Securities and Exchange Commission
- [Release No. 34-92070; File No. SR-CTA/CQ-2021-01]
I. Introduction
On February 3, 2021,[1] the Consolidated Tape Association (“CTA”) Plan participants [2] filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”), pursuant to Section 11A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [3] and Rule 608 of Regulation National Market System (“NMS”) thereunder,[4] a proposal to amend the Second Restatement of the CTA Plan and the Restated Consolidated Quotation (“CQ”) Plan (collectively “CTA/CQ Plans” or “Plans”).[5] These amendments represent the Thirty-Sixth Substantive Amendment to the Second Restatement of the CTA Plan and the Twenty-Seventh Substantive Amendment to the Restated CQ Plan (“Amendments”).
The Amendments were published for comment in the Federal Register on March 1, 2021.[6] One comment letter was received.[7] This order approves the Amendments to the Plans.
II. Description of the Proposal
The Amendments propose revisions to the Plans' provisions governing Regulatory Halts [8] and Operational Halts.[9] The Participants state that “[t]he purpose of the amendments is to incorporate into the Plans the same processes for Regulatory Halts that are proposed by the equity exchanges.” [10]
A. Regulatory Halts
1. Declaration of a Regulatory Halt
With respect to declaration of a Regulatory Halt, the Amendments would provide that the Primary Listing Market [11] may declare a Regulatory Halt in trading for any security for which it is the Primary Listing Market (1) as provided for in the rules of the Primary Listing Market; [12] (2) if it determines [13] there is a SIP Outage,[14] Material SIP Latency,[15] or Extraordinary Market Activity; [16] or (3) in the event of ( printed page 29850) national, regional, or localized disruption that necessitates a Regulatory Halt to maintain a fair and orderly market.[17]
The Amendments would further provide that, in determining whether to declare a Regulatory Halt, the Primary Listing Market will consider the totality of information available concerning the severity of the issue, its likely duration, and potential impact on Member Firms and other market participants, and will make a good-faith determination that the criteria to declare a Regulatory Halt have been satisfied and that a Regulatory Halt is appropriate.[18] The Amendments would also provide that, the Primary Listing Market will consult, if feasible, with the affected Trading Center(s), other Participants, or the Processor, as applicable, regarding the scope of the issue and what steps are being taken to address the issue, and that the Primary Listing Market will continue to evaluate the circumstances to determine when trading may resume in accordance with the rules of the Primary Listing Market.[19]
2. Initiating a Regulatory Halt
The Amendments would specify procedures for initiating a Regulatory Halt. Specifically, when initiating a Regulatory Halt, the start time of a Regulatory Halt would be when the Primary Listing Market declares the halt, regardless of whether an issue with communications impacts the dissemination of the notice.[20] The Amendments would further provide that if the Processor is unable to disseminate notice of a Regulatory Halt or the Primary Listing Market is not open for trading, the Primary Listing Market will take reasonable steps to provide notice of a Regulatory Halt, which shall include both the type and start time of the Regulatory Halt, by dissemination through: (1) Proprietary data feeds containing quotation and last sale price information that the Primary Listing Market also sends to the Processor; (2) posting on a publicly-available Participant website; or (3) system status messages.[21] The Amendments would further specify that a Participant will halt trading for any security traded on its Market if the Primary Listing Market declares a Regulatory Halt for the security.[22]
3. Resumption of Trading After a Regulatory Halt
The Amendments would specify certain procedures for the resumption of trading following (1) Regulatory Halts other than a SIP Halts and (2) SIP Halts.[23]
a. Resumption of Trading After a Regulatory Halt Other Than a SIP Halt
With respect to the resumption of trading after a Regulatory Halt other than a SIP Halt, the Amendments would provide that the Primary Listing Market will declare a resumption of trading when it makes a good-faith determination that trading may resume in a fair and orderly manner and in accordance with its rules.[24] The Amendments would further provide that for a Regulatory Halt that is initiated by another Participant that is a Primary Listing Market, a Participant may resume trading after the Participant receives notification from the Primary Listing Market that the Regulatory Halt has been terminated.[25]
b. Resumption of Trading After a SIP Halt
