Securities and Exchange Commission
- [Release No. 34-89593; File No. SR-FICC-2020-006]
I. Introduction
On June 19, 2020, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] proposed rule change SR-FICC-2020-006. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on July 7, 2020.[3] The Commission did not receive any comment letters on the proposed rule change. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
FICC proposes to modify its Government Securities Division (“GSD”) Rulebook (“GSD Rules”) and its Mortgage-Backed Securities Division (“MBSD” and together with GSD, each, a “Division”) Clearing Rules (“MSBD Rules,” and together with the GSD Rules, “Rules”) [4] in order to (i) provide for a passive acknowledgement process whereby any settling bank that does not timely acknowledge that it will settle its Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figures (as defined below) with FICC ( i.e., acknowledge its intention to pay to or collect from FICC), or notify the Settlement Agent (as defined below) of its refusal to settle for one or more members [5] for which it is the designated GSD Funds-Only Settling Bank or MBSD Cash Settling Bank (collectively, “FICC Settling Banks”) and has not otherwise been in contact with the Settlement Agent, would be deemed to have acknowledged its Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figures, (ii) codify FICC's discretion to exclude a FICC Settling Bank's balance from the National Settlement Service (“NSS”) file in certain circumstances, and (iii) make certain technical and conforming changes.
A. Current Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Process
Each Division provides a standardized, automated method for settling funds-only, for GSD, and cash, for MBSD, settlement (collectively, “Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement”) obligations, respectively, between each Division and its respective members' FICC Settling Banks. Each member designates a FICC Settling Bank to settle its Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement obligations with FICC. Settlement is effected via the NSS.[6]
On each business day, as applicable, each Division calculates either a Funds-Only Settlement Amount or Cash Balance figure, respectively, for each member and reports to each member and its respective FICC Settling Bank a Net Funds-Only Settlement Figure [7] (for GSD) and either a Total Debit Cash Balance Figure or a Total Credit Cash Balance Figure [8] (for MBSD) (collectively, “Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figures”). The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) acts as Settlement Agent [9] for both GSD's funds-only and MBSD's cash settlement process.
Once the FICC Settling Banks receive their Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figures from the Settlement Agent, the FICC Settling Banks submit either (1) acknowledgement that they will settle their Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figures with FICC or (2) refusal to settle such amounts on behalf of one or more of their respective members.[10] The acknowledgement or refusal submission occurs through a designated terminal system.[11] If all of the FICC Settling Banks submit acknowledgements of their intent to settle, then DTC, as Settlement Agent, would submit the requisite file to the relevant Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) for processing through the NSS.[12]
If a FICC Settling Bank notifies the Settlement Agent that the FICC Settling Bank refuses to pay the Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure for a member, then FICC would exclude that member's amount and the Settlement Agent would provide the FICC Settling Bank with a new Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure that no longer includes the excluded member's amount. The FICC Settling Bank must then immediately send a message to the Settlement Agent acknowledging the new amount.[13] The Settlement Agent would then submit the requisite file to the FRB for processing through the NSS.
The deadline for FICC Settling Banks to acknowledge or refuse is 30 minutes prior to the time at which debits and credits are executed via the NSS.[14] If a FICC Settling Bank does not acknowledge or refuse by this time, the Settlement Agent would use the most recent contact information available to contact the FICC Settling Bank. If the Settlement Agent is unable to contact the FICC Settling Bank or does not receive a response from the FICC Settling Bank as to the acknowledgement or refusal, FICC would determine whether to request an NSS extension while also determining whether to remove the FICC Settling Bank's Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure from the NSS file.
Under the current process, failure of a FICC Settling Bank to timely respond to the Settlement Agent after the Settlement Agent posts final settlement figures creates uncertainty with respect to timely completion of settlement at FICC. FICC states that it designed the proposed rule change to address this issue as discussed below.[15]
B. Proposed Rule Change
FICC proposes to establish an “Acknowledgement Cutoff Time” after which FICC would apply the passive acknowledgement process. The Acknowledgement Cutoff Time would be defined as the later of: (i) 30 minutes after the FICC Settling Banks have been notified that such payment is due, or (ii) 30 minutes prior to the times established by FICC for the execution of Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement debits and credits via NSS.
