83 FR 9692 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 45 (March 7, 2018)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 45 (March 7, 2018)
| Page Range | 9692-9697 | |
| FR Document | 2018-04265 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 9692-9697] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-04265] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2016-9074; Product Identifier 2016-NM-097-AD; Amendment 39-19213; AD 2018-05-04] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, - 114, and -115 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, and -214 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -211, -212, and -213 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of engine fan cowl door (FCD) losses on airplanes equipped with CFM56 engines due to operator failure to close the FCD during ground operations. This AD requires modification and re- identification, or replacement, of certain FCDs. This AD also requires installation of a placard. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective April 11, 2018. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 11, 2018. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016- 9074. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016- 9074; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, and -115 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, and -214 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -211, -212, and -213 airplanes. The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on September 27, 2017 (82 FR 44974) (``the SNPRM''). We preceded the SNPRM with a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register on September 26, 2016 (81 FR 65980) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by reports of engine FCD losses on airplanes equipped with CFM56 engines due to operator failure to close the FCD during ground operations. The NPRM proposed to require modification and re-identification, or replacement, of certain FCDs. The NPRM also proposed to require installation of a placard. The SNPRM proposed to add airplanes to the applicability and expand the list of affected FCD part numbers. We are issuing this AD to prevent in-flight loss of an engine FCD and possible consequent damage to the airplane. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2016-0257, dated December 16, 2016 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, and -115 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, and -214, airplanes; and Model A321- 111, -112, -211, -212, and -213 airplanes. The MCAI states: Fan Cowl Door (FCD) losses were reported on aeroplanes equipped with CFM56 engines. Investigation results confirmed that in all cases the fan cowls were opened prior to the flight and were not correctly re-secured. During the pre-flight inspection, it was then not detected that the FCD[s] were not properly latched. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to in- flight loss of a FCD, possibly resulting in damage to the aeroplane and/or injury to persons on the ground. Prompted by these events, new FCD front latch and keeper assembly were developed, having a specific key necessary to un-latch the FCD. This key cannot be removed unless the FCD front latch is safely closed. The key, after removal, must be stowed in the flight deck at a specific location, as instructed in the applicable Aircraft Maintenance Manual. Applicable Flight Crew Operating Manuals have been amended accordingly. After modification, the FCD is identified with a different Part Number (P/N). Airbus issued Service Bulletin (SB) A320-71-1068 to provide the modification instructions. Consequently, EASA issued AD 2016-0069 to require modification and re-identification of [affected] FCD[s] [or replacement of affected FCDs]. [[Page 9693]] After that [EASA] AD was published, FCD P/N 238-0301-509 was identified as missing in the list of affected FCD P/N[s] provided in the [EASA] AD. For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the requirement of EASA AD 2016-0069, which is superseded, and expands the list of affected FCD P/N[s]. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016- 9074. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the SNPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. In addition to its general agreement with the proposed requirement to implement the new latches on the FCDs, Delta Airlines (Delta) provided the following comments on the SNPRM. Request To Specify Which FCDs Require Modification Delta requested that we specify which FCDs need to be modified by listing the affected FCD serial numbers in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(3) of the proposed AD (in the SNPRM). Delta stated that Airbus confirmed that only a specific set of serial numbers is affected. We acknowledge that Delta provided additional information from Airbus regarding certain FCD serial numbers. However, Delta did not provide substantiation that only the FCDs with those serial numbers are subject to the identified unsafe condition. The State of Design Authority (EASA) and Airbus have determined that FCDs with certain part numbers (P/Ns), which are identified in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD, as ``Old P/N,'' rather than the serial numbers that Airbus provided to Delta, are affected by the unsafe condition. If an operator can provide substantiation that certain FCDs may be exempted from the AD requirements based on having a type design which mitigates the risk and provides an adequate level of safety, they may apply for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with the procedures in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD. We have not changed this AD in