Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders with Feb...
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders with February anniversary dates. In accordance with Commerce's regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews.
DATES:
Applicable March 31, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce has received timely requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of various AD and CVD orders with February anniversary dates. All deadlines for the submission of various types of information, certifications, comments, or actions by Commerce discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting time.
Respondent Selection
In the event that Commerce limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, Commerce intends to select respondents based either on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the period of review (POR) or questionnaires in which we request the quantity and value (Q&V) of sales, shipments, or exports during the POR. Where Commerce selects respondents based on CBP data, we intend to place the CBP data on the record within five days of publication of the initiation notice. Where Commerce selects respondents based on Q&V data, Commerce intends to place the Q&V questionnaire on the record of the review within five days of publication of the initiation notice. In either case, we intend to make our respondent selection decision within 35 days of the
Federal Register
publication of the initiation notice. Comments regarding the CBP data (and/or Q&V data (where applicable)) and respondent selection should be submitted within seven days after the placement of the CBP data/submission of the Q&V data on the record of the review. Parties wishing to submit rebuttal comments should submit those comments within five days after the deadline for the initial comments.
In the event that Commerce decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the following guidelines regarding collapsing of companies for purposes of respondent selection will apply. In general, Commerce has found that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be “collapsed” (
e.g.,
treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating AD rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of the review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of the AD proceeding (
e.g.,
investigation, administrative review, new shipper review, or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to the review, if Commerce determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, Commerce will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection.
Parties are requested to: (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Q&V questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general, each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of the proceeding where Commerce considered collapsing that entity, complete Q&V data for that collapsed entity must be submitted.
Notice of No Sales
With respect to AD administrative reviews, we intend to rescind the review where there are no suspended entries for a company or entity under review and/or where there are no suspended entries under the company-specific case number for that company or entity. Where there may be suspended entries, if a producer or exporter named in this notice of initiation had no exports, sales, or entries during the POR, it may notify Commerce of this fact within 30 days of publication of this initiation notice in the
Federal Register
for Commerce to consider how to treat suspended entries under that producer's or exporter's company-specific case number.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that Commerce may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. Determinations by Commerce to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis.
Deadline for Particular Market Situation Allegation
Section 504 of the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act by adding the concept of a particular market situation (PMS) for purposes of constructed value under section 773(e)
( printed page 15952)
of the Act.[1]
Section 773(e) of the Act states that “if a particular market situation exists such that the cost of materials and fabrication or other processing of any kind does not accurately reflect the cost of production in the ordinary course of trade, the administering authority may use another calculation methodology under this subtitle or any other calculation methodology.” When an interested party submits a PMS allegation pursuant to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce will respond to such a submission consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v). If Commerce finds that a PMS exists under section 773(e) of the Act, then it will modify its dumping calculations appropriately.
Neither section 773(e) of the Act nor 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v) set a deadline for the submission of PMS allegations and supporting factual information. However, in order to administer section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce must receive PMS allegations and supporting factual information with enough time to consider the submission. Thus, should an interested party wish to submit a PMS allegation and supporting new factual information pursuant to section 773(e) of the Act, it must do so no later than 20 days after submission of initial responses to section D of the questionnaire.
Separate Rates
In proceedings involving non-market economy (NME) countries, Commerce begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies within the country are subject to government control and, thus, should be assigned a single AD deposit rate. It is Commerce's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to an administrative review in an NME country this single rate unless an exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent so as to be entitled to a separate rate.
To establish whether a firm is sufficiently independent from government control of its export activities to be entitled to a separate rate, Commerce analyzes each entity exporting the subject merchandise. In accordance with the separate rates criteria, Commerce assigns separate rates to companies in NME cases only if respondents can demonstrate the absence of both
de jure
and
de facto
government control over export activities.
All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a Separate Rate Application or Certification, as described below. In addition, all firms that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews of AD orders in which a Q&V questionnaire is issued must complete, as appropriate, either a Separate Rate Application or Certification, and respond to the Q&V questionnaire.
For these administrative reviews, in order to demonstrate separate rate eligibility, Commerce requires entities for whom a review was requested, that were assigned a separate rate in the most recent segment of this proceeding in which they participated, to certify that they continue to meet the criteria for obtaining a separate rate. The Separate Rate Certification form will be available on Commerce's website at
https://access.trade.gov/Resources/nme/nme-sep-rate.html
on the date of publication of this
Federal Register
notice. In responding to the certification, please follow the “Instructions for Filing the Certification” in the Separate Rate Certification. Separate Rate Certifications are due to Commerce no later than 14 calendar days after publication of this
Federal Register
notice. In addition to filing a Separate Rate Certification with Commerce no later than 14 calendar days after publication of this
Federal Register
notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Separate Rate Certification applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers who purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States.
