80_FR_10088 80 FR 10051 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

80 FR 10051 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 37 (February 25, 2015)

Page Range10051-10053
FR Document2015-03897

On August 21, 2014, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') published its preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from Taiwan.\1\ Based upon our analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes to the margin calculations for these final results and continue to determine that Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (``Nan Ya'') made sales of subject merchandise to the United States at below normal value. The final dumping margin is listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10051-10053]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-837]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On August 21, 2014, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published its preliminary results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate 
film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from Taiwan.\1\ Based upon our 
analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes to the 
margin calculations for these final results and continue to determine 
that Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (``Nan Ya'') made sales of subject 
merchandise to the United States at below normal value. The final 
dumping margin is listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' 
section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From 
Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 49496 (August 21, 2014) (``Preliminary 
Results'').

DATED: Effective Date: February 25, 2015.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Due to the closure of the Federal Government in Washington, 
DC on February 17, 2015, the Department reached this determination 
on the next business day (i.e., February 18, 2015). See Notice of 
Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule for 
Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 
1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Milton Koch or Toni Page at (202) 482-
2584, or (202) 482-1398, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

[[Page 10052]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On August 21, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary 
Results of this administrative review. The administrative review covers 
one producer and exporter of the subject merchandise to the United 
States, Nan Ya. On January 8, 2014, the Department published a notice 
rescinding the review with respect to Shinkong Materials Technology 
Corporation.\3\ The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2012, through 
June 30, 2013. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary 
Results. Nan Ya timely filed a case brief on September 29, 2014; 
however, the Department rejected the case brief for containing new 
factual information. Nan Ya resubmitted its case brief on October 14, 
2014. Petitioners timely filed a rebuttal brief on October 21, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film From Taiwan: Partial 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 
FR 1362 (January 8, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the antidumping duty order are all gauges 
of raw, pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 
and strip, whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metalized films 
and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces 
modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or 
inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of 
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip are currently 
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(``HTSUS'') under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description 
of the scope of the antidumping duty order is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    The sole issue raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties 
regarding differential pricing methodology is addressed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently with these final 
results and incorporated herein by reference.\4\ The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in the Central 
Records Unit (``CRU''), Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce 
building, as well as electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the CRU. In addition, a complete version of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet 
at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene 
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Taiwan; 2012-2013,'' dated 
February 18, 2015 (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no 
adjustments to the margin calculations for Nan Ya.

Final Results of Review

    We determine that Nan Ya's weighted-average dumping margin is 1.56 
percent for entries of subject merchandise that were produced and/or 
exported by Nan Ya and that entered, or were withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption during the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013.

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final 
results of this review. For any individually examined respondents whose 
weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent) 
in the final results, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem 
duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value 
of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will 
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate 
calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis. 
Where either the respondent's weighted average dumping margin is zero 
or below de minimis or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
below de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties. The Department clarified 
its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on May 6, 2003.\5\ This 
clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR produced by each respondent for which they did not know that their 
merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others 
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in 
the transaction.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(``Assessment Policy Notice'').
    \6\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Assessment 
Policy Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of PET film from Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''): (1) 
The cash deposit rate for Nan Ya will be the rate established in the 
final results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or 
investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the 
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for 
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and, 
(4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in 
this or any previous review, the cash deposit rate will be the all 
others rate for this proceeding, 2.40 percent, as established in the 
less-than-fair-value investigation.\7\ These deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From 
Taiwan, 67 FR 44174 (July 1, 2002), as corrected in Notice of 
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 
Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 
Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR 46566 (July 15, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the 
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information

[[Page 10053]]

disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    These final results of administrative review and notice are 
published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: February 18, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-03897 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices                                                    10051

