Document

Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Designation of Energy Corridors in Eleven Western States and Notice of Public Hearings

DOE and BLM of the DOI as co-lead agencies, and the U.S. Forest Service (FS) of the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Defense (DOD), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Se...

PDF version Source Record

Department of Energy

Department of the Interior

Bureau of Land Management

AGENCIES:

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE), Department of Energy (DOE) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Department of the Interior (DOI).

ACTION:

Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Designation of Energy Corridors in Eleven Western States and Notice of Public Hearings.

SUMMARY:

DOE and BLM of the DOI as co-lead agencies, and the U.S. Forest Service (FS) of the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Defense (DOD), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) of the DOI as cooperating Federal Agencies (the Agencies) announce the availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Designation of Energy Corridors in the 11 Western States (Draft PEIS) (DOE/EIS—0386) and the dates and locations for the public hearings to receive comments on the Draft PEIS.

The Coeur d'Alene Tribe, the California Energy Commission (CEC), the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the State of Wyoming, and the Lincoln, Sweetwater, and Uinta counties and conservation districts in Wyoming are also cooperating agencies. The Department of Commerce (DOC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) are consulting agencies.

The Agencies prepared the Draft PEIS pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., the Council on Environmental Quality NEPA regulations, 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508, the DOE NEPA regulations, 10 CFR part 1021, and 10 CFR part 1022, Compliance with Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements, the BLM planning regulations, 43 CFR part 1600, and applicable FS planning regulations.

Section 368 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), Public Law 109-58, directs the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with FERC, States, tribal ( printed page 64592) or local units of governments, as appropriate, affected utility industries, and other interested persons, to designate, under their respective authorities, corridors for oil, gas, and hydrogen pipelines and electricity transmission and distribution facilities on Federal land in the 11 contiguous Western States (as defined in section 103(o) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1702(o)), perform any environmental reviews that may be required to complete the designation of such corridors, and incorporate the designated corridors into relevant agency land use and resource management plans or equivalent plans.

The 11 Western States are Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

DATES:

The 90-day public comment period begins with the publication of the Notice of Availability of the Draft PEIS in the Federal Register by the Environmental Protection Agency and continues until February 14, 2008. See Supplementary Information section for meeting dates.

ADDRESSES:

See Supplementary Information section for meeting addresses. Submit electronic comments and requests to speak at one of the public meetings on-line at https://corridoreis.anl.gov. Mail comments to: West-wide Energy Corridor Draft PEIS, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Bldg. 900, Mailstop 4, Argonne, IL 60439; or fax comments toll-free to: 1-866-542-5904. Requests to speak at one of the meetings or for more information about the Draft PEIS may also be addressed to: Ms. LaVerne Kyriss, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, phone: 202-586-1056, facsimile: 202-586-8008, or electronic mail at laverne.kyriss@hq.doe.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For information on the proposed project contact Ms. LaVerne Kyriss as indicated in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.

For general information on the DOE NEPA process, contact: Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC-20), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585; phone: 202-586-4600 or leave a message at 800-472-2756; facsimile: 202-586-7031.

For general information on the BLM's NEPA process, contact: Ron Montagna, (202) 452-7782, or KateWinthrop, (202) 452-5051, at: BLM, WO-350, MS 1000 LS, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Agencies invite interested Members of Congress, state and local governments, other Federal agencies, American Indian tribal governments, organizations, and members of the public to provide comments on the Draft PEIS. Written and oral comments will be given equal weight, and the agencies will consider all comments received or postmarked by February 14, 2008 in preparing the Final PEIS. Comments received or postmarked after that date will be considered to the extent practicable.

Public Meetings

Public meeting dates and addresses are:

1. January 8, 2008, 2 to 5 and 6 to 8 p.m., Portland, OR: Doubletree Portland Lloyd Center, 1000 North West Multnomah and Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission, 1516 Ninth Street.

2. January 10, 2008, 2 to 5 and 6 to 8 p.m., Seattle, WA: Renaissance Hotel Seattle, 515 Madison Street and Ontario, CA: Ayres Hotel and Suites, Ontario Airport/Convention Center, 1945 East Holt Boulevard.

