In compliance with Executive Order 12866, entitled "Regulatory Planning and Review," and the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) publis...
15 CFR Subtitle A; Subtitle B, Chs. I, II, III, VII, VIII, IX, and XI
19 CFR Ch. III
37 CFR Chs. I, IV, and V
48 CFR Ch. 13
50 CFR Chs. II, III, IV, and VI
( printed page 52968)
AGENCY:
Office of the Secretary, Commerce.
ACTION:
Unified regulatory agenda.
SUMMARY:
In compliance with Executive Order 12866, entitled “Regulatory Planning and Review,” and the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) publishes in the
Federal Register
an agenda of regulations under development or review over the next 12 months. Rulemaking actions are grouped according to pre-rulemaking, proposed rules, final rules, long-term actions, and rulemaking actions completed since the publication of the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda.
The purpose of the Agenda is to provide information to the public on regulations that are currently under review, being proposed, or recently issued by Commerce. It is expected that this information will enable the public to participate more effectively in Commerce's regulatory process.
Commerce's 2026 Unified Agenda includes regulatory activities that are expected to be conducted during the period November 1, 2025, through October 31, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Specific:
For additional information about specific regulatory actions listed in the agenda, contact the individual identified as the contact person.
General:
Comments or inquiries of a general nature about the agenda should be directed to Candida Harty, Senior Lead Counsel for Regulation, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulation, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 202-482-3410.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Commerce hereby publishes its 2026 Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions pursuant to Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601et seq.Executive Order 12866 requires agencies to publish an agenda of those regulations that are under consideration. By memorandum of September 15, 2025, the Office of Management and Budget issued guidelines and procedures for the preparation and publication of the 2026 Unified Agenda. The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to publish, in the spring and fall of each year, a regulatory flexibility agenda that contains a brief description of the subject of any rule likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The internet is the basic means for disseminating the Unified Agenda. The complete Unified Agenda is available online at
www.reginfo.gov,
in a format that offers users a greatly enhanced ability to obtain information from the Agenda database.
A list of Commerce's most important significant regulatory and deregulatory actions and a Statement of Regulatory Priorities are included only in the fall editions of the Unified Agendas and, thus, did not appear in the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda. Because publication in the
Federal Register
is mandated for the regulatory flexibility agendas required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Commerce's printed agenda entries include only:
(1) Rules that are in the Agency's regulatory flexibility agenda, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, because they are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities; and
(2) Rules that the Agency has identified for periodic review under section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Printing of these entries is limited to fields that contain information required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act's Agenda requirements. Additional information on these entries is available in the Unified Agenda published on the internet. In addition, for fall editions of the Agenda, Commerce's entire Regulatory Plan will continue to be printed in the
Federal Register
.
Within Commerce, the Office of the Secretary and various operating units may issue regulations. Among these operating units, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Bureau of Industry and Security, and the Patent and Trademark Office issue the greatest share of Commerce's regulations. In addition to regulations promulgated by NOAA, BIS, and PTO, this issue also includes regulations to be promulgated by, or that have been published and completed since the Spring 2025 Unified Agenda by, the International Trade Administration (ITA), the U.S. Census Bureau (CENSUS), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA), and the Office of the Secretary (OS).
Commerce's 2026 Unified Agenda follows.
Daniel Sweeney,
Deputy General Counsel for Economic, Statistical, and Regulatory Affairs.
General Administration—Long-Term Actions
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation
Identifier No.
181
Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain
0605-AA51
182
Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain: Licensing Procedures
0605-AA60
Bureau of Industry and Security—Long-Term Actions
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation
Identifier No.
183
Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain: Networking Equipment and Services in Data Centers
0694-AK23
( printed page 52969)
Bureau of Industry and Security—Completed Actions
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation
Identifier No.
184
Taking Additional Steps to Address the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities
0694-AJ35
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration—Proposed Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation
Identifier No.
185
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Protective Regulations for the Giant Manta Ray (Mobula birostris)
0648-BN07
186
Seafood Import Permitting and Reporting Procedures
0648-BK85
187
Framework Adjustment 69 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan
0648-BN23
188
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Amendment 16 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan
0648-BM08
189
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Revisions to Commercial Atlantic Blacknose and Recreational Atlantic Shark Fisheries
0648-BM88
190
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Demersal and Pelagic Indicator Species
0648-BN27
191
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Revisions to Fishing Gear Regulations
0648-BN52
192
Adjustment of North Atlantic Albacore, North Atlantic Swordfish, South Atlantic Swordfish, and Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Quotas
0648-BN60
193
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Revision of the Expiration Date for Swordfish and Shark Limited Access Permits
0648-BN68
194
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Management Measures for the Angling and General Category Fisheries
0648-BO23
195
Limiting Gear Switching in the Pacific Coast Groundfish Shorebased Individual Fishing Quota Program
0648-BN56
196
Cordell Bank Groundfish Conservation Area Revisions
Abstract: Pursuant to Executive Order 13873 of May 15,2019,”Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain” and Executive Order 14034 of June 9, 2021, Protecting Americans' Sensitive Data From Foreign Adversaries,” the Department of Commerce finalized the rule that sets forth the process and procedures that the Secretary of Commerce will use to identify, assess, and address transactions that pose an undue risk to the security, integrity, and reliability of information and communications technology and services provided and used in the United States. The final rule became effective on February 4, 2025.
Abstract: The Department is seeking public input regarding establishing a licensing process for entities to seek pre-approval before engaging in or continuing to engage in potentially regulated information and communications technology and services (ICTS) transactions under 15 CFR part 791.
