Securities and Exchange Commission
- [Release No. 34-46951; File No. SR-NASD-2002-121]
On September 12, 2002, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”), through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq Stock Market. Inc. (“Nasdaq”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] a proposed rule change to modify application of Additional Circuit/SDP Charge under NASD Rule 7010(f) to Non-NASD Members.[3] Specifically, Nasdaq proposes to impose the Additional Circuit/SDP Charge under NASD Rule 7010(f) on those subscribers who do not utilize existing T1 capacity efficiently ( printed page 76771) by placing 18 service delivery platforms (“SDPs”) on each T1 circuit.[4]
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on October 28, 2002.[5] The Commission received no comments on the proposal.
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities association.[6] The Commission finds specifically that the proposed rule change promotes the objectives of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,[7] which requires, among other things, that the rules of the association be designed to facilitate transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, because the increased efficiency of Nasdaq's T1 circuits, which will expand the available capacity of Nasdaq's Enterprise Wide Network II (“EWN II”) should enhance Nasdaq's ability to keep pace with future growth in trading volumes.
In addition, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(5) of the Act [8] which requires that the rules of the association provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities.
The Commission notes that this fee applies to members and non-members equally.[9]
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[10] that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NASD-2002-121) is hereby approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[11]
December 6, 2002.Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.