SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review on September 8, 2022, in the Federal Register , and invited interested parties to comment.^[1] For a detailed description of the events that occurred subsequent to the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.^[2] On December 7, 2022, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce extended the deadline for issuing the final results until March 7, 2023.^[3]

Scope of the Order ^[4]

The products covered by the scope of the Order are PVLT tires from China. A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

All issues raised by the interested parties in their case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum and are listed in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

Based on comments received from interested parties and issues originating from verification, we revised the calculation of the net countervailable subsidy rates for Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd. (SRH). For a discussion of the issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Methodology

Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.^[5] For a full description of the methodology underlying all of Commerce's conclusions, including our reliance, in part, on facts otherwise available, including adverse facts available, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Non-Selected Companies' Rate

Commerce made no changes to the methodology from the Preliminary Results for determining a rate for companies not selected for individual examination. However, due to changes in the calculation for SRH, we revised the non-selected rate accordingly. Consequently, for each of the eight non- ( printed page 15372) selected companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, we are applying an ad valorem subsidy rate of 11.05 percent.

Final Results of Review

We find the following net countervailable subsidy rates for the period January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020, as follows:

Disclosure

Commerce intends to disclose calculations and analysis performed for the final results of review within five days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Requirements

In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired ( i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown above for the above-listed companies with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of these final results of review. For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-others rate or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, effective upon publication of these final results, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Administrative Protective Order

This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

The final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary

II. Background

III. Scope of the Order

IV. Non-Selected Rate

V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse Inferences

VI. Subsidies Valuation

VII. Analysis of Programs

VIII. Analysis of Comments

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Continue To Find Use of the Export Buyer's Credit (EBC) Program

Comment 2: Whether the Provision of Land-Use Rights for Foreign-Invested Enterprises (FIE) for Less Than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) Is Export-Contingent and Specific

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Find That the Chinese Markets for Carbon Black and Synthetic Rubber Are Distorted

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Include IHS Markit Data in Input Benchmark Calculations

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated Inland Freight Costs in the Nylon Cord Benchmark

Comment 6: Whether the Benchmark for Electricity Includes Value-Added Tax (VAT)

Comment 7: Whether the Provision of Inputs for LTAR Constitutes a Financial Contribution

IX. Recommendation

88 FR 15371