Document

Tin Mill Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that tin mill products from the Republic of Korea (Korea) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less...

Department of Commerce
International Trade Administration
  1. [A-580-915]

AGENCY:

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that tin mill products from the Republic of Korea (Korea) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) for the period of investigation (POI) January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

DATES:

Applicable January 10, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fred Baker or Preston Cox, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2924 or (202) 482-5041, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On August 22, 2023, Commerce published in the Federal Register its preliminary negative determination in the LTFV investigation of tin mill products from Korea, in which we also postponed the final determination until January 4, 2023.[1] We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Determination.[2] No interested party submitted comments. Consequently, no decision memorandum accompanies this notice.

Scope of the Investigation

The products covered by this investigation are tin mill products from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see the appendix to this notice.

Scope Comments

During the course of this investigation, Commerce received scope comments from parties. Commerce issued a Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum to address these comments and set aside a period of time for parties to address scope issues in scope-specific case and rebuttal briefs.[3] We received comments from parties on the Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum, which we address in the Final Scope Decision Memorandum.[4] We did not make any changes to the scope of this investigation from the scope published in the Preliminary Determination, as noted in the appendix to this notice.

Verification

Commerce verified the sales and cost information submitted by KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (KG Dongbu) and TCC Steel Corp. (TCC) for use in our final determination, consistent with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant sales and accounting records, and original source documents provided by KG Dongbu and TCC.[5]

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

We made certain changes to the preliminary weighted-average margin ( printed page 1546) calculations for KG Dongbu and TCC to incorporate the minor corrections submitted by each company at verification.[6] For KG Dongbu, this resulted in no change to the company's preliminary weighted-average dumping margin ( i.e., 0.00 percent).[7] For TCC, this resulted in a change to the company's weighted-average dumping margin; for this final determination, we calculate a weighted-average dumping margin of 2.69 percent.[8]

We revised the sales data reported by TCC to incorporate the corrections provided by the company at verification.[9] Based on the revised data, the application of the Cohen's d confirms the existence of a pattern of prices that differ significantly among purchasers, regions, or time periods.[10] This difference is meaningful because the weighted-average dumping margin crosses the de minimis threshold when calculated using the average-to-average method and when calculated using alternative comparison methods.[11] Further, in accordance with Commerce's practice, if the value of sales to purchasers, regions, and time periods that pass the Cohen's d test accounts for more than 33 percent and less than 66 percent of the value of total sales, then the results support applying an average-to-transaction method to those sales identified as passing the Cohen's d test as an alternative to the average-to-average method and application of the average-to-average method to those sales identified as not passing the Cohen's d test.[12] On this basis, for purposes of this final determination, we are applying the average-to-transaction method to those U.S. sales which passed the Cohen's d test and the average-to-average method to those sales which did not pass the Cohen's d test to calculate the weighted-average dumping margin for TCC ( i.e., mixed-alternative method). This change from the Preliminary Determination  [13] results in an estimated weighted-average dumping margin for TCC of 2.69 percent for this final determination.[14]

All-Others Rate

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated weighted-average dumping margin for all other producers and exporters not individually investigated shall be equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for individually investigated exporters and producers, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or determined entirely under section 776 of the Act, i.e., facts otherwise available.

In this investigation, Commerce calculated an individual estimated weighted-average dumping margin for TCC that is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Consequently, Commerce assigned the estimated weighted-average dumping margin calculated for TCC to all other producers and exporters of the merchandise under consideration, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.

Final Determination

Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist:

Exporter/producer Estimated weighted-average dumping margin (percent)
KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd 0.00
TCC Steel Corp 2.69
All Others 2.69

Disclosure

Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in connection with this final determination within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Suspension of Liquidation

In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all entries of tin mill products from Korea as described in the appendix, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register , except for those entries of subject merchandise produced and exported by KG Dongbu.

Because the estimated weighted-average dumping margin for KG Dongbu as the producer and exporter is zero, entries of shipments of subject merchandise that are produced and exported by KG Dongbu will not be subject to suspension of liquidation or cash deposit requirements. Accordingly, Commerce will direct CBP not to suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise produced and exported by KG Dongbu. In accordance with section 735(a)(4) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.204(e)(1), should the investigation result in an antidumping duty order pursuant to section 736 of the Act, entries of shipments of subject merchandise from this producer/exporter combination will be excluded from the order. However, entries of shipments of subject merchandise from this company in any other producer/exporter combination, or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination, will be subject to suspension of liquidation at the all-others rate.

