Securities and Exchange Commission
- [Release No. 34-105376; File No. SR-SAPPHIRE-2026-19]
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act” or “Exchange Act”) [1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] notice is hereby given that on April 29, 2026, MIAX Sapphire, LLC (“MIAX Sapphire” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) a proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to (1) amend Exchange Rule 2040 to permit Floor Brokers [3] to execute Customer Cross Orders,[4] Complex Customer Cross Orders,[5] Qualified Contingent Cross Orders,[6] and Complex Qualified Contingent Cross Orders [7] (collectively, the “Crossing Orders”) on the Trading Floor [8] immediately without announcement to the trading crowd provided that certain requirements are met; (2) amend Exchange Rule 2040(a)(4) to remove the reference to paragraph “(a)” of Exchange Rule 518 to broaden the rule cross-reference; and (3) add an explicit reference and description of the behavior of a QFO with an ISO designation (described below) to the Exchange's Rulebook to provide additional detail and clarity regarding trading on the Exchange's Trading Floor.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/all-options-exchanges/rule-filings, and at MIAX Sapphire's principal office.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to (1) amend Exchange Rule 2040 to permit Floor Brokers to execute Crossing Orders on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd provided that certain requirements are met; (2) amend Exchange Rule 2040(a)(4) to remove the reference to paragraph “(a)” of Exchange Rule 518 to broaden the rule cross-reference; and (3) add an explicit reference and description of the behavior of a QFO with an ISO designation to the Exchange's Rulebook to provide additional detail and clarity regarding trading on the Exchange's Trading Floor.
Background
Electronic Market
The MIAX Sapphire Exchange operates both an electronic market and a physical Trading Floor. The electronic market supports both a Simple Order ( printed page 25414) Book [9] and a Strategy Book.[10] The order types available to Members [11] on the electronic market for the Simple Order Book are described in Exchange Rule 516, Order Types. Specifically included in Rule 516 is a description of a Customer Cross Order [12] and a Qualified Contingent Cross Order.[13] The order types available to Members on the electronic market for the Strategy Book are described in Rule 518, Complex Orders. Specifically included in Rule 518(b) is a description of a Complex Customer Cross Order (“cC2C”) [14] and a Complex Qualified Contingent Cross Order (“cQCC”).[15]
Customer Cross Orders
The trading of Customer Cross Orders is governed by Exchange Rule 515(g)(1). Specifically, Rule 515(g)(1) provides that, “Customer Cross Orders, as defined in Rule 516(i), are automatically executed upon entry provided that the execution (i) is at or between the best bid and offer on the Exchange; (ii) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; and (iii) will not trade at a price inferior to the NBBO.” [16] Further, the rule provides, “[i]f trading interest exists on the Exchange's Simple Order Book that is subject to the Managed Interest Process pursuant to Rule 515(d)(2) when the Exchange receives a Customer Cross Order, the System will reject the Customer Cross Order. Customer Cross Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed. Rule 520, Interpretation and Policy .01 applies to the entry and execution of Customer Cross Orders.” [17]
Complex Customer Cross Orders
The trading of Complex Customer Cross Orders is governed by Rule 515(g)(3). Rule 515(g)(3) provides that, “cC2C Orders, as defined in Rule 518(b)(3), are automatically executed upon entry provided that (A) a cC2C Order with a conforming ratio [18] will be executed in accordance with Rule 518(c)(1)(iv) and will improve the best price available on the Strategy Book; and (B) a cC2C Order with a non-conforming ratio [19] will be executed in accordance with Rule 518(c)(1)(v) and will improve the best price available on the Strategy Book.” [20] Rule 515(g)(3)(i) provides that, “cC2C Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” [21] Additionally, Rule 515(g)(3)(ii) provides that, “cC2C Orders may only be entered in minimum trading increments of $0.01.” [22] Rule 515(g)(3)(iii) provides that, “Rule 520, Interpretation and Policy .01, applies to the entry and execution of cC2C Orders.” [23] Finally, Rule 515(g)(3)(iv) provides that, “[t]he Exchange will determine, on a class-by-class basis, the option classes in which cC2C Orders are available for trading on the Exchange, and will announce such classes to Members via Regulatory Circular.” [24]
