Document

Hydrofluorocarbon Blends From the People's Republic of China: Final Negative Scope Ruling on Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd.'s R-410A Blend; Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order by Indian Blends Containing Chinese Components

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) blends containing HFC components from India and the People's Republic of China (...

Department of Commerce
International Trade Administration
  1. [A-570-028]

AGENCY:

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY:

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) blends containing HFC components from India and the People's Republic of China (China) that are blended in India prior to importation into the United States are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) order on HFC blends from China.

DATES:

Applicable October 1, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacob Garten or Benjamin Luberda, AD/ ( printed page 61931) CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3342 or (202) 482-2185, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On April 10, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Determination[1] of circumvention of the antidumping duty order on HFC blends from China with respect to certain HFC blends containing HFC components from India and China that are blended in India prior to importation into the United States.[2] We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Determination. Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. (GFL), SRF Limited (SRF), and Kivlan [3] filed case briefs, and the HFC Coalition (the petitioners) filed a rebuttal brief.

We notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of our preliminary determination in accordance with section 781(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).[4] We received a request for consultations from the ITC and held the consultations on June 11, 2020.[5] On July 6, 2020, the ITC notified Commerce that the ITC did not take a position on whether an affirmative circumvention finding for hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) blends produced in India, in whole or in part, from HFC components from China would raise a serious injury issue.[6]

A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by the parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[7] The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.tade.gov.frn/​. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Commerce conducted this anti-circumvention inquiry in accordance with section 781(b) of the Act.

Scope of the Order

The products subject to the Order are HFC blends. HFC blends covered by the scope are R-404A, a zeotropic mixture consisting of 52 percent 1,1,1 Trifluoroethane, 44 percent Pentafluoroethane, and 4 percent 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane; R-407A, a zeotropic mixture of 20 percent Difluoromethane, 40 percent Pentafluoroethane, and 40 percent 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane; R-407C, a zeotropic mixture of 23 percent Difluoromethane, 25 percent Pentafluoroethane, and 52 percent 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane; R-410A, a zeotropic mixture of 50 percent Difluoromethane and 50 percent Pentafluoroethane; and R-507A, an azeotropic mixture of 50 percent Pentafluoroethane and 50 percent 1,1,1-Trifluoroethane also known as R-507. The foregoing percentages are nominal percentages by weight. Actual percentages of single component refrigerants by weight may vary by plus or minus two percent points from the nominal percentage identified above.[8]

Any blend that includes an HFC component other than R-32, R-125, R-143a, or R-134a is excluded from the scope of the Order.

Excluded from the Order are blends of refrigerant chemicals that include products other than HFCs, such as blends including chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), hydrocarbons (HCs), or hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs).

Also excluded from the Order are patented HFC blends, including, but not limited to, ISCEON® blends, including MO99TM (R-438A), MO79 (R-422A), MO59 (R-417A), MO49PlusTM (R-437A) and MO29TM (R-4 22D), Genetron® PerformaxTM LT (R-407F), Choice® R-421A, and Choice® R-421B.

HFC blends covered by the scope of the Order are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheadings 3824.78.0020 and 3824.78.0050. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope is dispositive.[9]

Merchandise Subject to the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry

This anti-circumvention inquiry covers HFC blends R-404A, R-407A, R-407C, R-410A, and R-507A/R-507 produced in India using one or more HFC components of Chinese origin.[10]

Final Scope Ruling and Final Determination

In the Preliminary Determination, we determined, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.225(k), that, because the scope only covers HFC blends produced in China and the R-410A blend produced and exported by GFL is produced in India, the R-410A blend produced by GFL is not covered by the scope of the Order. We further found that a circumvention analysis and determination is warranted. We then determined that certain HFC blends containing HFC components from India and China that are blended in India prior to importation into the United States (Indian blends) are circumventing the ( printed page 61932) Order. Specifically, we determined that imports of Indian blends are finished in India and sold in the United States pursuant to the statutory and regulatory criteria laid out in section 781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(h). We based our Preliminary Determination upon record evidence submitted by the respondents, the petitioners, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). For a complete discussion of the evidence which led to our preliminary determination, see the Preliminary Determination.

