Document
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Epilepsy and Seizure Disorders
FMCSA announces its decision to renew exemptions for eight individuals from the requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) that interstate commercial m...
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
A. Viewing Comments
To view comments go to
www.regulations.gov.
Insert the docket number (FMCSA-2015-0320, FMCSA-2017-0252, FMCSA-2017-0253, or FMCSA-2022-0044) in the keyword box and click “Search.” Next, sort the results by “Posted (Newer-Older),” choose the first notice listed, and click “Browse Comments.” If you do not have access to the internet, you may view the docket online by visiting Dockets Operations on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 366-9317 or (202) 366-9826 before visiting Dockets Operations.
B. Privacy Act
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(6), DOT solicits comments from the public on the exemption request. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov.
As described in the system of records notice DOT/ALL 14 (Federal Docket Management System), which can be reviewed at
https://www.transportation.gov/individuals/privacy/privacy-act-system-records-notices,
the comments are searchable by the name of the submitter.
II. Background
On August 30, 2024, FMCSA published a notice announcing its decision to renew exemptions for eight individuals from the epilepsy and seizure disorders prohibition in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(8) to operate a CMV in interstate commerce and requested comments from the public (89 FR 70685). The public comment period ended on September 30, 2024, and no comments were received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of these applicants and determined that renewing these exemptions would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved by complying with § 391.41(b)(8).
The physical qualification standard for drivers regarding epilepsy found in § 391.41(b)(8) states that a person is physically qualified to drive a CMV if that person has no established medical history or clinical diagnosis of epilepsy or any other condition which is likely to cause the loss of consciousness or any loss of ability to control a CMV.
In addition to the regulations, FMCSA has published advisory criteria []
to assist medical examiners in determining whether drivers with certain medical conditions are qualified to operate a CMV in interstate commerce.
III. Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding.
IV. Conclusion
Based on its evaluation of the eight renewal exemption applications and comments received, FMCSA announces its decision to exempt the following drivers from the epilepsy and seizure disorders prohibition in § 391.41(b)(8).
As of September 16, 2024, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b), the following eight individuals have satisfied the renewal conditions for obtaining an exemption from the epilepsy and seizure disorders prohibition in the FMCSRs for interstate CMV drivers (89 FR 70685):
Nathan Dermer (AK)
Bradley Fullmer (UT)
Cole Funk (PA)
Joseph Hammond (OR)
Anthony Kornuszko (PA)
Michael Modica (FL)
David Pamperin (WI)
Dominick Sempervive (NJ)
The drivers were included in docket number FMCSA-2015-0320, FMCSA-2017-0252, FMCSA-2017-0253, or FMCSA-2022-0044. Their exemptions were applicable as of September 16, 2024 and will expire on September 16, 2026.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b), each exemption will be valid for 2 years from the effective date unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if the following occurs: (1) the person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained prior to being granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b).
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.