Qualified Contingent Cross Orders
The trading of Qualified Contingent Cross Orders is governed by Rule 515(g)(2). Rule 515(g)(2) provides that, “Qualified Contingent Cross Orders, as defined in Rule 516(j), are automatically executed upon entry provided that the execution (i) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; and (ii) is at or between the NBBO.” [25] Further, the rule provides, “[i]f trading interest exists on the Exchange's Simple Order Book that is subject to the Managed Interest Process pursuant to Rule 515(d)(2) when the Exchange receives a Qualified Contingent Cross Order, the System will reject the Qualified Contingent Cross Order. Qualified Contingent Cross Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” [26]
Complex Qualified Contingent Cross Orders
The trading of Complex Qualified Contingent Cross Orders is governed by Rule 515(g)(4). Rule 515(g)(4) provides that, “cQCC Orders, as defined in Rule 518(b)(4), are automatically executed upon entry provided that, with respect to each option leg of the cQCC Order, the execution (i) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; and (ii) is at or between the NBBO.” [27] Rule 515(g)(4)(i) provides that, “cQCC Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” [28] Additionally, Rule 515(g)(4)(ii) provides that, “cQCC Orders may only be entered in the minimum trading increments applicable to complex orders under Rule 518(c)(1)(i) or 518(c)(1)(ii) if the cQCC includes the stock component upon entry.” [29] Rule 515(g)(4)(iii) provides that, “[t]he Exchange will determine, on a class-by-class basis, the option classes in which cQCC Orders are available for trading on the Exchange, and will announce such classes to Members via Regulatory Circular.” [30] Additionally, Rule 515(g)(4)(iv) provides that, “[a] cQCC Order may be entered with or without the stock component. A cQCC Order entered without the stock component will be treated as a complex strategy with only option components. A cQCC Order entered with the stock component shall be subject to Rule 518.01. A Member that submits a cQCC Order to the Exchange (with or without the stock component) represents that such order satisfies the requirements of a qualified contingent trade (as described in Interpretations and Policies .01 of Rule 516) and agrees to provide information to the Exchange related to the execution of the stock component as determined by the Exchange and communicated via Regulatory Circular.” [31] Rule 515(g)(4)(v) provides that, “[a] cQCC Order with a conforming ratio will be executed in accordance with Rule 518(c)(1)(iv).” Finally, Rule 515(g)(4)(vi) provides that, “[a] cQCC Order with a non-conforming ratio will be executed in accordance with Rule 518(c)(1)(v).” [32] In sum, the Crossing Orders described above are ( printed page 25415) automatically executed upon entry provided that each specific crossing order satisfies the requirements unique to that type of crossing order as described.
Trading Floor
The Exchange operates a physical Trading Floor located in Miami, Florida. Only Qualified Floor Orders (“QFOs”) may be transacted on the Trading Floor.[33] QFOs may also be complex orders as defined in Rule 518(a) with no more than the applicable number of legs, as determined by the Exchange and communicated to Participants via Regulatory Circular.[34] Additionally, Rule 2040(b) provides that all QFOs must be announced to the trading crowd, as provided in Rule 2030(e)(2), prior to the QFO being submitted to the Exchange's System to facilitate post-trade workflows.
Proposal
The Exchange now proposes to amend Rule 2040(a)(4) to remove the reference to paragraph (a) of Rule 518. Paragraph (a) of Rule 518 provides a generic definition of what a “complex order” is on the Exchange.[35] Exchange Rule 518(b), however, provides a list of specific types of complex orders including Complex Customer Cross Order [36] and Complex Qualified Contingent Cross Order.[37] The Exchange proposes to remove the reference to paragraph (a) so that it is not mistakenly interpreted as excluding the complex order types enumerated in paragraph (b).
Crossing Orders
The Exchange also proposes to amend Exchange Rule 2040 to permit Floor Brokers to execute the Crossing Orders (as identified in this proposal) on the Trading Floor immediately, without being announced to the trading crowd as required by Rule 2040(b), provided that the requirements that allow each of the Crossing Orders to be executed immediately on the electronic market are similarly satisfied on the Trading Floor.
