Supplemental Evidence and Data Request on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Medicare Eligible Patients
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is seeking scientific information submissions from the public. Scientific information is being solicited to inform our revi...
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION:
Request for supplemental evidence and data submissions.
SUMMARY:
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is seeking scientific information submissions from the public. Scientific information is being solicited to inform our review on
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Medicare Eligible Patients,
which is currently being conducted by the AHRQ's Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) Program. Access to published and unpublished pertinent scientific information will improve the quality of this review.
DATES:
Submission Deadline
on or before 30 days after date of publication of this Notice.
Mailing Address:
Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, ATTN: EPC SEADs Coordinator, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E53A, Rockville, MD 20857.
Shipping Address (FedEx, UPS, etc.):
Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, ATTN: EPC SEADs Coordinator, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E77D, Rockville, MD 20857.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jenae Benns, Telephone: 301-427-1496 or Email:
epc@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has commissioned the Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) Program to complete a review of the evidence for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Medicare Eligible Patients. AHRQ is conducting this systematic review pursuant to Section 902(a) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 299a(a).
The EPC Program is dedicated to identifying as many studies as possible that are relevant to the questions for each of its reviews. In order to do so, we are supplementing the usual manual and electronic database searches of the literature by requesting information from the public (
e.g.,
details of studies conducted). We are looking for studies that report on
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Medicare Eligible Patients,
including those that describe adverse events. The entire research protocol is available online at:
https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/ta/index.html#supplemental.
This is to notify the public that the EPC Program would find the following information on
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Medicare Eligible Patients
helpful:
A list of completed studies that your organization has sponsored for this indication. In the list, please
indicate whether results are available on ClinicalTrials.gov along with the ClinicalTrials.gov trial number.
For completed studies that do not have results on ClinicalTrials.gov,
a summary, including the following elements: study number, study period, design, methodology, indication and diagnosis, proper use instructions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, primary and secondary outcomes, baseline characteristics, number of patients screened/eligible/enrolled/lost to follow-up/withdrawn/analyzed, effectiveness/efficacy, and safety results.
A list of ongoing studies that your organization has sponsored for this indication.
In the list, please provide the ClinicalTrials.gov trial number or, if the trial is not registered, the protocol for the study including a study number, the study period, design, methodology, indication and diagnosis, proper use instructions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and primary and secondary outcomes.
Description of whether the above studies constitute
ALL Phase II and above clinical trials
sponsored by your organization for this indication and an index outlining the relevant information in each submitted file.
Your contribution is very beneficial to the Program. Materials submitted must be publicly available or able to be made public. Materials that are considered confidential; marketing materials; study types not included in the review; or information on indications not included in the review cannot be used by the EPC Program. This is a voluntary request for information, and all costs for complying with this request must be borne by the submitter.
The draft of this review will be posted on AHRQ's EPC Program website and available for public comment for a period of 4 weeks. If you would like to be notified when the draft is posted, please sign up for the email list at:
https://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/email-updates.
The systematic review will answer the following questions.
This information is provided as background. AHRQ is not requesting that the public provide answers to these questions.
Contextual and Key Questions (KQ)
Contextual Questions
CQ 1:
What measures related to apneas and hypopneas (
e.g.,
apnea indices, hypopnea indices, and apnea-hypopnea indices with various measurements) or other measures (
e.g.,
time spent with oxygen saturation below 90% or other cutoffs, electrophysiologic signal analysis metrics such as time and frequency domain analyses of heart beats) are used in contemporary research and clinical settings? How have standard definitions of these measures changed over time and what is the explanation for such changes?
CQ 2:
What are commonly used sleep questionnaires and how have they been validated?
CQ 3:
What treatment modalities for OSA are currently being marketed in the U.S.? What OSA treatments (experimental or approved) are currently being investigated in ongoing trials for patients as an alternative to CPAP?
CQ 4:
What are the variable features of marketed CPAP devices?
CQ 5:
What are the patient-centered health outcome goals and symptom relief goals of CPAP devices?
Key Questions
KQ 1:
What is the efficacy, effectiveness, comparative effectiveness, and harms of CPAP devices to improve
clinically significant outcomes
?
