiative (SWFI) Grant Programs

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 37 (February 23, 2018)

Page Range		8108-8110
FR Document		2018-03762

The Department of Labor (DOL), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95). This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents is properly assessed. Currently, DOL is soliciting comments concerning the collection of data about the Evaluation of Strategies Used in TechHire and SWFI Grant Programs. A copy of the proposed Information Collection Request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section of this notice.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 37 (Friday, February 23, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8108-8110]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03762]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Evaluation of Strategies Used in TechHire and
Strengthening Working Families Initiative (SWFI) Grant Programs

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Chief Evaluation
Office, Department of Labor.

ACTION: Notice of information collection; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL), as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95). This program helps to ensure that
requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on
respondents is properly assessed.
Currently, DOL is soliciting comments concerning the collection of
data about the Evaluation of Strategies Used in TechHire and SWFI Grant
Programs. A copy of the proposed Information Collection Request (ICR)
can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee
section of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before April 24, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either one of the following
methods:
Email: ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov; Mail or Courier: Christina
Yancey, Chief Evaluation Office, OASP, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
S-2312, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210. Instructions:
Please submit one copy of your comments by only one method. All
submissions received must include the agency name and OMB Control
Number identified above for this information collection. Comments,
including any personal information provided, become a matter of public
record. They will also be summarized and/or included in the request for
OMB approval of the information collection request.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Yancey by email at
ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

The Chief Evaluation Office (CEO), in collaboration with the
Employment and Training Administration (ETA), of DOL seeks to build
evidence about effective approaches to prepare Americans with skills
and connect them to well-paying, middle- and high-skilled, and high
growth jobs in H-lB industries (such as IT, healthcare, advanced
manufacturing, financial services, and broadband). There is a
particular interest in learning about approaches to serving populations
and individuals who have traditionally faced barriers to training and
employment opportunities such as youth and young adults, parents with
childcare needs, individuals with disabilities, individuals with
limited English proficiency, and individuals with criminal records. The
evaluation will advance the evidence on innovative approaches being
used to meet these goals in the TechHire Partnership (TechHire) and
Strengthening Working Families Initiative (SWFI) grant programs. The
evaluation will include two components, an implementation study and an
impact study.
The goal of the impact study is to provide rigorous evidence on the
effectiveness of strategies used in the TechHire and SFWI grant
programs. The impact study will consist of both a randomized controlled
trial (RCT) and a quasi-experimental design (QED) evaluation.
Approximately five grantees will be selected to participate in an RCT.
The QED will include all 53 TechHire and SWFI grantees and use the
pooled RCT control group as the comparison group using propensity score
matching. The QED will collect data from an existing wage record data.
It will also use data from the implementation study (described below)

[[Page 8109]]

in an effort to analyze how variation in program impacts correlates
with implementation factors.
A key goal of the implementation study is to provide systematic
information on all of the grantees and link the findings to impacts.
For all 53 grantees, the implementation study will review grantee
applications, conduct web-based surveys with grantees and partners, and
conduct semi-structured telephone interviews with grantees and
partners. Additionally, for the grantees in the RCT, the implementation
study will include two rounds of field visits involving a mix of
observations, interviews, and case file reviews. This will provide
critical context for understanding the impact findings from the RCT.
In January 2018, OMB approved the baseline data collection for this
evaluation (OMB 1290-0014), which includes a baseline information form
(BIF), a 6-month follow-up participant survey, a participant tracking
form, and a first round of site visit interviews. This Federal Register
Notice provides the opportunity to comment on the following proposed
data collection instruments that will be used in the implementation
component of the evaluation:
* Grantee Survey. The survey will be administered to all 53
TechHire and SWFI grantees in 2018. The purpose of the survey is to
collect uniform information on implementation status and a variety of
program characteristics to support implementation analysis of the grant
programs.
* Partner Contact Information Form. Contact information and level
of involvement for each partner will be collected from grantees in a
partner contact information form. This information will be used to
build the list of partners and their contact information for the
partner survey.
* Partner Survey. The survey will be administered to all partners
of all 53 TechHire and SWFI grantees in 2018. The survey will explore
the strength of relationships between the partners in the TechHire and
SWFI grant programs. The survey will collect information on partner
roles and responsibilities, sustainability plans, and implementation
challenges and lessons learned.
* Telephone Interview With Grantees. Within approximately 6 months
after the grantee survey, the evaluation team will conduct semi-
structured telephone interviews with each grantee. The protocol will be
used to learn about challenges, successes, and barriers to
implementation that are difficult to obtain using a survey.
* Telephone Interview With Partners. Within approximately 6 months
after the partner survey, the evaluation team will conduct semi-
structured telephone interviews partners of a subset of grantees. The
protocol will be used to learn about the degree of engagement and
successful strategies that are difficult to obtain using a survey.
* Site Visit Interviews for Second Round of Site Visits. During a
second round of implementation site visits to the grantees in the RCT,
the evaluation team will conduct in-depth interviews with program staff
and partners. The site visit interview guide will collect information
on implementation status, changes in implementation during random
assignment, and degree of coordination. The site visit interview guide
will be modular and collect information based on the grantee and/or
partner staff knowledge and role.

