Securities and Exchange Commission
- [Release No. 34-106237; File No. 4-698]
On August 11, 2026, Consolidated Audit Trail, LLC (“CAT LLC”), on behalf of the Participants [1] in the National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (“CAT NMS Plan” or “Plan”),[2] submitted a letter (the “FAM 4 Exemption Request”) [3] requesting that the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) use its exemptive authority under Section 36 of the Exchange Act [4] and/or Rule 608(e) of Regulation NMS thereunder [5] in connection with the recovery of certain costs incurred during the fourth and final Financial Accountability Milestone (“FAM 4”) of the Plan. The Commission is publishing this notice to provide interested persons with an opportunity to comment.
I. Background
On July 18, 2012, the Commission adopted Rule 613 of Regulation NMS.[6] The goal of Rule 613 was to create a modernized audit trail system—the CAT—that would provide regulators with timely access to a comprehensive set of trading data, thus enabling regulators to more efficiently and effectively analyze and reconstruct market events, monitor market behavior, conduct market analysis to support regulatory decisions, and perform surveillance, investigation, and enforcement activities. On November 15, 2016, the Commission approved the CAT NMS Plan as the national market system plan required by Rule 613. While Rule 613 [7] and the CAT NMS Plan contemplated that the costs of building the CAT may eventually be split between Industry Members [8] and the Participants,[9] during the development and implementation stages of the CAT, the Participants fully funded the historical costs associated with building the CAT through non-interest-bearing loans.[10] On September 9, 2019, after significant delays in the development and implementation of the CAT where the Participants had met neither the deadlines set forth in the CAT NMS Plan [11] nor their own proposed extensions of those deadlines,[12] the Commission proposed to amend the CAT NMS Plan to include provisions designed to increase operational transparency surrounding the implementation process and the Participants' financial accountability for the timely completion of the CAT.[13] On May 15, 2020, the Commission approved the FAM Proposal and amended the CAT NMS Plan to require the Participants to develop a complete implementation plan containing a detailed timeline with objective milestones to achieve full CAT implementation.[14] Accordingly, the ( printed page 56692) Participants developed and implemented Section 11.6 (Funding Incentives for Post-Amendment Expenses) of the CAT NMS Plan to establish a four phased implementation schedule, as well as funding penalties in the event that their chosen deadlines for the phased implementation schedule were missed—the four Financial Accountability Milestones (“FAMs”). Section 11.6 of the CAT NMS Plan requires the four FAMs to be met by certain deadlines in order for the Participants to recover the full amount of any fees established by the Operating Committee, or implemented by the Participants, to recover a portion of Post-Amendment Expenses [15] from Industry Members (“Post-Amendment Industry Member Fees”) and imposed penalties on what could be recovered if a deadline was missed.[16]
The Participants stated that FAM 4—Full Implementation of CAT NMS Plan Requirements—requires the completion of the Customer and Account Information System (“CAIS”), among other things, and is defined as:
the point at which the Participants have satisfied all of their obligations to build and implement the CAT, such that all CAT system functionality required by Rule 613 and the CAT NMS Plan has been developed, successfully tested, and fully implemented at the initial Error Rates specified by Section 6.5(d)(i) or less, including functionality that efficiently permits the Participants and the Commission to access all CAT Data required to be stored in the Central Repository pursuant to Section 6.5(a), including Customer Account Information, Customer-ID, Customer Identifying Information, and Allocation Reports, and to analyze the full lifecycle of an order across the national market system, from order origination through order execution or order cancellation, including any related allocation information provided in an Allocation Report. This Financial Accountability Milestone shall be considered complete as of the date identified in a Quarterly Progress Report meeting the requirements of Section 6.6(c).[17]
Section 11.6(a)(i)(D) of the CAT NMS Plan sets forth the target deadline for FAM 4 of December 30, 2022. It states that:
[t]he Participants will be entitled to collect the full amount of: . . . (D) Any Post-Amendment Industry Member Fees established or implemented to recover the Post-Amendment Expenses incurred from the date immediately following the achievement of Full Availability and Regulatory Utilization of Transactional Database Functionality to the date of Full Implementation of CAT NMS Plan Requirements (“Period 4”), so long as such date is no later than December 30, 2022.
Section 11.6(a)(iii) of the CAT NMS Plan sets forth the penalty for missing the target deadline of December 30, 2022. It states that:
The amount of Post-Amendment Industry Member Fees that the Participants are entitled to collect for Periods 2, 3, and 4 will be reduced according to the following schedule if the Participants miss the deadline set forth for that Period:
(A) By 25% if the Participants miss the deadline set forth in Section 11.6(a)(i)(B)-(D) by less than 90 days;
(B) By 50% if the Participants miss the deadline set forth in Section 11.6(a)(i)(B)-(D) by 90 days or more, but less than 180 days;
(C) By 75% if the Participants miss the deadline set forth in Section 11.6(a)(i)(B)-(D) by 180 days or more, but less than 270 days; and
(D) By 100% if the Participants miss the deadline set forth in Section 11.6(a)(i)(B)-(D) by 270 days or more.