Customer Cross Orders
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to adopt Interpretation and Policy .11 to Exchange Rule 2040 related to Customer Cross Orders. The Exchange proposes to adopt rule text to provide that, “[n]otwithstanding Exchange Rule 2040(b), Customer Cross Orders, as defined in Exchange Rule 516(i), may be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd provided that the execution (i) is at or between the best bid and offer on the Exchange; (ii) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; (iii) will not trade at a price inferior to the NBBO; and (iv) no trading interest exists on the Exchange's Simple Order Book that is subject to the Managed Interest Process pursuant to Rule 515(d)(2). Rule 520, Interpretation and Policy .01 applies to Floor Broker execution of Customer Cross Orders.” The requirements that a Floor Broker must satisfy to immediately execute Customer Cross Orders on the Trading Floor are identical to those required in the electronic market pursuant to Exchange Rule 515(g)(1),[38] with one minor exception that is not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the separate and distinct execution processes that exist between the electronic market and the Trading Floor. Specifically, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the provision in Exchange Rule 515(g)(1) that states, “Customer Cross Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” In the electronic market, Electronic Exchange Members [39] will submit a Customer Cross Order directly into the System for execution, and if an order fails to satisfy the requirements of Exchange Rule 515(g)(1), the System will automatically cancel the order. By contrast, a Customer Cross Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor prior to the order being submitted into the System for post-trade validation. If an order fails the post-trade validation, the order will be invalidated and returned to the Floor Broker. The processes are substantively similar in that they both ensure that all the requirements necessary to immediately execute a Customer Cross Order are satisfied. Therefore, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the automatic cancellation provision in proposed Interpretation and Policy .11 to Exchange Rule 2040 as a similar mechanism already exists on the Trading Floor. Additionally, the Exchange notes that at least one other options exchange with a trading floor has a rule substantially similar to proposed Interpretation and Policy .11 to Exchange Rule 2040, that requires that the execution (i) be at or between the best bid and offer on the Exchange; (ii) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; and (iii) will not trade at a price inferior to the NBBO.[40]
Complex Customer Cross Orders
The Exchange proposes to adopt Interpretation and Policy .12 to Exchange Rule 2040 related to Complex Customer Cross (“cC2C”) Orders. The Exchange proposes to adopt rule text to provide that, “[n]otwithstanding Exchange Rule 2040(b), cC2C Orders, as defined in Exchange Rule 518(b)(3), with a conforming ratio, may be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd provided that the requirements of Rule 518(c)(1)(iv) are satisfied and the cC2C Order improves ( printed page 25416) the best price available on the Exchange's Strategy Book.” The Exchange also proposes to adopt paragraph (a) to Interpretation and Policy .12 to provide that, “cC2C Orders may be executed in minimum trading increments of $0.01.” The Exchange proposes to adopt paragraph (b) to Interpretation and Policy .12 to provide that, “cC2C Orders are only available on the Trading Floor in the option classes announced by the Exchange as provided for in Exchange Rule 515(g)(3)(iv).” The Exchange proposes to adopt paragraph (c) to Interpretation and Policy .12 to provide that, “Rule 520, Interpretation and Policy .01 applies to Floor Broker execution of cC2C Orders.” The requirements that a Floor Broker must satisfy to immediately execute cC2C Orders on the Trading Floor are identical to those required in the electronic market pursuant to Exchange Rule 515(g)(3),[41] with two minor exceptions. The first exception is related to one of the requirements in Rule 515(g)(3) that is not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the separate and distinct execution processes that exist between the electronic market and the Trading Floor. Specifically, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the provision in Exchange Rule 515(g)(3)(i) that states, “cC2C Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” In the electronic market, Electronic Exchange Members will submit a cC2C Order directly into the System for execution, and if an order fails to satisfy the requirements of Exchange Rule 515(g)(3), the System will automatically cancel the order. By contrast, a cC2C Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor, prior to the order being submitted into the System for post-trade validation. If an order fails the post-trade validation, the order will be invalidated and returned to the Floor Broker. The processes are substantively similar in that they both ensure that all the requirements necessary to immediately execute a cC2C Order are satisfied. Therefore, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the automatic cancellation provision in proposed Interpretation and Policy .12 to Exchange Rule 2040 as a similar mechanism already exists on the Trading Floor. The second exception is that only Complex Customer Cross Orders with a conforming ratio would be permitted to be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd, as provided in proposed Interpretation and Policy .12. By contrast, today, two Priority Customer Orders in open outcry pursuant to proposed Exchange Rule 2040(a)(4)may be in either conforming or non-conforming ratios.