SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose and Need for Action

LMC has applied to the SNF for a SUP under the National Forest Ski Area Permit Act of 1986 that would authorize LMC to construct, operate, and maintain an expansion to a winter sports resort onto approximately 495 acres of NFS lands. Federal regulations at 16 U.S.C. 497b and 36 CFR 251b specifically identify ski areas and associated facilities as permissible uses of NFS lands.

The purpose of, and need for, the Forest Service's action is to respond to the proposal from Lutsen Mountains Corporation to implement select projects at the Lutsen Mountain Resort on the Superior National Forest. The 2004 Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) identifies Forest-wide Desired Conditions which guide management direction across the SNF. The Proposed Action could help achieve D-REC-3, which states “the [SNF] provides developed sites, facilities, trails, water access sites, and other recreation opportunities within health and safety, resource protection, cost, and maintenance requirements.” (2004 Forest Plan, Chapter 2, Page 39) The Forest Supervisor will use the EIS to inform the decision regarding: (1) Whether to issue a SUP under the National Forest Ski Area Permit Act of 1986; (2) the selection of a preferred alternative; (3) any need to amend the Forest Plan; and (4) what specific terms and conditions should apply if a SUP is issued.

LMC's overall purpose of the proposed project and associated SUP application is to improve the guest experience at Lutsen Mountains, which cannot be accommodated on adjacent private land controlled by LMC. Specifically, LMC has identified a need to:

• Construct additional traditionally cleared alpine ski trails and undeveloped, minimally maintained lift-served terrain to address the current deficit in beginner and expert terrain and to enhance the existing terrain variety and skiing experiences at Lutsen Mountains.
• Improve skier circulation and reliable snow conditions, particularly on Eagle Mountain and Moose Mountain.
• Improve base area, parking, guest services, and operational facilities to meet the ever-increasing expectations of the local, regional, and destination skier markets.

Additional detail on the existing conditions driving the project Purpose and Need as well as the Objectives can be found at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/​project/​?project=​52440.

Proposed Action

The Proposed Action includes the following seven elements:

• Authorization of an approximately 495-acre SUP;
• Construction of seven new chairlifts and one surface lift;
• Development of 324 acres of additional ski terrain, including approximately 175 acres of developed ski trails and 149 acres of gladed terrain;
• Expansion of guest services including two new base facilities, maintenance facilities, and a mountain-top chalet;
• Expansion of ski patrol operations, including construction of an interim ski patrol duty station located in a similar location with the mountain-top chalet;
• Development of approximately 1,260 additional parking spaces, construction of approximately 5 miles of permanent access roads, and construction of approximately 0.9 miles of temporary access roads; and
• Installation of snowmaking coverage on all 175 acres of developed ski trails and construction of two snowmaking reservoirs with a combined capacity of 13 million gallons.

A full description of each element can be found at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/​project/​?project=​52440.

Responsible Official

The Responsible Official is Constance Cummins, Forest Supervisor for the SNF.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

Given the purpose and need, the Responsible Official will review the proposed action, the other alternatives, and the environmental consequences in order to decide the following:

• Whether to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the application for the creation of a SUP and associated expansions.
• Whether to prescribe conditions needed for the protection of the environment on NFS lands.

Permits or Licenses Required

• Forest Service SUP.
• Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Water Appropriations Permit.
• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Wastewater Permit.
• Other permits as identified through scoping and the EIS analysis process.

Scoping Process

This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. The Forest Service is soliciting comments from Federal, State and local agencies and other individuals or organizations that may be interested in or affected by implementation of the proposed projects. Tribal consultation is ongoing and will continue. One public open house meeting regarding this proposal will be held during the comment period. Time, date, and location of the open house will be posted at https://www.fs.usda.gov/​project/​?project=​52440. Representatives from the SNF and Lutsen Mountains will be present to answer questions and provide additional information on this project.

To be most helpful, comments should be specific to the project area and should identify resources or effects that should be considered by the Forest Service. Submitting timely, specific written comments during this scoping period or any other official comment period establishes standing for filing objections under 36 CFR parts 218 A and B. Additional information and maps of this proposal can be found at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/​project/​?project=​52440. Details of the project proposal can also be viewed through an online interactive viewer here: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/​collections/​be4d0cbd60f24bef8d5360f064edd4f0/​present.

It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in ( printed page 20989) such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed action.

85 FR 20987