SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In support, the Petitioner asserts that allowing the Station to move from a VHF to a UHF channel would serve the public interest by resolving viewer reception challenges and significantly improving the Station's over-the-air-service to the viewers in its existing service area. Petitioner includes with its Petition a number of viewer complaints highlighting current reception problems. Petitioner states that the Commission has recognized that VHF channels pose challenges for their use in providing digital television service, including propagation characteristics that allow undesired signals and noise to be receivable at relatively far distances and large variability in the performance of indoor antennas available to viewers, with most antennas performing very poorly on high VHF channels. An engineering statement provided by the Petitioner confirms that the proposed channel *34 contour would provide full principal community coverage to Des Moines, Iowa. The proposed move from channel *11 to channel *34 is also not predicted to create a loss of service to any viewers and according to the engineering statement will actually increase the area covered while serving the population with higher signal levels.

Petitioner acknowledges that the proposed channel substitution would not meet the distance separation requirements regarding the vacant channel *34 allotment at Ames, Iowa. As a result, Petitioner requests that simultaneously with the substitution of channel *34 at Des Moines, Iowa, we delete the vacant channel *34 allotment at Ames, Iowa and substitute it with the allotment of vacant channel *21 to Ames, Iowa. As stated in its supplemental engineering statement, the proposed channel *21 is described as meeting the distance criteria found in section 73.623(d) of the Commission's rules, and an analysis using the Commission's TVStudy software is provided showing no interference to any other station or allotment.

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 23-296; RM-11964; DA 23-774, adopted August 29, 2023, and released August 29, 2023. The full text of this document is available for download at https://www.fcc.gov/​edocs. To request materials in accessible formats (Braille, large print, computer diskettes, or audio recordings), please send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (VOICE), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).

This document does not contain information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden “for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,” pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, do not apply to this proceeding.

Members of the public should note that all ex parte contacts are prohibited from the time a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is issued to the time the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, see47 CFR 1.1208. There are, however, exceptions to this prohibition, which can be found in Section 1.1204(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.1204(a).

See Sections 1.415 and 1.420 of the Commission's rules for information regarding the proper filing procedures for comments, 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Proposed Rule

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, 307, 309, 310, 334, 336, 339.

2. In § 73.622, in the table in paragraph (j), under Iowa, revise the entry for Ames and Des Moines to read as follows:

88 FR 60611