Abstract: In this interim final rule (IFR), the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) will address risks to national security and U.S. persons posed by certain transactions involving data centers.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
Interim Final Rule
07/00/27
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Stefanie McCabe
Phone: 202 482-1356
RIN: 0694-AK23
Department of Commerce
(DOC)
Completed Actions
Bureau of Industry and
Security
(BIS)
( printed page 52971)
184. TAKING ADDITIONAL STEPS TO ADDRESS THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO SIGNIFICANT MALICIOUS CYBER-ENABLED ACTIVITIES
Abstract: Executive Order 13984 of January 19, 2021, Taking Additional Steps To Address the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, (E.O. 13984) directs the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to propose regulations requiring certain providers and resellers of certain Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) products to verify the identity of their foreign customers permitting the Secretary, in consultation with Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, to grant exemptions to the verification requirement; and authorizing the Secretary to impose special measures on providers with regard to certain foreign jurisdictions or foreign persons. The Department of Commerce is assessing public comments from its January 29, 2024, notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to E.O. 13984.
Abstract: We propose protective regulations under section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for the conservation of the giant manta ray (
Mobula birostris). The prohibitions listed under section 9(a)(1) of the ESA automatically apply when a species is listed as endangered. In the case of a species listed as threatened, the first sentence of section 4(d) provides that the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) shall issue such regulations as deemed necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of the species. The second sentence of section 4(d) states that the Secretary may by regulation prohibit with respect to any threatened species any or all acts prohibited under section 9(a)(1). The final rule to list the giant manta ray as a threatened species under the ESA was published on January 22, 2018, and became effective February 21, 2018 (83 FR 2916). Protective regulations for the species were not adopted at that time. Since the publication of the final rule, new information has revealed that giant manta ray bycatch occurs in many U.S. fisheries, including likely high levels of at-vessel and post-release mortality. While the most significant threat to the giant manta ray is overutilization primarily by artisanal fisheries operating in areas outside of U.S. jurisdiction, we are proposing to apply the section 9 prohibitions to the species to reduce and mitigate fisheries-related mortality resulting from bycatch in U.S. fisheries. We are proposing limited exceptions to the prohibitions for scientific research and emergency response and salvage activities.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM
07/00/26
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Kim Damon-Randall, Director, Office of Protected Resources, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Abstract: Following consideration of any necessary revisions or recessions as directed by E.O. 14276 Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness, NMFS may amend the regulations that require seafood import documentation under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801et seq.). The statute prohibits the importation of seafood that was harvested in violation of foreign laws, any treaty, or binding conservation measures of regional fisheries organizations to which the United States is a party. The import permitting, reporting and recordkeeping regulations facilitate enforcement of the statutory prohibition. To ensure compliance with the import monitoring program, NMFS may clarify what qualifies as the U.S. resident business address of the International Fisheries Trade Permit holder and the permit holder's obligation to ensure timely access to and production of the required supply chain records in the event of an audit NMFS may also consider changes to species included under the program if they are necessary to improve the program. U.S. seafood importers may be affected by this rulemaking through increased reporting and recordkeeping requirements, but NOAA estimates the economic impact will be small because documentation is already completed, transmitted through the supply chain, and available to importers.
Agency Contact: Alexa Cole, Director, Office of International Affairs, Trade, and Commerce, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Abstract: The proposed action would implement management measures included in Framework Adjustment 69
( printed page 52972)
to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (Framework 69) that were developed by the New England Fishery Management Council in response to new scientific information, pursuant to the rulemaking authorities under section 303(c) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. This action would: Update status determination criteria for groundfish stocks; Set fishing year 2025-2026 total allowable catches (TAC) for the 3 U.S./Canada stocks eastern GB cod, eastern GB haddock, and GB yellowtail flounder; Set annual specifications for fishing years 2025-2027 for EGOM cod, WGOM cod, GB cod, SNE cod, GOM haddock, GB haddock, American plaice, witch flounder, Pollock, and Atlantic halibut; Review GB haddock sub-ACL in the midwater trawl/herring fishery; Potentially revise sub-ACLs and/or the accountability measures triggers for the scallop fishery's flatfish allocations; Remove requirement for sectors to submit federal and state information in sector operations plans; and Address measures as part of cod management transition from two stocks to four.
Agency Contact: Michael Pentony, Regional Administrator, Greater Atlantic Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930
Abstract: NMFS is developing a proposed rule for Amendment 16 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) pursuant to Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) sections 304(c) and (g). The draft Amendment will include a draft environmental impact statement and other required analyses. Based on the mechanism used in establishing shark quotas and related management measures from Amendment 14 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, Amendment 16 would modify the acceptable biological catch (ABC) and annual catch limits (ACLs) for Atlantic sharks and the process used to account for carryover of underharvests of quotas. In this action, NMFS would also look at all commercial and recreational management measures related to the Atlantic shark fishery and make appropriate revisions. Amendment 16 would affect the bottom longline, gillnet, and pelagic longline fisheries, which fish for sharks throughout the entire range of the fishery (Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of America, and Caribbean Sea). The Agency's proposed actions for this rule will be based in part on feedback and public comments received on the issues and options paper. The comment period ended in August 2023. The comments received to date provide helpful feedback on the potential issues and ways forward. This rulemaking originated, in part, as a result of numerous requests from the public to expand opportunities for shark fishing. As a result of public comment received during scoping, we are reconsidering the scope of the measures needed for this rulemaking and may break out into some smaller actions into separate rulemakings.
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: The National Marine Fisheries Service, on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, is responsible for managing Atlantic highly migratory species (HMS) pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801et seq.,
and consistent with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA),
id.