this regard. Request To Remove Requirement for Placard Installation Delta requested that we remove the proposed requirement to install a placard at the applicable location specified in paragraph (g)(2) of the proposed AD (in the SNPRM). Delta noted that FCD keys are considered ground support equipment by Airbus and are routinely stored at ground operating stations. Delta suggested that since FCD keys are not required to be stored on an airplane, requiring a placard where the keys may or may not be located creates an undue regulatory burden on operators. Delta pointed out that if the placard was missing from an airplane, that airplane would be out of compliance and could not be operated. Delta added that Airbus has indicated that the placard and key locations are not safety related. We partially agree with the commenter's request. We agree that the proposed placard requirements were too stringent. However, we have determined that some means of advising the flight and maintenance crews of the location of the FCD keys is necessary. We have revised paragraph (g)(2) of this AD to allow flights, for a time period not to exceed 10 days, when one or both engine FCD keys or the placard are damaged or missing. We have also revised paragraph (g)(2) of this AD to allow an alternate key stowage location in the flight deck and installation of a placard for identification of the stowage location, provided the keys can be consistently retrieved from that flight deck location. Request To Remove Reference to Certain Instructions for Installing Replacement FCDs Delta requested that the alternative actions in paragraphs (h) and (l)(2) of the proposed AD (in the SNPRM) to install replacement FCDs using instructions ``. . . approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA)'' be removed from the proposed AD (in the SNPRM). Delta claimed that the safety issue being addressed is the latching of the FCDs, not their installation. Delta noted that the SNPRM would allow on-wing work on FCDs that were installed as specified in the airplane maintenance manual (AMM), and suggested that same method should be acceptable for installing a new or modified FCD. Delta requested that either the requirement to use ``approved'' instructions be removed or the term ``approved'' be changed to allow a method ``accepted'' by the FAA; EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA, which would allow operators to use procedures in the existing AMM. Delta requested that if this change is not made, the ``Costs of Compliance'' section of this AD be updated to reflect the $3,555 Airbus would charge Delta to approve the existing AMM procedure for the actions specified in paragraphs (h) and (l)(2) of the proposed AD (in the SNPRM). We disagree with the commenter's request. Installation of a new part using procedures that are not approved in the specified manner might result in an inadvertent introduction of an unsafe condition. We have coordinated with Airbus and EASA and agreed that the installation must be done in accordance with the approved methods specified in paragraphs (h) and (l)(2) of this AD. In addition, we recognize that in accomplishing the requirements of any AD, operators might incur ``incidental'' costs in addition to the ``direct'' costs that are reflected in the cost analysis presented in the AD. However, the cost analysis in ADs typically does not include incidental costs. We have not changed this AD in this regard. Change to Applicability In paragraph (c)(2) of the proposed AD (in the SNPRM), we inadvertently included Airbus Model A320-216 airplanes. We did not intend to include Model A320-216 airplanes in the applicability of this AD because the MCAI was already added to the required airworthiness action list (RAAL) for Model A320-216 airplanes. We have removed Model A320-216 airplanes from the applicability of this final rule. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously, and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these changes:Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the SNPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the SNPRM. We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-71-1068, Revision 01, dated April 28, 2016. This service information describes procedures for modifying the left-hand and right-hand FCDs on engines 1 and 2; installing a placard; and re-identifying both the left-hand and right- hand FCDs with a new part number. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business [[Page 9694]] or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 400 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: Estimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost on Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product U.S. operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Modification, placard Up to 11 work- $9,730 $10,665 (for two engines).......... $4,266,000 installation, and re- hours x $85 per identification (or hour = $935. replacement) of FCD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight Division. Regulatory Findings We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and 4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): 2018-05-04 Airbus: Amendment 39-19213; Docket No. FAA-2016-9074; Product Identifier 2016-NM-097-AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective April 11, 2018. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes, certificated in any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, all manufacturer serial numbers. (1) Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes. (2) Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, and -115 airplanes. (3) Airbus Model A320-211, -212, and -214 airplanes. (4) Airbus Model A321-111, -112, -211, -212, and -213 airplanes. