SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2025).

Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on September 21, 2026, ordered that—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1 and 6-9 of the '380 patent; claims 1-3, 5, and 7-12 of the '292 patent; the claim of the D'344 patent; claims 1, 4-15, 17, 19-23, 27, and 30 of the '388 patent; and the claim of the D'993 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is “wearable breast pumps, associated milk storage containers, and components including separately sold milk collection containers and replacement parts”;

(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a) The complainants are:

Willow Innovations, Inc., 1975 W El Camino Real, Suite 101, Mountain View, CA 94040.

Willow Blossom HoldCo Ltd., 107 Cheapside, 9th Floor, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 6DN.

(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served:

Shenzhen Root Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., #2-201, Floor 2, Hasee Computer Building, No. 2 Beier Road, Bantian Street, Longgang, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China # 518129.

Hong Kong Lute Technology Co., Ltd., 18121 E. Hampden Avenue, Unit C #1007, Aurora, CO 80013. ( printed page 60646)

Root Technology, Ltd., 9030 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California 90211.

Share Info, Inc., 3557 158th Street, Flushing, New York 11358.

Shenzhen TPH Technology Co., Ltd., Room 203, 2nd Floor, Building 29, Lianchuang Technology Park II, No. 21 Bulan Road, Xialilang Community, Longgang District, Shenzhen, China 518100.

Guangdong Horigen Mother & Baby Products Co., Ltd., No. 18 Pingnan Industrial Zone, Mianbei Street, Chaoyang District, Shantou City, Guangdong, China 515100.

Anker Innovations Limited, Unit/Room 56, 8th Floor, Admiralty Centre Tower, 218 Harcourt Road, Hong Kong 000000.

Fantasia Trading, LLC, 5350 Ontario Mills Parkway, Suite 100, Ontario, California 91764.

Power Mobile Life LLC, 10800 NE 8th Street, Suite 900, Bellevue, Washington 98004.

TPH Technology Malaysia Sdn Bhd, No. 2 (Block C)/2C, Jalan Rawang Indah 1, Taman Industri Integrasi Rawang, 48000 Rawang, Selangor, Malaysia 48000.

Foshan Shunde Ruiteng Electrical Appliance, Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (a.k.a Joystar Electrical Appliances Manufacturing Co., Ltd.), No. 7 Xingye Road, Mould City (Tooling/Mould City Industrial Area), Shapu Village Committee, Jun'an Town, Shunde District, Foshan City, Guangdong, China 528329.

Guangdong Youmeng Electrical Technology Co., Ltd., One of Area A, 3rd Floor, Factory Building 2, No. 17, Keyuan 3rd Road, Science & Technology Industrial Park, Shunde High-tech Industrial Development Zone, Xiaohuangpu Community, Ronggui Street, Shunde District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, China, 528300.

(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.

The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation.

The Commission is interested in the development of a thorough record on domestic industry in this investigation to facilitate a holistic review of all relevant considerations. Accordingly, the presiding administrative law judge may wish to consider what information will be necessary to make a determination with respect to complainant's domestic industry allegations under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of section 337(a)(3) based on an industry that exists or is in the process of being established; including the extent to which these allegations rely on expenditures made by third parties; and the extent to which expenditures are made outside the United States related to the domestic industry article(s) by any entity.

Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

91 FR 60645