SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Throughout this document “we,” “us,” and “our” means the EPA.

I. Background

The background for this action is discussed in detail in our July 10, 2020, proposal (85 FR 41484). In that document we proposed to accept the HMIWI negative declarations from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ), Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), and City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department (AEHD), and to amend the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in accordance with the requirements of the CAA. In this rulemaking, we are only taking final action on the HMIWI negative declaration letters from Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Albuquerque-Bernalillo County, New Mexico, and amending the CFR accordingly. We will take final action on the HMIWI negative declaration submitted by ODEQ for Oklahoma in a future, separate rulemaking.

II. Response to Comments

We received two comments on our proposal. We have determined that one comment has no relevance to the subject of this rulemaking and no further response is required. The other comment recommended that a state plan with the more stringent controls and results in the cleanest air should be adopted. As explained in our proposal, the negative declarations received reflect the absence of any sources subject to the standards of performance in the HMIWI Emission Guidelines, codified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce, and therefore a plan is not required. If any sources within the stated jurisdictions are later identified as subject to the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce, then such sources would be subject to the federal plan and the associated compliance schedule, unless and until the EPA approves a state plan for those sources.

III. Final Action

The EPA is amending 40 CFR part 62 to reflect receipt of the negative declaration letters from ADEQ, LDEQ, NMED and AEHD certifying that there are no existing HMIWI subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce, in their respective jurisdictions in accordance with 40 CFR 60.23(b), 40 CFR 62.06, and sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA. If a designated facility ( i.e., existing HMIWI) is later found within the aforementioned jurisdictions after publication of a final action, then the overlooked facility will become subject to the requirements of the federal plan for that designated facility, including the compliance schedule. The federal plan will no longer apply if we subsequently receive and approve the section 111(d)/129 plan from the jurisdiction with the overlooked facility.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a CAA section 111(d)/129 submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d); 42 U.S.C. 7429; 40 CFR part 60, subparts B and Ce; and 40 CFR part 62, subpart A. With regard to negative declarations for designated facilities received by the EPA from states, the EPA's role is to notify the public of the receipt of such negative declarations and revise 40 CFR part 62 accordingly. For that reason, this action:

• Is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
• Does not have federalism implications as specified inExecutive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
• Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject toExecutive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action subject toExecutive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement ( printed page 12110) Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, underExecutive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

This rule also does not have Tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency amends 40 CFR part 62 as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

2. Add an undesignated center heading following § 62.867 to read as follows:

Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators

3. Add 62.868 to read as follows:

4. Amend § 62.4620 by removing and reserving paragraphs (b)(5) and (c)(6).

5. Revise the undesignated center heading above § 62.4633 to read as follows:

Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators

6. Revise § 62.4633 to read as follows:

7. Remove the undesignated center heading above § 62.4634.

8. Remove § 62.4634.

9. Revise § 62.7870 to read as follows:

86 FR 12109