[42] The Exchange proposes to permit only Complex Customer Cross Orders with a conforming ratio to be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd in order to align its rules to that of another options exchange that provides a trading floor.[43] The Exchange notes that Floor Brokers may continue to cross two Priority Customer Orders in open outcry pursuant to Exchange Rule 2040(a)(4). This would be necessary if a Floor Broker desired to cross two Priority Customer Orders with non-conforming ratios. The Exchange notes that at least one other options exchange with a trading floor has a substantially similar rule that allows for the immediate execution of Complex Customer Cross Orders provided that the order is in a conforming ratio and the order will not trade ahead of a Priority Customer Order on the Simple Order Book without improving the SBBO of at least one option component of the complex strategy.[44]
Qualified Contingent Cross Orders
The Exchange proposes to adopt Interpretation and Policy .13 to Exchange Rule 2040 related to Qualified Contingent Cross Orders. The Exchange proposes to adopt rule text to provide that, “[n]otwithstanding Exchange Rule 2040(b), Qualified Contingent Cross Orders, as defined in Exchange Rule 516(j), may be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd provided that the execution (i) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; (ii) is at or between the NBBO; and (iii) no trading interest exists on the Exchange's Simple Order Book that is subject to the Managed Interest Process pursuant to Rule 515(d)(2).” The requirements that a Floor Broker must satisfy to immediately execute Qualified Contingent Cross Orders on the Trading Floor are identical to those required in the electronic market pursuant to Exchange Rule 515(g)(2) [45] with one minor exception that is not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the separate and distinct execution processes that exist between the electronic market and the Trading Floor. Specifically, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the provision in Exchange Rule 515(g)(2) that states, “Qualified Contingent Cross Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” In the electronic market, Electronic Exchange Members will submit a Qualified Contingent Cross Order directly into the System for execution, and if an order fails to satisfy the requirements of Exchange Rule 515(g)(2), the System will automatically cancel the order. By ( printed page 25417) contrast, a Qualified Continent Cross Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor, prior to the order being submitted into the System for post-trade validation. If an order fails the post-trade validation, the order will be invalidated and returned to the Floor Broker. The processes are substantively similar in that they both ensure that all the requirements necessary to immediately execute a Qualified Contingent Cross Order are satisfied. Therefore, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the automatic cancellation provision in proposed Interpretation and Policy .13 to Exchange Rule 2040 as a similar mechanism already exists on the Trading Floor. Additionally, the Exchange notes at least one other options exchange with a trading floor has a rule substantially similar to proposed Interpretation and Policy .13 to Exchange Rule 2040 that requires that the execution (i) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; and (ii) is at or between the NBBO.[46]
Complex Qualified Contingent Cross Orders
The Exchange proposes to adopt Interpretation and Policy .14 to Exchange Rule 2040 related to Complex Qualified Contingent Cross (“cQCC”) Orders. The Exchange proposes to adopt rule text to provide that, “[n]otwithstanding Exchange Rule 2040(b), cQCC Orders, as defined in Exchange Rule 518(b)(4), may be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd provided that, with respect to each option leg of the cQCC Order, the execution (i) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; and (ii) is at or between the NBBO.” The Exchange proposes to adopt paragraph (a) to Interpretation and Policy .14 to provide that, “cQCC Orders may only be executed in the minimum trading increments applicable to complex orders under Exchange Rule 518(c)(1)(i) or 518(c)(1)(ii) if the cQCC Order includes the stock component upon entry.” The Exchange proposes to adopt paragraph (b) to Interpretation and Policy .14 to provide that, “cQCC Orders are only available on the Trading Floor in the option classes announced by the Exchange as provided for in Exchange Rule 515(g)(4)(iii).” The Exchange proposes to adopt paragraph (c) to Interpretation and Policy .14 to provide that, “a cQCC Order may be executed with or without the stock component. A cQCC Order executed without the stock component will be treated as a complex strategy with only option components. A cQCC Order executed with the stock component shall be subject to Exchange Rule 518, Interpretation and Policy .01(a). A Member that submits a cQCC Order to the Exchange's System (with or without the stock component) represents that such order satisfies the requirements of a qualified contingent trade (as described in Interpretations and Policies .01 of Exchange Rule 516) and agrees to provide information to the Exchange related to the execution of the stock component as determined by the Exchange and communicated via Regulatory Circular.” The