The Participants stated that under Section 1.1 of the CAT NMS Plan, a FAM is considered complete as of the date identified in the Participants' Quarterly Progress Reports (“QPRs”), and that due to the need to address certain technical defects associated with CAIS, Full Implementation of CAT NMS Plan Requirements was completed on July 15, 2024.[18] Because July 15, 2024 was more than 270 days beyond FAM 4's December 30, 2022 deadline, under the schedule set forth in Section 11.6(a)(iii), the amount of Post-Amendment Industry Member Fees that the Participants could collect for FAM 4 would be reduced by 100%.
II. Summary of the FAM 4 Exemption Request
The Participants requested exemptive relief from this 100% reduction penalty, as they stated that various other factors should be taken into consideration.[19] Specifically, the Participants stated that they, through CAT LLC, seek exemptive relief to allow for the recovery of non-CAIS FAM 4 costs from Industry Members. The Participants also requested an exemption from Sections 11.3(b)(i)(D)(I) and 11.3(f) of the CAT NMS Plan, which would allow for a shortened historical recovery period or relief from the March 31, 2028 deadline to recover Historical CAT Costs.
The Participants stated that the requested exemptive relief is “necessary or appropriate in the public interest, and is consistent with the protection of investors,” [20] and is “consistent with the public interest, the protection of investors, the maintenance of fair and orderly markets and the removal of impediments to, and perfection of the mechanisms of, a national market system,” [21] because it would prevent “an excessive and grossly disproportionate” penalty from being imposed in connection with FAM 4.[22] The Participants stated that, in spite of what they believe to be the limited nature of the delay in FAM 4 CAIS implementation, FAM 4 would prevent the recovery of any CAT costs incurred by CAT LLC during Period 4—including any costs related to the ongoing, successful operation of the transactional database that was completed on time.[23] The Participants further stated that such a result would not be a reasonable or equitable application of the financial accountability provisions adopted by the Commission.[24]
The Participants stated that FAM 4 required the completion of a novel and separate system for the submission of customer and account data known as CAIS, among other requirements, and established a target deadline of December 30, 2022.[25] The Participants stated that although the CAT NMS Plan requirements related to the transactional database were implemented prior to FAM 4, certain technical aspects of the
( printed page 56693)CAIS database were not completed until July 15, 2024.[26] The Participants stated that during Period 4 (from January 1, 2022 through July 15, 2024), total CAT costs were $490,151,144, and these costs were funded by the Participants through voluntary, interest-free loans provided to CAT LLC.[27] The Participants stated that total costs incurred during Period 4 fall into three categories: (1) expenses incurred during FAM 4 related to the transactional database; (2) expenses incurred during FAM 4 related to CAIS; and (3) other operating costs incurred during FAM 4, largely comprised of fees for legal, consulting, and accounting support.[28] The Participants further stated that based on the current funding model, which allocates two-thirds of CAT costs to Industry Members and one-third of CAT costs to Participants, the application of the 100% penalty under FAM 4 would prevent the Participants' recovery of $326,767,429 from Industry Members.[29] The Participants stated that, unrelated to the CAIS delay, throughout Period 4 (January 1, 2022 through July 15, 2024), CAT LLC continued to operate the transactional database, incurring $364,219,549 in related technology costs and $26,624,090 in other CAT LLC operating costs—separate and apart from any CAIS-related costs.[30] In addition, the Participants stated that during Period 4, CAT LLC incurred CAIS-related costs of $99,307,505, or approximately 20% of overall Period 4 costs of $490,151,144.[31] The Participants provided the following chart, which outlines the FAM 4 costs that would otherwise be recoverable by Participants from Industry Members under the current CAT funding model.[32]
| FAM 4 costs | 2/3 recovery per CAT funding model | |
|---|---|---|
| FINRA CAT Technology Costs—Non-CAIS | $364,219,549 | $242,813,033 |
| FINRA CAT Technology Costs—CAIS | 99,307,505 | 66,205,003 |
| Other Operating Costs | 26,624,090 | 17,749,393 |
| Total FAM 4 Costs | 490,151,144 | 326,767,429 |
The Participants stated that this $490 million total excludes remediation costs incurred by FINRA CAT relating to the delayed implementation of CAIS, and that FINRA CAT is prohibited from passing through remediation costs associated with the CAIS implementation to CAT LLC.[33] The Participants stated that absent exemptive relief, they would bear the full burden of $490,151,144 of Period 4 costs.[34]
The Participants stated that, based on the current funding model, which allocates two-thirds of CAT costs to Industry Members and one-third of CAT costs to Participants, the requested relief would permit the recovery of $260,562,426.[35] The Participants provided the following chart, which gives a breakdown of the FAM 4 amounts that would be anticipated in a subsequent Historical CAT Assessment, should the Commission grant this exemptive request.[36]
