Securities and Exchange Commission
- [Release No. 34-106390; File No. SR-IEX-2026-31]
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) [1] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) [2] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[3] notice is hereby given that on September 8, 2026, the Investors Exchange LLC (“IEX” or the “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,[4] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[5] the Exchange is filing with the Commission a rule change proposal to address internal inconsistencies in Rule 22.260 in advance of the launch of IEX Options. The Exchange has designated this rule change as “non-controversial” under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act [6] and provided the Commission with the notice required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.[7]
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's website at www.iexexchange.io/resources/regulation/rule-filings and at the principal office of the Exchange. ( printed page 59825)
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
On September 18, 2025, the Commission approved IEX's proposal to adopt rules governing the trading of options on the Exchange in a new facility called “IEX Options”; [8] IEX Options has announced its plan to commence trading options on October 2, 2026.[9] As set forth in the IEX Options rules, the System's [10] acceptance and execution of orders, quotes, and bulk messages, as applicable, are subject to the price protection mechanisms and risk controls provided to Options Members [11] in Rule 22.250 (Pre-Trade and Activity-Based Risk Controls) and Rule 22.260 (Additional Price Protection Mechanisms and Risk Controls). In advance of the commencement of trading options, IEX now makes this rule change proposal to address internal inconsistencies in Rule 22.260. Specifically, as described below, IEX proposes to delete Rule 22.260(b) and to expand the types of orders that are not subject to Rule 22.260(e). The Exchange has designated this rule change as “non-controversial” under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act [12] and provided the Commission with the notice required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.[13]
Background
IEX Options has three Order Types (applicable to orders and quotes): Limit orders,[14] Market orders,[15] and Attributable orders.[16] Each order and quote must also have a TIF [17] of either IOC [18] or Day.[19] Options Members may also include one of three optional “Handling Instructions” [20] with their orders and quotes: Book only,[21] Post Only,[22] and Intermarket Sweep Orders.[23]
IEX Options rules provide for several price protection mechanisms, including Rule 22.260(b) (Market Orders in No-Bid (Offer) Series) and Rule 22.260(e) (Drill-Through Protection). The Market Orders in a No-Bid (Offer) Series rule is designed to protect Market orders from executions at potentially erroneous prices, and provides that if the System receives a sell Market order in a series after it is open for trading with an NBB [24] of zero and an NBO [25] less than or equal to $0.50, the System will convert the Market order to a Limit order with a limit price equal to the minimum trading increment applicable to the series and will post the order to the Order Book.[26] If the System receives a sell Market order in a series after it is open for trading with an NBB of zero and an NBO greater than $0.50, the System cancels or rejects the Market order, except if the sell Market order would be subject to the drill-through protection, in which case the order joins the ongoing drill-through process.[27] If the System receives a buy Market order in a series after it is open for trading with an NBO of zero, the System cancels or rejects the Market order.[28]
( printed page 59826)The Drill-Through Protection rule is designed to prevent an aggressively priced order from executing beyond multiple price levels by utilizing a series of iterations up to an Exchange-determined “buffer amount” [29] that caps how far the order can execute, rather than immediately sweeping all available liquidity up to its limit price, before it stops executing or routing the order.[30] Bulk messages [31] and ISOs are not eligible for drill-through protection.[32]
Proposal
A. Deletion of Rule 22.260(b)
As noted above, IEX Rule 22.260(b) specifies that if the System receives a sell Market order in a series after it is open for trading with an NBB of zero, if the NBO in the series is less than or equal to $0.50, then the System will convert the Market order to a Limit order with a limit price equal to the minimum trading increment applicable to the series and enter it into the IEX Options Book. However, IEX Market orders may only have a TIF of IOC,[33] which means a Market order that is not “executed immediately on the Exchange or another options exchange is cancelled and is not posted to the IEX Options Book.” [34] Because Market orders either execute or cancel on entry, they cannot be converted by the System into a Limit order that is entered into the Options Order Book nor could they be subject to an ongoing drill-through process.
Thus, the provisions in Rule 22.260(b) that refer to converting a sell Market order to a limit order or the order being subject to an ongoing drill-through process are inapplicable. If a Market order to sell is received at a time when the NBB is zero ( i.e., there is no interest to buy in the series), the Market order will be automatically canceled by the System because it would not be executed, pursuant to Rule 22.100(g)(1). With respect to a buy Market order received in a series after it is open for trading with an NBO of zero ( i.e., there is no interest to sell in the series), Rule 22.260(b)(2) provides that the order will be rejected. In this context the terms rejected and canceled achieve the same result because the order would not rest on the IEX Options Order Book. Accordingly, IEX proposes to delete Rule 22.260(b) as unnecessary and duplicative of Rule 22.100(g)(1) and insert the word “Reserved” in its place.
B. Amendment to Rule 22.260(e)
IEX's Drill-Through Protection provides execution-price protection for liquidity-taking orders, which permits a marketable order to access liquidity across multiple price levels while limiting the distance through the prevailing contra-side NBBO at which executions may initially occur to prevent an order from executing through successive price levels too aggressively.[35]
IEX's Drill-Through Protection Rule does not apply to bulk messages or ISOs.[36] Bulk messages are designed to enable Market Makers to efficiently submit and update liquidity providing quotations, rather than to function as liquidity-taking orders seeking execution through multiple price levels. For example, Day [37] bulk messages cannot sweep at all because they are Post Only; [38] and IOC bulk messages are for the limited purpose of Market Maker risk management.[39] Accordingly, applying drill-through to bulk messages would not meaningfully advance the purpose for which drill-through protection was designed.
IEX's Drill-Through Protection Rule does not apply to ISOs for a different reason. An Options Member submitting an ISO order is affirmatively instructing the Exchange to execute the order through the market up to its limit price without regard to Protected Quotations at other options exchanges.[40] Restricting the order by the Drill-Through process would be inconsistent with the objective of an ISO order.
IEX proposes to exclude Post Only orders ( i.e., including orders and quotes not submitted as bulk messages), which by definition cannot remove liquidity from the IEX Options Order Book, from the Drill-Through Protection rule. For the reasons discussed above, this exclusion is logical because Drill-Through Protection is designed to protect liquidity-taking orders (something Post Only orders cannot do) from executing at too aggressive a price.[41] Thus, as proposed, Rule 22.260(e)(3)(4) will now read: “This protection does not apply to bulk messages, Post Only, or ISOs.”
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act [42] in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act [43] in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in, securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
As discussed in the Purpose section, the proposed rule change is designed to address internal inconsistencies in IEX Options rules. As such, the proposed rule change would foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities and would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a national market system, and protect investors and the public interest, by clarifying how impacted order types will function. Specifically, IEX believes that Options Members would not expect a Market order with a TIF of IOC to be eligible for the Market Orders in No-Bid (Offer) Series protection of converting the order to a Limit order and would not expect Drill-Through Protection for aggressive taking orders to apply to Post Only orders that by definition must add liquidity to the Order Book. Thus, IEX believes that the proposed changes will reduce confusion ( printed page 59827) among market participants, thereby removing impediments to and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, protecting investors and the public interest.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed changes are consistent with the investor protection and the public interest provisions of the Act because impacted order types will continue to function as expected. Specifically, buy (or sell) Market orders received in a series after it is open for trading with an NBO (or NBB) of zero, will be canceled, which is what an Options Member would expect to happen when there is no contra-party interest because all IEX Options Market orders have a TIF of IOC.[44] And with respect to Drill-Through Protections, because Post Only orders do not take liquidity, it is logical to exclude them from a protection mechanism that prevents taking liquidity at excessive prices. Importantly, Market orders and Post Only orders will continue to be subject to all the applicable protections specified in Rules 22.250 and 22.260.
Moreover, the Exchange believes these proposed, narrowly tailored changes to its rules are not designed to permit unfair discrimination among Options Members as they would apply equally to all Options Members.
Finally, each of these proposed changes is based on the logical functionality of the Commission-approved price protection mechanisms coupled with how IEX's order types, TIFs, and Handling Instructions interact, and thus, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change raises any new or novel issues.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the extent the proposed changes enhance the competitiveness of IEX Options, competing exchanges have and can continue to adopt comparable functionality, subject to the Commission's rule filing process.
The Exchange also does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The rule change will apply equally to all Options Members. The Exchange believes that these proposed changes to Rule 22.260 to better align the rule with System functionality will enable Options Members to better understand and utilize these price protection mechanisms and risk controls, which, in turn, may enhance the integrity of trading on the options market and help to assure the stability of the financial system.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act [45] and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) [46] thereunder. Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; or (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act [47] and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) [48] thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) [49] normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),[50] the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule change may become operative immediately upon filing. According to the Exchange, waiving the 30-day delay would allow the proposed rule change to become operative on October 2, 2026, when IEX Options commences trading, and would permit the IEX Options System to operate in a manner fully aligned with IEX Options rules, alleviating any confusion among market participants about how the rules operate. Waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because it allows the revised IEX Options rules to be operative by October 2, 2026, the date that trading begins on the IEX Options System, provides clarity and prevents potential confusion for market participants about the operation of IEX Options rules, and does not introduce any novel regulatory issues. Accordingly, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.[51]
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
- Use the Commission's internet comment form (www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
- Send an email torule-comments@sec.gov. Please include file number SR-IEX-2026-31 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
- Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-IEX-2026-31. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will ( printed page 59828) post all comments on the Commission's internet website ( www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR-IEX-2026-31 and should be submitted on or before October 13, 2026.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[52]
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.