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 71, Powerplant. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by reports of engine fan cowl door (FCD) losses on airplanes equipped with CFM56 engines due to operator failure to close the FCD during ground operations. We are issuing this AD to prevent in-flight loss of an engine FCD and possible consequent damage to the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Modification of Affected FCDs Within 35 months after the effective date of this AD, accomplish concurrently the actions in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-71-1068, Revision 01, dated April 28, 2016. (1) Modify the left-hand and right-hand FCDs on engines 1 and 2 that have an old part number (``Old P/N''), as applicable, as specified in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD. (2) Install a placard on the box located at the bottom of the 120-volt unit (120 VU) panel, or at the bottom of the coat stowage, as applicable to airplane configuration. Revenue flights with one or both FCD keys missing from the stowage location in the flight deck, or the placard missing or damaged, are permitted for a period not to exceed 10 days. An alternate key stowage location in the flight deck and installation of a placard for identification of the stowage location is permitted in accordance with the operator's FAA accepted maintenance/inspection program, provided the keys can be consistently retrieved from that flight deck location when needed. (3) Re-identify the modified left-hand and right-hand FCDs with the new part number (``New P/N''), as applicable, as specified in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD. BILLING CODE 4910-13-P [[Page 9695]] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR07MR18.000 [[Page 9696]] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR07MR18.001 BILLING CODE 4910-13-C (h) Optional Replacement of Affected FCDs With New Door Design Replacing the FCDs having a P/N listed as ``Old P/N'' in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD with the FCDs having the corresponding P/Ns listed as ``New P/N'' in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(3) of this AD. The replacement must be done in accordance with instructions approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (i) Compliance Information for Airplanes on Which Airbus Modification 157517 Is Embodied Accomplishment of Airbus modification 157517 on an airplane in production is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(3) of this AD, provided that no FCD having a part number identified as ``Old P/N'' in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD is installed on that airplane. (j) Compliance Information for Airplanes on Which Airbus Modification 157519 or Modification 157521 Is Embodied Accomplishment of Airbus modification 157519 or modification 157521 on an airplane in production is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. (k) Parts Installation Prohibition (1) For any airplane with any FCD installed having a P/N identified as ``Old P/N'' in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD as of the effective date of this AD: No person may install on an airplane a part number identified as ``Old P/N'' in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD after accomplishing the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD on that airplane. (2) For any airplane with only FCDs installed having P/Ns that are identified as ``New P/N'' in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD as of the effective date of this AD: No person may install on any airplane a part number identified as ``Old P/N'' in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD as of the effective date of this AD. (l) Installation of Approved Parts Installation on an airplane of a right-hand or left-hand FCD having a part number approved after the effective date of this AD is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(3) of this AD for that airplane only, provided the conditions specified in paragraphs (l)(1) and (l)(2) of this AD are met. (1) The part number must be approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (2) The FCD installation must be accomplished in accordance with airplane modification instructions approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (m) Credit for Previous Actions This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-71-1068, Revision 00, dated December 18, 2015. (n) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (o)(2) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA- authorized signature. (o) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2016-0257, dated December 16, 2016, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9074. (2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223. (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (p)(3) and (p)(4) of this AD. (p) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-71-1068, Revision 01, dated April 28, 2016. [[Page 9697]] (ii) Reserved. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; internet http://www.airbus.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 22, 2018. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2018-04265 Filed 3-6-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![9692 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference losses on airplanes equipped with airplanes; Model A320–211, –212, and
(1) The Director of the Federal Register CFM56 engines due to operator failure –214 airplanes; and Model A321–111,
approved the incorporation by reference to close the FCD during ground –112, –211, –212, and –213 airplanes.