| FAM 4 costs | 2/3 recovery per CAT funding model | Anticipated 2/3 recovery per CAT funding model if exemption granted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FINRA CAT Technology Costs—Non-CAIS | $364,219,549 | $242,813,033 | $242,813,033 |
| FINRA CAT Technology Costs—CAIS | 99,307,505 | 66,205,003 | |
| Other Operating Costs | 26,624,090 | 17,749,393 | 17,749,393 |
| Total FAM 4 Costs | 490,151,144 | 326,767,429 | 260,562,426 |
The Participants stated that the exemptive relief should be granted because the vast majority of Period 4 costs related to the operation of the transactional database, which was fully implemented by December 31, 2021, and was fully operational during the entirety of Period 4.[37] The Participants stated that during the period when certain aspects of CAIS were delayed, the Commission acknowledged that “CAT is now operational and serves as a critical market oversight tool,” and that “CAT has also contributed to the Commission's enforcement and regulatory work.” [38] The Participants provided the examples of the Commission relying on CAT data in December 2022 to uncover a multi-year front-running scheme that generated at least $47 million in illegal trading profits,[39] and using CAT data in conducting the economic analyses for a package of market structure rule ( printed page 56694) proposals.[40] The Participants stated that the Commission adopted the FAMs with the goal of seeking to ensure that the Participants acted diligently while building the CAT and sought to encourage the timely development of the CAT by reducing the Participants' potential recovery of CAT costs in the event of delays.[41] The Participants stated that the transactional database was successfully completed on time and in accordance with the FAM deadlines, and thus the central premise underlying the FAMs— i.e., that missed deadlines “prevent regulators and market participants from reaping the regulatory benefits of the CAT” [42] —was absent with regard to the transactional database.[43] Therefore, the Participants stated, denying recovery of all Period 4 costs, the vast majority of which were attributed to the ongoing operation of the transactional database, would be an unfair and inequitable result.[44]
In addition, the Participants stated that when the Commission adopted the FAMs, it could not have reasonably envisioned imposing a strict liability $326 million FAM 4 penalty for CAIS-related defects while the transactional database remained fully operational and in active regulatory use.[45] The Participants stated that the delayed technical aspects of CAIS did not affect the overall utility of the transactional database, which was fully operational throughout Period 4.[46] The Participants stated that based on the successful completion of the transactional database, the Commission approved the retirement of OATS, which was supported by Industry Members.[47] The Participants further stated that neither the Commission nor the Participants anticipated such an excessive and disproportionate penalty would be possible when the FAMs were adopted, and that it would be inequitable for the Commission to impose a $326 million penalty tied to the completion of CAIS when the Commission later determined—only after the costs had already been incurred—that CAIS should no longer exist as originally conceived when the Commission established FAM 4.[48]
The Participants stated that, when adopting the FAMs, the Commission expressly highlighted its general exemptive authority, suggesting that the availability of exemptive relief was a material consideration in adopting the FAMs.[49] The Participants stated that the unforeseeable nature of an excessively large reduction in recoverable costs resulting from the delay in certain limited aspects of one part of the CAT system is exactly the type of circumstance that warrants the use of the Commission's exemptive authority.[50] The Participants stated when the SEC proposed the FAMs, both the Participants and Industry Members “recommended that the Commission adopt a more flexible approach that could account for the possibility of reasonable delays to CAT implementation” [51] without giving rise to financial penalties.[52] The Participants summarized sections from the Financial Information Forum (“FIF”), Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”), and Fidelity Capital Markets comment letters on the Financial Accountability Milestones Release suggesting that the Commission should allow for flexibility with the milestone dates and financial penalties, taking into account reasonable delays and unforeseen circumstances.[53] In their own comment letter on the Financial Accountability Milestones Release, the Participants stated that “the Commission and all market participants would benefit from a more flexible approach in which the Commission would assess the appropriateness of the recovery of Post-Amendment Industry Member Fees in the context of particular facts and circumstances in the event of a delay in meeting such a Milestone.” [54] The Participants stated that in Financial Accountability Milestones Release, the Commission noted “it is sensitive to the concerns expressed by commenters,” [55] that it has “authority to grant exemptive relief from any requirement associated with a particular Financial Accountability Milestone,” and that “this ability, in particular, should alleviate the Participants' concerns regarding the potential impact of unforeseeable or reasonable delays.” [56] The Participants stated that this is the type of circumstance that warrants exemptive relief. The Participants stated that, in the past, they submitted three exemptive requests seeking full recovery ( printed page 56695) of FAM 4 costs, but the Commission has not acted on those requests.[57] The Participants distinguished this request for exemptive relief by stating that this request relates to the recovery of non-CAIS FAM 4 costs.[58] The Participants stated that this circumstance—where certain technical defects with a single component of the larger CAT system would preclude recovery of $326 million in reasonably incurred costs, the vast majority of which were attributed to the ongoing operation of the transactional database—represents exactly the sort of scenario the Commission recognized in adopting the FAMs where it would be appropriate to exercise its exemptive authority.[59]
