Document

Constellation Energy Generation, LLC; Christopher M. Crane Clean Energy Center; Draft Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment a draft environmental assessment (EA) and draft finding of no significant impact (FONSI) regarding the...

Nuclear Regualtory Commission
  1. [Docket No. 50-289; EAXX-429-00-000-1773009788; NRC-2026-0397]

AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION:

Notice; request for comment.

SUMMARY:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment a draft environmental assessment (EA) and draft finding of no significant impact (FONSI) regarding the evaluation of the reasonably foreseeable environmental effects from proposed Federal actions related to reauthorizing ( printed page 34659) power operations at the Christopher M. Crane Clean Energy Center (CCEC). Specifically, the NRC is considering issuance of an exemption and three license amendments, which were requested by Constellation Energy Generation, LLC (CEG) to support the potential reauthorization of power operations at the CCEC. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Dominance Financing (EDF) is a cooperating agency on the draft EA. The DOE EDF's proposed action is a decision on providing Federal financial assistance (a loan guarantee) for refueling and resumption of power operations at the CCEC.

DATES:

Submit comments by July 8, 2026. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date.

ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments by any of the following methods; however, the NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the Federal rulemaking website.

  • Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2026-0397. Address questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Bridget Curran; telephone: 301-415-1003; email: . For technical questions, contact the individual(s) listed in the For Further Information Contact section of this document.
  • Email: Comments may be submitted to the NRC electronically using the email address .
  • Mail comments to: Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN-5-A85, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Program Management, Announcements and Editing Staff.

For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see “Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments” in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kevin Folk, telephone: 301-415-6944; email: , or Ashley Waldron, telephone: 301-415-7317; email: . Both are staff of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments

A. Obtaining Information

Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2026-0397 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly available information related to this action by any of the following methods:

B. Submitting Comments

The NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the Federal rulemaking website ( https://www.regulations.gov). Please include Docket ID NRC-2026-0397 in your comment submission.

The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information.

If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.

II. Introduction

The CCEC, formerly Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1), consists of a single pressurized-water nuclear reactor located in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, on Three Mile Island in the Susquehanna River. Originally licensed for operation on April 19, 1974, the NRC issued a renewed facility operating license (RFOL) for TMI-1 on October 22, 2009, with the license term expiring on April 19, 2034.

On June 20, 2017, and September 26, 2019, Exelon Generation Company, LLC, the licensee who then operated the facility, submitted certifications that it would permanently cease operations of TMI-1 and had permanently removed fuel from the reactor vessel, respectively, in accordance with paragraph 50.82(a)(1) of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). Upon the NRC's docketing of these certifications, the RFOL license no longer authorized operation of the reactor or emplacement or retention of fuel into the reactor vessel, as provided by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(2).

CEG is seeking to return the CCEC to power operations and has submitted for NRC approval an exemption request and three license amendment requests (LARs) in support of allowing the resumption of power operations through April 19, 2034, the previous expiration date of the facility's RFOL.

A notice of opportunity to request a hearing and petition for leave to intervene was published in the Federal Register on February 24, 2026, regarding the three LARs. Consistent with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the NRC's regulations, the NRC did not publish a notice of opportunity for hearing on the exemption request.

The NRC staff has prepared a draft EA and draft FONSI documenting its environmental review of the proposed actions related to reauthorizing power operations at the CCEC. Based on its ( printed page 34660) environmental review, the NRC staff has made the preliminary determination that the proposed actions will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, the NRC staff has made the preliminary determination that it will not prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the proposed actions and that a FONSI is warranted.

The NRC staff will consider comments on the draft EA and draft FONSI received over a 30-day public comment period from Federal, State, local, and Tribal officials and members of the public. After consideration of these comments, the NRC staff will make a final determination regarding whether it will prepare an EIS for the proposed actions or whether a FONSI is warranted.

The environmental review included fulfillment of the NRC's obligations related to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (54 U.S.C. 300101, et seq.) (NHPA). The regulation in section 800.8 of title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations (36 CFR), “Coordination with the National Environmental Policy Act,” allows agencies to use their National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.) process to fulfill the requirements of Section 106 of the NHPA. Therefore, pursuant to 36 CFR 800.8(c), the NRC used its process for the preparation of the EA on the proposed actions to comply with Section 106 of the NHPA in lieu of the procedures set forth at 36 CFR 800.3 through 800.6.

III. Summary of Draft Environmental Assessment

Description of the Proposed Federal Actions and Need

The NRC's proposed actions are decisions on whether to grant or deny CEG's interdependent, connected licensing and regulatory requests, including any revisions or supplements thereto or other regulatory or licensing requests submitted to the NRC, that are necessary to support reauthorizing power operations and refueling of the CCEC reactor. The DOE EDF's proposed action is a decision on providing Federal financial assistance for refueling and resumption of power operations at the CCEC pursuant to CEG's loan guarantee agreement with the DOE that was issued pursuant to the Energy Policy Act (EPA) of 2005.

