Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019
The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers and/or exporters of certain frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from India made sales at less than normal value duri...
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers and/or exporters of certain frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from India made sales at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), February 1, 2018 through January 31, 2019.
DATES:
Applicable December 29, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brittany Bauer or Benjamin Luberda, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3860 or (202) 482-2185, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This administrative review covers 183 producers and/or exporters of the subject merchandise. Commerce selected two mandatory respondents for individual examination: Razban Seafoods Ltd. (Razban) and ZA Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd. (ZA Sea Foods). The producers/exporters not selected for individual examination are listed in the “Final Results of the Review” section of this notice.
On March 6, 2020, Commerce published the
Preliminary Results.[1]
On April 10, 2020, we received a case brief from ZA Sea Foods and seven other Indian shrimp producers. On April 17, 2020, we received rebuttal briefs from the petitioner and the American Shrimp Processors Association.[2]
On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by 50 days.[3]
On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by an additional 60 days.[4]
On October 7, 2020, Commerce extended the final results of this review by 60 days.[5]
The deadline for the final results of this review is now December 21, 2020.
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is certain frozen warmwater shrimp.[6]
The product is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers: 0306.17.00.03, 0306.17.00.06, 0306.17.00.09, 0306.17.00.12, 0306.17.00.15, 0306.17.00.18, 0306.17.00.21, 0306.17.00.24, 0306.17.00.27, 0306.17.00.40, 1605.21.10.30, and 1605.29.10.10. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are listed in Appendix I to this notice and addressed in the IDM. Parties can find a complete discussion of these issues and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users
( printed page 85581)
at
http://access.trade.gov.
In addition, a complete version of the IDM can be accessed directly at
http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our
Preliminary Results,
we made certain changes to the preliminary weighted-average margin calculations for ZA Sea Foods and for those companies not selected for individual review.[7]
Final Results of the Review
We are assigning the following dumping margins to the firms listed below for the POR, February 1, 2018 through January 31, 2019:
Producers/exporters
Weighted-
average
dumping
margin
(percent)
ZA Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Companies Receiving a Review-Specific Average Rate 8
3.06
We
intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the
Preliminary Results,
Commerce determined that Razban made no shipments of the subject merchandise during the POR. As we have not received any information to contradict our preliminary finding, we continue to find that Razban did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR and intend to issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on the final results of this review.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), because ZA Sea Foods reported the entered value for all its U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific
ad valorem
duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or
de minimis
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific rate is zero or
de minimis,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
Further, because we continue to find in these final results that Razban had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended entries that entered under its antidumping duty case number (
i.e.,
at the exporter's rate) at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.
For the companies that were not selected for individual examination, we used, as the assessment rate, the cash deposit rate assigned to ZA Sea Foods, in accordance with our practice.[9]
Commerce's “reseller policy” will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary (
e.g.,
a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.[10]
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be the rates shown above, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent (
de minimis
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1)), the cash deposit will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all-other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 10.17 percent, the all-others rate established in the investigation.[11]
These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 21, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the IDM
I. Summary
( printed page 85582)
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Differential Pricing Time Periods
Comment 2: Use of Third-Country Sales as a Comparison Market
Comment 3: Methodology for Constructed Value Profit and Selling Expenses
Comment 4: Names in Customs Instructions
