SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

On September 10, 2025, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted an application to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 3, for a determination that adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are reasonably available for certain waters of Northern Neck peninsula, so that Virginia may completely prohibit the discharge from all vessels of any sewage, whether treated or not, into such waters. This application for a no-discharge zone was made pursuant to Clean Water Act section 312(f)(3).

The proposed no-discharge zone encompasses various waterbodies in the rural watersheds of Virginia's Coastal Plain, specifically on the Northern Neck peninsula, in the counties of Richmond, Lancaster, Northumberland, and Westmoreland. Virginia's application includes maps that depict the waterbodies included in the proposed no-discharge zone, as well as tables that specify the geographic coordinates of the zone's boundaries. In its application, Virginia certified that the protection and enhancement of the quality of these waters require greater environmental protection than is afforded by the applicable Federal standard. This certification was based on a need to protect extensive shellfish harvest and aquaculture acreage from bacterial impairment and to preserve water ( printed page 24864) quality for recreational activities, such as boating, fishing, and swimming. Virginia also provided information on the vessel population and usage of these waters and identified the pumpout facilities available to service these vessels. Virginia's application is available electronically in Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OW-2025-2004 through https://www.regulations.gov.

II. Response to Public Comments

On December 8, 2025 (90 FR 56748), the EPA published a tentative affirmative determination in the Federal Register that adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are reasonably available for the waters subject to Virginia's proposed no-discharge zone and solicited the public's input during a 30-day comment period.

The EPA received two comments on the tentative affirmative determination. One commenter wrote in support of the designation. The other commenter expressed concern that obtaining data for this area is difficult due to the construction of offshore wind turbines in the Virginia Beach area. The EPA disagrees. Virginia's application included the necessary data and information to demonstrate the adequacy and availability of pumpout facilities to potentially affected vessels in the Northern Neck peninsula. Other matters discussed in this comment are outside the scope of the EPA's responsibility to determine whether adequate facilities are reasonably available for the removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels to which the no-discharge zone would apply.

III. Adequacy and Availability of Pumpout Facilities

In the tentative determination, the EPA outlined the Agency's role in evaluating Virginia's application for a vessel sewage no-discharge zone under Clean Water Act section 312(f)(3), which requires that the Agency determine whether adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are reasonably available for the waters proposed for a no-discharge zone designation.

As set forth in the tentative determination, based on the information provided by Virginia and the EPA's subsequent review, there are an estimated 3,105 recreational and transient vessels and 50 commercial vessels operating within the waters of the Northern Neck that are expected to require pumpout services. These vessels may be serviced by 24 publicly accessible sewage pumpout facilities, as well as one private facility. Information about these facilities is provided in Table 1 ^[1] of this document. During peak usage, such as a holiday weekend, the EPA estimates that 1,292 vessels are expected to require access to pumpout facilities, and up to 1,456 vessels may be served by available pumpout facilities. This estimate is based on the number of vessels that can be serviced per hour by each available facility and the hours of operation of each facility. As such, the EPA determined that adequate pumpout facilities are reasonably available to meet the expected demand during peak usage. Additionally, the EPA finds that the cost for recreational vessels to access these facilities is minimal, with most publicly accessible facilities (19 of the 24 facilities) charging 10 dollars or less per pump out.

Because commercial vessels incur additional types of costs associated with accessing pumpout facilities that recreational vessels do not, the EPA compared the volume of sewage produced by commercial vessels with the volume that can be received by available pumpout facilities and considered the costs associated with accessing and using those facilities. As described in the tentative affirmative determination, the EPA's screening analysis showed that demand for pumpout services is never expected to exceed capacity in the waters proposed for designation, indicating that sufficient pumpout capacity is available for commercial vessels. Because capacity significantly exceeds demand, the EPA expects that this capacity surplus would be sufficient when both recreational and commercial vessels access the facilities during peak usage. The EPA also considered the various costs incurred by commercial vessels to determine how the proposed no-discharge zone would impact baseline operating costs. The EPA estimates that the increase in baseline operating costs would be 0.2 percent for working vessels ( e.g., tugboats), 1.8 percent for commercial fishing vessels, 2.3 percent for excursion vessels, and 1.3 percent for offshore vessels. This increase is largely attributable to lost revenue due to the time it takes to pump out sewage from a vessel; therefore, savings may be achieved if vessel operators are able to time pumpout activities to minimize cost impacts. The EPA also used conservative values in estimating the increase in costs, as such, the true percent increases are likely to be lower.

Finally, the EPA verified that the treatment of waste from pumpout facilities is in conformance with Federal law. As discussed in the EPA's tentative affirmative determination, seven wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) receive sewage from the available pumpout facilities. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality reviews and issues Virginia Pollutant Elimination Discharge System permits to the WWTPs to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. While two of the facilities (Reedville WWTP and Town of Colonial Beach WWTP) had permit violations within the last five years, Virginia confirmed that Reedville WWTP is currently in compliance with a consent order intended to bring the facility into compliance. For the Town of Colonial Beach WWTP, the EPA determined that, upon implementation of appropriate corrective actions, the facility could be operated consistent with Federal, State, and local requirements. Based on a review of design capacities and average actual flows, the EPA does not expect that any of the WWTPs would exceed capacity due to increased volumes that may result from establishment of a no-discharge zone.

IV. Determination

Based on the EPA's review of both the information provided in Virginia's application and the comments received on the EPA's tentative determination, the EPA Region 3 hereby makes a final determination that adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are available for the waters of the Northern Neck peninsula, including waters in Richmond, Lancaster, Northumberland, and Westmoreland Counties. ( printed page 24865)

91 FR 24863