971
et seq.
This proposed rule would consider options to: (1) remove the Atlantic blacknose shark management boundary in the Atlantic region, (2) modify the commercial retention limit for blacknose sharks in the Atlantic region, (3) revise the recreational minimum size limits for authorized Atlantic shark species, and (4) revise the recreational bag limits for some authorized Atlantic shark species. This proposed rule would also remove commercial management group quota linkages, consistent with management measures established in Amendment 14 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS Fishery Management Plan (88 FR 4157, January 24, 2023). This action would affect the commercial and recreational Atlantic shark fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of America, and Caribbean Sea. In 2021, ex-vessel revenues for the entire Atlantic shark fishery totaled approximately $2.6 million. This action is being taken pursuant to the rulemaking authority under section 304(g) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. 16 U.S.C. 1854(c). This rulemaking originated in part based on public comments received during scoping for Amendment 16 (0648-BM08). The comments expressed a need to provide additional flexibility in the regulations to allow for additional shark harvest while also being mindful of rebuilding overfished stock and preventing overfishing, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, is responsible for managing Atlantic highly migratory species (HMS) pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and consistent with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA), the implementing statute for binding recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. NMFS is considering changes to regulations regarding demersal and pelagic indicator species in the HMS pelagic and bottom longline fisheries in order to increase flexibility and remove inefficiencies while still achieving fishery management and conservation goals. Currently, to be considered a pelagic longline vessel when fishing in a bottom longline closed area, no more than five percent (by weight) of the species possessed or landed may be demersal indicator species, as measured relative to the total weight of all pelagic and demersal indicator species. Likewise, to be considered a bottom longline vessel when fishing in a pelagic longline closed area, no more than five percent (by weight) of the species possessed or landed may be pelagic indicator species, as measured relative to the total weight of all pelagic and demersal indicator species. While these management measures helped achieve fishery management and conservation goals in the past, the measures may no longer be necessary due to changes in fishery monitoring methods and fishing techniques. This action is being taken pursuant to the rulemaking authority under section 304(g) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM
07/00/26
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, is responsible for managing Atlantic highly migratory species (HMS) pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801et seq.,
and consistent with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA),
id.
971
et seq.,
the implementing statute for binding recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. NMFS is considering changes to fishing gear regulations and requirements in fisheries targeting HMS. These regulations and requirements were originally developed to achieve fishery management and conservation goals, but may have become outdated due to changes in species distributions, fishing gear technology, fishing techniques, market conditions, and fishing interests. These outdated regulations may be limiting fishing opportunities, which in turn may affect the ability to achieve optimum yield from the fisheries. This action would consider changes to fishing gear regulations in HMS fisheries in order to increase flexibility and remove inefficiencies while still achieving fishery management and conservation goals. This action could affect the commercial buoy gear and speargun fisheries, which fish for swordfish, bigeye, albacore, yellowfin, and skipjack tunas, and sharks throughout the entire range of the fishery (Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of America, and Caribbean Sea). In 2021, these fisheries across all regions and gear types had ex-vessel revenues of approximately $27.8 million of which the specific gears affected by this action are only a small portion. This action may also consider overarching changes to increase flexibility regarding how bait can be collected in all HMS fisheries. This action is being taken pursuant to the rulemaking authority under 304(g)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act or 16 U.S.C. 1854(c).
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM
07/00/26
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, is responsible for managing Atlantic highly migratory species pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801et seq.,
and consistent with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act,
id.
971
et seq.,
the implementing statute for binding recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). NMFS is developing a rulemaking that would, on a temporary basis: adjust the annual baseline quotas for North Atlantic albacore tuna (northern albacore), the North and South Atlantic swordfish, and the Atlantic bluefin tuna quota based on harvest levels from 2025. Existing regulations provide for such adjustments annually in order to extend fishing opportunities, and NMFS takes such action each year when complete catch information for the prior year is available. This rulemaking would also consider changes to implement baseline quota modifications as approved by ICCAT. Temporary quota adjustments in this action would affect the bluefin tuna, northern albacore, and swordfish fisheries for 2026 in the Atlantic Ocean. Implementation of the ICCAT measures may similarly affect these fisheries in future years. This action is being taken pursuant to the rulemaking authority under section 304(g)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act or 16 U.S.C. 1854(c).
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM
07/00/26
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
( printed page 52974)
Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, is responsible for managing Atlantic highly migratory species pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801et seq.,
and consistent with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act,
id.
971
et seq.,
the implementing statute for binding recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. Limited access permits for the U.S. Atlantic swordfish and shark fisheries were implemented in 1999 with the goals of rationalizing the fishing capacity with the available quota and reducing latent effort. As part of achieving those goals, these permits were implemented with an annual renewal time period, and permits that were not renewed within one year of expiring became invalid. Since implementation, NMFS has seen a significant decrease in the number of valid swordfish and shark limited access permits. To help address this decline, NMFS is developing a proposed rule that considers modifications to the regulations that currently prevent swordfish and shark limited access permits from being renewed when the permit was not renewed within a year of its expiration date.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM
07/00/26
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, is responsible for managing Atlantic highly migratory species (HMS) pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801et seq.,
and consistent with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA),
id.