In addition, the Participants stated that the Commission has consistently reaffirmed that both the Participants and Industry Members should share in the costs of the CAT.[60] The Participants stated that all industry participants—the Commission, Participants, and Industry Members—benefitted from the regulatory oversight afforded by a fully operational CAT that was used in surveillance, enforcement, and rulemaking throughout Period 4.[61] The Participants stated that Industry Members would be unjustly enriched by FAM 4 absent exemptive relief because the Participants would bear the full burden of $490 million in reasonably incurred FAM 4 costs.[62] Additionally, the Participants stated that the vast majority of FAM 4 costs were cloud hosting fees and Plan Processor operating fees associated with the development and operation of the transactional database, which was fully operational throughout Period 4.[63] The Participants stated that any such penalty would overlook the specific intent expressed in Rule 613 that the Participants and Industry Members are to share in the costs of CAT.[64]
For these reasons, the Participants stated that they requested, through CAT LLC, that the Commission provide exemptive relief from the provisions in Section 11.6(a)(i)(D) and (iii) limiting the collection of the full amount of any Post-Amendment Industry Member Fees established or implemented to recover the Post-Amendment Expenses incurred from the date immediately following the achievement of Full Availability and Regulatory Utilization of Transactional Database Functionality to the date of Full Implementation of CAT NMS Plan Requirements with respect to the $390,843,639 in non-CAIS FAM 4 costs described above.[65] The Participants stated that with such exemptive relief, based on the existing funding model, CAT LLC would anticipate seeking recovery of $260,562,426 in costs related to FAM 4 from Industry Members via a Historical CAT Assessment ( i.e., two-thirds of $390,843,639).[66]
The Participants further stated that in order to facilitate the recovery of historical CAT costs pursuant to the funding model under the CAT NMS Plan, the Operating Committee is required to reasonably establish the length of the Historical Recovery Period used in calculating each Historical Fee Rate based upon the amount of the Historical CAT Costs to be recovered by the Historical CAT Assessment, and to describe the reasons for its length.[67] Section 11.3(b)(i)(D)(I) of the CAT NMS Plan states that the Historical Recovery Period used in calculating the Historical Fee Rate may not be less than 24 months or more than five years.[68] However, Section 11.3(f) of the CAT NMS Plan would prohibit the billing of Historical CAT Assessments after March 31, 2028, which is less than 24 months from the date of this request.[69] Accordingly, the Participants stated that a shortened historical recovery period or relief from the March 2028 deadline is necessary to effectuate the requested relief.[70]
In order to establish a Historical CAT Assessment to recover the FAM 4 costs contemplated by the requested relief prior to the March 31, 2028 deadline, the Participants requested an exemption from Section 11.3(b)(i)(D)(I) of the CAT NMS Plan to allow for a historical recovery period of one year.[71] The Participants represented that using a historical recovery period shorter than two years would continue to result in a reasonable fee rate, as CAT LLC currently estimates, based on the recovery of $260,562,426 and based on recent executed equivalent share volumes, the estimated fee rate would be approximately $0.000022 for a one-year recovery period.[72] The Participants stated that this is comparable to the fee rates previously charged for Prospective CAT Fees and Historical CAT Assessments.[73]
III. Request for Comment
We request and encourage any interested person to submit written data, views, arguments, and comments regarding the FAM 4 Exemption Request, including whether the Commission should grant the request.
Comments should be received on or before October 5, 2026. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
- Use the Commission's internet comment form (www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
- Send an email torule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number 4-698 (CAT FAM 4 Exemption Request) on the subject line.
Paper Comments
- Send paper comments to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number 4-698 (CAT FAM 4 Exemption Request). This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website ( www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
For further information, you may contact David Hsu, Office of Market Supervision, Division of Trading and Markets, at (202) 551-5500, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.
By the Commission.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.