With respect to the resumption of trading after a SIP Halt, the Amendments would provide that the Primary Listing Market will determine the SIP Halt Resume Time.[26] The Amendments would further provide that, in making such determination, the Primary Listing Market will make a good-faith determination and consider the totality of information to determine whether resuming trading would promote a fair and orderly market, including input from the Processor, the Operating Committee, or the operator of the system in question (as well as any Trading Center(s) to which such system is linked), regarding operational readiness to resume trading.[27] The Amendments would also provide that the Primary Listing Market retains discretion to delay the SIP Halt Resume Time if it believes trading will not resume in a fair and orderly manner.[28] Also, with respect to termination of the SIP Halt, the Amendments would provide that the Primary Listing Market will terminate a SIP Halt with a notification that specifies a SIP Halt Resume Time.[29] The Amendments would further provide that the Primary Listing Market shall provide a minimum notice of a SIP Halt Resume Time, as specified by the rules of the Primary Listing Market, during which period market participants may enter quotes and orders in the affected securities.[30] Under the Amendments, the Primary Listing Market would be permitted to stagger the SIP Halt Resume Times for multiple symbols in order to reopen in a fair and orderly manner.[31]
Finally, the Amendments would provide that during Regular Trading Hours, if the Primary Listing Market does not open a security within the amount of time as specified by the rules of the Primary Listing Market after the SIP Halt Resume Time, a Participant may resume trading in that security.[32] Under the Amendments, a Participant may, outside Regular Trading Hours, resume trading immediately after the SIP Halt Resume Time.[33]
B. Communications
The Amendments address communications regarding trading halts. Specifically, the Amendments would provide that, whenever in the exercise of its regulatory functions the Primary Listing Market for an Eligible Security determines it is appropriate to initiate a Regulatory Halt, the Primary Listing ( printed page 29851) Market will notify all other Participants and the Processor of such Regulatory Halt and will provide notice that a Regulatory Halt has been lifted using such protocols and other emergency procedures as may be mutually agreed to between the Operating Committee and the Primary Listing Market.[34] The Amendments would further provide that the Processor shall disseminate to Participants notice of the Regulatory Halt (as well as notice of the lifting of a Regulatory Halt) through the high speed line or through the “high speed line” under the CQ Plan, and (ii) any other means the Processor, in its sole discretion, considers appropriate. Under the Amendments, each Participant would be required to continuously monitor these communication protocols established by the Operating Committee and the Processor during market hours.[35]
C. Operational Halts
With respect to Operational Halts,[36] the Amendments would provide that a Participant must notify the Processor if it has concerns about its ability to collect and transmit quotes, orders or last sale prices, or where it has declared an Operational Halt or suspension of trading in one or more Eligible Securities, pursuant to the procedures adopted by the Operating Committee.[37]
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review, the Commission is approving the Amendments, for the reasons discussed below. Section 11A of the Act authorizes the Commission, by rule or order, to authorize or require the self-regulatory organizations to act jointly with respect to matters as to which they share authority under the Act in planning, developing, operating, or regulating a facility of the national market system.[38] Pursuant to this authority, the Commission adopted Regulation NMS.[39] Rule 603 of Regulation NMS requires the SROs to act jointly pursuant to NMS plans to “disseminate consolidated information, including a national best bid and national best offer, on quotations for and transactions in NMS stocks.” [40] And Rule 608 of Regulation NMS authorizes two or more SROs, acting jointly, to file with the Commission a national market system plan (“NMS plan”) or a proposed amendment to an effective NMS plan.[41] Rule 608 further provides that the Commission shall approve an amendment to an NMS plan if it finds that the amendment is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a national market system, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.[42]