971
et seq., the implementing statute for binding recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. This rulemaking would consider options in line with the bluefin tuna-related public requests received for regulatory changes per Executive Order 14276 and consistent with applicable law. These options could include among others: (1) modifying the Angling category areas and allocations for school and large school/small medium-sized bluefin tuna; (2) establishing fishing seasons for school and large school/small medium-sized bluefin tuna; (3) and modifying regulations regarding restricted-fishing days, including potential expansion to other categories. These potential changes would ensure equitable fishing opportunities for recreational and commercial bluefin tuna fishery participants in federal waters of the Atlantic Ocean. While these potential changes could have different effects on individual entities, the action as a whole would not change the overall quota available for harvest and therefore is not expected to have an overall economic impact on bluefin tuna fisheries. In 2022, ex-vessel revenues for the entire bluefin tuna fishery totaled approximately $12.4 million. This action is being taken pursuant to the rulemaking authority under sections 304(c) and 304(g)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. 16 U.S.C. 1854(g)(1).
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM
07/00/26
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: The Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) recommended limiting the ability for participants in the West Coast groundfish trawl catch share program (Program) to use non-trawl gear types to prosecute the trawl fishery (termed gear switching). The Council recommends that NMFS issue gear-specific quota pounds for northern sablefish in years where the northern sablefish annual catch limit is below 6,000 metric tons. Sablefish is a vital target and co-occurring species in the Program. This action is proposed because the use of quota for northern sablefish by participants engaging in gear switching may lead to uncertainty in access to sablefish and other species, such as Dover sole, by vessels using trawl gear. This uncertainty may inhibit the development of markets and infrastructure necessary to achieve optimum yield in the fishery, and the Program's economic and community stability goals. The purpose of this action would be to help stabilize the trawl fishery by limiting gear switching for northern sablefish in years of relatively low abundance, while maximizing gear flexibility and harvest opportunity in years of greater abundance. An Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, published on April 26, 2018 (0648-BH34), announced that the Council may or may not provide credit for any gear switching related activities, after a control date of after September 15, 2017, in any decision setting limits on gear switching. In its recommended action, the Council incorporated considerations of historical participation and quota ownership. Its recommendation included a control date to allow higher levels of gear switching, for qualifying participants, in years when gear switching would be limited.
Agency Contact: Jennifer Quan, Regional Administrator—West Coast Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, DC 20230
Abstract: In accordance with a recommendation from the Council, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is proposing to open the Cordell Bank Groundfish Conservation Area (GCA) off the coast of central California, and implement a new Groundfish Exclusion Area (GEA) over a portion of the existing GCA footprint to protect sensitive habitat. This action would result in a net opening of approximately 40 square miles of historically important fishing grounds to California fishermen while still protecting sensitive rocky reef habitat in the Cordell Bank area. This action would also decrease regulatory complexity and address enforcement challenges associated with other overlapping closures in the area.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM
07/00/26
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jennifer Quan, Regional Administrator—West Coast Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, DC 20230
Abstract: In accordance with a recommendation from the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) at their June 2025 meeting, and under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) West Coast Region proposes to implement the following limited entry fixed gear (LEFG) actions. Specifically, NMFS proposes to: (1) Create a single limited entry non-trawl endorsed permit. Vessels registered to a permit with this endorsement would be permitted to use any legal non-trawl groundfish gear, except entangling nets, to harvest their quota. (2) Remove the base permit designation and associated regulations at 50 CFR 660.25(b)(3)(iii)(C). (3) Remove the start and end times (
i.e.,
hours of the day) in groundfish regulations for the dates on which the sablefish primary season opens and closes. (4) Develop a cost recovery program for the limited entry fixed gear tier program in which the vessel owner or authorized representative pays the cost recovery fee. The purpose of these actions is to increase flexibility and opportunity for LEFG participants, while reducing administrative burdens. This action is also needed to develop a cost recovery program to meet the Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements for limited access privilege programs.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM
07/00/26
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jennifer Quan, Regional Administrator—West Coast Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, DC 20230
Abstract: This proposed rule would implement regulations under the Tuna Conventions Act (TCA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 951et seq), to implement Resolutions C-25-01 (
Conservation Measures for Tropical Tunas in the Eastern Pacific Ocean During 2026 and 2027-2028) and C-25-07 (
Amends and Replaces Resolution C-24-06 on Fish-Aggregating Devices), which were adopted at the 103rd Meeting of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) in September 2025. The proposed rule would also implement several provisions of Resolution C-19-04 (
Resolution to Mitigate Impacts on Sea Turtles) that were not previously implemented. Finally, this proposed rule would make technical corrections to citations and hyperlinks in regulations for fishing under the Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program at 50 CFR 216.24 and 50 CFR 300.24 that are outdated and incorrect. This proposed rule would implement fishing management measures for tropical tuna (
i.e.,
bigeye tuna (yellowfin tuna, and skipjack tuna) in the eastern Pacific Ocean (EPO). Resolution C-25-01 continues measures currently in place in 50 CFR part 300, subpart C, including purse seine area closures, bigeye tuna catch limits, active fish aggregating device (FAD) limits, and retention and longline catch limits for bigeye tuna. The proposed rule would reduce the current purse seine closure period from 72 days to 64 days, modify the closure period for class 4 purse seine vessels, and require a one-time vessel assessment fee to pay for tuna tagging research. The Resolution will expire at the end of 2026 unless the scientific advice provided by staff and SAC in 2026 through the management strategy evaluation process confirms the effectiveness of the measures in place in which case the Resolution would remain in force until December 31, 2028.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
NPRM
07/00/26
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jennifer Quan, Regional Administrator—West Coast Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, DC 20230
Abstract: We propose protective regulations under section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for the conservation of the threatened oceanic whitetip shark (
Carcharhinus longimanus). The prohibitions listed under section 9(a)(1) of the ESA automatically apply when a species is listed as endangered. In the case of a
( printed page 52976)
species listed as threatened, the first sentence of section 4(d) provides that the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) shall issue such regulations as deemed necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of the species. The second sentence of section 4(d) states that the Secretary may by regulation prohibit with respect to any threatened species any or all acts prohibited under section 9(a)(1). The final rule to list the oceanic whitetip shark as a threatened species under the ESA became effective March 1, 2018 (83 FR 4153; January 30, 2018) and protective regulations for the species were not adopted at that time. There is increasing concern regarding the population-level impacts of ongoing take (intentional in some cases) of oceanic whitetip sharks both in the U.S. Pacific and Atlantic since the listing, which is legally allowed to occur in the absence of protective regulations. For this reason, we are now proposing to apply all of the prohibitions listed under ESA sections 9(a)(1)(A) through 9(a)(1)(G) to the species with limited exceptions for scientific research and law enforcement purposes.