3. January 15, 2008, 2 to 5 and 6 to 8 p.m., Phoenix, AZ: BLM Training Center, 9828 North 31st Avenue and Grand Junction, CO: Marriott Courtyard, 765 Horizon Drive.

4. January 17, 2008, 2 to 5 and 6 to 8 p.m., Las Vegas, NV: The Atomic Testing Museum, 1755 E. Flamingo Road and Salt Lake City, UT: Airport Hilton Hotel, 5151 Wiley Post Way.

5. January 23, 2008, 2 to 5 p.m., Window Rock, AZ: Navajo Education Center, Morgan Boulevard.

6. January 24, 2008, 2 to 5 and 6 to 8 p.m., Albuquerque, NM: Holiday Inn and Suites, 5050 Jefferson Street.

7. January 29, 2008, 2 to 5 and 6 to 8 p.m., Helena, MT: Best Western Helena Great Northern Hotel, 835 Great Northern Boulevard and Cheyenne, WY: Best Western Hitching Post Inn and Conference Center, 1700 West Lincoln Way.

8. January 31, 2008, 2 to 5 and 6 to 8 p.m., Boise, ID: Best Western Vista Inn and Conference Center, 2645 Airport Way and Denver, CO: Holiday Inn Cherry Creek, 455 South Colorado Boulevard.

9. February 5, 2008, 2 to 4 p.m., Washington, DC: Embassy Suites Washington Convention Center, 900 10th Street, NW.

Requests to speak at a specific public hearing should be received by DOE as indicated in the ADDRESSES section no later than two business days before that hearing. Requests to speak may also be made at the time of registration for the hearing(s). However, persons who have submitted advance requests to speak will be given priority if time should be limited during the hearing. Please be aware that anthrax screening delays conventional mail delivery to DOE.

The Draft PEIS consists of a stand alone Summary, the PEIS Chapters (Volume 1, 567 pages), the PEIS Appendices (Volume 2, 400 pages), and Maps (Volume 3, 131 pages). The entire Draft PEIS is available online at https://corridoreis.anl.gov or on a CD-ROM. Requests for paper copies of the Draft PEIS, or additional copies in either format should be addressed to West-wide Energy Corridor Draft PEIS, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Building 900, Mailstop 4, Argonne, IL 60439. The Draft PEIS is also available on the DOE NEPA Web site at https://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/docs/deis/deis.html.

The Draft PEIS Volume 3 map atlas is printed on ledger-sized paper. The CD version of the Draft PEIS includes the map atlas in PDF format. The most powerful and flexible version of the map data is available on the project Web site ( https://corridoreis.anl.gov). The Web site maps are available within a geographic information system (GIS) database that allows users to merge, enlarge, and view multiple map data layers. Software and instructions to use the GIS data are user friendly and available for free download from the public Web site.

The purpose and need for the Agencies' action is to implement EPAct Section 368 by designating corridors for the preferred locations of future oil, gas, and hydrogen pipelines and electricity transmission and distribution facilities and to incorporate the designated corridors into the relevant agency land use and resource management plans or equivalent plans.

Section 368 directs the Agencies to take into account the need for upgraded and new infrastructure and to take actions to improve reliability, relieve congestion, and enhance the capability of the national grid to deliver energy. This action only pertains to the designation of corridors for potential facilities on Federal lands located within the 11 Western States. In addition, this action is intended to improve coordination among the Agencies to increase the efficiency of using designated corridors.

In many areas of the United States, including the West, the infrastructure required to deliver energy has not always kept pace with growth in energy ( printed page 64593) demand. The Agencies hope to improve the delivery of energy in the West, while enhancing the western electric transmission grid for the future, by establishing a coordinated network of Federal energy corridors on Federal lands in the West. The Draft PEIS analyzes the environmental impacts of designating Federal energy corridors in 11 Western States, and incorporating those designations into relevant agency land use and resource management plans or equivalent plans.