Interested parties submitted comments regarding our Preliminary Determination, and we discuss those comments in the “Discussion of the Issues” section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Our final affirmative determination of circumvention remains unchanged from the Preliminary Determination. Accordingly, we determine, pursuant to section 781(b) of the Act, that imports of Indian blends are circumventing the Order. However, we did make certain changes to the certification requirements, as set forth in Appendix II.

Methodology

Commerce is conducting this anti-circumvention inquiry in accordance with section 781(b) of the Act. Given that China is a non-market economy, within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, Commerce calculated the value of certain merchandise using factors of production and market economy values, as discussed in section 773(c) of the Act. Further, because Coolmate Refrigerant Pvt. Ltd. did not cooperate to the best of its ability in responding to Commerce's requests for information, we have based parts of our final determination on the facts available with adverse inferences, as set forth in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum for a full description of the methodology. We have continued to apply this methodology for our final determination.

Analysis of Comments Received

All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this inquiry are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I.

Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes to the findings in the Preliminary Determination. However, we did make certain changes to the certification requirements, as set forth in Appendix II.

Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention

We determine that exports to the United States of certain HFC blends containing HFC components from India and China that are blended in India prior to importation into the United States, as described in the “Merchandise Subject to the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry” section, are circumventing the Order. We therefore find it appropriate to determine that this merchandise falls within the Order and to instruct CBP to continue to suspend liquidation of any entries of Indian blends.

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

As a result of this determination, and consistent with 19 CFR 351.225(l)(3), we intend to direct CBP to continue to suspend liquidation and to require a cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties at the applicable rate on unliquidated entries of merchandise subject to this inquiry that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after June 18, 2019, the date of initiation of this anti-circumvention inquiry.[11] The suspension of liquidation and cash deposit instructions will remain in effect until further notice.

HFC blends R-404A, R-407A, R-407C, R-410A, and R-507A/R-507 produced in India entirely from non-Chinese HFC components are not subject to this inquiry. Therefore, cash deposits are not required for such merchandise. However, imports of such merchandise are subject to the certification requirements, and cash deposits may be required, if the certification requirements are not satisfied. Accordingly if an importer imports HFC blends R-404A, R-407A, R-407C, R-410A, and R-507A/R-507 produced in India and claims that the HFC blend was produced entirely from non-Chinese components, in order not to be subject to AD requirements, the importer and exporter are required to meet the certification and documentation requirements described in Appendices II, III, and IV. The party that made the sale to the United States should fill out the exporter certification.

In order to prevent evasion, Commerce will instruct CBP that, in the situation where the parties have not maintained the requisite certification regarding the origin of the HFC components for an entry, CBP should suspend the entry and collect cash deposits at the AD rate established for the China-wide entity (216.37 percent) pursuant to the Order.

Further, for this final determination, we continue to determine that the following company is not eligible for the certification process: Coolmate Refrigerant Pvt. Ltd. Accordingly, exporters of HFC blends from India produced and/or exported by this ineligible company are similarly ineligible for the certification process with regard to imports of HFC blends produced by or sourced from this company. Additionally, exporters are not eligible to certify shipments of merchandise produced by the above-listed company. Accordingly, CBP shall suspend the entry and collect cash deposits for entries of merchandise produced and/or exported by Coolmate Refrigerant Pvt. Ltd. at the AD rate established for the China-wide entity (216.37 percent), pursuant to the Order.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with section 781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(h).

Dated: September 25, 2020.