II. Desired Focus of Comments

Currently, DOL is soliciting comments concerning the above data
collection for the Evaluation of Strategies Use in the TechHire and
SWFI programs. DOL is particularly interested in comments that do the
following:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used.
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected.
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology--for example,
permitting electronic submission of responses.

III. Current Actions

At this time, DOL is requesting clearance for the implementation
site visit protocols, the focus group protocols, and a grantee survey.
A future information collection request will include an 18-month
participant follow-up survey.
Type of Review: New information collection request.
OMB Control Number: 1290--0NEW.
Affected Public: TechHire and SWFI grantees and partners.

Estimated Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden
Total number Annual number Number of time per Estimated
Information collection of respondents of respondents responses per response annual burden
respondent (hours) hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grantee survey.................. 53 18 1 1 18
Grantee telephone interview \a\. 159 53 1 1 53
Partner contact information form 53 18 1 1 18
Partner survey \b\.............. 960 320 1 .5 160
Partner telephone interview \c\. 106 35 1 1 35
Site visit interview guide for 90 30 1 1 30
second round of site visits \d\
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 1,421 474 .............. .............. 314
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Assumes 53 grantees and 3 respondents per grantee for (53 x 3) = 159 total respondents and (159/3) = 53
annual respondents.
\b\ Assumes 1,200 partners and an 80 percent response rate for (1,200/.80) = 960 total respondents and (960/3) =
320 annual respondents.
\c\ Assumes 53 partners and 2 respondents per partner for (53 x 2) = 106 total respondents and (53/2) = 35.33
annual respondents.
\d\ Assumes 5 grantees and 10 grantee staff and 8 partner staff for each grantee for (5 x (10 + 8)) = 90 total
respondents and (90/3) = 30 annual respondents.

Comments submitted in response to this request will be summarized
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget
approval of the information collection request; they will also become a
matter of public record.

[[Page 8110]]

Dated: February 16, 2018.
Molly Irwin,
Chief Evaluation Officer, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2018-03762 Filed 2-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-HX-P