                                                    the start of the program, are U.S.                      estimated response time is expected to                proposed revision to the scope of
                                                    citizens, and are interested in scientific              be less than 30 minutes.                              production authority is warranted at
                                                    research. Students selected for this                      Burden Hours: 15,000.                               this time. The proposed revision
                                                    competitive volunteer program will                        Needs and Uses: NIST conducts                       described in the notification is
                                                    participate in cutting-edge research at                 surveys, focus groups, and other                      authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and
                                                    NIST, and will work closely with NIST                   customer satisfaction/service data                    the Board’s regulations, including
                                                    staff scientists and engineers on a                     collections. The collected information is             Section 400.14.
                                                    specific research problem.                              needed and will be used to determine                    Dated: February 19, 2015.
                                                       The first round of the application                   the kind and the quality of products,                 Andrew McGilvray,
                                                    process is completed via an on-line                     services, and information our key
                                                                                                                                                                  Executive Secretary.
                                                    application through the Student                         customers want and expect, as well as
                                                    Information System which collects basic                                                                       [FR Doc. 2015–03895 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                            their satisfaction with and awareness or
                                                    biographical information about the                      existing products, services, and                      BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

                                                    student. This information is reviewed                   information.
                                                    and finalists are invited to submit                       Affected Public: Business or other for-
                                                    secondary materials via email to ship@                                                                        DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                                                                            profit organizations, individuals or
                                                    nist.gov. These secondary materials                     households, not-for-profit institutions.              International Trade Administration
                                                    include a resume, transcript, letters of                  Frequency: On occasion.
                                                    recommendation, personal statement,                       Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary,                 [A–583–837]
                                                    and parental consent and commitment                     providing the requested information is
                                                    form.                                                   necessary to obtain accurate information              Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
                                                       Affected Public: Individuals or                      regarding customer satisfaction with                  Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: Final
                                                    households; local government (public                    NIST products, services and                           Results of Antidumping Duty
                                                    schools).                                               information.                                          Administrative Review; 2012–2013
                                                       Frequency: Once a year.                                This information collection request                 AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                       Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.                  may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow                  International Trade Administration,
                                                       This information collection request                  the instructions to view Department of                U.S. Department of Commerce.
                                                    may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow                    Commerce collections currently under                  SUMMARY: On August 21, 2014, the
                                                    the instructions to view Department of                  review by OMB.                                        Department of Commerce (‘‘the
                                                    Commerce collections currently under                      Written comments and                                Department’’) published its preliminary
                                                    review by OMB.                                          recommendations for the proposed                      results of the administrative review of
                                                       Written comments and                                 information collection should be sent                 the antidumping duty order on
                                                    recommendations for the proposed                        within 30 days of publication of this                 polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
                                                    information collection should be sent                   notice to OIRA_Submission@                            and strip (PET film) from Taiwan.1
                                                    within 30 days of publication of this                   omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
                                                    notice to OIRA_Submission@                                                                                    Based upon our analysis of the
                                                    omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.                     Dated: February 19, 2015.                           comments received, we have made no
                                                                                                            Glenna Mickelson,                                     changes to the margin calculations for
                                                      Dated: February 20, 2015.                                                                                   these final results and continue to
                                                                                                            Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
                                                    Glenna Mickelson,                                       Information Officer.                                  determine that Nan Ya Plastics
                                                    Management Analyst, Office of the Chief                 [FR Doc. 2015–03824 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]           Corporation (‘‘Nan Ya’’) made sales of
                                                    Information Officer.                                                                                          subject merchandise to the United
                                                                                                            BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
                                                    [FR Doc. 2015–03870 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]                                                                   States at below normal value. The final
                                                    BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P                                                                                        dumping margin is listed below in the
                                                                                                            DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this
                                                                                                                                                                  notice.
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  Foreign-Trade Zones Board                             DATED: Effective Date: February 25,
                                                                                                            [B–76–2014]
                                                                                                                                                                  2015.2
                                                    Submission for OMB Review;
                                                                                                                                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                    Comment Request
                                                                                                            Foreign-Trade Zone 45—Portland,                       Milton Koch or Toni Page at (202) 482–
                                                      The Department of Commerce will                       Oregon; Revision to Production                        2584, or (202) 482–1398, respectively;
                                                    submit to the Office of Management and                  Authority; Epson Portland, Inc.,                      AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
                                                    Budget (OMB) for clearance the                          Subzone 45F; (Inkjet Cartridges and                   Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                    following proposal for collection of                    Bulk Ink); Hillsboro, Oregon                          International Trade Administration,
                                                    information under the provisions of the                                                                       U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
                                                    Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.                        On October 20, 2014, Epson Portland,                Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
                                                    Chapter 35).                                            Inc. (EPI) submitted a notification of                Washington, DC 20230.
                                                      Agency: National Institute of                         proposed revision to existing
                                                    Standards and Technology (NIST).                        production authority to the Foreign-                    1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and