Joseph A. Laroski Jr.,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary

II. Background

III. Merchandise Subject to the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry

IV. Scope of the Order

V. Discussion of the Issues

Comment 1: Whether Commerce's Initiation and Preliminary Determination Were Lawful with Respect to the ITC's Negative Injury Determination

Comment 2: Whether to Use Surrogate Values to Value Chinese-Origin Material Inputs

Comment 3: Whether the Production Process in India is Minor or Insignificant and Whether the Value of Further ( printed page 61933) Processing in India Represents a Small Portion of the Value of U.S. Merchandise

Comment 4: Validity of the 12 Month Look-Back Provision of the Certification Requirements

Comment 5: Whether the Final Determination Should Be Retroactive to the Date of Initiation

VI. Recommendation

Appendix II

Certification Requirements

If an importer imports HFC blends ( i.e., R-404A, R-407A, R-407C, R-410A, and R-507A/R-507) from India and claims that the HFC blends were not produced from Chinese components ( i.e., Chinese origin R-32, R-125, R-134a, and/or R-143a), the importer is required to complete and maintain the importer certification attached hereto as Appendix III and all supporting documentation. Where the importer uses a broker to facilitate the entry process, it should obtain the entry number from the broker. Agents of the importer, such as brokers, however, are not permitted to make this certification on behalf of the importer.

The exporter is required to complete and maintain the exporter certification, attached as Appendix IV, and is further required to provide the importer a copy of that certification and all supporting documentation. As explained below, shipments made within one year of purchase of Chinese blends or components are not eligible for the certification process.

For shipments and/or entries on or after June 18, 2019, through April 30, 2020, for which certifications are required, importers and exporters should have completed the required certification no later than 30 days after the publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register . Accordingly, where appropriate, the relevant bullet in the certification should reflect that the certification was completed within the time frame specified above. For example, the bullet in the importer certification that reads: “This certification was completed at or prior to the time of Entry,” could be edited as follows: “The imports referenced herein entered before May 1, 2020. This certification was completed on mm/dd/yyyy, within 30 days of the Federal Register notice publication of the preliminary determination of circumvention.” Similarly, the bullet in the exporter certification that reads, “This certification was completed at or prior to the time of shipment,” could be edited as follows: “The shipments/products referenced herein shipped before May 1, 2020. This certification was completed on mm/dd/yyyy, within 30 days of the Federal Register notice publication of the preliminary determination of circumvention.” For such entries/shipments, importers and exporters each have the option to complete a blanket certification covering multiple entries/shipments, individual certifications for each entry/shipment, or a combination thereof.

For shipments and/or entries on or after May 1, 2020, for which certifications are required, importers should complete the required certification at or prior to the date of entry and exporters should complete the required certification and provide it to the importer at or prior to the date of shipment.

The importer and Indian exporter are also required to maintain sufficient documentation supporting their certifications. The importer will not be required to submit the certifications or supporting documentation to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) as part of the entry process at this time. However, the importer and the exporter will be required to present the certifications and supporting documentation, to Commerce and/or CBP, as applicable, upon request by the respective agency. Additionally, the claims made in the certifications and any supporting documentation are subject to verification by Commerce and/or CBP. The importer and exporter are required to maintain the certifications (the importer must retain both certifications) and supporting documentation for the later of (1) a period of five years from the date of entry or (2) a period of three years after the conclusion of any litigation in United States courts regarding such entries.

In the situation where no certification is provided for an entry, and the AD China HFC blends order potentially applies to that entry, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to suspend the entry and collect cash deposits at the AD rate established for the China-wide entity (216.37 percent).

Appendix III

Importer Certification

I hereby certify that:

If the importer is acting on behalf of the first U.S. customer, complete this paragraph:

{Repeat this block as many times as necessary}

Producer Entry summary No. Entry summary line item No. Invoice No. Invoice line item No.

○ Suspension of liquidation of all unliquidated entries (and entries for which liquidation has not become final) for which these requirements were not met;

○ The requirement that the importer post applicable AD cash deposits equal to the rates as determined by Commerce; and

○ The revocation of {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY}'s privilege to certify future imports of HFC blends from India as not manufactured using HFC blends and/or components from China.