(IBR) of the service information listed in this operations. This AD requires The SNPRM published in the Federal
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR modification and re-identification, or Register on September 27, 2017 (82 FR
part 51. replacement, of certain FCDs. This AD 44974) (‘‘the SNPRM’’). We preceded
(2) You must use this service information also requires installation of a placard. the SNPRM with a notice of proposed
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
We are issuing this AD to address the rulemaking (NPRM) that published in
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787– unsafe condition on these products. the Federal Register on September 26,
81205–SB500008–00, Issue 001, dated DATES: This AD is effective April 11, 2016 (81 FR 65980) (‘‘the NPRM’’). The
December 7, 2016. 2018. NPRM was prompted by reports of
(ii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin B787– The Director of the Federal Register engine FCD losses on airplanes
81205–SB500009–00, Issue 003, dated approved the incorporation by reference equipped with CFM56 engines due to
December 7, 2016. of a certain publication listed in this AD operator failure to close the FCD during
(3) For service information identified in as of April 11, 2018. ground operations. The NPRM proposed
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial to require modification and re-
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data ADDRESSES: For service information
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., identified in this final rule, contact identification, or replacement, of certain
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740; Airbus, Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 FCDs. The NPRM also proposed to
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https:// Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 require installation of a placard. The
www.myboeingfleet.com. Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 SNPRM proposed to add airplanes to
(4) You may view this service information 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email the applicability and expand the list of
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; affected FCD part numbers. We are
2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA. issuing this AD to prevent in-flight loss
internet http://www.airbus.com. You
For information on the availability of this of an engine FCD and possible
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport consequent damage to the airplane.
(5) You may view this service information
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., The European Aviation Safety Agency
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records Des Moines, WA. For information on the (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
Administration (NARA). For information on availability of this material at the FAA, for the Member States of the European
the availability of this material at NARA, call call 206–231–3195. It is also available Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
202–741–6030, or go to http:// on the internet at http:// Directive 2016–0257, dated December
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- www.regulations.gov by searching for 16, 2016 (referred to after this as the
locations.html. Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 9074. Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
21, 2018. an unsafe condition for all Airbus
Michael Kaszycki, Examining the AD Docket Model A318–111 and –112 airplanes;
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, You may examine the AD docket on Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114, and
Aircraft Certification Service. the internet at http:// –115 airplanes; Model A320–211, –212,
[FR Doc. 2018–04261 Filed 3–6–18; 8:45 am] www.regulations.gov by searching for and –214, airplanes; and Model A321–
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P and locating Docket No. FAA–2016– 111, –112, –211, –212, and –213
9074; or in person at the Docket airplanes. The MCAI states:
Management Facility between 9 a.m. Fan Cowl Door (FCD) losses were reported
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, on aeroplanes equipped with CFM56
except Federal holidays. The AD docket engines. Investigation results confirmed that
Federal Aviation Administration contains this AD, the regulatory in all cases the fan cowls were opened prior
evaluation, any comments received, and to the flight and were not correctly re-
14 CFR Part 39 other information. The street address for secured. During the pre-flight inspection, it
was then not detected that the FCD[s] were
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9074; Product
the Docket Office (telephone 800–647– not properly latched.
Identifier 2016–NM–097–AD; Amendment 5527) is Docket Management Facility, This condition, if not detected and
39–19213; AD 2018–05–04] U.S. Department of Transportation, corrected, could lead to in-flight loss of a
Docket Operations, M–30, West FCD, possibly resulting in damage to the
RIN 2120–AA64 Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, aeroplane and/or injury to persons on the
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, ground.
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Washington, DC 20590. Prompted by these events, new FCD front
Airplanes latch and keeper assembly were developed,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
having a specific key necessary to un-latch
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, the FCD. This key cannot be removed unless
Administration (FAA), Department of International Section, Transport the FCD front latch is safely closed. The key,
Transportation (DOT). Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South after removal, must be stowed in the flight
ACTION: Final rule. 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; deck at a specific location, as instructed in
telephone and fax 206–231–3223. the applicable Aircraft Maintenance Manual.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applicable Flight Crew Operating Manuals
airworthiness directive (AD) for all have been amended accordingly. After
Airbus Model A318–111 and –112 Discussion modification, the FCD is identified with a
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
different Part Number (P/N). Airbus issued
airplanes; Model A319–111, –112, –113, We issued a supplemental notice of
Service Bulletin (SB) A320–71–1068 to
–114, and –115 airplanes; Model A320– proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to provide the modification instructions.
211, –212, and –214 airplanes; and amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD Consequently, EASA issued AD 2016–0069
Model A321–111, –112, –211, –212, and that would apply to all Airbus Model to require modification and re-identification
–213 airplanes. This AD was prompted A318–111 and –112 airplanes; Model of [affected] FCD[s] [or replacement of
by reports of engine fan cowl door (FCD) A319–111, –112, –113, –114, and –115 affected FCDs].