                                                      Title: NIST Three-Year Generic                        Trade Zones (FTZ) Board for EPI’s                     Strip From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of
                                                                                                            facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, within                 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    Request for Customer Service—Related
                                                                                                            Subzone 45F.                                          2013, 79 FR 49496 (August 21, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary
                                                    Data Collections.                                                                                             Results’’).
                                                      OMB Control Number: 0693–0031.                          The notification was processed in                     2 Due to the closure of the Federal Government in

                                                      Form Number(s): None.                                 accordance with the regulations of the                Washington, DC on February 17, 2015, the
                                                      Type of Request: Regular submission.                  FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including                Department reached this determination on the next
                                                      Number of Respondents: 90,000.                        notice in the Federal Register inviting               business day (i.e., February 18, 2015). See Notice of
                                                                                                                                                                  Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’
                                                      Average Hours Per Response: Less                      public comment (79 FR 64168–64169,                    Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines
                                                    than 2 minutes for a response card; 2                   10–28–2014). The FTZ Board has                        Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70
                                                    hours for focus group participation. The                determined that no further review of the              FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:05 Feb 24, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00008   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM   25FEN1


                                                    10052                     Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices

                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              electronically via Enforcement and                    This clarification will apply to entries of
                                                                                                            Compliance’s Antidumping and                          subject merchandise during the POR
                                                    Background
                                                                                                            Countervailing Duty Centralized                       produced by each respondent for which
                                                      On August 21, 2014, the Department                    Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).               they did not know that their
                                                    published the Preliminary Results of                    ACCESS is available to registered users               merchandise was destined for the
                                                    this administrative review. The                         at http://access.trade.gov and in the                 United States. In such instances, we will
                                                    administrative review covers one                        CRU. In addition, a complete version of               instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
                                                    producer and exporter of the subject                    the Issues and Decision Memorandum                    entries at the all-others rate if there is no
                                                    merchandise to the United States, Nan                   can be accessed directly on the internet              rate for the intermediate company(ies)
                                                    Ya. On January 8, 2014, the Department                  at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement.                  involved in the transaction.6
                                                    published a notice rescinding the                       The signed Issues and Decision
                                                    review with respect to Shinkong                                                                               Cash Deposit Requirements
                                                                                                            Memorandum and the electronic
                                                    Materials Technology Corporation.3 The                  versions of the Issues and Decision                      The following deposit requirements
                                                    period of review (POR) is July 1, 2012,                 Memorandum are identical in content.                  will be effective for all shipments of
                                                    through June 30, 2013. We invited                                                                             PET film from Taiwan entered, or
                                                    parties to comment on the Preliminary                   Changes Since the Preliminary Results                 withdrawn from warehouse, for
                                                    Results. Nan Ya timely filed a case brief                 Based on our analysis of the                        consumption on or after the date of
                                                    on September 29, 2014; however, the                     comments received, we have made no                    publication of the final results of this
                                                    Department rejected the case brief for                  adjustments to the margin calculations                administrative review, as provided for
                                                    containing new factual information. Nan                 for Nan Ya.                                           by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act
                                                    Ya resubmitted its case brief on October                                                                      of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’): (1) The
                                                                                                            Final Results of Review
                                                    14, 2014. Petitioners timely filed a                                                                          cash deposit rate for Nan Ya will be the
                                                    rebuttal brief on October 21, 2014.                       We determine that Nan Ya’s                          rate established in the final results of
                                                                                                            weighted-average dumping margin is                    this review; (2) for previously reviewed
                                                    Scope of the Order                                      1.56 percent for entries of subject                   or investigated companies not listed
                                                       The products covered by the                          merchandise that were produced and/or                 above, the cash deposit rate will
                                                    antidumping duty order are all gauges of                exported by Nan Ya and that entered, or               continue to be the company-specific rate
                                                    raw, pretreated, or primed polyethylene                 were withdrawn from warehouse, for                    published for the most recent period; (3)
                                                    terephthalate film, sheet, and strip,                   consumption during the period July 1,                 if the exporter is not a firm covered in
                                                    whether extruded or coextruded.                         2012, through June 30, 2013.                          this review, a prior review, or the less-
                                                    Excluded are metalized films and other                                                                        than-fair-value investigation, but the
                                                                                                            Assessment Rates
                                                    finished films that have had at least one                                                                     manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