KQ 1a:
How are respiratory disturbance events (apnea, hypopnea,
( printed page 42403)
arousal) defined in each study? What are the diagnostic criteria for OSA (or criteria to treat with CPAP) in each study? How do the diagnostic criteria relate to time of AASM criteria? Do treatment effects of CPAP differ by the specific diagnostic criteria used within or across studies?
KQ 1b:
What is the within-study concordance in CPAP trials among apnea and hypopnea indices (
e.g.,
AHI), sleep questionnaires (
e.g.,
Epworth Sleepiness Scale), and clinically significant outcomes?*
KQ 1c:
Do the clinical effects or harms of specific CPAP devices differ by patient subgroups, duration of followup, or particular CPAP features?
KQ 1d:
Summarize the methodological issues in the existing studies.
KQ 2:
What is the evidence that apnea and hypopnea-based measures of sleep-disordered breathing (
e.g.,
apneic indices, hypopnea indices, and apnea-hypopnea indices) used in current practice and research are valid surrogate or intermediate measures for clinically significant outcomes?
KQ 2a:
Summarize the methodological issues in the existing studies. What is the ideal study design for establishing the validity of a surrogate or intermediate measure?
* Note that the association between changes in apnea and hypopnea indices and clinical outcomes across a broader set of studies is primarily addressed in KQ 2.
Systematic Review Study Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria Relevant to Both KQs
Population
Adults (>18 years)
Exclude
studies with any pregnant women
Exclude
studies in which any participants are reported to have, at baseline, central sleep apnea (from any cause including prior stroke, severe heart failure, among others), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (Pickwickian syndrome), neuromuscular disease, Parkinson disease, Down syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, major congenital skeletal abnormalities, narcolepsy, narcotic addiction, Alzheimer disease, epilepsy and or with mild cognitive impairment
Intervention/Comparator
Exclude
studies of surgical interventions for OSA or bariatric surgery
Outcomes
Hard clinical outcomes
○ Major clinical outcomes
Death
Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events or incident diagnosis
Motor vehicle accidents
Composite outcomes that include only major clinical outcomes (
e.g.,
major adverse cardiovascular events defined as including all-cause mortality)
○ Other patient-centered and/or clinically significant outcomes
Other cardiovascular outcomes
Objective measures of cardiovascular severity (categorized, not continuous measures such as intima media thickness)
Incident hypertension (or regression to normotension)
Arrhythmias
Incident arrhythmias (or resolution of arrhythmias)
Clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias
Atrial fibrillation
New-onset diabetes mellitus or prediabetes (or regression to normoglycemia)
Mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety, and substance use disorder: Incident diagnosis or resolution
Cognitive function: Clinical diagnosis (
e.g.,
of dementia) or validated executive function measures
Quality of life and functional outcomes (validated measures)
Sexual function: Clinical diagnosis (
e.g.,
diagnosis of erectile dysfunction or anorgasmia) or their resolution
Sequelae of sleep deprivation (
e.g.,
trauma, missed work or school)
Other clinically significant outcomes reported in studies or as found for CQ 5
Exclude
Blood pressure
Asymptomatic arrhythmias or laboratory measures (e.g.,
captured by electrophysiologic testing [heart rate variability, QTc interval, etc.])
Instruments to measure severity of OSA (including AHI and sleepiness)
Minimum duration for associations with death, incident cardiovascular events,hypertension, or diabetes
is 1 year
Minimum duration for all other outcomes is 6 months
Mediators of treatment effect (or association)
(
e.g.,
factors to be evaluated in subgroup analyses) Note that
these are not eligibility criteria,
but are factors that will evaluated to potentially explain different findings across studies;
e.g.,
by subgroup analysis, regression, or other methods to evaluate heterogeneity of treatment effect)
Body weight/obesity/neck circumference, etc.