Agency Contact: Kim Damon-Randall, Director, Office of Protected Resources, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Abstract: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (collectively referred to as the Services or we) proposed to rescind the regulatory definition of harm in our Endangered Species Act (ESA or the Act) regulations. The existing regulatory definition of harm, which includes habitat modification, runs contrary to the best meaning of the statutory term take. We are undertaking this change to adhere to the single, best meaning of the ESA.
Agency Contact: Kim Damon-Randall, Director, Office of Protected Resources, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Abstract: In response to a recommendation by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, this action would allow smaller hook-and-line or pot catcher vessels operating in the Federal Bering Sea and Aleutian Island (BSAI) Pacific cod (
Gadus macrophalus) less than 60' hook-and-line or pot catcher vessel sector to harvest Pacific cod from the BSAI Pacific cod jig sector's allocation. Under the current regulations, the BSAI Pacific cod jig sector only includes jig catcher vessels and catcher processors. The proposed amendment would redefine the current Federal BSAI Pacific cod jig sector to add hook-and-line and pot catcher vessels that are less than or equal to 55' length overall to the current definition. This proposed action is needed because of reduced Pacific cod total allowable catch (TAC), shortened seasons for the less than 60' hook-and-line and pot catcher vessel Pacific cod sector, and the inability of these smaller vessels to compete with larger vessels during poor weather. As such, the proposed action would likely provide a small benefit to a small number of fishery participants (those with smaller vessels). This action could provide stability and additional opportunities for current fishery participants and potential new entrants with smaller hook-and-line or pot catcher vessels without negatively impacting vessels that operate in the jig sector. However, larger hook-and-line or pot vessels could be negatively impacted by the proposed action, which would likely impact the historically common reallocations of projected unused Pacific cod allocation from the jig sector to the less than 60' hook-and-line or pot catcher vessel sector. The authority for this action is Section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
Agency Contact: Jon Kurland, Regional Administrator, Alaska Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 709 West Ninth Street, Juneau, AK 99801
Abstract: In response to a recommendation by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, this proposed action would implement regulations to establish the fee requirement for a Charter Halibut Stamp and (consistent with any applicable legal requirements). The Charter Halibut Stamp will be required for charter vessel anglers 18 years of age or older for each day they intend to harvest halibut on a charter vessel fishing trip in regulatory areas 2C and 3A. This includes charter halibut vessels operated and permitted under the Community Quota Entity and Military Morale and Welfare programs. The Sportfishing Guide Business Owner or their designee (as defined by Alaska Department of Fish and Game) will be responsible for paying all required fees. Charter vessel guides (as defined by NMFS) will be responsible for ensuring there is a validated halibut stamp on the vessel for each angler subject to the fee for each day of halibut fishing. Fee payment and Charter Halibut Stamp validation would need to occur prior to departure prior to the start of each fishing day. The RQE program provides a mechanism for the charter fishery to
( printed page 52977)
compensate the commercial IFQ fishery for halibut QS purchased from the commercial sector to increase the charter annual catch limits. The Council stated that the principle objective of the RQE program is to promote social and economic flexibility in the charter fishery under a willing buyer and willing seller approach.
Agency Contact: Jon Kurland, Regional Administrator, Alaska Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 709 West Ninth Street, Juneau, AK 99801
Abstract: This rule addresses conducting research in areas currently closed to fishing for Atlantic highly migratory species (HMS)—during various times or by certain gear— to collect fishery-dependent data. A number of time/area closures or gear-restricted areas have been implemented over the years through various rulemakings, limiting fishing for Atlantic highly migratory species in those areas for a variety of reasons including reducing bycatch. These time/area closures have been implemented in consultation with the HMS Advisory Panel to protect species consistent with the Magnuson- Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act (
e.g.,
to reduce bycatch in the pelagic longline fishery off the east coast of Florida), the Endangered Species Act (
e.g.,
to protect sea turtles in the North Atlantic), and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (
e.g.,
to protect spawning bluefin tuna in the Gulf of America). Fishery-dependent data supports effective fisheries management, and areas that restrict fishing effort often have a commensurate decrease in fishery-dependent data collection. Programs to facilitate research and data collection, such as those that would be covered by this rule, could assess the efficacy of closed areas, improve sustainable management of highly migratory species, and may provide benefits to commercial and recreational fishermen. The Agency's final actions for this rule are based in part on feedback and public comments on the proposed rule and draft environmental impact statement, regulatory impact review (RIR), and initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA). The comment period ended in October 2023. The comments received to date provide helpful feedback on the potential issues and ways forward. This rulemaking originated because of numerous requests from the public to reconsider closed areas. The measures in the proposed rule were developed after numerous scoping meetings and after considering written comments.