                                                    of their surfaces modified by the                          The Department shall determine, and
                                                                                                            U.S. Customs and Border Protection                    will be the rate established for the most
                                                    application of a performance-enhancing                                                                        recent period for the manufacturer of
                                                    resinous or inorganic layer of more than                (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
                                                                                                            duties on all appropriate entries. The                the merchandise; and, (4) if neither the
                                                    0.00001 inches thick. Imports of                                                                              exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
                                                    polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,                 Department intends to issue assessment
                                                                                                            instructions to CBP 15 days after the                 covered in this or any previous review,
                                                    and strip are currently classifiable in the                                                                   the cash deposit rate will be the all
                                                    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the                       date of publication of the final results of
                                                                                                            this review. For any individually                     others rate for this proceeding, 2.40
                                                    United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under item                                                                          percent, as established in the less-than-
                                                    number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS                             examined respondents whose weighted-
                                                                                                            average dumping margin is above de                    fair-value investigation.7 These deposit
                                                    subheadings are provided for                                                                                  requirements, when imposed, shall
                                                    convenience and customs purposes. The                   minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent) in the final
                                                                                                            results, we will calculate importer-                  remain in effect until further notice.
                                                    written description of the scope of the
                                                    antidumping duty order is dispositive.                  specific ad valorem duty assessment                   Disclosure
                                                                                                            rates based on the ratio of the total
                                                    Analysis of Comments Received                                                                                   We will disclose the calculations
                                                                                                            amount of dumping calculated for the
                                                                                                                                                                  performed within five days of the date
                                                       The sole issue raised in the case and                importer’s examined sales to the total
                                                                                                                                                                  of publication of this notice to parties in
                                                    rebuttal briefs by parties regarding                    entered value of those sales in
                                                                                                                                                                  this proceeding in accordance with 19
                                                    differential pricing methodology is                     accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
                                                                                                            We will instruct CBP to assess                        CFR 351.224(b).
                                                    addressed in the Issues and Decision
                                                    Memorandum, which is dated                              antidumping duties on all appropriate                 Notification Regarding Administrative
                                                    concurrently with these final results and               entries covered by this review when the               Protective Orders
                                                    incorporated herein by reference.4 The                  importer-specific assessment rate                       This notice is the only reminder to
                                                    Issues and Decision Memorandum is a                     calculated in the final results of this               parties subject to the administrative
                                                    public document and is on file in the                   review is above de minimis. Where                     protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
                                                    Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room                    either the respondent’s weighted                      responsibility concerning the return or
                                                    7046 of the main Department of                          average dumping margin is zero or                     destruction of proprietary information
                                                    Commerce building, as well as                           below de minimis or an importer-
                                                                                                            specific assessment rate is zero or below               6 For a full discussion of this clarification, see
                                                      3 See  Polyethylene Terephthalate Film From           de minimis, we will instruct CBP to                   Assessment Policy Notice.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    Taiwan: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty          liquidate the appropriate entries                       7 See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty
                                                    Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 1362            without regard to antidumping duties.                 Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
                                                    (January 8, 2014).                                                                                            Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene
                                                       4 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant
                                                                                                            The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic
                                                                                                                                                                  Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film)
                                                    Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,               assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003.5              From Taiwan, 67 FR 44174 (July 1, 2002), as
                                                    ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Final Results of                                                                    corrected in Notice of Amended Final
                                                    Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:                   5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty           Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
                                                    Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip       Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68     Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene
                                                    from Taiwan; 2012–2013,’’ dated February 18, 2015       FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (‘‘Assessment Policy           Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film)
                                                    (Issues and Decision Memorandum).                       Notice’’).                                            from Taiwan, 67 FR 46566 (July 15, 2002).