Entities that currently do not have a separate rate from a completed segment of the proceeding [2]
should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. In addition, companies that received a separate rate in a completed segment of the proceeding that have subsequently made changes, including, but not limited to, changes to corporate structure, acquisitions of new companies or facilities, or changes to their official company name,3
should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. The Separate Rate Application will be available on Commerce's website at
https://access.trade.gov/Resources/nme/nme-sep-rate.html
on the date of publication of this
Federal Register
notice. In responding to the Separate Rate Application, refer to the instructions contained in the application. Separate Rate Applications are due to Commerce no later than 14 calendar days after publication of this
Federal Register
notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Separate Rate Application applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers that purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States.
Exporters and producers must file a timely Separate Rate Application or Certification if they want to be considered for individual examination. Furthermore, exporters and producers who submit a Separate Rate Application or Certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory respondents will no longer be eligible for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents.
Certification Eligibility
Commerce may establish a certification process for companies whose exports to the United States could contain both subject and non-subject merchandise. Companies under review that were deemed to not be eligible to participate in the certification program of that proceeding may submit a Certification Eligibility Application to establish that they maintain the necessary systems to track their sales to the United States of subject and non-subject goods.
All firms listed below that are not currently eligible to certify but wish to establish certification eligibility are required to submit a Certification Eligibility Application. The Certification Eligibility Application will be available on Commerce's website at
https://access.trade.gov/Resources/Certification-Eligibility-Application.pdf.
Certification Eligibility Applications must be filed according to Commerce's regulations and are due to Commerce no later than 30 calendar days after the publication of the
Federal Register
notice.
Exporters and producers that are not currently eligible to certify, who submit a Certification Eligibility Application, and are subsequently selected as
( printed page 15953)
mandatory respondents must respond to all parts of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents for Commerce to consider their Certification Eligibility Application.
Initiation of Reviews
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating administrative reviews of the following AD and CVD orders and findings. We intend to issue the final results of these reviews not later than February 28, 2027.
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet, A-570-073
2/1/25-1/31/26
Yantai Jintai International Trade Co., Ltd.
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products, A-570-010
2/1/25-1/31/26
Anji Dasol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd.
Canadian Solar International Limited
Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc.
Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc.
Changzhou Trina Hezhong Photoelectric Co., Ltd.
Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.
Chint Energy (Haining) Co., Ltd.; Chint Solar (Hong Kong) Company Limited; Chint Solar (Jiuquan) Co., Ltd.
Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; Chint New Energy Technology (Haining) Co. Ltd.
CSI Cells Co., Ltd.
CSI Solar Power (China) Inc.
CSI-GCL Solar Manufacturing (Yancheng) Co., Ltd.
De-Tech Trading Limited HK
Hefei JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co. Ltd.
Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
JA Solar Co., Ltd.
JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd.
( printed page 15969)
Jiangsu Jinko Tiansheng Solar Co., Ltd.
Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd.
JingAo Solar Co., Ltd.
Jinko Solar Co. Ltd.
Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd.
Jinko Solar International Limited
JinkoSolar Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd.
Jiujiang Shengchao Xinye Technology Co., Ltd.
Jiujiang Shengzhao Xinye Trade Co., Ltd.
Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd.
Longi (HK) Trading Ltd.
Longi Solar Technology Co. Ltd.; Lerri Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd.
Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.
Perlight Solar Co., Ltd.
Renesola Jiangsu Ltd.
ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd.
Risen (Luoyang) New Energy Co., Ltd.
Risen (Wuhai) New Energy Co., Ltd.
Risen Energy Co. Ltd.; Risen Energy (Changzhou) Co., Ltd.
Ruichang Branch, Risen Energy (HongKong) Co., Ltd.
Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd
Shenzen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd.; Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited
Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd.
Sunny Apex Development Ltd.
Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd.
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
Trina Solar (Hefei) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
Raoping HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. (d.b.a. Chen Chui Global Corp.)
Sanming Lintong Trading Co., Ltd.
( printed page 15972)
Shandong Miting Household Co., Ltd.
Shaxian Hengtong Wood Industry Co., Ltd
Shaxian Shiyiwood, Ltd
Shenzhen Xinjintai Industrial Co., Ltd.
Shuyang Kevin International Co., Ltd
Suqian Sulu Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd.