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: Atlantic highly migratory species (HMS) are managed under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801et seq.,
and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA),
id.
971
et seq.,
the implementing statute for binding recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. NMFS proposed modifying and/or expanding reporting requirements for Atlantic HMS, including reporting by commercial, for-hire, and private recreational vessel owners and dealers. Specifically, the proposed action considered requiring vessel owners, who currently report in existing paper commercial logbooks (
i.e.,
Atlantic HMS logbook and the Southeast Coastal Fisheries Logbook Program), to report electronically. NMFS also proposed implementing new logbook requirements for vessel owners holding HMS Charter/Headboat permits or Atlantic Tunas General category permits, Atlantic Tunas Harpoon category permits, and/or Swordfish General Commercial permits. The proposed action considered modifying reporting options for private recreational vessel owners holding HMS Angling permits. Additionally, the proposed rule considered requiring HMS dealers to report individual fish weights for additional species (
i.e.,
Atlantic bigeye, albacore, yellowfin, and skipjack (BAYS) tunas, swordfish, and pelagic sharks). Under the proposed rule, all HMS reporting would become electronic, using systems or applications approved by NMFS for Atlantic HMS. Finally, the proposed action proposed technical changes to clarify certain HMS regulations. This action is being taken pursuant to the rulemaking authority under section 304(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. 16 U.S.C. 1854(c). The proposed rule comment period ended in January 2025. The comments received provide helpful feedback on the potential proposed measures, which are under consideration by the Agency. The Agency's final actions for this rulemaking will be based in part on feedback and public comments received on the proposed rule.
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, is responsible for managing Atlantic highly migratory species (HMS) pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801et seq.,
and consistent with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA),
id.
971
et seq., the implementing statute for binding recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). NMFS is considering changes to regulations to implement ICCAT Recommendation 24-12, adopted in 2024. Recommendation 24-12 requires that the United States and other ICCAT parties prohibit retaining on board, transhipping, landing or storing any part or whole carcass of all species of mobulid rays (family Mobulidae) as listed in Recommendation 19-01 and taken in the Convention area in association with ICCAT fisheries. Recommendation 19-01 lists the following seven species of mobulid rays:
Mobula alfredi, M. birostris
(giant manta),
M. hypostoma
(lesser devil ray),
M. japonica, M. mobular
(devil fish),
M. tarapacana
(Chilean devil ray), and
M. thurstoni
(smoothtail mobula). Further, Recommendation 24-12 requires that vessels promptly release unharmed, to the extent practicable, mobulid rays as soon as they are seen in the net, on the hook, or at the vessel, in a manner that shall result in the least possible harm to the individual. This action is not expected to have an economic impact on HMS fisheries, as these fisheries do not target or retain mobulid rays. In 2022, HMS fisheries across all regions and gear types had ex-vessel revenues of approximately $41.1 million. This action is being taken pursuant to the rulemaking authority under section 971d of ATCA, 16 U.S.C. 971d, and section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1855(d).
Agency Contact: Kelly Denit, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, MD 20901
Abstract: Gulf of America Bryde's whales (Balaenoptera edeni) were listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) effective April 15, 2019 (84 FR 15446). On October 22, 2021, NMFS published a final rule that revised the listing of Gulf of America Bryde's whales to reflect the scientifically accepted taxonomy and nomenclature of the species (86 FR 47022). The revised common name for this species is Rice's whale and the scientific name is Balaenoptera ricei. The ESA requires that critical habitat be designated to the maximum extent prudent and determinable at the time a species is listed (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)(3)(i)). NMFS concluded that critical habitat was not yet determinable for the Rice's whale at the time of listing. However, NMFS indicated that they anticipated critical habitat would be determinable in the future given on-going research. NMFS, therefore, announced in the final listing rule that they would propose critical habitat in a separate rulemaking. This rule finalizes designation of critical habitat for the endangered Rice's whale. NMFS will consult with the Department of Defense to assess any potential national security impacts as a result of the critical habitat designation.
Abstract: On December 9, 2016, NMFS issued a final rule that established a risk-based traceability program to track seafood from harvest to entry into U.S. commerce. The final rule included, for designated priority fish species, import permitting and reporting requirements to provide for traceability of seafood products offered for entry into the U.S. supply chain, and to ensure that these products were lawfully acquired and are properly represented. Shrimp and abalone products were included in the final rule to implement the Seafood Import Monitoring Program, but compliance with Seafood Import Monitoring Program requirements for those species was stayed indefinitely due to the disparity between Federal reporting programs for domestic aquaculture of shrimp and abalone products relative to the requirements that would apply to imports under the Seafood Import Monitoring Program. In section 539 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, Congress mandated lifting the stay on inclusion of shrimp and abalone in Seafood Import Monitoring Program and authorized the Secretary of Commerce to require comparable reporting and recordkeeping requirements for domestic aquaculture of shrimp and abalone. Following due consideration of necessary revisions or rescissions as directed by E.O. 14276 Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness, a rulemaking addressing the above issues may establish permitting, reporting and recordkeeping requirements for domestic producers of shrimp and abalone from the point of production to entry into commerce.
208. ATLANTIC COASTAL FISHERIES COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT ACT PROVISIONS; AMERICAN LOBSTER FISHERY VESSEL TRACKING FOR THE FEDERAL AMERICAN LOBSTER FISHERY
Abstract: The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, the body responsible for the interstate management of the American lobster fishery, recently approved Addendum XXIX to Amendment 3 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for American Lobster, which requires electronic tracking of vessels participating in the fishery, with state implementation beginning in 2023. The Commission is made up of representatives from each of the eastern coastal states, including members of the lobster industry, and voted unanimously in support of vessel tracking, which is similar to global positioning system (GPS) capabilities on a cellular/mobile telephone. These data are critical to improving stock assessments, informing discussions and management decisions related to protected species and marine spatial planning, and enhancing offshore enforcement. NOAA Fisheries is proposing complementary Federal regulations under the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act, this would consider revising to regulations under 50 CFR 697.