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:31 Mar 06, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM 07MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_9737/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 9693
After that [EASA] AD was published, FCD ground support equipment by Airbus (h) and (l)(2) of the proposed AD (in the
P/N 238–0301–509 was identified as missing and are routinely stored at ground SNPRM).
in the list of affected FCD P/N[s] provided in operating stations. Delta suggested that We disagree with the commenter’s
the [EASA] AD. since FCD keys are not required to be
For the reasons described above, this
request. Installation of a new part using
[EASA] AD retains the requirement of EASA
stored on an airplane, requiring a procedures that are not approved in the
AD 2016–0069, which is superseded, and placard where the keys may or may not specified manner might result in an
expands the list of affected FCD P/N[s]. be located creates an undue regulatory inadvertent introduction of an unsafe
burden on operators. Delta pointed out condition. We have coordinated with
You may examine the MCAI in the that if the placard was missing from an Airbus and EASA and agreed that the
AD docket on the internet at http:// airplane, that airplane would be out of installation must be done in accordance
www.regulations.gov by searching for compliance and could not be operated. with the approved methods specified in
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016– Delta added that Airbus has indicated paragraphs (h) and (l)(2) of this AD. In
9074. that the placard and key locations are addition, we recognize that in
Comments not safety related. accomplishing the requirements of any
We partially agree with the AD, operators might incur ‘‘incidental’’
We gave the public the opportunity to commenter’s request. We agree that the
participate in developing this AD. The costs in addition to the ‘‘direct’’ costs
proposed placard requirements were too that are reflected in the cost analysis
following presents the comments stringent. However, we have determined
received on the SNPRM and the FAA’s presented in the AD. However, the cost
that some means of advising the flight analysis in ADs typically does not
response to each comment. In addition and maintenance crews of the location
to its general agreement with the include incidental costs. We have not
of the FCD keys is necessary. We have changed this AD in this regard.
proposed requirement to implement the revised paragraph (g)(2) of this AD to
new latches on the FCDs, Delta Airlines allow flights, for a time period not to Change to Applicability
(Delta) provided the following exceed 10 days, when one or both
comments on the SNPRM. In paragraph (c)(2) of the proposed
engine FCD keys or the placard are AD (in the SNPRM), we inadvertently
Request To Specify Which FCDs damaged or missing. We have also included Airbus Model A320–216
Require Modification revised paragraph (g)(2) of this AD to airplanes. We did not intend to include
allow an alternate key stowage location Model A320–216 airplanes in the
Delta requested that we specify which in the flight deck and installation of a
FCDs need to be modified by listing the applicability of this AD because the
placard for identification of the stowage MCAI was already added to the required
affected FCD serial numbers in location, provided the keys can be
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(3) of the airworthiness action list (RAAL) for
consistently retrieved from that flight Model A320–216 airplanes. We have
proposed AD (in the SNPRM). Delta deck location.
stated that Airbus confirmed that only a removed Model A320–216 airplanes
specific set of serial numbers is affected. Request To Remove Reference to from the applicability of this final rule.
We acknowledge that Delta provided Certain Instructions for Installing
Conclusion
additional information from Airbus Replacement FCDs
regarding certain FCD serial numbers. Delta requested that the alternative We reviewed the relevant data,
However, Delta did not provide actions in paragraphs (h) and (l)(2) of considered the comments received, and
substantiation that only the FCDs with the proposed AD (in the SNPRM) to determined that air safety and the
those serial numbers are subject to the install replacement FCDs using public interest require adopting this AD
identified unsafe condition. The State of instructions ‘‘. . . approved by the with the changes described previously,
Design Authority (EASA) and Airbus Manager, International Section, and minor editorial changes. We have
have determined that FCDs with certain Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or determined that these changes:
part numbers (P/Ns), which are EASA; or Airbus’s EASA Design • Are consistent with the intent that
identified in table 1 to paragraphs (g), Organization Approval (DOA)’’ be was proposed in the SNPRM for
(h), (i), and (k) of this AD, as ‘‘Old removed from the proposed AD (in the correcting the unsafe condition; and
P/N,’’ rather than the serial numbers SNPRM). Delta claimed that the safety • Do not add any additional burden
that Airbus provided to Delta, are issue being addressed is the latching of upon the public than was already
affected by the unsafe condition. If an the FCDs, not their installation. Delta proposed in the SNPRM.
