Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod From India and the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Orders
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on carbon and alloy steel threaded rod (steel threaded rod) from India a...
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on carbon and alloy steel threaded rod (steel threaded rod) from India and the People's Republic of China (China) would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these CVD orders.
DATES:
Applicable March 11, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Hooker, Trade Agreements Policy and Negotiations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6299.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 9, 2020, Commerce published in the
Federal Register
the CVD orders on carbon and alloy steel threaded rod from India and China.[1]
On November 4, 2024, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the
Orders,
pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).[2]
On November 19, 2024, Commerce received notices of intent to participate from Vulcan Threaded Products, inc., the domestic interested party, within the 15-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).[3]
The domestic interested party claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a producer of the domestic like product in the United States.[4]
On December 2, 2024, Commerce received an adequate substantive response from the domestic interested party within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).[5]
Commerce received no substantive response from the
( printed page 11709)
Governments of China or India or any respondent interested party.
On December 26, 2024, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from the Government of China or India or any respondent interested party.[6]
As a result, Commerce conducted an expediated (120-day) sunset review of the
Orders,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2).
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by the
Orders
is carbon and alloy steel threaded rod from India and China. For a complete description of the scope of the
Orders, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[7]
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review is contained in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.[8]
A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be directly accessed at
https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that the revocation of the
India Order
would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following net countervailable subsidy rates:
Producers/exporters
Net countervailable
subsidy rate
(percent
ad valorem)
Daksh Fasteners
211.72
Mangal Steel Enterprises Limited
6.07
All Others
6.07
Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that the revocation of the
China Order
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following net countervailable rates:
Producers/exporters
Net countervailable
subsidy rate
(percent
ad valorem)
Ningbo Zhongjiang High Strength Bolts Co., Ltd
69.20
Zhejiang Junyue Standard Part Co., Ltd
31.20
All Others
42.70
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: March 4, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the
Orders
IV. History of the
Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy
2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail
3. Nature of the Subsidies
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
Footnotes
1.
See Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod from India and the People's Republic of China Countervailing
Duty Orders, 85 FR 19927 (April 9, 2020) (
India Order
and
China Order; collectively,
Orders).
3.
See
Domestic Interest Party's Letters, “Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod from India—Petitioner's Notice of Intent to Participate,” dated November 19, 2024 (Intent to Participate—India); and “Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China—Petitioner's Notice of Intent to Participate,” dated November 19, 2024 (Intent to Participate—China).
5.
See
Domestic Interested Party's Letters, “First Five-Year (“Sunset”) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod from India—Petitioner's Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,” dated December 2, 2024 (Substantive Response—India);
see also
“First Five-Year (“Sunset”) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China—Petitioner's Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,” dated December 2, 2024 (Substantive Response—China).
7.
See
Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expediated First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod from India and the People's Republic of China,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.
90 FR 11708
Web Citation
Suggested Web Citation
Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.
“Carbon and Alloy Steel Threaded Rod From India and the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Orders,” thefederalregister.org (March 11, 2025), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2025-03825/carbon-and-alloy-steel-threaded-rod-from-india-and-the-people-s-republic-of-china-final-results-of-the-expedited-first-s.