SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).

Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on February 11, 2018, ordered that —

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine:

(a) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of ( printed page 4535) certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of the claim of the '877 patent; claims 11, 13, 17, and 18 of the '888 patent; claims 1-3, 5, 6, 19, and 20 of the '788 patent; claim 2 of the '758 patent; claims 1-7, and 11-30 of the '021 patent; claims 1-6 and 8-10 of the '224 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; and

(b) whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of the '393 trademark and the '016 trademark and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is “folding cover assemblies for pickup truck cargo boxes and components thereof”;

(3) Pursuant to section 210.58 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.58, the motion for temporary relief under subsection (e) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which was filed with the complaint, is provisionally accepted and referred to the presiding administrative law judge for investigation;

(4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a) The complainants are: Extang Corporation, 5400 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108; Laurmark Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a BAK Industries, 5400 Data Court, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108.

(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Stehlen Automotive, 21912 Garcia Lane, Walnut, California 91789; SyneticUSA, 7141 Paramount Boulevard, Pico Rivera, California 90660; Topline Autoparts, Inc., 1157 Dunswell Avenue, Hacienda Heights, California 91745; Velocity Concepts Inc., 2847 Villa Alta Place, Hacienda Heights, CA 91745; JL Concepts Inc., 21912 Garcia Lane, Walnut, California 91789; DT Trading Inc., 417 W San Marino Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91801; Wenzhou Kouvi Hardware Products Co., Ltd., No. 10, Xiafeng Road, Xianyan Industrial Zone, Ouhai District, Wenzh City, Zhejiang Province, China 325204; Syppo Marketing, Inc., 15240 Nelson Avenue, City of Industry, California 91744; Apex Auto Parts Mfg. Inc., 15240 Nelson Avenue, City of Industry, California 91744; Ningbo Huadian Cross Country Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd., Room 2402 Huijin Building No. 77, Heyi Road, Ningbo, China 315000; Sunwood Industries Co., Ltd., Room 501, Sealand Plaza, #20 Guanghua Street, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China 213001.

(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and

(5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.

Responses to the complaint, motion for temporary relief, and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with sections 210.13 and 210.59 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13, 210.59. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e), 210.13(a), and 210.59, such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 10 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint, motion for temporary relief, and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint, motion for temporary relief, and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint, motion for temporary relief, and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

84 FR 4534