operator can provide substantiation that noted that the SNPRM would allow on- We also determined that these
certain FCDs may be exempted from the wing work on FCDs that were installed changes will not increase the economic
AD requirements based on having a type as specified in the airplane maintenance burden on any operator or increase the
design which mitigates the risk and manual (AMM), and suggested that scope of this AD.
provides an adequate level of safety, same method should be acceptable for
Related Service Information Under 1
they may apply for an alternative installing a new or modified FCD. Delta
CFR Part 51
method of compliance in accordance requested that either the requirement to
with the procedures in paragraph (n)(1) use ‘‘approved’’ instructions be removed Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
of this AD. We have not changed this or the term ‘‘approved’’ be changed to A320–71–1068, Revision 01, dated April
AD in this regard. allow a method ‘‘accepted’’ by the FAA; 28, 2016. This service information
EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA, which describes procedures for modifying the
Request To Remove Requirement for would allow operators to use left-hand and right-hand FCDs on
Placard Installation procedures in the existing AMM. Delta engines 1 and 2; installing a placard;
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Delta requested that we remove the requested that if this change is not and re-identifying both the left-hand
proposed requirement to install a made, the ‘‘Costs of Compliance’’ and right-hand FCDs with a new part
placard at the applicable location section of this AD be updated to reflect number. This service information is
specified in paragraph (g)(2) of the the $3,555 Airbus would charge Delta to reasonably available because the
proposed AD (in the SNPRM). Delta approve the existing AMM procedure interested parties have access to it
noted that FCD keys are considered for the actions specified in paragraphs through their normal course of business
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:31 Mar 06, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM 07MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_9737/page/2.svg)
![9694 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
or by the means identified in the Costs of Compliance We estimate the following costs to
ADDRESSES section. We estimate that this AD affects 400 comply with this AD:
airplanes of U.S. registry.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost on
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product U.S.
operators
Modification, placard installation, and re- Up to 11 work-hours × $85 per hour = $9,730 $10,665 (for two engines) .. $4,266,000
identification (or replacement) of FCD. $935.
Authority for This Rulemaking 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the (4) Airbus Model A321–111, –112, –211,
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures –212, and –213 airplanes.
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (d) Subject
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
section 106, describes the authority of Alaska, and
America Code 71, Powerplant.
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 4. Will not have a significant
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more economic impact, positive or negative, (e) Reason
detail the scope of the Agency’s on a substantial number of small entities This AD was prompted by reports of
authority. under the criteria of the Regulatory engine fan cowl door (FCD) losses on
We are issuing this rulemaking under Flexibility Act. airplanes equipped with CFM56 engines due
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, to operator failure to close the FCD during
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 ground operations. We are issuing this AD to
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation prevent in-flight loss of an engine FCD and
safety, Incorporation by reference, possible consequent damage to the airplane.
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in Safety. (f) Compliance
air commerce by prescribing regulations Adoption of the Amendment Comply with this AD within the
for practices, methods, and procedures compliance times specified, unless already
Accordingly, under the authority
the Administrator finds necessary for done.
delegated to me by the Administrator,
safety in air commerce. This regulation
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as (g) Modification of Affected FCDs
is within the scope of that authority
follows: Within 35 months after the effective date
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on of this AD, accomplish concurrently the
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS actions in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3)
products identified in this rulemaking DIRECTIVES
action. of this AD, in accordance with the
This AD is issued in accordance with Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 Service Bulletin A320–71–1068, Revision 01,
authority delegated by the Executive continues to read as follows: dated April 28, 2016.