Exchange proposes to adopt paragraph (d) to Interpretation and Policy .14 to provide that, “a cQCC Order with a conforming ratio will be executed in accordance with Exchange Rule 518(c)(1)(iv).” The Exchange proposes to adopt paragraph (e) to Interpretation and Policy .14 to provide that, “a cQCC Order with a non-conforming ratio will be executed in accordance with Exchange Rule 518(c)(1)(v).” The requirements that a Floor Broker must satisfy to immediately execute cQCC Orders on the Trading Floor are identical to those required in the electronic market pursuant to Exchange Rule 515(g)(4) [47] with one minor exception that is not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the separate and distinct execution processes that exist between the electronic market and the Trading Floor. Specifically, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the provision in Exchange Rule 515(g)(4) that states, “cQCC Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” In the electronic market, Electronic Exchange Members will submit a cQCC Order directly into the System for execution, and if an order fails to satisfy the requirements of Exchange Rule 515(g)(4), the System will automatically cancel the order. By contrast, a cQCC Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor, prior to the order being submitted into the System for post-trade validation. If an order fails the post-trade validation, the order will be invalidated and returned to the Floor Broker. The processes are substantively similar in that they both ensure that all the requirements necessary to immediately execute a cQCC Order are satisfied. Therefore, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the automatic cancellation provision in proposed Interpretation and Policy .14 to Exchange Rule 2040 as a similar mechanism already exists on the Trading Floor. Additionally, the Exchange notes at least one other options exchange with a trading floor has a rule substantially similar to proposed Interpretation and Policy .14 to Exchange Rule 2040 that requires, with respect to each option leg of the cQCC Order, that the execution (i) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; and (ii) is at or between the NBBO.[48]
The purpose of the proposed rule changes is to align and harmonize the rules governing the electronic market and Trading Floor. The Exchange's proposal would permit Floor Brokers to immediately execute the Crossing Orders pursuant to proposed Interpretations and Policies .11 through .14 to Exchange Rule 2040 utilizing the same order entry requirements as the Members that transact business electronically pursuant to Exchange Rule 515(g)(1) through (4). The requirements that a Floor Broker must satisfy to immediately execute the Crossing Orders on the Trading Floor are identical to those required in the electronic market with certain exceptions that are not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the separate and distinct execution processes that exists between the electronic market and the Trading Floor. The Exchange notes that at least one other options exchange with a trading floor has substantially similar rules.[49]
( printed page 25418)QFO With an ISO Designation
The Exchange proposes to adopt Interpretation and Policy .10 to Exchange Rule 2040 to explicitly state that a two-sided order (“Qualified Floor Order” or “QFO”) with an Intermarket Sweep Order (“ISO”) [50] designation can be executed on the Trading Floor and entered into the Exchange's System to facilitate post-trade workflow. The Exchange proposes to add this explicit reference and description of the behavior of a QFO with an ISO designation into the Exchange Rulebook to provide greater detail to the Rulebook.
An Intermarket Sweep Order (“ISO”), as defined in Exchange Rule 1400(i),[51] is a limit order that is designated by a Member as an ISO in the manner prescribed by the Exchange, and is executed within the System by Members without respect to Protected Quotations [52] of other Eligible Exchanges [53] as defined in Rule 1400(q) and (g).[54] A Member may submit an ISO to the Exchange only if it has simultaneously routed one or more additional ISOs to execute against the full displayed size of any Protected Bid,[55] in the case of a limit order to sell, or Protected Offer,[56] in the case of a limit order to buy, for an options series with a price that is superior to the limit price of the ISO.
The Exchange notes that it currently allows a Floor Broker to execute a QFO with an ISO designation. The Exchange now proposes to add this explicit reference and description of the behavior of a QFO with an ISO designation to provide greater detail within the Rulebook. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to adopt Interpretation and Policy .10 to Exchange Rule 2040 to provide that notwithstanding Exchange Rule 2040(e), a QFO with an ISO designation will be processed without regard for better priced Protected Bids or Protected Offers (as defined in Exchange Rule 1400) because the Member submitting the QFO to the Exchange's System has simultaneously transmitted one or more ISOs, as necessary, to execute against the full displayed size of any Protected Bid or Protected Offer. The Exchange processes the QFO with an ISO designation in the same manner that it currently processes QFOs without an ISO designation, except that it accepts the QFOs with an ISO designation without protecting away prices. The Member submitting the QFO with an ISO designation shall bear the responsibility to clear all better priced interest away simultaneously with the submission of the QFO with an ISO designation to the Exchange.