Further, pursuant to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d), Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the estimated weighted-average dumping margin or the estimated all-others rate, as follows: (1) the cash deposit rate for the respondents listed in the table above is the company-specific cash deposit rate listed for the respondent in the table; (2) if the exporter is not a respondent identified in the table above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal to the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margin established for that producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will be equal to the all-others estimated weighted-average dumping margin.

U.S. International Trade Commission Notification

In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of this final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. Because Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of tin mill products no later than 45 days after this final determination. If the ITC determines ( printed page 1547) that such injury does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated, all cash deposits posted will be refunded, and suspension of liquidation will be lifted. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed in the “Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation” section above.

Administrative Protective Order

This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

This determination and this notice are issued and published pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c).

Dated: January 4, 2024.

Abdelali Elouaradia,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Scope of the Investigation

The products within the scope of this investigation are tin mill flat-rolled products that are coated or plated with tin, chromium, or chromium oxides. Flat-rolled steel products coated with tin are known as tinplate. Flat-rolled steel products coated with chromium or chromium oxides are known as tin-free steel or electrolytic chromium-coated steel. The scope includes all the noted tin mill products regardless of thickness, width, form (in coils or cut sheets), coating type (electrolytic or otherwise), edge (trimmed, untrimmed or further processed, such as scroll cut), coating thickness, surface finish, temper, coating metal (tin, chromium, chromium oxide), reduction (single- or double-reduced), and whether or not coated with a plastic material.

All products that meet the written physical description are within the scope of this investigation unless specifically excluded. The following products are outside and/or specifically excluded from the scope of this investigation:

The merchandise subject to this investigation is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), under HTSUS subheadings 7210.11.0000, 7210.12.0000, 7210.50.0020, 7210.50.0090, 7212.10.0000, and 7212.50.0000 if of non-alloy steel and under HTSUS subheadings 7225.99.0090, and 7226.99.0180 if of alloy steel. Although the subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive.

Footnotes

1.   See Tin Mill Products from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Negative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination,88 FR 57093 (August 22, 2023) ( Preliminary Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).

Back to Citation

2.   See Preliminary Determination, 88 FR at 57094.

Back to Citation

3.   See Memorandum, “Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum,” dated August 16, 2023 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum).

Back to Citation

4.   See Memorandum, “Final Scope Decision Memorandum,” dated concurrently with this memorandum (Final Scope Decision Memorandum).

Back to Citation

5.   See Memoranda, “Verification of the Cost Response of TCC Steel Corp.,” dated November 6, 2023; “Verification of the Cost Response of KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.,” dated November 28, 2023 (KG Dongbu Cost Verification Report); “Sales Verification Report for KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.,” dated December 4, 2023 (KG Dongbu Sales Verification Report); “Constructed Export Price Sales Verification Report for KG Steel USA,” dated December 4, 2023 (KG Steel USA Sales Verification Report); “Verification of the Sales Response of TCC Steel Corp.” dated December 4, 2023 (TCC Sales Verification Report); and “Verification of the Sales Response of TCC America Corporation,” dated December 5, 2023 (TAC Sales Verification Report).

Back to Citation

6.   See KG Dongbu Cost Verification Report at 2; see also KG Dongbu Sales Verification Report at 2-3; KG Steel USA Sales Verification Report at 2-3; TCC Sales Verification Report at 2-3; and TAC Sales Verification Report at 2-3.

Back to Citation

7.   See Memorandum, “Final Determination Analysis Memorandum for KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.,” dated concurrently with this notice.

Back to Citation

8.   See Memorandum, “Final Analysis Memorandum for TCC Steel Corp.,” dated concurrently with this notice (TCC Final Analysis Memorandum).

Back to Citation

9.  TCC Sales Verification Report at 2-3.

Back to Citation

10.   Id.

Back to Citation

11.   Id.

Back to Citation

12.   See Preliminary Determination PDM at 6.

Back to Citation

13.   Id. at 7; see also Memorandum, “Preliminary Analysis Memorandum for TCC Steel Corp.,” dated August 16, 2023, at 3; and “Analysis of Ministerial Error Allegation for TCC Steel Corp.,” dated September 22, 2023, at Attachment II.

Back to Citation

14.   See TCC Final Analysis Memorandum.

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2024-00323 Filed 1-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Legal Citation

Federal Register Citation

Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.

89 FR 1545

Web Citation

Suggested Web Citation

Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.

“Tin Mill Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,” thefederalregister.org (January 10, 2024), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2024-00323/tin-mill-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at-less-than-fair-value.