Department of Commerce
International Trade Administration
- [A-475-818]
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. In addition, we are rescinding the review with respect to 15 companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.
DATES:
Applicable October 15, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Walter Ankner or T.J. Worthington, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-8374 or (202) 482-4567, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 22, 2025, based on timely requests for review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain pasta (pasta) from Italy.[1] On September 24, 2025, Commerce selected La Molisana, S.p.A. (La Molisana) and Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A. (Garofalo) as the mandatory respondents in this review.[2] On September 3, 2025, La Doria Pasta PL S.r.l. (La Doria) timely withdrew its request for review.[3] On October 28, 2025, 8th Avenue Food & Provisions, Inc. and Winland Foods, Inc. (collectively, the domestic interested parties) timely withdrew their request for review of 17 companies.[4] On October 29, 2025, Pastificio Di Martino Gaetano e Flli S.p.A. (Di Martino) timely withdrew its request for review.[5] On November 10, 2025, Marchesi Frescobaldi Soc. Agricola S.r.l. (Frescobaldi) timely withdrew its request for review.[6] On January 27, 2026, Barilla America Inc. and Barilla G. e R. Fratelli Società per Azioni Socio Unico (collectively, Barilla) timely withdrew their request for review.[7]
For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[8] A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as Appendix I of this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), which is available to registered users at access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at access.trade.gov/frnotices.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order is pasta from Italy. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested a review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation. As noted above, Commerce received timely-filed withdrawal requests with respect to the companies listed in Appendix III, and no other parties requested an administrative review of these companies. Therefore, we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to these companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Rate for Non-Individually Examined Companies
The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to apply to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review.
Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any rates that are zero, de minimis ( i.e., less than 0.5 percent), or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Where the weighted-average dumping margin for each of the individually examined companies is zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that Commerce may use “any reasonable method to establish the estimated all-others rate for exporters and producers ( printed page 65526) not individually investigated, including averaging the estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined for the exporters and producers individually investigated.”
In this administrative review, we preliminarily calculated weighted-average dumping margins for the mandatory respondents, La Molisana and Garofalo, that are not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. Accordingly, we are preliminarily assigning to the companies under review that were not selected for individual examination a weighted-average dumping margin equal to the simple average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for La Molisana and Garofalo, consistent with 19 CFR 351.109(g).[9]
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025:
| Producer/exporter | Weighted- average dumping margin (percent) |
|---|---|
| La Molisana, S.p.A | 3.62 |
| Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A | 6.47 |
| Companies Not Selected for Individual Review 10 | 5.05 |
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis performed to interested parties for these preliminary results within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register , in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to verify the information relied upon in making its final results.
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs to Commerce no later than seven days after the date on which the last verification report is issued in this review. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.[11] Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.[12] All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the established deadline.
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iii), we request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.[13] Further, we request that interested parties limit their public executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to use the public executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the public executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).[14]
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants, and whether any participant is a foreign national; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing.[15]
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.
If La Molisana's or Garofalo's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis ( i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, Commerce intends to calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those sales. Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales to a particular importer, we will calculate an importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total quantity of those sales.[16] To determine whether an importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on estimated entered values. If La Molisana's or Garofalo's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis or where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.[17]
In accordance with Commerce's “automatic assessment” practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by La Molisana or Garofalo for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at the all-others rate calculated in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.[18]
( printed page 65527)For the companies listed in Appendix II which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the review-specific rate, calculated as noted in the “Rate for Non-Individually Examined Companies” section, above. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.[19]
For the companies listed in Appendix III for which the review is being rescinded, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit rate for estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue rescission instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register .
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP regarding La Molisana, Garofalo, and the companies listed in Appendix II no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired ( i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be that established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed companies not covered by this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific cash deposit rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the rate established in the Section 129 Determination.[20] These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: October 7, 2026.
Scot Fullerton,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Recission of Review, In Part
V. Affiliation
VI. Discussion of the Methodology
VII. Currency Conversion
VIII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for Individual Review
1. Gruppo Milo SpA
2. Rummo S.p.A; Pasta Castiglioni S.r.l.; Molino e Pastifico; Rummo Lenta Lavorazione S.p.A.
Appendix III
Companies for Which We Are Rescinding This Administrative Review
1. Agritalia S.r.L.
2. Andriani S.p.A.
3. Antiche Tradizioni Di Gragnano S.R.L
4. Barilla G. e R. Fratelli Società per Azioni Socio Unico
5. George DeLallo Company, Inc.
6. La Doria Pasta PL S.r.l.
7. Marchesi Frescobaldi Soc. Agricola S.r.l.
8. Pastificio Artigiano Cav. Giuseppe Cocco S.R.L.
9. Pastificio Di Martino Gaetano e Flli S.p.A.
10. Pastificio Fratelli Cellino S.P.A
11. Pastificio Fratelli Cellino S.R.L.
12. Pastificio Ligouri S.p.A.; PAM S.P.A.; PAM S.R.L.; Liguori Pastificio Dal 1820 S.P.A.; Pastificio Della Forma S.r.l.
13. Pastificio Mediterranea S.R.L
14. Pastificio Sgambaro
15. The Aldino Group: Aldino S.r.l.; Pastificio Tamma S.r.l, Pastificio Chiavenna S.r.l., Pastificio Rigo S.P.A.
Footnotes
1. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,90 FR 41043 (August 22, 2025); see also Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy,61 FR 38547 (July 24, 1996) ( Order).
Back to Citation2. See Memorandum, “Respondent Selection,” dated September 24, 2025.
Back to Citation3. See La Doria's Letter, “Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,” dated September 3, 2025.
Back to Citation4. See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, “Domestic Industry's Withdrawal of Request for 2024-2025 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order,” dated October 28, 2025.
Back to Citation5. See Di Martino's Letter, “Withdrawal of request for Administrative Review,” dated October 29, 2025.
Back to Citation6. See Frescobaldi's Letter, “Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,” dated November 10, 2025.
Back to Citation7. See Barilla's Letter, “Barilla Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,” dated January 27, 2026.
Back to Citation8. See Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Pasta from Italy; 2024-2025,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
Back to Citation9. With two respondents under examination, Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the dumping margins calculated for the examined respondents using each company's publicly ranged U.S. sale quantities for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. See 19 CFR 351.109(f)(2)(ii); see also Memorandum, “Preliminary Calculation of the Dumping Margin for the Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination,” dated concurrently with this notice.
Back to Citation10. The exporters or producers not selected for individual review are listed in Appendix II.
Back to Citation11. See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) ( APO and Service Procedures).
Back to Citation12. See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
Back to Citation13. We use the term “issue” here to describe an argument that Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Back to Citation14. See APO and Service Procedures.
Back to Citation15. See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
Back to Citation16. See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Back to Citation17. See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification,77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).
Back to Citation18. For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Back to Citation19. See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
Back to Citation20. See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in US-Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders,72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007) ( Section 129 Determination).
Back to Citation[FR Doc. 2026-21042 Filed 10-14-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P