The proposed rule change to add an explicit reference and description of the behavior of a QFO with an ISO designation to the Exchange Rulebook is intended to provide greater detail within the Exchange's Rulebook.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,[57] in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) [58] of the Act in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
The proposal to add an explicit reference and description of the behavior of a QFO with an ISO designation to the Exchange's Rulebook is designed to provide greater detail within the Exchange's Rulebook. The proposal to amend Exchange Rule 2040(a)(4) is to ensure that it is not mistakenly interpreted as excluding the complex order types enumerated in paragraph (b). These proposed rule changes are not as a result of any changes made to the Exchange functionality, operations, policies or procedures, but are rather designed to provide greater detail and better reflect the current operation of the Exchange's Trading Floor in the Exchange's Rulebook. These proposed non-substantive changes would ensure that the Exchange's Rules are clear, concise, and easier to understand. In addition, the proposed rule changes would reduce potential investor and market participant confusion and therefore remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by ensuring that investors and market participants can more easily navigate, understand and comply with the Exchange's Rules. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule changes would remove impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market by ensuring that persons subject to the Exchange's jurisdiction, regulators, and the investing public can more easily navigate and understand the Exchange's Rules. The proposed rule changes are consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors because investors will not be harmed and in fact would benefit from the increased transparency and clarity, thereby reducing potential confusion.
Permitting Floor Brokers to immediately execute Crossing Orders (as defined herein) without having to first announce the order to the trading crowd is consistent with the Act because it would permit Floor Brokers to execute these orders similarly to how these orders are executed on the electronic market, provided similar requirements for each specific order type are similarly satisfied. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market by placing Floor Brokers on equal footing with Members that trade Crossing Orders electronically. The proposed rule changes are consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors because it would harmonize the ( printed page 25419) requirements for immediate execution of Crossing Orders on the Trading Floor to those of the electronic market, with certain exceptions as discussed above.
Customer Cross Orders
Identical to Members that transact electronically, with one minor exception that is not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the separate and distinct execution processes, Floor Brokers may immediately execute Customer Cross Orders on the Trading Floor provided the requirements mandated for automatic execution in the electronic market are similarly satisfied on the Trading Floor. Specifically, a Customer Cross Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor so long as the execution (i) is at or between the best bid and offer on the Exchange; (ii) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; (iii) will not trade at a price inferior to the NBBO; and (iv) no trading interest exists on the Exchange's Simple Order Book that is subject to the Managed Interest Process pursuant to Rule 515(d)(2).[59] The Exchange does not propose to adopt the provision in Exchange Rule 515(g)(1) that states, “Customer Cross Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” In the electronic market, Electronic Exchange Members will submit a Customer Cross Order directly into the System for execution, and if an order fails to satisfy the requirements of Exchange Rule 515(g)(1), the System will automatically cancel the order. By contrast, a Customer Cross Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor, prior to the order being submitted into the System for post-trade validation. If an order fails the post-trade validation, the order will be invalidated and returned to the Floor Broker. The processes are substantively similar in that they both ensure that all the requirements necessary to immediately execute a Customer Cross Order are satisfied. Therefore, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the automatic cancellation provision in proposed Interpretation and Policy .11 to Exchange Rule 2040 as a similar mechanism already exists on the Trading Floor.