Wuxi Boda Bamboo & Wood Industrial Co., Ltd.
Zhangzhou Wangjiamei Industry & Trade Co., Ltd.
Zhangzhou Yihong Industrial Co., Ltd.
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether Or Not Assembled Into Modules 35
C-570-980 1/1/24-12/31/24
Hanwha Corporation
Hanwha Q CELLS Corporation
Hanwha Q CELLS Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
Hanwha Solutions Corporation
Longi Technology SDN
Suspension Agreements
None.
( printed page 15973)
Duty Absorption Reviews
During any administrative review covering all or part of a period falling between the first and second or third and fourth anniversary of the publication of an AD order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a determination under 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or suspended investigation (after sunset review), Commerce, if requested by a domestic interested party within 30 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the review, will determine whether antidumping duties have been absorbed by an exporter or producer subject to the review if the subject merchandise is sold in the United States through an importer that is affiliated with such exporter or producer. The request must include the name(s) of the exporter or producer for which the inquiry is requested.
Gap Period Liquidation
For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant “gap” period of the order (
i.e.,
the period following the expiry of provisional measures and before definitive measures were put into place), if such a gap period is applicable to the POR.
Administrative Protective Orders and Letters of Appearance
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with the procedures outlined in Commerce's regulations at 19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures apply to administrative reviews
( printed page 15974)
included in this notice of initiation. Parties wishing to participate in any of these administrative reviews should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (
e.g.,
the filing of separate letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)).
Factual Information Requirements
Commerce's regulations identify five categories of factual information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are summarized as follows: (i) evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other than factual information described in (i)-(iv). These regulations require any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also provide specific time limits for such factual submissions based on the type of factual information being submitted. Please review the
Final Rule,[36]
available at
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2013-07-17/pdf/2013-17045.pdf,
prior to submitting factual information in this segment. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).37
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information using the formats provided at the end of the
Final Rule.[38]
Commerce intends to reject factual submissions in any proceeding segments if the submitting party does not comply with applicable certification requirements.
Extension of Time Limits Regulation
Parties may request an extension of time limits before a time limit established under Part 351 expires, or as otherwise specified by Commerce.[39]
In general, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after the time limit established under Part 351 expires. For submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) case and rebuttal briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments concerning the selection of a surrogate country and surrogate values and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning CBP data; and (5) Q&V questionnaires. Under certain circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, Commerce will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. This policy also requires that an extension request must be made in a separate, standalone submission, and clarifies the circumstances under which Commerce will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension of time limits. Please review the
Final Rule,
available at
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm,
prior to submitting factual information in these segments.
2.
Such entities include entities that have not participated in the proceeding, entities that were preliminarily granted a separate rate in any currently incomplete segment of the proceeding (
e.g.,
an ongoing administrative review, new shipper review,
etc.) and entities that lost their separate rate in the most recently completed segment of the proceeding in which they participated.
3.
Only changes to the official company name, rather than trade names, need to be addressed via a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding new trade names may be submitted via a Separate Rate Certification.
4.
On 12/15/2016, the Department found that Avanti Frozen Foods Private Limited is the successor-in-interest to Avanti Feeds Limited. Consequently, effective 12/15/2016, all entries for Avanti Feeds Limited should have been made under the case number for Avanti Frozen Foods Private Limited.
5.
On March 11, 2024, Commerce determined that Elque Ventures Private Limited is the successor-in interest to Elque & Co. Therefore, the results of this review will be applicable to the Elque Group comprised of the companies listed above.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review,89 FR 17386 (March 11, 2024).
6.
Shrimp produced and exported by Devi Sea Foods Limited (Devi) was excluded from the order effective February 1, 2009.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, and Notice of Revocation of Order in Part,75 FR 41813, 41814 (July 19, 2010). Accordingly, we are initiating this administrative review with respect to Devi only for shrimp produced in India where Devi acted as either the manufacturer or exporter (but not both).
7.
On December 23, 2022, Commerce determined that Kader Exports Private Limited is the successor in-interest to the Liberty Group, which is comprised of Devi Marine Food Exports Private Ltd.; Kader Exports Private Limited; Kader Investment and Trading Company Private Limited; Liberty Frozen Foods Private Limited; Liberty Oil Mills Limited; Premier Marine Products Private Limited; and Universal Cold Storage Private Limited.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review,87 FR 78941 (December 23, 2022).
8.
Where interested parties requested review of a company name with a doing-business-as name (DBA), Commerce treated the company names and DBA names separately for review initiation purposes.