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:05 Feb 24, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00009   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM   25FEN1


                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices                                                 10053

                                                    disclosed under the APO in accordance                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:      Title III of            Date Deemed Submitted: February 6,
                                                    with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which                        the Export Trading Company Act of                     2014.
                                                    continues to govern business                            1982 (15 U.S.C. Sections 4001–21) (‘‘the                Proposed Amendment: CAEA seeks to
                                                    proprietary information in this segment                 Act’’) authorizes the Secretary of                    amend its Certificate to delete the
                                                    of the proceeding. Timely written                       Commerce to issue Export Trade                        following company as a Member of
                                                    notification of the return or destruction               Certificates of Review. An Export Trade               CAEA’s Certificate: Minturn Nut
                                                    of APO materials or conversion to                       Certificate of Review protects the holder             Company, Inc., Le Grand, CA.
                                                    judicial protective order is hereby                     and the members identified in the                       CAEA’s proposed amendment of its
                                                    requested. Failure to comply with the                   Certificate from State and Federal                    Export Trade Certificate of Review
                                                    regulations and the terms of an APO is                  government antitrust actions and from                 would result in the following companies
                                                    a sanctionable violation.                               private treble damage antitrust actions               as Members under the Certificate:
                                                                                                            for the export conduct specified in the               Almonds California Pride, Inc.,
                                                    Notification to Importers                                                                                     Caruthers, CA, Baldwin-Minkler Farms,
                                                                                                            Certificate and carried out in
                                                      This notice also serves as a final                    compliance with its terms and                         Orland, CA, Blue Diamond Growers,
                                                    reminder to importers of their                          conditions. The regulations                           Sacramento, CA, Campos Brothers,
                                                    responsibility under 19 CFR                             implementing Title III are found at 15                Caruthers, CA, Chico Nut Company,
                                                    351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate                     CFR part 325 (2014). Section 302(b)(1)                Chico, CA, Del Rio Nut Company, Inc.,
                                                    regarding the reimbursement of                          of the Export Trade Company Act of                    Livingston, CA, Fair Trade Corner, Inc.,
                                                    antidumping duties prior to liquidation                 1982 and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the                  Chico, CA, Fisher Nut Company,
                                                    of the relevant entries during this                     Secretary to publish a notice in the                  Modesto, CA, Hilltop Ranch, Inc.,
                                                    review period. Failure to comply with                   Federal Register identifying the                      Ballico, CA, Hughson Nut, Inc.,
                                                    this requirement could result in the                    applicant and summarizing its                         Hughson, CA, Mariani Nut Company,
                                                    Secretary’s presumption that                            application. Under 15 CFR 325.6(a),                   Winters, CA, Nutco, LLC d.b.a. Spycher
                                                    reimbursement of antidumping duties                     interested parties may, within twenty                 Brothers, Turlock, CA, Paramount
                                                    occurred and the subsequent assessment                  days after the date of this notice, submit            Farms, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, P–R
                                                    of double antidumping duties.                           written comments to the Secretary on                  Farms, Inc., Clovis, CA, Roche Brothers
                                                      These final results of administrative                 the application.                                      International Family Nut Co., Escalon,
                                                    review and notice are published in                                                                            CA, South Valley Almond Company,
                                                    accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and                  Request for Public Comments                           LLC, Wasco, CA, Sunny Gem, LLC,
                                                    777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR                            Interested parties may submit written              Wasco, CA, Western Nut Company,
                                                    351.213(h).                                             comments relevant to the determination                Chico, CA.
                                                      Dated: February 18, 2015.                             whether an amended Certificate should                   Dated: February 19, 2015.
                                                    Paul Piquado,                                           be issued. If the comments include any                Joseph Flynn,
                                                    Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
                                                                                                            privileged or confidential business                   Director, Office of Trade and Economic