The Draft PEIS analyzes two alternatives: A No Action Alternative and the Proposed Action to designate new and locally approved energy corridors (Proposed Action). Under the No Action Alternative, Federal energy corridors mandated by EPAct Section 368 would not be designated on Federal lands in the 11 Western States; the siting and development of energy transport projects would continue under current agency procedures for granting rights-of-way (ROW), for which energy transport project applicants must satisfy the often disparate requirements of multiple agencies for the same project. There would be relatively little West-wide coordination for siting and permitting these projects to meet current and future energy needs in the 11 Western States.

Under the Proposed Action, the Agencies would designate and incorporate through relevant land use and resource management plans certain Federal energy corridors that would consist of existing, locally designated Federal energy corridors together with additional, newly designated energy corridors located on Federal land. These energy corridors would comprise a comprehensive, coordinated network of preferred locations for future energy projects that could be developed to satisfy demand for energy. Under the Proposed Action, approximately 6,055 miles of Federal energy corridors would be designated for multimodal energy transmission and transportation in the 11 Western States. The energy corridors would typically be 3,500 feet wide, though the width may vary in certain areas because of environmental, topographic or management constraints. BLM, DOD, FS and USFWS would amend their respective land use or equivalent plans to incorporate the designated energy corridors; the amendments would be effective upon signing of a Record(s) of Decision. The designation of energy corridors under the Proposed Action would require the amendment of the following land management or equivalent plans.