9.
Interested parties requested a review of Camau Frozen Seafood Processing Import Export Corporation, but Commerce has previously determined that Camimex Group Joint Stock Company is the successor-in-interest to Camau Frozen Seafood Processing Import Export Corporation, so has only listed Camimex Group Joint Stock Company in this notice.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review,86 FR 47617 (August 26, 2021).
10.
Shrimp produced and exported by Minh Phat Seafood Company Limited were excluded from the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Vietnam, effective July 18, 2016.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order,81 FR 47756, 47757-47758 (July 22, 2016). Accordingly, we are initiating this administrative review for this exporter only with respect to subject merchandise produced by another entity.
11.
Shrimp produced and exported by Minh Phu Hau Giang Seafood aka Minh Phu Hau Giang Seafood Corporation aka Minh Phu Hau Giang Seafood Processing were excluded from the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Vietnam, effective July 18, 2016.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order,81 FR 47756, 47757-47758 (July 22, 2016). Accordingly, we are initiating this administrative review for this exporter only with respect to subject merchandise produced by another entity.
12.
Shrimp produced and exported by Minh Phu Seafood Corporation were excluded from the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Vietnam, effective July 18, 2016.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order,81 FR 47756, 47757-47758 (July 22, 2016). Accordingly, we are initiating this administrative review for this exporter only with respect to subject merchandise produced by another entity.
13.
Shrimp produced and exported by Minh Qui Seafood Co., Ltd. were excluded from the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Vietnam, effective July 18, 2016.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order,81 FR 47756, 47757-47758 (July 22, 2016). Accordingly, we are initiating this administrative review for this exporter only with respect to subject merchandise produced by another entity.
14.
Interested parties requested a review of these companies separately, but Commerce has listed them together here because it previously determined that these entities are affiliated within the meaning of section 771(33) of the Act and comprise a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f).
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results, Partial Rescission, and Request for Revocation, In Part, of the Fifth Administrative Review,76 FR 12054, 12056 (March 4, 2011), unchanged in
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,76 FR 56158 (September 12, 2011).
15.
Interested parties requested a review of FIMEX VN and Sao Ta Seafood Factory separately, but Commerce has listed them together here because it previously determined that these two entities are affiliated within the meaning of section 771(33) of the Act and comprise a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f).
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2017-2018,84 FR 44859 (August 27, 2019).
16.
Interested parties requested a review of Thong Thuan Company Limited and Thong Thuan Cam Ranh Seafood Joint Stock Company separately, but Commerce has listed them together here because it previously determined that these two entities are affiliated within the meaning of section 771(33) of the Act and comprise a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f).
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of and Final Rescission of Review, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024,91 FR 8429 (February 23, 2026).
17.
In past reviews, Commerce has treated these companies as a single entity.
See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2006-2007,73 FR 50933 (August 29, 2008) (
2006-2007 AR Final). Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these companies as a single entity for the purpose of this administrative review.
18.
Certain frozen warmwater shrimp produced and exported by Chanthaburi Frozen Food Co., Ltd. (Chanthaburi Frozen) were excluded from the order effective January 16, 2009.
See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in United States-Antidumping Measure on Shrimp from Thailand: Notice of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order on Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand,74 FR 5638 (January 30, 2009) (
Section 129 Determination). This exclusion is not applicable to merchandise exported to the United States by Chanthaburi Frozen in any other producer/exporter combination or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter
combination. Accordingly, this initiation covers merchandise: (1) produced by a third party and exported by Chanthaburi Frozen; (2) produced by Chanthaburi Frozen and exported by a third party; or (3) exported by a third party that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination.
19.
Certain frozen warmwater shrimp produced and exported by Chanthaburi Seafoods Co., Ltd. (Chanthaburi Seafoods) were excluded from the order effective January 16, 2009.
See Section 129 Determination.
This exclusion is not applicable to merchandise exported to the United States by Chanthaburi Seafoods in any other producer/exporter combination or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination. Accordingly, this initiation covers merchandise: (1) produced by a third party and exported by Chanthaburi Seafoods; (2) produced by Chanthaburi Seafoods and exported by a third party; or (3) exported by a third party that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination.
20.
In past reviews, Commerce has treated these companies as a single entity.
See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016,82 FR 30836 (
2015-2016 AR Final). Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these companies as a single entity for the purpose of this administrative review.
21.
In past reviews, Commerce has treated these companies as a single entity.
See, e.g., 2006-2007 AR Final.
Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these companies as a single entity for the purpose of this administrative review.
22.