8108 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices

—Evaluate whether the proposed 5,000 × 30 minutes = 150,000/60 Email: ChiefEvaluationOffice@
collection of information is necessary minutes per hour = 2,500 burden dol.gov; Mail or Courier: Christina
for the proper performance of the hours. Yancey, Chief Evaluation Office, OASP,
functions of the Civil Division, If additional information is required U.S. Department of Labor, Room S–
including whether the information contact: Melody Braswell, Department 2312, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
will have practical utility; Clearance Officer, United States Washington, DC 20210. Instructions:
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s Department of Justice, Justice Please submit one copy of your
estimate of the burden of the Management Division, Policy and comments by only one method. All
proposed collection of information, Planning Staff, Two Constitution submissions received must include the
including the validity of the Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405A, agency name and OMB Control Number
methodology and assumptions used; Washington, DC 20530. identified above for this information
—Evaluate whether and if so how the collection. Comments, including any
quality, utility, and clarity of the Dated: February 20, 2018. personal information provided, become
information to be collected can be Melody Braswell, a matter of public record. They will also
enhanced; and Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. be summarized and/or included in the
—Minimize the burden of the collection Department of Justice. request for OMB approval of the
of information on those who are to [FR Doc. 2018–03720 Filed 2–22–18; 8:45 am] information collection request.
respond, including through the use of BILLING CODE 4410–12–P FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
appropriate automated, electronic, Christina Yancey by email at
mechanical, or other technological ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov.
collection techniques or other forms DEPARTMENT OF LABOR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of Agency Information Collection I. Background
responses. Activities; Submission for OMB The Chief Evaluation Office (CEO), in
Review; Comment Request; Evaluation collaboration with the Employment and
Overview of This Information
of Strategies Used in TechHire and Training Administration (ETA), of DOL
Collection
Strengthening Working Families seeks to build evidence about effective
1. Type of Information Collection: Initiative (SWFI) Grant Programs approaches to prepare Americans with
New. skills and connect them to well-paying,
2. The Title of the Form/Collection: AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
middle- and high-skilled, and high
Survey of Elder Justice Needs in Rural Secretary for Policy, Chief Evaluation
growth jobs in H–lB industries (such as
America. Office, Department of Labor.
IT, healthcare, advanced manufacturing,
3. The agency form number, if any, ACTION: Notice of information collection; financial services, and broadband).
and the applicable component of the request for comment. There is a particular interest in learning
Department sponsoring the collection: about approaches to serving populations
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor
Civil Division, United States and individuals who have traditionally
(DOL), as part of its continuing effort to
Department of Justice. faced barriers to training and
reduce paperwork and respondent
4. Affected public who will be asked employment opportunities such as
burden, conducts a preclearance
or required to respond, as well as a brief youth and young adults, parents with
consultation program to provide the
abstract: childcare needs, individuals with
general public and Federal agencies
Primary: States and local units of disabilities, individuals with limited
with an opportunity to comment on
general government including the 50 English proficiency, and individuals
proposed and/or continuing collections
state governments, the District of with criminal records. The evaluation
of information in accordance with the
Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. will advance the evidence on innovative
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Virgin Islands, and the more than 3,000 approaches being used to meet these
(PRA95). This program helps to ensure
counties and cities with correctional goals in the TechHire Partnership
that requested data can be provided in
facilities. Other: None. (TechHire) and Strengthening Working
the desired format, reporting burden
Abstract: The US Department of (time and financial resources) is Families Initiative (SWFI) grant
Justice, Elder Justice Initiative is minimized, collection instruments are programs. The evaluation will include
conducting a survey of rural needs for clearly understood, and the impact of two components, an implementation
the field of elder abuse. These needs collection requirements on respondents study and an impact study.
will be combined with findings from is properly assessed. The goal of the impact study is to
local listening sessions and will inform Currently, DOL is soliciting comments provide rigorous evidence on the
the agenda of a national conference on concerning the collection of data about effectiveness of strategies used in the
rural elder abuse in the Fall of 2018. the Evaluation of Strategies Used in TechHire and SFWI grant programs. The
5. An estimate of the total number of TechHire and SWFI Grant Programs. A impact study will consist of both a
respondents and the amount of time copy of the proposed Information randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a
estimated for an average respondent to Collection Request (ICR) can be quasi-experimental design (QED)
respond: It is estimated that no more obtained by contacting the office listed evaluation. Approximately five grantees
than 5,000 respondents will apply. Each below in the addressee section of this will be selected to participate in an
application takes approximately less notice. RCT. The QED will include all 53
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

than 30 minutes to complete and is TechHire and SWFI grantees and use
submitted once per year (annually). DATES: Written comments must be the pooled RCT control group as the
6. An estimate of the total public submitted to the office listed in the comparison group using propensity
burden (in hours) associated with the addressee section below on or before score matching. The QED will collect
collection: The total hour burden to April 24, 2018. data from an existing wage record data.
complete the applications is 2,500 ADDRESSES: You may submit comments It will also use data from the
hours. by either one of the following methods: implementation study (described below)

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:52 Feb 22, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices 8109

