Melamine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on melamine from the People's Republic of China (China) would be likely t...
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on melamine from the People's Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the “Final Results of Sunset Review” section of this notice.
DATES:
Applicable October 2, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexander Cipolla, Office III, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4956.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 28, 2015, Commerce published the
Order
in the
Federal Register
.[1]
On July 9, 2021, following the first five-year sunset review, Commerce published the notice of continuation of the
Order.[2]
On June 1, 2026, Commerce
( printed page 62701)
published the notice of initiation of this second sunset review of the
Order,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.218(c).[3]
On June 12, 2026, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate in this review from Cornerstone Chemical Company (the domestic interested party), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).[4]
The domestic interested party claims that it has interested party status within the meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a manufacturer in the United States of the domestic like product.[5]
On July 1, 2026, Commerce received an adequate substantive response from the domestic interested party, within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).[6]
Commerce did not receive a substantive response from either the Government of China or a respondent interested party to this proceeding. On June 22, 2026, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.[7]
As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is conducting an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the
Order.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this
Order
is melamine from China. For the full description of the scope of the
Order, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[8]
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the
Order
were to be revoked, is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[9]
A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), which is available to registered users at
access.trade.gov.
In addition, complete versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at
access.trade.gov/​frnotices.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the
Order
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following net countervailable subsidy rates.
Producers/exporters
Net
countervailable
subsidy rate
(percent
ad valorem)
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: September 29, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the
Order
IV. History of the
Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy
2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail
3. Nature of the Subsidies
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
Footnotes
1.
See Melamine from the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders,80 FR 80751 (December 28, 2015) (
Order).
8.
See
Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Melamine from the People's Republic of China,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.
91 FR 62700
Web Citation
Suggested Web Citation
Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.
“Melamine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order,” thefederalregister.org (October 2, 2026), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2026-20259/melamine-from-the-people-s-republic-of-china-final-results-of-the-expedited-second-sunset-review-of-the-countervailing-d.