Abstract: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, is responsible for managing Atlantic highly migratory species (HMS) pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801et seq.,
and consistent with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act,
id.
971
et seq.,
the implementing statute for binding recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. NMFS is developing a rule that would consider implementing area closures for HMS fisheries that complement area closures for fisheries managed under non-HMS fishery management plans. Some of these closures, for example the ones for bottom longline gear, would be wholly new closures in HMS fisheries. Other area closures, such as those related to the Madison-Swanson and Steamboat Lumps closed areas, could include changes and possibly additional restrictions to existing HMS area closures. The Regional Fishery Management Councils requested that NMFS implement these complementary measures in HMS fisheries to simplify enforcement of protections for bottom habitat and reef species.
Abstract: Under authority of the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988, this rule would implement recent amendments to the Treaty on Fisheries between the Governments of Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the United States of America (also known as the South Pacific Tuna Treaty). The rule would include modification to the procedures used to request licenses for U.S. vessels in the western and central Pacific Ocean purse seine fishery, including changing the annual licensing period from June-to-June to the calendar year, and modifications to existing reporting requirements for purse seine vessels fishing in the western and central Pacific Ocean. The rule would implement only those aspects of the Treaty amendments that can be implemented under the existing South Pacific Tuna Act.
Abstract: Under authority of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention Implementation Act (16 U.S.C. 6901et seq.), NMFS is implementing fishing effort limits for the U.S. purse seine fishery operating in the western and central Pacific Ocean (WCPO). Regulations at 50 CFR 300.223(a) currently limit U.S. WCPO purse seine fishing effort in a combined area of the high seas and U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Based on recent decisions of the Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, this rule implements separate U.S. WCPO purse seine fishing effort limits for the high seas and U.S. EEZ. This rule could have some economic effects on U.S. purse seine vessels, as the separate effort limits would reduce the operational flexibility provided by the combined effort limits. This rule could also have some economic effects on American Samoa, as the separate limits could lead to a fishery closure earlier in the year than under the combined limits, which could reduce fish supply to the cannery based in American Samoa. Other elements of this rule include modifications to the process for closing the fishery once an effort limit is reached, and modifications to the procedures for obtaining daily purse seine fishing effort reports.
Abstract: The NMFS proposes to amend the Fishery Ecosystem Plans (FEP) for the American Samoa Archipelago, the Hawaii Archipelago, the Marianas Archipelago, the Pacific Remote Island Areas, and the Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific. The amendments would establish a Federal management program for aquaculture fisheries in Federal waters of the U.S. exclusive economic zone of the Pacific Islands Region (PIR) and would include regulations for implementing the program. The intent of the proposed action is to manage commercial aquaculture production in these waters. The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council recommended the amendments recognizing the growing need and desire to develop aquaculture and the possibility of user conflicts and effects to the marine environment. The proposed action would apply to operators of aquaculture facilities in Federal waters of the PIR. NMFS would implement this action pursuant to the rulemaking authority under Section 303(a) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and implement regulations at 50 CFR 600.330(c)(1).
The action would likely result in minor to moderate economic impacts. The impacts of implementing an aquaculture framework would directly affect aquaculture operations by streamlining the permitting process of developing new aquaculture operations. The action could also affect a number of sectors of the economy throughout the PIR, ranging from wild-capture fisheries, near-shore and on-shore aquaculture operations, employment, to seafood markets. However, numerous factors contribute to the uncertainty in forecasting the effects of developing an aquaculture framework, including uncertainty associated with what harvested products would be developed, what specific technology will be used for production, where the facilities will be located. NMFS predicts that, in the first five years that the framework is in place, two operations would operate under the framework as implemented.
Abstract: On November 27, 2020, we, NMFS, published in the
Federal Register
a proposal to designate 17 island units of critical habitat in the Pacific Islands Region for 7 Indo-Pacific coral species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Based on public comments and new information regarding the interpretation of the records of the listed corals and application to critical habitat, a substantial revision of the proposed rule is warranted. Accordingly, we withdrew the 2020 proposed rule and published a new proposed rule. We proposed to designate critical habitat for five of the seven coral species that were addressed in the 2020 proposed rule: Acropora globiceps, Acropora retusa, Acropora speciosa, Euphyllia paradivisa, and Isopora crateriformis. Proposed critical habitat includes 16 island units encompassing approximately 251 square kilometers (km2
; 97 square miles, mi2
) of marine habitat. In the development of the proposed rule, NMFS considered economic, national security, and other relevant impacts of the proposed designations, but we are not excluding any areas from the critical habitat designations due to anticipated impacts.
Agency Contact: Kim Damon-Randall, Director, Office of Protected Resources, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Abstract: NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service is proposing this action pursuant to the authorities under sections 303(c) and 304(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council and the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission jointly manage summer flounder, scup, and black sea bass as a part of the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan (FMP). At the joint meeting in December 2024, the Council and the Commission's Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Board recommended 2025 black sea bass recreational management measures. For black sea bass, the Regional Administrator must implement coastwide measures or approve conservation equivalent measures per 50 CFR 648.142(d) as soon as possible following the Council and Commission's recommendation. This action proposed establishing conservation equivalency (
i.e.,
waiving Federal measures in lieu of appropriate state water measures) for the
( printed page 52981)
recreational black sea bass fisheries and proposes non-preferred coastwide measures to be effective in Federal waters if, ultimately, we are unable to approve conservation equivalency. This action proposed no changes to the Federal recreational management measures for scup or summer flounder.