Director, Aircraft Certification Service, (1) Modify the left-hand and right-hand
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. FCDs on engines 1 and 2 that have an old
In accordance with that order, issuance § 39.13 [Amended] part number (‘‘Old P/N’’), as applicable, as
of ADs is normally a function of the specified in table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i),
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
Compliance and Airworthiness and (k) of this AD.
the following new airworthiness
Division, but during this transition (2) Install a placard on the box located at
directive (AD):
period, the Executive Director has the bottom of the 120-volt unit (120 VU)
delegated the authority to issue ADs 2018–05–04 Airbus: Amendment 39–19213; panel, or at the bottom of the coat stowage,
applicable to transport category Docket No. FAA–2016–9074; Product as applicable to airplane configuration.
airplanes to the Director of the System Identifier 2016–NM–097–AD. Revenue flights with one or both FCD keys
Oversight Division. (a) Effective Date missing from the stowage location in the
flight deck, or the placard missing or
Regulatory Findings This AD is effective April 11, 2018. damaged, are permitted for a period not to
We determined that this AD will not (b) Affected ADs exceed 10 days. An alternate key stowage
have federalism implications under location in the flight deck and installation of
None.
a placard for identification of the stowage
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
(c) Applicability location is permitted in accordance with the
not have a substantial direct effect on operator’s FAA accepted maintenance/
the States, on the relationship between This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes,
certificated in any category, identified in inspection program, provided the keys can be
the national government and the States, consistently retrieved from that flight deck
paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, all
or on the distribution of power and manufacturer serial numbers. location when needed.
responsibilities among the various (1) Airbus Model A318–111 and –112 (3) Re-identify the modified left-hand and
levels of government. airplanes. right-hand FCDs with the new part number
For the reasons discussed above, I
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
(2) Airbus Model A319–111, –112, –113, (‘‘New P/N’’), as applicable, as specified in
certify that this AD: –114, and –115 airplanes. table 1 to paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory (3) Airbus Model A320–211, –212, and this AD.
action’’ under Executive Order 12866, –214 airplanes. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:31 Mar 06, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM 07MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_9737/page/3.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 9697
(ii) Reserved. 157.215(a) specifies the calendar year TABLE I TO PART 157
(3) For service information identified in dollar limit which may be expended on
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness underground storage testing and Limit
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
development (Table II) authorized under
Prior notice
the blanket certificate. Section Year Auto. proj.
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 cost limit proj. cost
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ 157.208(d) requires that the ‘‘limits limit
(Col. 1)
airbus.com; internet http://www.airbus.com. specified in Tables I and II shall be (Col. 2)
(4) You may view this service information adjusted each calendar year to reflect
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1982 .......... $4,200,000 $12,000,000
the ’GDP implicit price deflator’
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For 1983 .......... 4,500,000 12,800,000
published by the Department of 1984 .......... 4,700,000 13,300,000
information on the availability of this Commerce for the previous calendar
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. 1985 .......... 4,900,000 13,800,000
(5) You may view this service information year.’’ 1986 .......... 5,100,000 14,300,000
that is incorporated by reference at the Pursuant to § 375.308(x)(1) of the 1987 .......... 5,200,000 14,700,000
National Archives and Records 1988 .......... 5,400,000 15,100,000
Commission’s Regulations, the authority
Administration (NARA). For information on 1989 .......... 5,600,000 15,600,000
for the publication of such cost limits, 1990 .......... 5,800,000 16,000,000
the availability of this material at NARA, call as adjusted for inflation, is delegated to
202–741–6030, or go to: http:// 1991 .......... 6,000,000 16,700,000
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- the Director of the Office of Energy 1992 .......... 6,200,000 17,300,000
locations.html. Projects. The cost limits for calendar 1993 .......... 6,400,000 17,700,000
year 2018, as published in Table I of 1994 .......... 6,600,000 18,100,000
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 1995 .......... 6,700,000 18,400,000
22, 2018.
