SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 

Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2022).

Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on October 18, 2022, ordered that —

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as ( printed page 64248) amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 2, 5-11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, and 33 of the '273 patent and claims 1, 2, 5-11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, and 23 of the '685 patent; claims 1-6, 8-10, and 11-19 of the '118 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is “(1) certain smart thermostat devices that serve as in-unit hubs for the remote control of smart door locks, (2) systems including those smart thermostat devices, and (3) internal circuity, printed circuit boards, and communication components for those smart thermostat devices.”;

(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a) The complainants are:

EDST, LLC, 5214 68th Street, Suite 402, Lubbock, TX 79424

Quext IoT, LLC, 5214 68th Street, Suite 201, Lubbock, TX 79424

(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served:

iApartments, Inc.,201 E Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1925, Tampa, FL 33602

Hsun Wealth Technology Co., Ltd., 11th Floor, No. 47, Qingpu, Qingpu Village, Zhongli District, Taoyuan City, 32056, Taiwan

Huarifu Technology Co., Ltd., 11th Floor, No. 49, Section 1, Qingfeng Road, Zhongli District, Taoyuan City, 32056, Taiwan

(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be participating as a party in this investigation.

Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainants of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

87 FR 64247