SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Throughout this document, wherever “we”, “us” or “our” are used, we mean the EPA. Information is organized as follows:

Table of Contents

I. Background

II. What the EPA Is Doing in This Action

III. Incorporation by Reference

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

Each State has a SIP containing the control measures and strategies used to attain and maintain the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The SIP is extensive, containing such elements as air pollution control regulations, emission inventories, monitoring networks, attainment demonstrations, and enforcement mechanisms.

On November 23, 2016 (81 FR 85038), the EPA revised the format for materials submitted by the State of Arizona that are approved by the EPA as part of the Arizona SIP and incorporated by reference (IBR) into the Code of Federal Regulations. In revising the format, we changed how we identify the contents of the applicable Arizona SIP from a paragraph format to a table format. The change can be seen by comparing the table format in the “identification of plan” section set forth at 40 CFR 52.120(c), (d) and (e) with the paragraph format in the original “identification of plan” section set forth at 40 CFR 52.152.

In the November 23, 2016 final rule, we made the following errors that we are correcting through this action:

• Inadvertent omission of an entry for Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD) Rule 34 (“Organic Solvents—Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)”), which the EPA approved at47 FR 19326 (May 5, 1982). Certain paragraphs of MCAQD Rule 34 have been superseded by EPA approval of more recent VOC rules for Maricopa County or have been rescinded, but paragraphs F, G, H, I, J and K of Rule 34 remain in the applicable SIP.^[1] We are adding the appropriate entry to the table of approved rules for Maricopa County.

• Inadvertent errors in the entries for Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PCDEQ) Rules 7A (“Emission Limitation, Fuel Burning Equipment—Sulfur Dioxide”) and 7B (“Emission Limitation, Fuel Burning Equipment—Nitrogen Oxides”), which the EPA approved at42 FR 36998 (July 19, 1977). With respect to Rule 7A, we indicated correctly that paragraphs 2 through 5 had been disapproved, but inadvertently failed to identify paragraph 6 of Rule 7A as part of the ( printed page 53677) applicable SIP. With respect to Rule 7B, the entry erroneously identified only paragraph 1 as part of the SIP, but the approval applies to paragraphs 1 through 4. In this action, we are amending the entries accordingly and are also correcting the title of the rules to match the rule titles as submitted.
• Lastly, in the entry for Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) section 9-500.27 (excluding paragraphs D and E), we inadvertently added an equals (=) sign after the section number and accompanying parenthetical phrase, and we are correcting the typographical error in this action.

II. What the EPA Is Doing in This Action

Section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”), as amended in 1990, provides that, whenever the EPA determines that the EPA's action approving, disapproving, or promulgating any plan or plan revision (or part thereof), area designation, redesignation, classification or reclassification was in error, the EPA may in the same manner as the approval, disapproval, or promulgation revise such action as appropriate without requiring any further submission from the state. Such determination and the basis thereof must be provided to the state and the public. We interpret this provision to authorize the EPA to make corrections to a promulgated regulation when it is shown to our satisfaction (or we discover) that (1) we clearly erred by failing to consider or by inappropriately considering information made available to the EPA at the time of the promulgation, or the information made available at the time of promulgation is subsequently demonstrated to have been clearly inadequate, and (2) other information persuasively supports a change in the regulation. See 57 FR 56762, at 56763 (November 30, 1992) (correcting designations, boundaries, and classifications of ozone, carbon monoxide, particulate matter and lead areas).

In this action, pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(6), we are correcting the November 23, 2016 final rule revising the format of the Arizona SIP in part 52 to include a MCAQD rule that we inadvertently omitted and to fix certain other errors we made in that rulemaking. We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the Federal Register , we are simultaneously proposing the same error corrections. If we receive adverse comments by October 3, 2022, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on October 31, 2022. This will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable SIP.

Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Incorporation by Reference

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the MCAQD and PCDEQ rules described in section I of the preamble and set forth below in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52. Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.^[2] The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely corrects errors in a previous rulemaking and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:

• Is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
• Does not have federalism implications as specified inExecutive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
• Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject toExecutive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action subject toExecutive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods underExecutive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, this rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will ( printed page 53678) submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register . A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register . This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 8, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the Federal Register , rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency amends Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

2. Amend § 52.120 as follows:

a. In paragraph (c), Table 1 under the table headings “Title 9 (Cities and Towns),” “Chapter 4 (General Powers)” and “Article 8 (Miscellaneous),” revise the entry for “9-500.27, excluding paragraphs D and E.”;

b. In paragraph (c), Table 4 under the table headings “Pre-July 1988 Rule Codification” and “Regulation III—Control of Air Contaminants,” add an entry for “Rule 34 (paragraphs F, G, H, I, J and K only)” before the entry for “Rule 35”; and

c. In paragraph (c), Table 7 under the table headings “1976-1978 Rule Codification” and “Regulation II—Fuel Burning Equipment,” revise the entries for “Rule 7A (Paragraph 1)” and “Rule 7B (Paragraph 1)”.

The revisions and addition read as follows:

87 FR 53676