1. Passive Acknowledgement Process
If a FICC Settling Bank (i) does not submit either (1) an acknowledgement that it would settle the Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure with FICC, or (2) a refusal to pay the Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure, by the Acknowledgement Cutoff Time, and (ii) has not been in contact with the Settlement Agent, then the Settlement Agent would attempt to contact the FICC Settling Bank. This passive acknowledgement process would also apply in situations where the FICC Settling Bank receives a new Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure after such FICC Settling Bank's refusal to pay the prior Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure for one or more members. Additionally, to facilitate the Settlement Agent's ability to contact FICC Settling Banks, FICC proposes to revise the Rules to state that each FICC Settling Bank must ensure that it maintains accurate contact details with the Settlement Agent so that the Settlement Agent may contact the FICC Settling Bank regarding this settlement process and any settlement issues.
If the FICC Settling Bank cannot be reached, then the FICC Settling Bank would be deemed to have acknowledged that it will settle such Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure with FICC. The FICC Settling Bank's balance will then, in the ordinary course of settlement processing, be debited from or credited to its FRB account through the NSS process along with the other FICC Settling Banks.
However, if the Settlement Agent is able to contact the FICC Settling Bank who notifies the Settlement Agent that it needs more time to determine whether to acknowledge or refuse, then the FICC Settling Bank would not be deemed to have acknowledged its Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure. In this circumstance, the FICC Settling Bank balance would not, as a matter of course, be included in the NSS file unless the FICC Settling Bank subsequently affirmatively acknowledges the balance before the Settlement Agent submits the NSS file.
2. Discretion to Exclude Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figures From the NSS File
FICC represents that, although it would maintain flexibility for FICC Settling Banks requesting extra time, it must facilitate timely settlement via NSS for the other Settling Banks.[16] Therefore, FICC proposes to retain its discretion to remove the FICC Settling Bank's Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure from the NSS file if: (1) Passive acknowledgement does not apply because the FICC Settling Bank has notified the Settlement Agent that it cannot yet acknowledge or refuse its Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure, and (2) the payment deadline ( i.e., the time by which it must execute settlement via the NSS) [17] established by FICC is approaching. According to FICC, its discretion in this circumstance would facilitate timely processing of the NSS file for the other FICC Settling Banks.[18]
3. Technical and Conforming Changes
FICC proposes to make certain technical and conforming changes to the Rules to enhance clarity. First, FICC proposes to revise the Rules to add a new defined term “Acknowledgement Cutoff Time.” [19] Second, FICC proposes to replace certain references to the “Corporation,” the “Corporation's Operations area,” and “DTC” with “Settlement Agent” for accuracy and consistency and to clarify the role of the Settlement Agent under the relevant Rules.[20] In addition, FICC proposes to move certain current subsections and to revise the subsection numbers in the relevant Rules to enhance clarity and accuracy.[21]
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act [22] directs the Commission to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such organization. After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to FICC. In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act [23] for the reasons described below.
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, in part, that the rules be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions.[24] As stated in Section II.A above, the failure of a FICC Settling Bank to timely acknowledge that it will settle its Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure with FICC or refuse to pay its Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure creates uncertainty with respect to the timely completion of Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement at FICC. Additionally, circumstances in which a FICC Settling Bank has requested more time to either acknowledge or refuse its Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure could create uncertainty with respect to the timely completion of Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement at FICC via NSS because FICC would not be able to submit the NSS file that includes the balance of the requesting FICC Settling Bank.
The introduction of a passive acknowledgement process, in which a FICC Settling Bank has not responded by the Acknowledgement Cutoff Time and cannot be reached by the Settlement Agent would be deemed to have passively acknowledged its Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement Figure, could enhance settlement certainty because it would allow FICC to submit the NSS file for settlement of all FICC Settling Banks' obligations despite an unresponsive FICC Settling Bank. Additionally, the change to expressly allow FICC to exclude a FICC Settling Bank's balance from the NSS file, where the FICC Settling Bank has requested more time, would allow FICC to submit the NSS file without the FICC Settling Bank's balance and thus complete Funds-Only (Cash) Settlement for all other members. Therefore, the Commission believes the changes are designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions, consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.[25]
Further, the technical and conforming changes should ensure that the Rules remain clear and accurate to FICC members. Having clear and accurate Rules should facilitate FICC members' understanding of those rules and provide members with increased predictability and certainty regarding their obligations. Therefore, the Commission believes the technical and conforming changes would also promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities, consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.[26]
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act [27] and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
It is therefore ordered , pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act [28] that proposed rule change SR-FICC-2020-006, be, and hereby is, approved.[29]
August 18, 2020. ( printed page 52165) ( printed page 52166)For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[30]
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.