Land Use or Equivalent Plans Proposed for Amendment by Designating EPAct Section 368 Energy Corridors on Federal Lands in the 11 Western States ^a ^b ^c
State	Land use plan	Agency office(s)
Arizona	Arizona Strip RMP	BLM, Arizona Strip FO.
	Coronado NF LRMP	FS, Coronado NF.
	Glen Canyon NRA GMP	NPS, Glen Canyon NRA.
	Havasu NWR Comprehensive Conservation Plan	USFWS, Lake Havasu NWR.
	Kaibab NF LRMP	FS, Kaibab NF.
	Kingman RMP	BLM, Kingman FO, Lake Havasu FO.
	Lake Havasu RMP	BLM, Lake Havasu FO.
	Lake Mead NRA GMP	NPS, Lake Mead NRA.
	Lower Gila North MFP	BLM, Hassayampa FO.
	Lower Gila South RMP	BLM, Hassayampa FO, Lower Sonoran FO.
	Phoenix RMP	BLM, Tucson FO, Hassayampa FO, Lower Sonoran FO.
	Prescott NF LRMP	FS, Prescott NF.
	Safford RMP	BLM, Safford FO, Tucson FO.
	Apache-Sitgreaves NF LRMP	FS, Apache-Sitgreaves NF.
	Tonto NF LRMP	FS, Tonto NF.
	Yuma Proving Ground INRMP	DOD, U.S. Army, Yuma Proving Ground.
	Yuma RMP	BLM, Yuma FO.
California	Alturas RMP	BLM, Alturas FO.
	Angeles NF LRMP	FS, Angeles NF.
	Arcata RMP	BLM, Arcata FO.
	Bishop RMP	BLM, Bishop FO.
	Caliente RMP	BLM, Bakersfield FO, Bishop FO, Ridgecrest FO.
	California Desert Conservation Area Plan	BLM, Barstow FO, El Centro FO, Lake Havasu FO, Needles FO, Ridgecrest FO, Palm Springs-South Coast FO.
	Proposed Eagle Lake RMP	BLM, Eagle Lake FO.
	China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station INRMP	DOD, U.S. Navy, China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station.
	Cleveland NF LRMP	FS, Cleveland NF.
	Eastern San Diego RMP	BLM, El Centro FO.
	Havasu NWR Comprehensive Conservation Plan	USFWS, Lake Havasu NWR.
	Imperial Sand Dunes RAMP	BLM, El Centro FO.
	Inyo NF LRMP	FS, Inyo NF.
	Klamath NF LRMP	FS, Klamath NF.
	Lassen NF LRMP	FS, Lassen NF.
	Modoc NF LRMP	FS, Modoc NF.
	Proposed Alturas RMP	BLM, Alturas FO.
	Redding RMP	BLM, Redding FO.
	San Bernadino NF LRMP	FS, San Bernadino NF.
	Shasta-Trinity NF LRMP	FS, Shasta-Trinity NF.
	Proposed Sierra RMP	BLM, Folsom FO.
	Six Rivers NF LRMP	FS, Six Rivers NF.
	South Coast RMP	BLM, Palm Springs-South Coast FO.
	Tahoe NF LRMP	FS, Tahoe NF.
	Proposed Surprise RMP	BLM, Surprise FO.
	Ukiah RMP	BLM, Ukiah FO.
Colorado	Arapaho-Roosevelt NF LRMP	FS, Arapaho-Roosevelt NF.
( printed page 64594)
	Glenwood Springs RMP	BLM, Glenwood Springs FO.
	Grand Junction RMP	BLM, Grand Junction FO.
	Grand Mesa-Uncompahgre-Gunnison NF LRMP	FS, Grand Mesa-Uncompahgre-Gunnison NF.
	Gunnison RMP	BLM, Gunnison FO.
	Kremmling RMP	BLM, Kremmling FO.
	Little Snake RMP	BLM, Little Snake FO.
	Curecanti NCA GMP	NPS, Curecanti NRA.
	Routt NF LRMP	FS, Medicine Bow and Routt NF, Thunder Basin NG.
	Royal Gorge RMP	BLM, Royal Gorge FO.
	Pike-San Isabel NF LRMP	FS, Pike-San Isabel NF.
	San Juan NF LRMP	FS, San Juan NF.
	San Juan/San Miguel RMP	BLM, Dolores FO, Uncompahgre FO.
	Uncompahgre Basin RMP	BLM, Uncompahgre FO.
	White River RMP	BLM, White River FO.
Idaho	Big Desert MFP	BLM, Upper Snake FO.
	Bruneau MFP	BLM, Bruneau FO.
	Cassia RMP	BLM, Burley FO.
	Coeur d'Alene RMP	BLM, Coeur d'Alene FO.
	Idaho Panhandle NF LRMP	FS, Idaho Panhandle NF.
	Jarbidge RMP	BLM, Bruneau FO, Four Rivers FO, Jarbridge FO.
	Kuna MFP	BLM, Four Rivers FO.
	Little Lost-Birch Creek MFP	BLM, Upper Snake FO.
	Malad MFP	BLM, Pocatello FO.
	Medicine Lodge RMP	BLM, Upper Snake FO.
	Monument RMP	BLM, Burley FO, Shoshone FO.
	Pocatello RMP	BLM, Pocatello FO.
	Owyhee RMP	BLM, Four Rivers FO, Owyhee FO.
	Caribou-Targhee NF LRMP	FS, Caribou-Targhee NF.
	Twin Falls MFP	BLM, Burley FO.
Montana	Beaverhead-Deerlodge NF LRMP	FS, Beaverhead-Deerlodge NF.
	Billings RMP	BLM, Billings FO.
	Dillon RMP	BLM, Dillon FO.
	Garnet RMP	BLM, Missoula FO.
	Headwaters RMP	BLM, Butte FO.
	Lolo NF LRMP	FS, Lolo NF.
Nevada	Black Rock-High Rock NCA RMP	BLM, Winnemucca FO.
	Caliente MFP	BLM, Ely FO.
	Desert NWR CC Conservation Plan	USFWS, Desert NWR.
	Egan RMP	BLM, Ely FO.
	Elko RMP	BLM, Elko FO.
	Hawthorne Army Depot INRMP	DOD, U.S. Army, Hawthorne AD.
	Humboldt-Toiyabe NF LRMP	FS, Humboldt-Toiyabe NF.
	Carson City Field Office Consolidated Resource Management Plan	BLM, Carson City FO.
	Lake Mead NRA GMP	NPS, Lake Mead NRA.
	Las Vegas RMP	BLM, Las Vegas FO.
	Nellis AFB Plan 126-4 INRMP	DOD, U.S. Air Force, Nellis AFB.
	Paradise-Denio MFP	BLM, Winnemucca FO.
	Schell MFP	BLM, Ely FO.