Agency Contact: Michael Pentony, Regional Administrator, Greater Atlantic Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930
215. SECRETARIAL AMENDMENT TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE SNAPPER-GROUPER FISHERY OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC REGION TO END OVERFISHING OF RED SNAPPER
Abstract: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) proposes regulations to implement the Secretarial Amendment pursuant to section 304(c)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The most recent stock assessment for red snapper (Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review 73, 2021) indicated that red snapper is overfished and undergoing overfishing, but the stock is making adequate progress towards rebuilding. In July 2021, NMFS sent a letter to the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) stating that red snapper were overfished and that a plan to end overfishing of the red snapper stock needed to be developed and implemented. The Council developed Regulatory Amendment 35 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region (Regulatory Amendment 35) and if implemented, it would have reduced the catch levels of red snapper, but it would not have ended overfishing. The Council considered the results of a recent pilot study on the possible overestimation of recreational fishing effort, and Council members expressed their individual concerns with Regulatory Amendment 35. The Council rescinded its final action to submit Regulatory Amendment 35 to NMFS for implementation and no regulations are in place to end overfishing. On June 14, 2024, NMFS implemented interim measures to reduce overfishing by temporarily reducing the catch limits for red snapper (89 FR 50350), and these measures are effective through December 11, 2024. The Secretarial Amendment will evaluate a range of alternatives for setting and managing catch for South Atlantic red snapper to end overfishing and support rebuilding objectives of the stock. The Secretarial Amendment would also explore management strategies to increase fishing opportunities for red snapper by transitioning the large number of dead recreational discards to landed catch. NMFS will develop an environmental impact statement (EIS) to describe and analyze alternatives to address the management needs previously described, including the current or no action alternatives. Possible actions that NMFS may consider to include in the EIS are, but are not limited to adjusting catch levels, adjusting accountability measures, and discard reduction measures. Based on a potential range of actions and alternatives, including dead discard reduction seasons and areas, and prior to conducting any actual economic effects analysis, NMFS believes this rule may adversely affect all sectors and components of the South Atlantic Snapper-Grouper fishery. This would include owners and crew of commercial fishing vessels, charter vessels and headboats, seafood dealers, and recreational anglers. Onshore support businesses such as bait and tackle shops may also be adversely affected. The magnitude of these effects will be determined by the breadth and duration of proposed management measures aimed at reducing red snapper dead discards.
Agency Contact: Andrew J. Strelcheck, Regional Administrator, Southeast Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
Abstract: In accordance with a recommendation from the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) at their June 2024 meeting, and under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) West Coast Region proposes to implement a closure to commercial groundfish bottom contact gear in the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS). Specifically, NMFS proposes to implement a groundfish exclusion area for the purposes of coral research and restoration within the MBNMS at the site of Sur Ridge. The purpose of this action is to close the Sur Ridge site within the National Marine Sanctuaries off California to commercial groundfish bottom contact gear in order to protect future deep-sea coral research and restoration projects from the impact of fishing gear. The coral research and restoration projects are intended to restore injuries to natural resources, habitat, and biota resulting from the sinking of the drydock YFD-70 at Pioneer Canyon in the MBNMS, on October 26, 2016. This action is being taken as a result of substantial public engagement through the Pacific Fishery Management Council.
Agency Contact: Jennifer Quan, Regional Administrator—West Coast Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, DC 20230
Abstract: This rule would establish the 2025 harvest specifications and allocations for Pacific Whiting. Through this rulemaking, NMFS would announce the intent to establish a U.S. Total Allowable Catch (TAC) level determined under the terms of the Agreement with Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting (Agreement) and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006 (Whiting Act) and apply the interim percent allocation for the Tribal fishery and set-asides (off the top deductions) for research and bycatch to determine the fishery harvest guideline, called the non-Tribal allocation, and sector allocations for three commercial whiting sectors. As in prior years, the Tribal allocation is not intended to set a precedent for future years. This action would be implemented pursuant to the rulemaking authority under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) 304(b) and MSA section 305(d), and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006. Pursuant to MSA section 304(b), this action would implement a recommendation from the Pacific Fishery Management Council at their November 2024 meeting for the 2025 Pacific whiting set-aside for research and bycatch. Pursuant to MSA section 305(d), this action would implement the annual Pacific whiting Treaty allocation and is necessary to ensure that the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan is implemented in a manner consistent with treaty rights of four Treaty Tribes to fish in their usual and accustomed grounds and stations in common with non-tribal citizens. United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 313 (W.D. Wash. 1974). Pursuant to the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006, this action would announce the U.S. TAC level, and subsequent non-discretionary sector allocations. The harvest specifications that would be implemented by this action would be in effect for the Pacific Whiting fishery that opens May 01, 2025 through December 31, 2025.
Agency Contact: Jennifer Quan, Regional Administrator—West Coast Region, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, DC 20230
Abstract: Pursuant to Executive Order 14285 of April 24, 2025, Unleashing America's Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources, and the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act, the Department of Commerce is revising regulations governing the application process for exploration licenses and commercial recovery permits.
Agency Contact: Kerry Kehoe, Federal Consistency Specialist, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office for Coastal Management, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
David W. Kaiser, Senior Policy Analyst, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office for Coastal Management 246 Gregg Hall, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824