As stated above, the Commission received one comment letter regarding the proposed Amendments. The commenter states that the Amendments should be approved as filed.[43] According to the commenter, the purpose of the Amendments is to incorporate into the Plans the same processes for Regulatory and Operational Halts that are proposed by the equity exchanges, including that the Primary Listing Market be vested with the authority to determine when to initiate and end a Regulatory Halt, consistent with its rules.[44] The commenter states that the Primary Listing Market would be enabled to declare a Regulatory Halt as provided for in the Primary Listing Market's rules, if it determines that there is a SIP Outage, Material SIP Latency, Extraordinary Market Activity, or in the event of national, regional, or localized disruption that necessitates a Regulatory Halt to maintain a fair and orderly market. The commenter states that the Commission should thus approve the Amendments because they are consistent with the Act and Rule 608 thereunder.[45]
The Commission agrees that the Amendments are consistent with the Act and Rule 608 of Regulation NMS.[46] The Commission believes that the Amendments further the goals of Section 11A of the Act and of Rules 603 and 608 of Regulation NMS by establishing a clear and uniform approach with respect to trading halts under various defined circumstances. The Plans' provisions currently lack clarity with respect to whether a Primary Listing Market may declare a Regulatory Halt due to underlying problems at the SIP, as well as the standard and process for calling a halt and resuming trading thereafter. The Amendments—and in particular the revisions that address Regulatory Halts in connection with SIP Outages, Material SIP Latency, Extraordinary Market Activity, and national, regional, or localized disruptions that necessitate a Regulatory Halt to maintain a fair and orderly market—address this shortcoming by providing for uniform rules governing how Participants will address, among other things, the initiation, implementation, and communication of trading halts, as well as the resumption of trading after a trading halt or SIP Halt, thereby clarifying the procedures to be followed and the standards to be applied, improving coordination and certainty among the Participants and other market participants, and enhancing the resiliency and integrity of market systems. Accordingly, the Commission believes that the Amendments are in the public interest, support the protection of investors, and help the maintenance of fair and orderly markets because the Amendments are reasonably designed to assist market participants in understanding the processes to be followed during circumstances potentially warranting a regulatory halt, such as events involving the loss, timeliness, or accuracy of information that is processed or disseminated by the SIPs. Additionally, the Commission believes that the Amendments are reasonably designed to enhance the resiliency of the national market system by clearly memorializing the coordinated actions to be taken by the Participants during such events so that trading may resume in a fair and orderly manner.
The Commission further believes that the proposed requirement for Primary Listing Markets to make good-faith determinations [47] in consultation with other market participants, as may be applicable concerning the appropriateness of declaring a regulatory halt and resuming trading thereafter, should promote fairness and orderliness in decision-making by the Primary Listing Markets. In particular, the good-faith determination standard promotes fair and orderly markets and the protection of investors because it addresses potential concerns that ( printed page 29852) Primary Listing Markets may be subject to commercial pressures in making decisions to call a Regulatory Halt and resuming trading thereafter. Accordingly, the Commission believes that the good-faith-determination standard encourages Primary Listing Markets to consider the broader interests of the national market system with respect to declaring trading halts and resuming trading thereafter, thereby promoting the maintenance of fair and orderly markets and enhancing the protection of investors.[48]
For the reasons discussed, the Commission finds that the Amendments to the Plans, are consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, and in particular, Section 11A of the Act [49] and Rule 608 [50] thereunder in that the Amendments are necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a national market system. Section 11A of the Act [51] sets forth Congress' finding that it is in the public interest and appropriate for the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets to ensure the prompt, accurate, reliable and fair collection, processing, distribution, and publication of information with respect to quotations for and transactions in such securities and the fairness and usefulness of the form and content of such information. The Commission believes that the Amendments further these goals set forth by Congress.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 11A of the Act,[52] and Rule 608(b)(2) thereunder,[53] that the Amendments to the CTA and CQ Plans (File No. SR-CTA/CQ-2021-01) are approved.
May 28, 2021.By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.