	Sonoma Gerlach MFP	BLM, Winnemucca FO.
	Tonopah RMP	BLM, Battle Mountain FO.
	Tuledad/Homecamp MFP	BLM, Surprise FO.
	Wells RMP	BLM, Elko FO.
New Mexico	Carlsbad RMP	BLM, Carlsbad FO.
	Farmington RMP	BLM, Farmington FO.
	Fort Bliss INRMP	DOD, U.S. Army, Fort Bliss.
	Mimbres RMP	BLM, Las Cruces DO.
	Rio Puerco RMP	BLM, Rio Puerco FO.
	Roswell RMP	BLM, Roswell FO.
	Sevilleta NWR Comprehensive Conservation Plan	USFWS, Sevilletta NWR.
	Socorro RMP	BLM, Socoro FO.
	White Sands RMP	BLM, Las Cruces DO.
Oregon	Andrews-Steens RMP	BLM, Andrews FO.
	Baker RMP	BLM, Baker FO.
	Brothers-Lapine RMP	BLM, Central Oregon FO, Deschutes FO.
	Ochocco NF LRMP	FS, Ochocco NF.
	Deschutes NF LRMP	FS, Deschutes NF.
	Eugene RMP	BLM, Upper Willamette FO.
	Fremont NF LRMP	FS, Winema-Fremont NFs.
	Klamath Falls RMP	BLM, Klamath Falls FO.
	Klamath NF LRMP	FS, Klamath NF.
( printed page 64595)
	Lakeview RMP	BLM, Lakeview FO.
	Medford RMP	BLM, Ashland FO, Butte Falls FO, Glendale FO.
	Mt. Hood NF LRMP	FS, Mt. Hood NF.
	Roseburg RMP	BLM, South River FO, Swiftwater FO, Upper Willamette FO.
	Salem RMP	BLM, Cascades FO, Tillamook FO.
	Southeastern Oregon RMP	BLM, Jordan FO, Malheur FO.
	Three Rivers RMP	BLM, Three Rivers FO.
	Two Rivers RMP	BLM, Deschutes FO.
	Umatilla NF LRMP	FS, Umatilla NF.
	Upper Deschutes RMP	BLM, Deschutes FO.
	Winema NF LRMP	FS, Winema-Fremont NFs.
Utah	Ashley NF LRMP	FS, Ashley NF.
	Beaver RMP	BLM, Kanab FO.
	CBGA	BLM, Cedar City FO.
	Book Cliffs RMP	BLM, Vernal FO.
	Wasatch-Cache NF LRMP	FS, Wasatch-Cache NF.
	Diamond Mountain RMP	BLM, Vernal FO.
	Dixie NF LRMP	FS, Dixie NF.
	Fishlake NF LRMP	FS, Fishlake NF.
	Grand RMP	BLM, Moab FO.
	Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Management Plan	BLM, Grand Staircase-Escalante NM FO.
	House Range RMP	BLM, Fillmore FO.
	Mountain Valley MFP	BLM, Richfield FO.
	Paria MFP	BLM, Kanab FO.
	Pinyon MFP	BLM, Cedar City FO.
	Pony Express RMP	BLM, Salt Lake FO.
	Price River RMP	BLM, Price FO.
	San Juan RMP	BLM, Moab FO, Monticello FO.
	St. George (Dixie) RMP	BLM, St. George FO.
	Uinta NF LRMP	FS, Uinta NF.
	Vermillion MFP	BLM, Kanab FO.
	Warm Springs RMP	BLM, Fillmore FO.
	Zion MFP	BLM, Kanab FO.
Washington	Mount Baker-Snoqualmie NF LRMP	FS, Mount Baker-Snoqualmie NF.
	Spokane RMP	BLM, Wenatchee FO.
	Wenatchee NF LRMP	FS, Wenatchee NF.
Wyoming	Ashley NF LRMP	FS, Ashley NF.
	Cody RMP	BLM, Cody FO.
	Grass Creek RMP	BLM, Worland FO.
	Great Divide RMP	BLM, Rawlins FO.
	Green River RMP	BLM, Rock Springs FO.
	Kemmerer RMP	BLM, Kemmerer FO.
	Lander RMP	BLM, Lander FO.
	Thunder Basin National Grassland LRMP	FS, Medicine Bow and Routt NF, Thunder Basin NG.
	Platte River RMP	BLM, Casper FO.
	Washakie RMP	BLM, Worland FO.
^a AFB = Air Force Base; BLM = Bureau of Land Management; CBGA = Cedar-Beaver-Garfield-Antimony; CCCP = Complex Comprehensive Conservation Plan; DO = district office; DOD = Department of Defense; FO = field office; FS = Forest Service; GMP = General Management Plan; INRMP = Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan; LMP = Land Management Plan; LRMP = Land and Resource Management Plan; MFP = Management Framework Plan; NCA = National Conservation Area; NF = National Forest; NM = National Monument; NG = National Grassland; NPS = National Park Service; NRA = National Recreation Area; NWR = National Wildlife Refuge; RAMP= Recreation Area Management Plan; RFP= Revised Forest Plan, RMP = Resource Management Plan; USFWS = U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
^b This list represents the most current plans. This list differs in some particulars from the list in the Draft PEIS, Vol. 2, which went to print prior to these changes. Since planning is dynamic and there may also be further changes in the locations of specific corridors, the Final PEIS may also include changes in this list.
^c The PEIS identifies corridors through three national wildlife refuges, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Development on these refuges may only occur if the specific proposed project is determined to be compatible with refuge purposes and the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System. Existing refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan(s) may require amendment should a specific project be found compatible, and subsequent right-of-way permitting by the USFWS occur.