Weight change (loss or gain)
Prior cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or other major clinical disease/condition
Sex/gender
Race/ethnicity
Severity of OSA (as defined by study)
Other mediators as reported in primary studies
Setting
Outpatient only (except for sleep laboratory setting for measurement of sleep and breathing measures)
Exclude
acute care hospital settings (including perioperative)
Additional Eligibility Criteria Specific to KQ 1
Populations
As listed above, for both KQs
Intervention (CPAP)
CPAP for treatment (not diagnosis or staging) of OSA
○ At least 1 month of prescribed (planned) treatment
Exclude
intervention designed only to improve CPAP compliance/adherence (
i.e.,
not an intervention of CPAP,
per se)
Exclude
evaluations of accessories only (
e.g.,
nasal cannulas, head straps, humidifiers)
Exclude
evaluation of CPAP titration methods,
per se,
including specific parameters or modes (
e.g.,
starting pressures)
Exclude
evaluations of other features meant to improve comfort or adherence
Exclude
other non-CPAP interventions (
e.g.,
different times of monitoring, scoring), including noninvasive ventilation
Comparators
No CPAP
Non-CPAP active interventions for OSA (e.g.,
mandibular advancement device)
○
Exclude
bariatric surgery (as a comparator treatment)
○
Exclude
surgical OSA procedure (as a comparator treatment)
Other CPAP modality or protocol (e.g.,
autoCPAP vs. bilevel CPAP)
( printed page 42404)
Exclude
comparisons with different accessories, titration methods, features to improve comfort or adherence, other non-CPAP interventions (
e.g.,
different times of monitoring, scoring), including noninvasive
Outcomes
As listed above, for both KQs
Sleep and breathing measures (e.g.,
AHI) and validated sleep questionnaires (
e.g.,
Epworth Sleepiness Scale) (only for the purpose of addressing KQ 1b, not as outcomes of interest)
Adverse events related to CPAP use
Mediators of treatment effect
(
e.g.,
subgroup analyses; see note above about mediators)
As listed above, for both KQs
New or prior OSA diagnosis
Treatment naïve versus failed prior treatment
First versus second or more use of CPAP
Treatment (CPAP) compliance
Treatment (CPAP) discontinuation
Design
Randomized controlled trials (RCT)
○ Consider whether study met power calculation for the outcome(s) of interest (including adverse events)
Nonrandomized comparative studies (NRCS)
○ Restrict to studies that use modeling or other analytic methods to minimize confounding bias (due to inherent differences between people who receive one or the other intervention)
○
Exclude
case-control design
○
Exclude
“pre-post” design (comparison of before and after CPAP treatment in a single group of participants)
Longitudinal
○
Exclude
cross-sectional
Additional Eligibility Criteria Specific to KQ 2
For KQ 2, we will include studies that measure a change in the intermediate/surrogate measure (
e.g.,
AHI) over a period of time and report on outcomes of interest. We will include studies that provide formal evaluation of validity of the intermediate/surrogate measure for the clinical outcome and other studies that report sufficient data to analyze a potential association between the change in the measure and the clinical outcome.
Population
Adults
○ Do not require a diagnosis of OSA (for evaluations of associations of measures)
○
Exclude
populations as described under “Eligibility Criteria relevant to Both KQs”
Intermediate/Surrogate measures
(variables of interest evaluated regarding their association with clinical outcomes)
Sleep and breathing measures
○ Indices based on apneas or hypopneas (
e.g.,
AHI, RDI) or other respiratory events such as RERAs, oxygen desaturations
Exclude
evaluations of isolated neurophysiologic parameters of sleep (
e.g.,
respiratory effort, heart rate, air flow, pulse oximetry alone) and cardiac electrophysiology indices (
e.g.,
heart rate variability)
Outcomes
As listed above, for both KQs
Each study must report both one or more intermediate/surrogate measures (i.e.,
sleep and breathing measures)
and
one or more outcomes of interest
Additional mediators of association
(
e.g.,
analyzed by subgroup analyses)
As listed above, for both KQs
Definition of sleep and breathing measure
Study Design
Longitudinal studies informing on person-level associations of sleep and breathing measure(s) with outcome(s)
○ Patient-level association between
change
in measure and
change or incident
outcome (
i.e.,
evaluation of association reported within study)
○
Exclude
cross-sectional studies
Comparative or noncomparative (single group) studies
N ≥ 30 analyzed for a given association between intermediate/surrogate measure and outcome
Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.
85 FR 42402
Web Citation
Suggested Web Citation
Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.
“Supplemental Evidence and Data Request on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Medicare Eligible Patients,” thefederalregister.org (July 14, 2020), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2020-15172/supplemental-evidence-and-data-request-on-continuous-positive-airway-pressure-treatment-for-obstructive-sleep-apnea-in-m.