Certain frozen warmwater shrimp produced and exported by Marine Gold Products Ltd. (Marine Gold) were excluded from the order effective February 1, 2012.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, and Revocation of the Order (in Part); 2011-2012,78 FR 42497 (July 16, 2013). This exclusion is not applicable to merchandise exported to the United States by Marine Gold in any other producer/exporter combination or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination. Accordingly, this initiation covers merchandise: (1) produced by a third party and exported by Marine Gold; (2) produced by Marine Gold and exported by a third party; or (3) exported by a third party that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination.
23.
In past reviews, Commerce has treated these companies as a single entity.
See, e.g., 2015-2016 AR Final.
Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these companies as a single entity for the purpose of this administrative review.
24.
Certain frozen warmwater shrimp produced and exported by Phatthana Frozen Food Co., Ltd. (Phatthana Frozen) were excluded from the order effective January 16, 2009.
See Certain Frozen Warm Water Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Notice of Revocation in Part,74 FR 52452 (October 13, 2009) (
CCR Final and Partial Revocation). This exclusion is not applicable to merchandise exported to the United States by Phatthana Frozen in any other producer/exporter combination or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination. Accordingly, this initiation covers merchandise: (1) produced by a third party and exported by Phatthana Frozen; (2) produced by Phatthana Frozen and exported by a third party; or (3) exported by a third party that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination.
25.
Certain frozen warmwater shrimp produced and exported by Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd. (Phatthana Seafood) were excluded from the order effective January 16, 2009.
See Section 129 Determination.
This exclusion is not applicable to merchandise exported to the United States by Phatthana Seafood in any other producer/exporter combination or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination. Accordingly, this initiation covers merchandise: (1) produced by a third party and exported by Phatthana Seafood; (2) produced by Phatthana Seafood and exported by a third party; or (3) exported by a third party that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination.
26.
Certain frozen warmwater shrimp produced and exported by Sea Wealth Frozen Food Co., Ltd. (Sea Wealth) were excluded from the order effective January 16, 2009.
See CCR Final and Partial Revocation.
This exclusion is not applicable to merchandise exported to the United States by Sea Wealth in any other producer/exporter combination or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination. Accordingly, this initiation covers merchandise: (1) produced by a third party and exported by Sea Wealth; (2) produced by Sea Wealth and exported by a third party; or (3) exported by a third party that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination.
27.
In past reviews, Commerce has treated these companies as a single entity.
See, e.g., 2015-2016 AR Final.
Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these companies as a single entity for the purpose of this administrative review.
28.
In past reviews, Commerce has treated these companies as a single entity.
See, e.g., 2015-2016 AR Final.
Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these companies as a single entity for the purpose of this administrative review.
29.
Certain frozen warmwater shrimp produced and exported by Thai I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd. (Thai I-Mei) were excluded from the order effective January 16, 2009.
See Section 129 Determination.
This exclusion is not applicable to merchandise exported to the United States by Thai I-Mei in any other producer/exporter combination or by third parties that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination. Accordingly, this initiation covers merchandise: (1) produced by a third party and exported by Thai I-Mei; (2) produced by Thai I-Mei and exported by a third party; or (3) exported by a third party that sourced subject merchandise from the excluded producer/exporter combination.
30.
In past reviews, Commerce has treated these companies as a single entity.
See, e.g., 2015-2016 AR Final.
Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these companies as a single entity for the purpose of this administrative review.
31.
In past reviews, Commerce has treated these companies as a single entity.
See, e.g., 2015-2016 AR Final.
Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these companies as a single entity for the purpose of this administrative review.
32.
In past reviews, Commerce has found these companies to be cross-owned.
See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021,88 FR 62319 (September 11, 2023); and
Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022,89 FR 68858 (August 28, 2024). Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these entities as cross-owned for the purpose of this administrative review.
33.
In past reviews, Commerce has found these companies to be cross-owned.
See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021,88 FR 62319 (September 11, 2023); and
Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022,89 FR 68858 (August 28, 2024). Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these entities as cross-owned for the purpose of this administrative review.
34.
In past reviews, Commerce has found these companies to be cross-owned.
See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023,91 FR 8408 (February 23, 2026). Absent information to the contrary, we intend to continue to treat these entities as cross-owned for the purpose of this administrative review.
35.
In the initiation notices published on February 20, 2026 (91 FR 8186) and March 9, 2026 (91 FR 11274), Commerce inadvertently did not include the companies listed above. This notice serves as a correction.
37.
See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings; Final Rule,88 FR 67069 (September 29, 2023).