§ 157.208(d) and Table II of 157.215(a),
are hereby issued. 1996 .......... 6,900,000 18,800,000
Michael Kaszycki, 1997 .......... 7,000,000 19,200,000
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Effective Date 1998 .......... 7,100,000 19,600,000
Aircraft Certification Service. 1999 .......... 7,200,000 19,800,000
[FR Doc. 2018–04265 Filed 3–6–18; 8:45 am] This final rule is effective March 7, 2000 .......... 7,300,000 20,200,000
2018. The provisions of 5 U.S.C. 804 2001 .......... 7,400,000 20,600,000
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
regarding Congressional review of Final 2002 .......... 7,500,000 21,000,000
2003 .......... 7,600,000 21,200,000
Rules does not apply to the Final Rule
2004 .......... 7,800,000 21,600,000
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY because the rule concerns agency 2005 .......... 8,000,000 22,000,000
procedure and practice and will not 2006 .......... 9,600,000 27,400,000
Federal Energy Regulatory substantially affect the rights or 2007 .......... 9,900,000 28,200,000
Commission obligations of non-agency parties. The 2008 .......... 10,200,000 29,000,000
Final Rule merely updates amounts 2009 .......... 10,400,000 29,600,000
18 CFR Part 157 published in the Code of Federal 2010 .......... 10,500,000 29,900,000
Regulations to reflect the Department of 2011 .......... 10,600,000 30,200,000
[Docket No. RM81–19–000] 2012 .......... 10,800,000 30,800,000
Commerce’s latest annual determination
2013 .......... 11,000,000 31,400,000
Natural Gas Pipelines; Project Cost of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 2014 .......... 11,200,000 31,900,000
and Annual Limits implicit price deflator, a mathematical 2015 .......... 11,400,000 32,400,000
updating required by the Commission’s 2016 .......... 11,600,000 32,800,000
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory existing regulations. 2017 .......... 11,800,000 33,200,000
Commission, Energy. 2018 .......... 12,000,000 33,800,000
ACTION: Final rule.
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 157
Administrative practice and * * * * *
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority ■ 3. Table II in § 157.215(a)(5) is revised
delegated by the Commission’s procedure, Natural gas, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements. to read as follows:
regulations, the Director of the Office of
Energy Projects (OEP) computes and Issued: February 27, 2018. § 157.215 Underground storage testing
publishes the project cost and annual Terry L. Turpin, and development.
limits for natural gas pipelines blanket (a) * * *
Director, Office of Energy Projects.
construction certificates for each (5) * * *
calendar year. Accordingly, 18 CFR part 157 is
DATES: This final rule is effective March amended as follows: TABLE II TO PART 157
7, 2018 and establishes cost limits
applicable from January 1, 2018 through PART 157—[AMENDED] Year Limit
December 31, 2018.
1982 ...................................... $2,700,000
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ■ 1. The authority citation for part 157 1983 ...................................... 2,900,000
Richard W. Fole, Chief, Certificates continues to read as follows: 1984 ...................................... 3,000,000
Branch 1, Division of Pipeline Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717–717w, 3301– 1985 ...................................... 3,100,000
Certificates, (202) 502–8955. 3432; 42 U.S.C. 7101–7352. 1986 ...................................... 3,200,000
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1987 ...................................... 3,300,000
157.208(d) of the Commission’s ■ 2. Table I in § 157.208(d) is revised to 1988 ...................................... 3,400,000
Regulations provides for project cost read as follows: 1989 ...................................... 3,500,000
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
1990 ...................................... 3,600,000
limits applicable to construction, 1991 ...................................... 3,800,000
§ 157.208 Construction, acquisition,
acquisition, operation and 1992 ...................................... 3,900,000
operation, replacement, and miscellaneous
miscellaneous rearrangement of rearrangement of facilities. 1993 ...................................... 4,000,000
facilities (Table I) authorized under the 1994 ...................................... 4,100,000
blanket certificate procedure (Order No. * * * * * 1995 ...................................... 4,200,000
234, 19 FERC ¶ 61,216). Section (d) * * * 1996 ...................................... 4,300,000
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:31 Mar 06, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM 07MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_9737/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-07 01:27:14
Document Modified: 2018-03-07 01:27:14
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This AD is effective April 11, 2018. | |
| Contact | Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 9692 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR