Document

Raw Honey From Argentina: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that NEXCO S.A. (NEXCO) and Villamora S.A. (Villamora), and the non-individually-examined companies for which...

Department of Commerce
International Trade Administration
  1. [A-357-823]

AGENCY:

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that NEXCO S.A. (NEXCO) and Villamora S.A. (Villamora), and the non-individually-examined companies for which a review was requested made sales of raw honey from at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.

DATES:

Applicable September 14, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jun Jack Zhao or Scott Davison, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-1396 or (202) 482-1015, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On July 25, 2025, based on timely requests for review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on raw honey (honey) from Argentina.[1] On September 9, 2025, Commerce selected NEXCO and Villamora as the mandatory respondents in this review.[2]

Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by 47 days.[3] Additionally, due to a backlog of documents that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an additional 21 days.[4] On March 25, 2026, Commerce extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this review by 113 days, to no later than August 31, 2026.[5] On August 27, 2026, Commerce extended the deadline for the Preliminary results of this review by 7 days, to no later than September 8, 2026.[6]

For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[7] A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at access.trade.gov/​frnotices.

Scope of the Order

The merchandise subject to the Order is Honey from Argentina. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Methodology

Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Rate for Non-Individually Examined Companies

There are 34 companies for which a review was requested and Commerce does not intend to rescind review, which had reviewable entries, and ( printed page 58088) which were not selected as mandatory respondents or found to be cross-owned with a mandatory respondent ( see Appendix II). The Act does not address the establishment of a rate to apply to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. However, Commerce's regulation at 19 CFR 351.109(g) states that Commerce will determine the rate for non-selected companies by following the process set forth in 19 CFR 351.109(f)(1)-(2), which generally parallels the process for determining the all-others rate in an investigation under section 705(c)(5) of the Act. Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.109(f) state that for companies not investigated, in general, we will determine an all-others rate by weight averaging the antidumping rates established for each of the companies individually investigated, excluding zero and de minimis rates or any rates based entirely on facts available.

Accordingly, to determine the rate for companies not selected for individual examination, Commerce's practice is to weight average the net subsidy rates for the selected mandatory respondents, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. Because the rate calculated for both mandatory respondents is above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we are applying to the non-selected companies the weighted average of the net subsidy rates calculated for NEXCO and Villamora, which we calculated using the publicly-ranged sales dated submitted by NEXCO and Villamora.[8]

Preliminary Results of Review

As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the following estimated weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025:

Producer/exporter Weighted-average dumping margin (percent)
NEXCO S.A 1.93
Villamora S.A 6.80
Companies Not Selected for Individual Review 9 3.48

Disclosure

Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis performed to interested parties for these preliminary results within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Verification

On November 3, 2025, the American Honey Producers Association, the petitioners, requested that Commerce conduct verification of NEXCO S.A. and Villamora's responses.[10] As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to verify the information relied upon in making its final results.

Public Comment

Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we have modified the deadline for interested parties to submit case briefs to Commerce to no later than 21 days after the date of the publication of this notice.[11] Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.[12] Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.[13] All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the established deadline.

As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iii), we request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.[14] Further, we request that interested parties limit their public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).[15]

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing.[16]

Assessment Rates

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.

If NEXCO S.A.'s and Villamora's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis ( i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, Commerce intends to calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those sales. Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales to a particular importer, we will calculate an importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total quantity of those sales.[17] To determine whether an importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on estimated entered values. If a NEXCO S.A.'s and Villamora's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis or where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, ( printed page 58089) we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.[18]

In accordance with Commerce's “automatic assessment” practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by NEXCO S.A. and Villamora for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at the all-others rate calculated in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation if there is no rate for the intermediate companies involved in the transaction.[19]

For the companies listed in Appendix II which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the review-specific rate, calculated as noted in the “Rate for Non-Individually Examined Companies” section, above. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.[20]

If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired ( i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be that established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed companies not covered by this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific cash deposit rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 16.92 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.[21] These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).

Dated: September 8, 2026.

Christopher Abbott,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary

II. Background

III. Scope of the Order

IV. Discussion of the Methodology

V. Currency Conversion

VI. Recommendation

Appendix II

Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for Individual Review

1. Algodonera Avellaneda S.A.

2. Annamell Imp. E Exp. De Produtos Apicolas Ltda.

3. Apicola Danangie

4. Apidouro Comercial Exportadora E Importadora Ltda.

5. Argentik LLC

6. Asociacion De Cooperativas Argentinas Cooperativa Limitada

7. Associacion de Cooperativas Argentinas C.L.

8. Azul Agronegocios S.A.

9. Breyer E Cia. Ltda.

10. CAM Honey Brothers S.A.

11. Camino de Circunvalancion y Calle Cladan S.A.

12. Compania Apicola Argentina S.A.

13. Compania Inversora Platense S.A.

14. Conexao Agro Ltda. ME

15. Cooperativa Apicola La Colmena Ltda.

16. Cooperativa de Provision Apicola COSAR Limitada

17. D'Ambros Maria de los Angeles y D'Ambros Maria Daniela SRL

18. D'Ambros Maria de los Angeles D'Ambros Maria Daniela SRL

19. D'Ambros Maria de los Angeles y D'Ambros Maria Daniela SH

20. D'Ambros Maria de los Angeles D'Ambros Maria Daniela SH

21. Flora Nectar Industria Comercio Importacao E Exportacao Ltda.

22. Gasrroni S.R.L.

23. Geomiel S.A.

24. Gruas San Blas S.A.

25. Honey & Grains Srl

26. Industrial Haedo S.A.

27. Mieles Cor Pam Srl

28. Naiman S.A.

29. Newsan S.A.

30. Osbo S.A.

31. Patagonik Food S.A.

32. Patagonik S.A.

33. Promiel Srl (Vicentin S.A.I.C.)

34. Terremare Foods S.A.S.

Footnotes

1.   See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,90 FR 35268 (July 25, 2025); see also Raw Honey from Argentina, Brazil, India, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders,90 FR 23515 (June 3, 2025) ( Order).

Back to Citation

2.   See Memorandum, “Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Raw Honey from Argentina; 2024-2025: Respondent Selection,” dated September 9, 2025.

Back to Citation

3.   See Memorandum, “Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government,” dated November 14, 2025.

Back to Citation

4.   See Memorandum, “Tolling of all Case Deadlines,” dated November 24, 2025.

Back to Citation

5.   See Memorandum, “Raw Honey from Argentina: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated March 25, 2026.

Back to Citation

6.   See Memorandum, “Raw Honey from Argentina: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025” dated August 27, 2026.

Back to Citation

7.   See Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Raw Honey from Argentina; 2024-2025,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).

Back to Citation

8.   See Memorandum, “Calculation of the Preliminary Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination,” dated concurrently with this notice.

Back to Citation

9.  The exporters or producers not selected for individual review are listed in Appendix II.

Back to Citation

10.   See Petitioners' Letter, “Petitioner's Request for Verification,” dated November 3, 2025.

Back to Citation

12.   See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) ( APO and Service Procedures).

Back to Citation

14.  We use the term “issue” here to describe an argument that Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Back to Citation

15.   See APO and Service Procedures.

Back to Citation

18.   See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification,77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).

Back to Citation

19.  For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).

Back to Citation

20.   See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.

Back to Citation

21.   See Order.

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2026-18701 Filed 9-11-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Legal Citation

Federal Register Citation

Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.

91 FR 58087

Web Citation

Suggested Web Citation

Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.

“Raw Honey From Argentina: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025,” thefederalregister.org (September 14, 2026), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2026-18701/raw-honey-from-argentina-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2024-2025.