SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

To support development of a competitive fusion power industry in the U.S., the Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) program is exploring the near-term feasibility of a fusion energy public-private consortium framework (PPCF). This PPCF, inspired by the successful 1980s public-private partnership (PPP) between the Department of Defense and Sematech,^[1 2] would support the U.S. BDV.^[3]

The proposed PPCF would aim to accelerate fusion energy RDD&D and amplify Federal funding by bringing together State/local government, private, and philanthropic funding, with an initial focus on delivering and operating small-to-medium scale test stands and conducting R&D with these tools to help resolve significant, remaining S&T gaps (aligned with FPP technology roadmaps of private-sector fusion developers and critical supply-chain providers).^[4] A key rationale for pursuing a PPCF at this time is because the required funding and pace of R&D and project delivery are not readily achievable within the BDV timeframe. The proposed PPCF is envisioned to be executed ( e.g., tool delivery and operation, R&D, growing supply chains, and broader engagements/activities to support fusion demonstration and commercialization) by a network of regional ecosystems that will build upon local expertise, stimulate economic development, and bolster domestic supply chains anchored in fusion S&T translation and innovation.^[5]

The PPCF would be aligned and coordinated with various priority initiatives of the BDV and the SC FES program, such as the Milestone-Based Fusion Development Program ^[6] (“Milestone Program”) and Fusion Innovation Research Engine (FIRE) Collaboratives,^[7] taking advantage of regional capabilities and investing in infrastructure ( e.g., test and manufacturing tools) to de-risk fusion S&T.

The purpose of the PPCF would be to (1) conduct applied R&D to help address and resolve common, priority S&T gaps in the technology roadmaps of private-sector-led FPPs aligned with the SC FES Fusion Science & Technology (FS&T) Roadmap, with an emphasis on pre-competitive R&D; (2) deliver and operate critical test platforms for the benefit of all consortium members; and (3) stimulate the growth of supply chains that will be needed to support fusion demonstration and deployment. The vision of the consortium would be to enable timely commercial fusion demonstration and deployment led by the private sector and to help establish a world-leading and vibrant U.S. fusion industry.

Questions for Input

SC is issuing this RFI to seek input on the vision, mission, impact, near-to-medium term feasibility, including funding, and structure of the proposed fusion energy PPCF. Responses should address/discuss any or all of the following topics (limit all responses to five pages total):

• PPCF vision, mission, impact (including proposed examples discussed previously):
• How can a PPCF provide incentives from both public and private sector to invest in common Fusion Materials & Technology (FM&T) de-risk capabilities?
• What are some cost-share models that could incentivize the private sector in engaging with local, State, and Federal government to address FM&T gaps?
• What are the priority S&T gaps in the technology roadmaps of private-sector-led FPPs which a PPCF could address?
• What will be the impact of the PPCF, as envisioned?
• How can a PPCF help support supply chains, community engagement and technology adoption of fusion energy in the long term?
• On which topics should a public-private consortium framework focus? Possible topics include (but are not limited to): the fusion fuel cycle, ( printed page 48606) blankets, structural materials, and gyrotrons.
• What are some public-private consortia models that could be emulated or adapted to best serve the needs of the U.S. in establishing a robust fusion power industry?
• Near-to-medium term (in the next three, five, and ten years) feasibility of a fusion energy PPCF:
• Which sources of funding are likely to be available from non-Federal sources (including State/local governments, private sector, philanthropy)?
• How can universities and national laboratories support a fusion energy PPCF and what important roles can they serve?
• What is the expected amount of funding needed to make a meaningful impact toward bridging S&T gaps?
• What type of work (in both delivery/operation of tools and associated R&D) would be considered “pre-competitive?”
• What are key short-term fusion FM&T capabilities needed now that could be supported through a PPCF and what are some longer-term capabilities that should be considered?
• PPCF organizational structure and relationship to DOE:
• Which flexibilities may be required to meet S&T goals in the areas of intellectual property, U.S. manufacturing, research security, foreign work, and partnerships, etc.?
• How may the PPCF stimulate partnerships with State/local governments and economic development in communities? How about international partnerships?
• What organizational structures may work to achieve the mission, vision, and impact of the proposed PPCF?

Signing Authority

This document of the Department of Energy was signed on June 3, 2024, by Harriet Kung, Acting Director, Office of Science, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. The document with the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the Federal Register .

89 FR 48605