Securities and Exchange Commission
- [SEC File No. 270-237, OMB Control No. 3235-0226]
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is soliciting comments on the collections of information discussed below. The Commission plans to submit these existing collections of information to the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) for extension and approval.
Section 10(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) prohibits a registered investment company (“fund”) from purchasing any security during an underwriting or selling syndicate if the fund has certain affiliated relationships with a principal underwriter for the security.[1] Congress enacted this provision in 1940 to protect funds and their shareholders by preventing underwriters from “dumping” unmarketable securities on affiliated funds.
Rule 10f-3 under the Act permits a fund to engage in a securities transaction that otherwise would violate Section 10(f) if, among other things: (i) the fund's directors have approved procedures for purchases made in reliance on the rule, regularly review fund purchases to determine whether they comply with these procedures, and approve necessary changes to the procedures; and (ii) a written record of each transaction effected under the rule is maintained for six years, the first two of which in an easily accessible place.[2]
Rule 10f-3 also conditionally allows managed portions of fund portfolios to purchase securities offered in otherwise off-limits primary offerings. To qualify for this exemption, Rule 10f-3 requires that the subadviser that is advising the purchaser be contractually prohibited from providing investment advice to any other portion of the fund's portfolio and consulting with any other of the fund's advisers that is a principal underwriter or affiliated person of a principal underwriter concerning the fund's securities transactions.
These requirements provide a mechanism for fund boards to oversee compliance with the rule. The required recordkeeping facilitates the Commission staff's review of Rule 10f-3 transactions during routine fund inspections and, when necessary, in connection with enforcement actions.
The staff estimates that approximately 745 funds engage in at least one Rule 10f-3 transaction each year, for a total of 745 such transactions.[3] Rule 10f-3 requires that the purchasing fund create a written record of each transaction that includes, among other things, information about from whom the securities were purchased and the terms of the transaction. The staff estimates that it takes an average fund approximately 30 minutes per transaction at a time cost of $131 per transaction to document each transaction.[4] Thus, annually funds ( printed page 52529) spend approximately 373 hours [5] at an internal cost of $97,595 documenting these transactions.[6]
The funds also must maintain and preserve these transactional records in accordance with the rule's recordkeeping requirement, and the staff estimates that it takes a fund approximately 20 minutes per transaction at a time cost of $28 per transaction to comply with this part of the rule.[7] The staff estimates that annually, in the aggregate, funds spend approximately 248 hours [8] at a cost of $20,832 to comply with this aspect of Rule 10f-3's recordkeeping requirements.[9]
In addition, fund boards must, no less than quarterly, examine each of these transactions to ensure that they comply with the fund's policies and procedures. The information or materials upon which the board relied in making its determination also must be maintained. The staff estimates that it takes a fund 1 hour per quarter at a cost of $262 per quarter to comply with the maintenance requirement of the rule.[10] Thus annually, in the aggregate, funds spend approximately 2,980 hours [11] annually at a total internal cost of $780,760 to comply with this recordkeeping requirement.[12]
The staff further estimates that reviewing and revising as needed written procedures for Rule 10f-3 transactions takes, on average for each fund, two hours of a compliance attorney's time at a cost of approximately $880 [13] per year.[14] Thus, annually, in the aggregate, the staff estimates that funds spend a total of approximately 1,490 hours [15] at a cost of approximately $655,600 [16] on monitoring and revising Rule 10f-3 procedures.
Based on an analysis of Form N-CEN filings, the staff estimates that approximately 589 new funds enter into sub-advisory agreements each year.[17] Based on discussions with industry representatives, the staff estimates that it will require approximately 0.75 attorney hours to draft and execute additional clauses in new subadvisory contracts in order for funds and subadvisers to be able to rely on the exemptions in Rule 10f-3.[18] Assuming that all 589 new funds that enter into new subadvisory contracts each year make the modification to their subadvisory contracts required by the rule, we estimate that Rule 10f-3's subadvisory contract requirement will require a total of 442 burden hours annually for new funds, with an associated aggregate internal cost of approximately $221,200.[19]
The staff estimates that complying with Rule 10f-3's requirements imposes an internal burden of 5,408 hours at an internal cost of approximately $1,755,155. This estimate does not include the time spent to report a fund's reliance on Rule 10f-3 on Form N-CEN, which is subject to a separate PRA information collection.
Written comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted by August 23, 2024.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Please direct your written comments to: David Bottom, Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-2736
Dated: June 17, 2024.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.