The need for the NRC proposed actions, which would collectively support the reauthorization of power operations and refueling of the CCEC under the existing RFOL, is to provide 835 megawatts-electric of baseload power generation capability to the Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Maryland electric grid. In support of its decision to pursue the resumption of power operations at the CCEC, CEG cites a 20-year power purchase agreement signed in 2024 with Microsoft to supply carbon-free energy from the CCEC to Microsoft's data centers located within the PJM Interconnection LLC's electric grid.

The need for the DOE proposed action (Federal financial assistance in the form of a loan guarantee) is to implement DOE's authority under Title XVII of the EPA of 2005, which was reauthorized, amended, and revised by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (42 U.S.C. 16517) and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Pub. L. 119-21 (July 4, 2025)) to create the EDF Program. The purpose of the EDF Program is to finance projects and facilities in the United States that retool, repower, repurpose, or replace energy infrastructure that has ceased operations or enable operating energy infrastructure to increase capacity or output.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Federal Actions

In the draft EA, the NRC staff assessed the potential reasonably foreseeable environmental effects (impacts) from the proposed actions associated with the following relevant resource areas: land use and visual resources; meteorology, air quality, and noise; surface water resources; groundwater resources, ecological resources (terrestrial and aquatic); Federally protected ecological resources, historic and cultural resources; socioeconomic conditions; radiological and nonradiological human health; waste management; uranium fuel cycle and transportation; and postulated accidents. The NRC staff also considered decommissioning impacts as well as greenhouse gas emissions and climate change effects. The NRC staff determined that the environmental impacts of the proposed actions would be NOT SIGNIFICANT for each potentially affected environmental resource area. In addition, the NRC staff determined that the projected effects of climate change would not alter any of the impact determinations described in the EA.

Environmental Impacts of Alternatives to the Proposed Federal Actions

The NRC staff considered a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed actions, including an analysis of any environmental impacts of not implementing the proposed actions ( i.e., the no-action alternative). The NRC staff determined that there are no alternatives that meet the need for the proposed actions. For the no-action alternative, the NRC staff determined that the environmental impacts could potentially be SIGNIFICANT. In contrast, the potential environmental impacts from the proposed actions of reauthorizing power operations at the existing CCEC would be NOT SIGNIFICANT for each potentially affected environmental resource area. Therefore, the NRC staff concluded that there are no environmentally preferrable alternatives to the proposed actions.

IV. Draft Finding of No Significant Impact

The proposed Federal actions before the NRC are whether to grant requests for an exemption and license amendments to support reauthorizing power operations at the CCEC through the remainder of its RFOL term (to April 19, 2034). The NRC staff has conducted an environmental review of these actions and prepared a draft EA. This draft FONSI incorporates by reference the draft EA summarized in Section III of this notice and referenced in Section V of this notice. Based on its preliminary determination in the draft EA that the environmental impacts of the proposed actions would be NOT SIGNIFICANT for each potentially affected resource area, the NRC staff is issuing a draft determination that the proposed Federal actions will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC staff has made a draft determination not to prepare an EIS for the proposed Federal actions and that a FONSI is warranted.

This draft FONSI and the related environmental documents are available for public inspection as discussed in the draft EA and Section I of this notice. Before making its final determination, the NRC staff will consider comments on the draft EA and draft FONSI received over a 30-day public comment period from Federal, State, Tribal, and local officials and members of the public. Once the NRC staff makes its final determination, the NRC will publish the final EA and final FONSI or proceed to prepare an EIS. At the conclusion of the NRC environmental review, the DOE EDF would publish a separate notice or decision document, as appropriate.

V. Availability of Documents

The documents identified in the following table are available to interested parties through ADAMS, as indicated. ( printed page 34661)

Document description ADAMS accession No./ Federal Register Notice
Draft Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact for the Christopher M. Crane Clean Energy Center Reauthorization of Power Operations Project, dated June 5, 2026 ML26120A058.
Constellation Energy Generation, LLC; Christopher M. Crane Clean Energy Center; Applications for Amendments to Renewed Facility License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination and Containing Safeguards Information and Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Safeguards Information; License amendment request (LAR); notice of opportunity to comment, request a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene; order imposing procedures, dated February 24, 2026 ML26013A106; 91 FR 8910.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.)

Dated: June 3, 2026.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Kimyata Savoy,

Acting Deputy Director, Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, and Financial Support, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 2026-11377 Filed 6-5-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P

Legal Citation

Federal Register Citation

Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.

91 FR 34658

Web Citation

Suggested Web Citation

Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.

“Constellation Energy Generation, LLC; Christopher M. Crane Clean Energy Center; Draft Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact,” thefederalregister.org (June 8, 2026), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2026-11377/constellation-energy-generation-llc-christopher-m-crane-clean-energy-center-draft-environmental-assessment-and-draft-fin.