V. Recommendation
Appendix II
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: 12
Producers/exporters
Weighted-
average
dumping
margin
(percent)
Abad Fisheries
3.06
Albys Agro Private Limited
3.06
Allana Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Allanasons Ltd
3.06
Amarsagar Seafoods Private Limited
3.06
AMI Enterprises
3.06
Amulya Seafoods
3.06
Anatha Seafoods Private Limited
3.06
Angelique International Ltd
3.06
Ayshwarya Seafood Private Limited
3.06
B R Traders
3.06
Baby Marine Eastern Exports
3.06
Baby Marine Exports
3.06
Baby Marine International
3.06
Baby Marine Sarass
3.06
Baby Marine Ventures
3.06
Balasore Marine Exports Private Limited
3.06
Bell Exim Private Limited (Bells Foods (Marine Division))
3.06
Bhatsons Aquatic Products
3.06
Bhavani Seafoods
3.06
Bijaya Marine Products
3.06
Blue Fin Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Blue Water Foods & Exports P. Ltd
3.06
B-One Business House Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Britto Seafood Exports Pvt Ltd
3.06
Canaan Marine Products
3.06
Capithan Exporting Co
3.06
Cargomar Private Limited
3.06
Chakri Fisheries Private Limited
3.06
Chemmeens (Regd)
3.06
Cherukattu Industries (Marine Div)
3.06
Cochin Frozen Food Exports Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Continental Fisheries India Private Limited
3.06
Coreline Exports
3.06
Corlim Marine Exports Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Crystal Sea Foods Private Limited
3.06
D2 D Logistics Private Limited
3.06
Damco India Private
3.06
Delsea Exports Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Devi Sea Foods Limited 13
3.06
Entel Food Products Private Limited
3.06
Esmario Export Enterprises
3.06
Everblue Sea Foods Private Limited
3.06
Exporter Coreline Exports
3.06
Febin Marine Foods
3.06
Five Star Marine Exports Private Limited
3.06
Forstar Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Fouress Food Products Private Limited
3.06
Frontline Exports Pvt. Ltd
3.06
G A Randerian Ltd
3.06
Gadre Marine Exports
3.06
Galaxy Maritech Exports P. Ltd
3.06
Geo Aquatic Products (P) Ltd
3.06
Goodwill Enterprises
3.06
Grandtrust Overseas (P) Ltd
3.06
Green House Agro Products
3.06
GVR Exports Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Hari Marine Private Limited
3.06
Haripriya Marine Export Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Harmony Spices Pvt. Ltd
3.06
HIC ABF Special Foods Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Hindustan Lever, Ltd
3.06
Hiravata Ice & Cold Storage
3.06
( printed page 85583)
Hiravati Exports Pvt. Ltd
3.06
Hiravati International Pvt. Ltd. (located at APM-Mafco Yard, Sector-18, Vashi, Navi, Mumbai-400 705, India)
3.06
Hiravati International Pvt. Ltd. (located at Jawar Naka, Porbandar, Gujarat, 360 575, India)
3.06
Hiravati Marine Products Private Limited
3.06
HN Indigos Private Limited
3.06
Hyson Logistics and Marine Exports Private Limited
3.
See
Memorandum, “Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational Adjustments Due to COVID-19,” dated April 24, 2020.
5.
See
Memorandum, “Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India; 2018-2019 Administrative Review: Extension of Deadline for Final Results,” dated October 7, 2020.
6.
For a complete description of the Scope of the Order,
see
Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018-2019 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (IDM).
9.
See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017,83 FR 32835 (July 16, 2018).
10.
For a full discussion of this practice,
see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
11.
See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India,70 FR 5147, 5148 (February 1, 2005).
12.
Because we only had one respondent with a calculated rate, this rate is used for the review-specific rate.
13.
Shrimp produced and exported by Devi Sea Foods Limited (Devi) was excluded from the order effective February 1, 2009.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, and Notice of Revocation of Order in Part,75 FR 41813, 41814 (July 19, 2010). Accordingly, we initiated this administrative review with respect to Devi only for shrimp produced in India where Devi acted as either the manufacturer or exporter (but not both).
14.
In past reviews, Commerce has treated these companies as a single entity.
See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017,83 FR 32835 (July 16, 2018). Absent information to the contrary, we continue to treat these companies as a single entity for purposes of this administrative review.
15.
On August 27, 2010, Srikanth International was found to be the successor-in-interest to NGR Aqua International.
See Certain Warmwater Shrimp from India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review,75 FR 52718 (August 27, 2010). Therefore, we did not initiate a separate administrative review with respect to NGR Aqua International.
Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.
85 FR 85580
Web Citation
Suggested Web Citation
Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.
“Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019,” thefederalregister.org (December 29, 2020), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2020-28753/certain-frozen-warmwater-shrimp-from-india-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-and-final-determinati.