                                                    Compliance.                                             information, it must be clearly marked                Analysis, International Trade Administration.
                                                    [FR Doc. 2015–03897 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                            and a nonconfidential version of the                  [FR Doc. 2015–03784 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                            comments (identified as such) should be
                                                    BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                                                                        BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
                                                                                                            included. Any comments not marked as
                                                                                                            privileged or confidential business
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  information will be deemed to be                      DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                                                                            nonconfidential.
                                                    International Trade Administration                         An original and five (5) copies, plus              International Trade Administration
                                                                                                            two (2) copies of the nonconfidential
                                                    [Application No. 99–8A005]                              version, should be submitted no later                 Trade Mission to South Africa, Kenya
                                                                                                            than 20 days after the date of this notice            and Mozambique
                                                    Export Trade Certificate of Review
                                                                                                            to: Export Trading Company Affairs,                   AGENCY:  International Trade
                                                    ACTION: Notice of Application to Amend                  International Trade Administration,                   Administration, Department of
                                                    the Export Trade Certificate of Review                  U.S. Department of Commerce, Room                     Commerce.
                                                    Issued to California Almond Export                      21028, Washington, DC 20230.
                                                                                                                                                                  ACTION: Replacement of Trade Mission
                                                    Association, LLC (‘‘CAEA’’),                               Information submitted by any person                Statement.
                                                    Application No. (99–8A005).                             is exempt from disclosure under the
                                                                                                            Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.                  SUMMARY:  The United States Department
                                                    SUMMARY:    The Office of Trade and                     552). However, nonconfidential versions               of Commerce, International Trade
                                                    Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’) of the                     of the comments will be made available                Administration is replacing a notice
                                                    International Trade Administration,                     to the applicant if necessary for                     published June 14, 2014, at 79 FR
                                                    Department of Commerce, has received                    determining whether or not to issue the               36290, for the Trade Mission to South
                                                    an application to amend an Export                       amended Certificate. Comments should                  Africa and Mozambique, With an
                                                    Trade Certificate of Review                             refer to this application as ‘‘Export                 Optional Stop in Kenya; February 23–
                                                    (‘‘Certificate’’). This notice summarizes               Trade Certificate of Review, application              27, 2015.
                                                    the proposed amendment and requests                     number 99–8A005.’’
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                    comments relevant to whether the                                                                              Replacement of Trade Mission
                                                    amended Certificate should be issued.                   Summary of the Application
                                                                                                                                                                  Statement.
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                          Applicant: California Almond Export
                                                    Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade                 Association, LLC (‘‘CAEA’’), 4800 Sisk                Background
                                                    and Economic Analysis, International                    Road Modesto, CA 95356.                                 The United States Department of
                                                    Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131                      Contact: Bill Morecraft, Chairman,                  Commerce, International Trade
                                                    (this is not a toll-free number) or email               Telephone: (916) 446–8537.                            Administration is replacing its Trade
                                                    at etca@trade.gov.                                        Application No.: 99–8A005.                          Mission to South Africa and


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:05 Feb 24, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00010   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM   25FEN1



Document Created: 2015-12-18 13:09:27
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 13:09:27
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesFebruary 25, 2015.\2\
ContactMilton Koch or Toni Page at (202) 482- 2584, or (202) 482-1398, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
FR Citation80 FR 10051 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR