SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 503, 3652 and 3691, the Commission finds that it is appropriate to initiate this proceeding to review the accuracy, reliability, and representativeness of the Postal Service's Internal Service Performance Measurement (SPM) System. The Commission seeks comments regarding this review.

SPM produces composite service performance results that are generated using several different data sources and data processing methods. The service performance results produced by SPM are an amalgamation of granular and siloed evaluations of performance for the individual segments of mail collection (First Mile), mail processing (Processing Duration), and mail delivery (Last Mile). Given recent changes in operations and mail mix, the Commission has concerns about the continued validity of the design and implementation of each of these three systems, as well as how the systems function collectively as a whole.

Commission Information Request No. 1 is being issued today in this docket and the Postal Service shall fully respond by August 14, 2024.

A technical conference will be held live via Microsoft Teams on July 24, 2024, at 11 a.m. ET. This technical conference is an informal, off-the-record opportunity to interactively discuss and clarify technical issues related to the nature and extent of the information sought in Commission Information Request No. 1, as well as to identify and discuss information relevant to evaluating the SPM System. Details on how to participate appear in Order No. 7247.

Interested persons are invited to provide written comments to facilitate the Commission's review of the accuracy, reliability, and representativeness of SPM. Below, the Commission identifies specific topics on which it would particularly appreciate comment. However, commenters are not limited to addressing these identified topics—the Commission will consider all comments that fall within the scope of this proceeding.

1. Is SPM in its current state producing accurate, reliable, and/or representative measurements of the Postal Service's service performance? If not, what specific aspect of SPM's design and/or implementation is causing service performance measurement to be inaccurate, unreliable, and/or unrepresentative?

2. Are there modifications that could be made to SPM in its current state that would result in it being more accurate, reliable, and/or representative?

3. Are there alternative measurement systems (either external or internal) that would be more accurate, reliable, and/or representative than SPM?

89 FR 56679