Complex Customer Cross Orders
Additionally, identical to Members that transact electronically, with two minor exceptions, Floor Brokers may immediately execute cC2C Orders on the Trading Floor provided the requirements mandated for automatic execution in the electronic market are similarly satisfied on the Trading Floor. Specifically, a cC2C Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor so long as: the requirements of Rule 518(c)(1)(iv) are satisfied and the cC2C Order improves the best price available on the Exchange's Strategy Book.[60] The first exception is related to one of the requirements in Rule 515(g)(3) that is not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the separate and distinct execution processes that exist between the electronic market and the Trading Floor. The Exchange does not propose to adopt the provision in Exchange Rule 515(g)(3)(i) that states, “cC2C Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” In the electronic market, Electronic Exchange Members will submit a cC2C Order directly into the System for execution, and if an order fails to satisfy the requirements of Exchange Rule 515(g)(3), the System will automatically cancel the order. By contrast, a cC2C Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor, prior to the order being submitted into the System for post-trade validation. If an order fails the post-trade validation, the order will be invalidated and returned to the Floor Broker. The processes are substantively similar in that they both ensure that all the requirements necessary to immediately execute a cC2C Order are satisfied. Therefore, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the automatic cancellation provision in proposed Interpretation and Policy .12 to Exchange Rule 2040 as a similar mechanism already exists on the Trading Floor. The second exception is that the Exchange would permit only cC2C Orders with a conforming ratio to be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd in order to align its rules with those of other options exchanges. The Exchange notes that at least one other options exchange similarly permits only Complex Customer Cross Orders with a conforming ratio to be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd.[61]
Qualified Contingent Cross Orders
Identical to Members that transact electronically, with one minor exception that is not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the separate and distinct execution processes, Floor Brokers may immediately execute Qualified Contingent Cross Orders on the Trading Floor provided the requirements mandated for automatic execution in the electronic market are similarly satisfied on the Trading Floor. Specifically, a Qualified Contingent Cross Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor so long as the execution (i) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; (ii) is at or between the NBBO; and (iii) no trading interest exists on the Exchange's Simple Order Book that is subject to the Managed Interest Process pursuant to Rule 515(d)(2).[62] The Exchange does not propose to adopt the provision in Exchange Rule 515(g)(2) that states, “Qualified Contingent Cross Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” In the electronic market, Electronic Exchange Members will submit a Qualified Contingent Cross Order directly into the System for execution, and if an order fails to satisfy the requirements of Exchange Rule 515(g)(2), the System will automatically cancel the order. By contrast, a Qualified Contingent Cross Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor, prior to the order being submitted into the System for post-trade validation. If an order fails the post-trade validation, the order will be invalidated and returned to the Floor Broker. The processes are substantively similar in that they both ensure that all the requirements necessary to immediately execute a Qualified Contingent Cross Order are satisfied. Therefore, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the automatic cancellation provision in proposed Interpretation and Policy .13 to Exchange Rule 2040 as a similar mechanism already exists on the Trading Floor.
Complex Qualified Contingent Cross Orders
Identical to Members that transact electronically, with one minor exception that is not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the separate and distinct execution processes, Floor Brokers may immediately execute cQCC Orders on the Trading Floor provided the requirements mandated for automatic execution in the electronic market are similarly satisfied on the Trading Floor. Specifically, a cQCC Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor so long as: with respect to each option leg of the cQCC ( printed page 25420) Order, the execution (i) is not at the same price as a Priority Customer Order on the Exchange's Simple Order Book; and (ii) is at or between the NBBO.[63] The Exchange does not propose to adopt the provision in Exchange Rule 515(g)(4) that states, “cQCC Orders will be automatically canceled if they cannot be executed.” In the electronic market, Electronic Exchange Members will submit a cQCC Order directly into the System for execution, and if an order fails to satisfy the requirements of Exchange Rule 515(g)(4), the System will automatically cancel the order. By contrast, a cQCC Order may be executed immediately on the Trading Floor, prior to the order being submitted into the System for post-trade validation. If an order fails the post-trade validation, the order will be invalidated and returned to the Floor Broker. The processes are substantively similar in that they both ensure that all the requirements necessary to immediately execute a cQCC Order are satisfied. Therefore, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the automatic cancellation provision in proposed Interpretation and Policy .14 to Exchange Rule 2040 as a similar mechanism already exists on the Trading Floor.