In addition to designating Federal energy corridors through these amendments, the Agencies would establish cooperative procedures to expedite the application process for energy projects proposed to be sited within these corridors.

Under the No Action Alternative, no Federal energy corridors would be designated pursuant to Section 368. The No Action alternative represents the status quo. Siting and development would continue, likely without coordination among the Agencies, under each agency's procedures for granting ROW. It would be incorrect to assume that the No Action Alternative signifies that there will be no groundbreaking for energy projects at some point in the future.

Neither alternative authorizes site-specific energy transport projects. The Draft PEIS does not examine the ( printed page 64596) environmental impacts of specific projects or related ROW that may or may not at some point be proposed for the Federal energy corridors. These projects would be subject to individual, project-specific NEPA review at the siting stage.

Although actual environmental impacts must inevitably await proposals before being analyzed, the Agencies are preparing a PEIS at the designation stage because they believe it is an appropriate time to examine the region-wide environmental concerns. The Agencies expect that the PEIS will greatly assist subsequent, site-specific analyses for individual project proposals by allowing the Agencies to incorporate this PEIS into those later analyses.

Availability of the Draft PEIS

The Agencies distributed copies of the Draft PEIS to appropriate members of Congress, state and local government officials in the 11 Western States, American Indian tribal governments, and other Federal agencies, groups, and interested parties. Copies of the document may be obtained online at the project Web site or by contacting DOE as provided in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. Copies of the Draft PEIS are also available for inspection at the Agencies' affected field office locations (see list above) within the 11 Western States and at public libraries near public meeting locations. A list of these libraries is available on the project Web site.

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 24, 2007.

Michael D. Nedd,

Assistant Director, Minerals, Realty and Resource Protection, Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 30, 2007.

Kevin M. Kolevar,

Assistant Secretary, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Department of Energy.

[FR Doc. 07-5716 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P

Legal Citation

Federal Register Citation

Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.

72 FR 64591

Web Citation

Suggested Web Citation

Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.

“Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Designation of Energy Corridors in Eleven Western States and Notice of Public Hearings,” thefederalregister.org (November 16, 2007), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/07-5716/notice-of-availability-of-the-draft-programmatic-environmental-impact-statement-for-the-designation-of-energy-corridors-.