Document
Aluminum Extrusion From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013, Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013, and Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013; Correction
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in the Federal Register of June 9, 2015, in which Commerce announced the preliminary results of the 2013 administra...
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 9, 2015, Commerce published in the
Federal Register
the
Preliminary Results
on the 2013 administrative review of the CVD
Order
[]
on aluminum extrusions from China.[]
On December 14, 2015, Commerce published in the
Federal Register
the
Final Results
on the 2013 administative review of the CVD
Order
on aluminum extrusions from China.[]
On March 22, 2016, Commerce published in the
Federal Register
the
Amended Final Results
on the 2013 administrative review of the CVD
Order
on aluminum extrusions from China.[]
In these three
Federal Register
notices, Commerce inadvertently omitted the company, Guangzhou Mingcan, from the cash deposit rate table and did not assign the company a subsidy rate. Guangzhou Mingcan was a company for which an administrative review was requested and initiated, and that Commerce did not select for individual examination. The administrative review of this company was not rescinded.[]
Correction
In the
Federal Register
of June 9, 2015, in FR Doc 2015-14076, on pages 32530-32531 in the first, second, and third columns, correct the cash deposit rate table as follows: under “Company,” include the company name, “Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products Co., Ltd.,” and under “2013
Ad valorem
rate (percent),” include the rate 1.81 percent. In addition, in the second column, under “Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review,” correct the first sentence in the first paragraph to: “There are 38 companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, but were not selected as mandatory respondents.”
In the
Federal Register
of December 14, 2015, in FR Doc 2015-31425, on page 77327 in the first, second, and third columns, correct the cash deposit rate table as follows: under “Company,” include the company name, “Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products Co., Ltd.,” and under “2013
Ad valorem
rate (percent),” include the rate 61.36 percent. In addition, in the third column, under “Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review,” correct the first sentence in the first paragraph to: “There are 39 companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, but were not selected as mandatory respondents.”
In the
Federal Register
of March 22, 2016, in FR Doc 2016-06425, on page 15239 in the third column, correct the cash deposit rate table as follows: under “Company,” include the company name, “Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products Co., Ltd.,” and under “2013
Ad valorem
rate (percent),” include the rate 28.01 percent. Lastly, in the second column, under “Amendment to Rates for Non-Selected Companies Under Review,” correct the first sentence in the first paragraph to: “In light of the above corrections, for the 39 companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, but were not selected as mandatory respondents, we have recalculated the net subsidy rate which is based on the overall subsidy rates calculated for the mandatory respondents of this review.”
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 14, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.