Signature

NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL

TITLE

DATE

Appendix IV

Exporter Certification

I hereby certify that:

{Repeat this block as many times as necessary}

Producer Invoice No. Invoice line item No.

○ Suspension of all unliquidated entries (and entries for which liquidation has not become final) for which these requirements were not met;

○ The requirement that the importer post applicable AD cash deposits equal to the rates as determined by Commerce; and

○ The revocation of {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY}'s privilege to certify future exports of HFC blends from India as not manufactured using HFC blends and/or components from China.

Signature

NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL

TITLE

DATE

Footnotes

1.   See Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Scope Ruling on Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd.'s R-410A Blend; Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order for Indian Blends Containing Chinese Components,85 FR 20244 (April 10, 2020) ( Preliminary Determination).

Back to Citation

2.   See Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order,81 FR 55436

(August 19, 2016) ( Order).

Back to Citation

3.  Kivlan and Company, Inc. and its affiliated company FluoroFusion Specialty Chemicals Inc. (collectively, Kivlan).

Back to Citation

4.   See Commerce's Letter, “Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order with Respect to HFC Blends Imported from India Containing Chinese Components,” dated April 6, 2020.

Back to Citation

5.   See Memorandum, “Anti-Circumvention Inquiries of Antidumping Duty Order on Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People's Republic of China—HFC Components & Indian Blends: Consultations with the United States International Trade Commission,” dated June 12, 2020

Back to Citation

6.   See ITC Letter, “Anticircumvention Inquiry of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People's Republic of China, A-570-028; Third-Country Assembly in India,” dated July 6, 2020.

Back to Citation

7.   See Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for Scope Ruling and Anti-Circumvention Inquiry of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People's Republic of China: Indian Blends,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).

Back to Citation

8.  R-404A is sold under various trade names, including Forane® 404A, Genetron® 404A, Solkane® 404A, Klea® 404A, and Suva®404A. R-407A is sold under various trade names, including Forane® 407A, Solkane® 407A, Klea®407A, and Suva®407A. R-407C is sold under various trade names, including Forane® 407C, Genetron® 407C, Solkane® 407C, Klea® 407C and Suva® 407C. R-410A is sold under various trade names, including EcoFluor R410, Forane® 410A, Genetron® R410A and AZ-20, Solkane® 410A, Klea® 410A, Suva® 410A, and Puron®. R-507A is sold under various trade names, including Forane® 507, Solkane® 507, Klea®507, Genetron®AZ-50, and Suva®507. R-32 is sold under various trade names, including Solkane®32, Forane®32, and Klea®32. R-125 is sold under various trade names, including Solkane®125, Klea®125, Genetron®125, and Forane®125. R-143a is sold under various trade names, including Solkane®143a, Genetron®143a, and Forane®125.

Back to Citation

9.   See Order.

Back to Citation

10.  Based upon questionnaire responses provided by the Indian producer/exporters in this inquiry, we have determined to cover all of the HFC blends listed under the scope of the Order, as we stated we may cover in the Notice of Initiation, 84 FR at 28270.

Back to Citation

11.   See Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention Inquiry of Antidumping Duty Order; Unfinished Blends,84 FR 28276, 28278 (June 18, 2018).

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2020-21730 Filed 9-30-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Legal Citation

Federal Register Citation

Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.

85 FR 61930

Web Citation

Suggested Web Citation

Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.

“Hydrofluorocarbon Blends From the People's Republic of China: Final Negative Scope Ruling on Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd.'s R-410A Blend; Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order by Indian Blends Containing Chinese Components,” thefederalregister.org (October 1, 2020), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2020-21730/hydrofluorocarbon-blends-from-the-people-s-republic-of-china-final-negative-scope-ruling-on-gujarat-fluorochemicals-ltd-.