in an effort to analyze how variation in information will be used to build the list II. Desired Focus of Comments
program impacts correlates with of partners and their contact
implementation factors. information for the partner survey. Currently, DOL is soliciting comments
A key goal of the implementation * Partner Survey. The survey will be concerning the above data collection for
study is to provide systematic administered to all partners of all 53 the Evaluation of Strategies Use in the
information on all of the grantees and TechHire and SWFI grantees in 2018. TechHire and SWFI programs. DOL is
link the findings to impacts. For all 53 The survey will explore the strength of particularly interested in comments that
grantees, the implementation study will relationships between the partners in do the following:
review grantee applications, conduct the TechHire and SWFI grant programs. • Evaluate whether the proposed
web-based surveys with grantees and The survey will collect information on collection of information is necessary
partners, and conduct semi-structured partner roles and responsibilities, for the proper performance of the
telephone interviews with grantees and sustainability plans, and functions of the agency, including
partners. Additionally, for the grantees implementation challenges and lessons whether the information will have
in the RCT, the implementation study learned. practical utility.
will include two rounds of field visits * Telephone Interview With Grantees. • Evaluate the accuracy of the
involving a mix of observations, Within approximately 6 months after agency’s estimate of the burden of the
interviews, and case file reviews. This the grantee survey, the evaluation team proposed collection of information,
will provide critical context for will conduct semi-structured telephone including the validity of the
understanding the impact findings from interviews with each grantee. The methodology and assumptions used.
the RCT. protocol will be used to learn about • Enhance the quality, utility, and
In January 2018, OMB approved the challenges, successes, and barriers to clarity of the information to be
baseline data collection for this implementation that are difficult to collected.
evaluation (OMB 1290–0014), which obtain using a survey. • Minimize the burden of the
includes a baseline information form * Telephone Interview With Partners. collection of information on those who
(BIF), a 6-month follow-up participant Within approximately 6 months after are to respond, including through the
survey, a participant tracking form, and the partner survey, the evaluation team use of appropriate automated,
a first round of site visit interviews. will conduct semi-structured telephone electronic, mechanical, or other
This Federal Register Notice provides interviews partners of a subset of technological collection techniques or
the opportunity to comment on the grantees. The protocol will be used to other forms of information technology—
following proposed data collection learn about the degree of engagement for example, permitting electronic
instruments that will be used in the and successful strategies that are submission of responses.
implementation component of the difficult to obtain using a survey.
evaluation: * Site Visit Interviews for Second III. Current Actions
* Grantee Survey. The survey will be Round of Site Visits. During a second
round of implementation site visits to At this time, DOL is requesting
administered to all 53 TechHire and
the grantees in the RCT, the evaluation clearance for the implementation site
SWFI grantees in 2018. The purpose of
team will conduct in-depth interviews visit protocols, the focus group
the survey is to collect uniform
with program staff and partners. The protocols, and a grantee survey. A future
information on implementation status
site visit interview guide will collect information collection request will
and a variety of program characteristics
information on implementation status, include an 18-month participant follow-
to support implementation analysis of
changes in implementation during up survey.
the grant programs.
* Partner Contact Information Form. random assignment, and degree of Type of Review: New information
Contact information and level of coordination. The site visit interview collection request.
involvement for each partner will be guide will be modular and collect OMB Control Number: 1290—0NEW.
collected from grantees in a partner information based on the grantee and/or Affected Public: TechHire and SWFI
contact information form. This partner staff knowledge and role. grantees and partners.

ESTIMATED BURDEN HOURS
Average
Annual Number of Estimated
Total number burden time
Information collection number of responses per annual burden
of respondents per response
respondents respondent hours
(hours)

Grantee survey .................................................................... 53 18 1 1 18
Grantee telephone interview a .............................................. 159 53 1 1 53
Partner contact information form ......................................... 53 18 1 1 18
Partner survey b ................................................................... 960 320 1 .5 160
Partner telephone interview c ............................................... 106 35 1 1 35
Site visit interview guide for second round of site visits d ... 90 30 1 1 30

Total .............................................................................. 1,421 474 ........................ ........................ 314
a Assumes53 grantees and 3 respondents per grantee for (53 × 3) = 159 total respondents and (159/3) = 53 annual respondents.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

b Assumes1,200 partners and an 80 percent response rate for (1,200/.80) = 960 total respondents and (960/3) = 320 annual respondents.
c Assumes53 partners and 2 respondents per partner for (53 × 2) = 106 total respondents and (53/2) = 35.33 annual respondents.
d Assumes 5 grantees and 10 grantee staff and 8 partner staff for each grantee for (5 × (10 + 8)) = 90 total respondents and (90/3) = 30 an-
nual respondents.