Further, the Exchange believes it is consistent with the Act and the protection of investors to permit the Crossing Orders to be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd. This would place them on equal footing with Members that trade these orders electronically. With this proposal, Floor Brokers may only immediately execute cC2C Orders (without announcement) if such orders are in conforming ratios as proposed in Interpretation and Policy .12 to Exchange Rule 2040, however Floor Brokers would be able to continue to cross two Priority Customer Orders in open outcry pursuant to Exchange Rule 2040(a)(4). This would be necessary if a Floor Broker desired to cross two Priority Customer Orders with non-conforming ratios because under proposed Interpretation and Policy .12 to Exchange Rule 2040 only Complex Customer Cross Orders with a conforming ratio are accepted for electronic processing. The Exchange proposes to permit only Complex Customer Cross Orders with a conforming ratio to be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd in order to align its rules with that of another options exchange that has a trading floor. Specifically, the Exchange notes that at least one other options exchange similarly permits only Complex Customer Cross Orders with a conforming ratio to be executed on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd.[64]
Permitting Floor Brokers to only submit cQCC Orders with a stock/ETF component if such orders comply with the Qualified Contingent Trade Exemption from Rule 611(a) of Regulation NMS is consistent with the Act and the protection of investors.[65] Proposed Interpretation and Policy.14(c) to Exchange Rule 2040 will require that Floor Brokers submitting such orders with a stock/ETF component represent that such orders comply with the Qualified Contingent Trade Exemption. This proposal is consistent with today's treatment of Complex Orders with a stock/ETF component and is not changing the manner in which a Complex Order with a stock/ETF component is treated today on the Exchange.[66]
Section 11(a) and the rules thereunder generally prohibit members of an exchange from effecting transactions on the exchange for their own account, the account of an associated person, or an account with respect to which it or an associated person thereof exercises investment discretion unless an exemption applies.[67] With respect to the application of the Crossing Orders to Section 11(a) of the Act and the rules thereunder, the Exchange notes that the entry and execution of the Crossing Orders raises no novel issues under Section 11(a) and the rules thereunder from a compliance, surveillance or enforcement perspective. Floor Brokers are required to comply and the Exchange surveils for compliance with Section 11(a) and the rules thereunder when using Exchange systems to effect transactions using existing order types, and they will be required to comply with Section 11(a) and the rules thereunder when using the Crossing Orders as amended.[68]
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes to add an explicit reference and description of the behavior of a QFO with an ISO designation to the Exchange's Rulebook and amend Exchange Rule 2040(a)(4) to remove the reference to paragraph (a) of Rule 518 are not intended to address competitive issues but rather are concerned solely with making clarifying changes to the rule text with no proposed changes to related functionality. The proposal to permit Floor Brokers to execute certain Crossing Orders on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd does not impose any burden on intramarket competition because today Members that transact electronically are subject to identical rules, with certain exceptions that are not applicable to the Trading Floor due to the distinct execution processes, and may enter such orders without exposing such orders. The proposal does not impose an undue burden on intramarket competition because all Floor Brokers may similarly execute Crossing Orders.
Intermarket Competition
The Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes to add an explicit reference and description of the behavior of a QFO with an ISO designation to the Exchange's Rulebook and amend Exchange Rule 2040(a)(4) to remove the reference to paragraph (a) of Rule 518 are not intended to address competitive issues but rather are concerned solely with making clarifying changes to the rule text with no proposed changes to related functionality. The proposal to permit Floor Brokers to execute certain Crossing Orders on the Trading Floor immediately without announcement to the trading crowd does not impose any burden on intermarket competition because at least one other options ( printed page 25421) exchange with a trading floor has similar rules.[69]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The Exchange has designated this rule filing as non-controversial under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act [70] and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) [71] thereunder. Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act [72] and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) [73] thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act [74] normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) [75] permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule change may become operative upon filing. The Exchange states that waiving the operative delay will allow the Exchange to make clarifying changes to its rule text immediately, which will benefit investors and the public interest because such changes would add clarity to the Exchange's rules and therefore alleviate potential investor or market participant confusion. Further, the Exchange states that waiver of the operative delay will permit Floor Brokers immediately to execute Crossing Orders on the Trading Floor without requiring prior announcement to the trading crowd, to the benefit of market participants, and would align and harmonize its rules governing its electronic market and its Trading Floor, thereby placing Floor Brokers on an equal footing with Members that trade Crossing Orders electronically. The Exchange also states that another options exchange with a trading floor has similar rules.[76] For these reasons, and because the proposal raises no new or novel legal or regulatory issues, the Commission finds that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposed rule change to be operative immediately upon filing.[77]
At any time within 60 days of the filing of this proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
- Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
- Send an email torule-comments@sec.gov. Please include file number SR-SAPPHIRE-2026-19 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
- Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-SAPPHIRE-2026-19. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website ( https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR-SAPPHIRE-2026-19 and should be submitted on or before May 29, 2026.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[78]
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.