Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Bulgaria: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Bulgaria are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less...
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Bulgaria are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV) during the period of investigation (POI) April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025.
DATES:
Applicable July 30, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3477.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 13, 2026, Commerce published in the
Federal Register
its preliminary affirmative determination in the LTFV investigation of rebar from Bulgaria.[1]
A summary of the events that occurred since the
Preliminary Determination,
as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[2]
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov.
In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at
https://access.trade.gov/frnotices.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is rebar from Bulgaria. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation,
see
Appendix I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to Commerce's regulations,[3]
the
Initiation Notice
set aside a period of time for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (
i.e.,
scope).[4]
No interested party commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice.
Therefore, Commerce is not modifying the scope language as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice. See
the scope in Appendix I to this notice.
Verification
Commerce conducted verifications of the information relied upon in making its final determination in this investigation, in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Specifically, we conducted on-site verifications of the sales and cost information submitted by Promet Steel JSC (Promet) for use in the final determination. We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant sales and accounting records, and original source documents provided by Promet.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by interested parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix II.
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
We made certain changes to the margin calculation for Promet since the
Preliminary Determination.
For a discussion of these changes,
see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that Commerce shall determine an estimated all-others rate for all exporters and producers not individually examined.[5]
This rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and
de minimis
margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act.
In this final determination, Commerce calculated an estimated weighted-average dumping margin for Promet that is not zero,
de minimis,
or based entirely on facts otherwise available.[6]
Consequently, the rate calculated for Promet is assigned as the rate for all other producers and exporters.
Final Determination
Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POI April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025:
Exporter/producer
Weighted-
average
dumping
margin
(percent)
Promet Steel JSC
53.27
All Others
53.27
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in connection with this final determination to interested parties within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register
, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all entries of subject merchandise, as described in Appendix I of this notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after March 13, 2026, the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination
in the
Federal Register
, for Promet and all other producers and exporters.
Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(d), upon the publication of this notice, we will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for estimated weighted-average dumping margin or the estimated all-others rate as follows: (1) the cash deposit rate for the respondent listed above will be equal to the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined in this
( printed page 48085)
final determination; (2) if the exporter is not a respondent identified above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal to the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margin established for that producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will be equal to the estimated weighted-average dumping margin for all other producers and exporters. These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
U.S. International Trade Commission
In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of its final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. Because Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of subject merchandise no later than 45 days after this final determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all cash deposits will be refunded or canceled, and suspension of liquidation will be lifted. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instructions by Commerce, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the “Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation” section above.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This final determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).
Dated: July 27, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise subject to this investigation is steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade or lack thereof.
The subject merchandise includes rebar that has been further processed in the subject countries or a third country, including but not limited to cutting, grinding, galvanizing, painting, coating, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of this investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the rebar.
Specifically excluded are plain rounds (
i.e.,
nondeformed or smooth rebar).
The subject merchandise is classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) primarily under item numbers 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise may also enter under other HTSUS numbers including 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057, 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6040, 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000. HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope remains dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes Since the
Preliminary Determination
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether To Use Promet's Revised Sales Databases
Comment 2: Whether To Reject Petitioner's Comments Regarding Promet's Minor Corrections
Comment 3: Whether To Revise the Major Input Adjustment
Comment 4: Whether To Revise General & Administrative Expense Ratio
Comment 5: Whether To Revise Financial Expense Ratio
Comment 6: Whether To Reject BAMI's Filing
V. Recommendation
Footnotes
1.
See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Bulgaria: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination,
and
Extension of Provisional Measures,91 FR 12351 (March 13, 2026) (
Preliminary Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2.
See
Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value in the Investigation of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Bulgaria,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
4.
See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Algeria, Bulgaria, Egypt, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations,90 FR 27846 (June 30, 2025) (
Initiation Notice).
Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.
91 FR 48084
Web Citation
Suggested Web Citation
Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.
“Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Bulgaria: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,” thefederalregister.org (July 30, 2026), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2026-15441/steel-concrete-reinforcing-bar-from-bulgaria-final-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at-less-than-fair-value.