Comments submitted in response to included in the request for Office of information collection request; they will
this request will be summarized and/or Management and Budget approval of the also become a matter of public record.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:52 Feb 22, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1

8110 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices

Dated: February 16, 2018. DC 20210. Instructions: Please submit proposed data collection instrument for
Molly Irwin, one copy of your comments by only one a national survey on Titles I and III
Chief Evaluation Officer, U.S. Department of method. All submissions received must workforce programs to support the
Labor. include the agency name and OMB implementation study. The online, self-
[FR Doc. 2018–03762 Filed 2–22–18; 8:45 am] Control Number identified above for administered survey will be conducted
BILLING CODE 4510–HX–P this information collection. Comments, in all 50 states plus the District of
including any personal information Columbia. The state program staff who
provided, become a matter of public will be included in the survey sample
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR record. They will also be summarized are staff responsible for implementation
and/or included in the request for OMB of Titles I and III. Each state will
Agency Information Collection approval of the information collection complete one survey, although multiple
Activities; Submission for OMB request. state staff may contribute to a state’s
Review; Comment Request; Workforce FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: response. An earlier information
Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Janet Javar by email at collection request (82 Federal Register
Implementation Study ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov. 56845) was posted on November 30,
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2017 to solicit comments on semi-
Secretary for Policy, Chief Evaluation structured interviews for site visit data
I. Background collection to support the
Office, Department of Labor.
WIOA, signed into law on July 22, implementation study.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
2014, authorized and amended a series II. Desired Focus of Comments
request for comment.
of employment and educational
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor programs under five titles. DOL seeks to Currently, DOL is soliciting comments
(DOL), as part of its continuing effort to understand how the implementation of concerning the above data collection for
reduce paperwork and respondent WIOA is changing the core workforce the WIOA implementation study. DOL
burden, conducts a preclearance programs authorized under Title I is particularly interested in comments
consultation program to provide the (Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Youth that do the following:
general public and Federal agencies programs) and the Employment Service • Evaluate whether the proposed
with an opportunity to comment on program authorized under the Wagner- collection of information is necessary
proposed and/or continuing collections Peyser Act and amended by Title III, as for the proper performance of the
of information in accordance with the well as how the implementation is functions of the agency, including
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 contributing to more integration with whether the information will have
(PRA95). This program helps to ensure stakeholders in programs authorized practical utility.
that requested data can be provided in under Titles II (Adult Education and • Evaluate the accuracy of the
the desired format, reporting burden Literacy) and IV (Vocational agency’s estimate of the burden of the
(time and financial resources) is Rehabilitation). proposed collection of information,
minimized, collection instruments are DOL is funding a study to document including the validity of the
and describe how critical state-level methodology and assumptions used.
clearly understood, and the impact of
activities under WIOA are being • Enhance the quality, utility, and
collection requirements on respondents
implemented and identify possible areas
is properly assessed. clarity of the information to be
for which further technical assistance,
Currently, DOL is soliciting comments collected.
guidance, or policies might be needed in
concerning the collection of survey data
order to help implement the law. The • Minimize the burden of the
for a study of the implementation of the collection of information on those who
study’s major research questions are: (1)
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity are to respond, including through the
How are the critical reforms under
Act (WIOA). A copy of the proposed use of appropriate automated,
WIOA related to the core workforce
Information Collection Request (ICR) electronic, mechanical, or other
programs for Title I and III being
can be obtained by contacting the office technological collection techniques or
implemented? (2) to what extent is
listed below in the addressee section of other forms of information technology-
WIOA’s vision for an integrated
this notice. for example, permitting electronic
workforce system being achieved
DATES: Written comments must be through state- and local-level synergies submission of responses.
submitted to the office listed in the between Titles I and III and Titles II and III. Current Actions
addressee section below on or before IV stakeholders? and (3) what changes
April 24, 2018. or supplemental technical assistance, At this time, DOL is requesting
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments guidance, or policy would be helpful to clearance for a national survey of state
by either one of the following methods: states administering the core programs workforce administrators.
Email: ChiefEvaluationOffice@ and in providing guidance and oversight Type of Review: New information
dol.gov; Mail or Courier: Janet Javar, to the local level to improve service collection request.
Chief Evaluation Office, OASP, U.S. quality and management? OMB Control Number: 1290—0NEW
Department of Labor, Room S–2312, 200 This Federal Register Notice provides Affected Public: State program staff
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, the opportunity to comment on the involved in WIOA implementation.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:52 Feb 22, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1

Document Created: 2018-02-23 01:32:38
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 01:32:38

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice of information collection; request for comment.
Dates		Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
Contact		Christina Yancey by email at [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 8108